Published
2025-06-18
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chaofan Guo, Jia-Fure Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
From moral compromise to psychological depletion: How unethical pro-organizational behavior leads to role stress
Chaofan Guo
Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand
Jia-Fure Wang
Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3777
Keywords: unethical pro-organizational behavior; cognitive dissonance; role stress; organizational justice; conservation of resources theory
Abstract
In organizational practice, employees’ voluntary engagement in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) to promote organizational interests has become increasingly prevalent, drawing growing scholarly attention. While existing research has primarily focused on the antecedents and formation mechanisms of UPB, its potential consequences—Particularly its psychological impact on employees—Remain underexplored. Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study develops and tests a theoretical model to examine how employees’ proactive UPB influences their role stress via cognitive dissonance, and how organizational justice moderates these relationships. Using purposive sampling, data were collected from 548 valid responses from employees in Chinese enterprises. Empirical analyses were conducted through regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that UPB significantly and positively predicts both cognitive dissonance (β = 0.478, p < .001) and role stress (β = 0.527, p < .001). Cognitive dissonance also exerts a significant positive effect on role stress (β = 0.647, p < .001), serving as a partial mediator between UPB and role stress. Furthermore, organizational justice negatively moderates the effects of UPB on both cognitive dissonance and role stress. When employees perceive higher levels of organizational justice, the psychological strain associated with UPB is significantly alleviated; conversely, lower levels of perceived justice amplify the adverse effects. This study not only extends the theoretical understanding of the consequences of UPB but also offers empirical support for building fair management systems to mitigate psychological stress and reduce behavioral risks in organizations.
References
[1]. 1.Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.
[2]. 2.Bryant, W., & Merritt, S. M. (2021). Unethical pro-organizational behavior and positive leader-employee relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(4), 777–793.
[3]. 3.Figueroa, A. N., & Poole, J. M. (2022). BlueBloods: Fictive kinship, and unethical pro-organizational behavior in police organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 15063.
[4]. 4.Wolfgruber, D. (2024). Unethical pro-organizational behavior. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Corporate Communication, 246–250.
[5]. 5.Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Xu, L. (2020). Ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating mechanism of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1457–1465.
[6]. 6.Hu, W., Feng, F., & Dong, Y. (2024). Motivation analysis of unethical pro-organizational behavior based on the theory of planned behavior. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 6(5), 295–300.
[7]. 7.Fadhilah, A., Alam, S., & Tjan, J. S. (2024). The effect of role stress on auditor performance with psychological well-being as moderation variables in BPKP makassar. Economos: Journal Ekonomi Dan Business, 7(1), 84–93.
[8]. 8.Nikolova, I., Caniëls, M. C., & Sverke, M. (2023). Qualitative job insecurity and extra-role behaviours: The moderating role of work motivation and perceived investment in employee development. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(2), 547–572.
[9]. 9.Ames, J., Bluhm, D., Gaskin, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020). The impact of moral attentiveness on manager’s turnover intent. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 189–209.
[10]. 10.Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (2013). Handbook of Organizational Justice. Psychology Press.
[11]. 11.Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
[12]. 12.Mukherjee, S., & Saritha, K. (2024). Unethical pro-organizational behavior and emotional exhaustion: Mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Management and Ethics, 4(1), 15–26.
[13]. 13.Zhang, Y., He, B., & Sun, X. (2018). The contagion of unethical pro-organizational behavior: From leaders to followers. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1102.
[14]. 14.Chen, W., & Chen, Y. (2023). Psychological implications of moral dissonance in corporate behavior. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(2), 101–115.
[15]. 15.Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
[16]. 16.Demerouti, E. (2024). Burnout: A comprehensive review. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 78(4), 492–504.
[17]. 17.Rauf, A., Rook, L., Rajapakse, B., Lartey, J. K. S., & Almeida, S. (2024). Resource loss a significant issue for healthcare professionals: A case study of an Australian regional hospital. Stress and Health, 40(5), e3461.
[18]. 18.Lowell, J. (2012). Managers and moral dissonance: Self-justification as a big threat to ethical management? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 17–25.
[19]. 19.Reynolds, S. J., Owens, B. P., & Rubenstein, A. L. (2012). Moral stress: Considering the nature and effects of managerial moral uncertainty. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4), 491–502.
[20]. 20.Brown, M. E., Vogel, R. M., & Akben, M. (2022). Ethical conflict: Conceptualization, measurement, and an examination of consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(7), 1130–1149.
[21]. 21.Pladdys, J. (2024). Mitigating workplace burnout through transformational leadership and employee participation in recovery experiences. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 5(3), 215–223.
[22]. 22.Festinger, L. (1963). Cognitive dissonance theory. Stanford University Press.
[23]. 23.Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
[24]. 24.Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity.
[25]. 25.Eatough, E. M., Chang, C. H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619–632.
[26]. 26.Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.
[27]. 27.Restubog, S. L. D., Zagenczyk, T. J., Bordia, P., Bordia, S., & Chapman, G. J. (2011). If you wrong us, shall we not revenge? Moderating roles of self-control and perceived aggressive work culture in predicting responses to psychological contract breach. Journal of Management, 37(3), 676–698.
[28]. 28.Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., & Zivnuska, S. (2013). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 123–134.
[29]. 29.Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Xu, L. (2020). Ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating mechanism of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1457–1465.
[30]. 30.Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2020). Unethical behavior in organizations: Influence processes and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 208–242.
[31]. 31.Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
[32]. 32.Lowell, J. (2012). Managers and moral dissonance: Self-justification as a big threat to ethical management? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 17–25.
[33]. 33.Yang, L. (2022). An empirical study of unethical behavioral conducts to understand why managers fail to do the “right” thing. Modern Economics & Management Forum, 3(3), 185–188.
[34]. 34.Houdek, P. (2020). Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(2), 691–707.
[35]. 35.Liu, C., Liu, L., Abbas, S. Z., & Zou, L. (2024). Independently Measure the Organizational and (Un)ethical Dimensions of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior using the Process Dissociation Paradigm.
[36]. 36.Westover, J. H. (2024b). Understanding the hidden drivers of unethical decisions. Human Capital Leadership Review, 12(3).
[37]. 37.Koslowski, P. (2012). Principles of ethical economy. Springer Science & Business Media.
[38]. 38.Pasricha, N. (2023). Research ethics and integrity. Journal of Dental Specialities, 11(2), 69–70.
[39]. 39.Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity.
[40]. 40.Palamarchuk, I., & Vaillancourt, L. (2021). Cognitive dissonance and self-justification: The psychological conflict in organizational behavior. Psychological Studies, 45(3), 234–250.
[41]. 41.Cibrian-Llanderal, S., Tovar, E., & Vargas, J. (2018). Role stress and cognitive burden in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 110–126.
[42]. 42.Karademas, E. C., & Taylor, R. (2019). Role competence anxiety: How cognitive dissonance affects self-efficacy. Journal of Behavioral Science, 19(1), 45–60.
[43]. 43.Chen, W., & Taylor, E. (2023). Resilience and self-control impairment. In Handbook of Resilience in Children, 175–211.
[44]. 44.Williams, A., Stone, T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Cognitive dissonance and its role in diminishing psychological resilience. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 11(3), 102–115.
[45]. 45.Marakushyn, A., Yushchuk, O., & Frolova, V. (2024). Anxiety and stress perception: A study of dissonance and emotional regulation in organizational settings. Journal of Emotional Health, 33(2), 205–219.
[46]. 46.Muhammad, S. T., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Stress, coping mechanisms, and organizational support: How employees deal with moral dilemmas. International Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 458–472.
[47]. 47.Li, Z. (2022). Characteristics and trends in unethical pro-organizational behavior research in business and management: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877419.
[48]. 48.Wang, J., Zhou, Q., & Liu, G. (2022). Cognitive dissonance and unethical behavior in organizations: A review. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(5), 764–779.
[49]. 49.Dadaboyev, S. M. U., Paek, S., & Choi, S. (2022). Differential consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior: Dual-path mechanism. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 16557.
[50]. 50.Tovmasyan, G. (2023). How do psychological factors, cognitive biases, and cognitive dissonance affect work performance and decision making? Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(3), 26–36.
[51]. 51.Sabie, O. M., Popescu, R. I., & Cretu, I. (2024). Burnout and job satisfaction: A pilot study among employees of Romanian cultural research institutions. Applied Research in Administrative Sciences, 5(1), 4–19.
[52]. 52.Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
[53]. 53.Payne, K. (2023). Doing bad things for good reasons: An examination of unethical pro-organizational behavior among professional engineers. ASCE Inspire, 11(14), 802–810.
[54]. 54.Luo, M. (2023). The influence of organizational fairness on organizational identification: The regulatory role of moral identity and the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 7(1), 1–14.
[55]. 55.Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2001). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(4), 34–48.
[56]. 56.Colquitt, J. A., Hill, E. T., & De Cremer, D. (2023). Forever focused on fairness: 75 years of organizational justice in Personnel Psychology. Personnel Psychology, 76(2), 413–435.
[57]. 57.Pandey, N., & Rupp, D. E. (2024). Reconsidering Assumptions about Organizational Justice through the Lens of Culture and Moral Philosophy. In M. J. Gelfand & M. Erez (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior, 210–239. Oxford University Press.
[58]. 58.Brunetto, Y., Xerri, M., & Farr-Wharton, B. (2024). The link between organizational support, wellbeing and engagement for emergency service employees: A comparative analysis. Public Money & Management, 44(2), 100–107.
[59]. 59.Veetikazhi, S., Sreevathsa, R., & Mehra, K. (2024). The ethical implications of organizational behavior in real-time service industries. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(2), 265–278.
[60]. 60.Yan, H., Solnet, D., & Okimoto, T. G. (2023). Helping the organization but harming customers: A social identity perspective of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Services Marketing, 37(7), 927–943.
[61]. 61.Gao, Z. H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., & Chen, J. Y. (2023). Perceived leader dependence and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moderated chain mediation model. Economics & Management, 44(4), 131–144.
[62]. 62.Morrison, M. (2023). Ethical challenges in the training industry: Misleading promotions and customer behavior. International Journal of Training and Development, 28(3), 254–267.
[63]. 63.El Khoury, G., Merle, D., & Kassem, M. (2022). Sales representatives and ethical practices: Exaggeration of product benefits to meet targets. Journal of Business Research, 49(6), 785–799.
[64]. 64.Lee, J., & Landers, R. (2022). The impact of purposive sampling in organizational research: A review of methodologies. Journal of Applied Research in Organizational Behavior, 16(1), 58–71.
[65]. 65.Wu, M. Z., Shen, B., & Sun, X. L. (2016). The relationship between organizational commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The moderating role of moral identity. Psychology, 39(2), 392–398.
[66]. 66.Li, Z., & Zhang, L. (2009). Role stress and its impact on employee performance: A study in Chinese organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(3), 240–258.
[67]. 67.Lii, P. (2001). The impact of personal gains on cognitive dissonance for business ethics judgments. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(1), 21–33.
[68]. 68.Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
[69]. 69.Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic methods for the analysis of indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
[70]. 70.Hayes, A. F. (2015). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach.
[71]. 71.Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.
[72]. 72.Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Xu, L. (2020). Ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating mechanism of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 39(5), 1457–1465.
[73]. 73.Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452–1465.
[74]. 74.Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
[75]. 75.Pladdys, J. (2024). Mitigating workplace burnout through transformational leadership and employee participation in recovery experiences. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 5(3), 215–223.
[76]. 76.Dadaboyev, S. M. U., Paek, S., & Choi, S. (2022). Differential consequences of unethical pro-organizational behavior: Dual-path mechanism. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 16557.
[77]. 77.Yang, L. (2022). An empirical study of unethical behavioral conducts to understand why managers fail to do the “right” thing. Modern Economics & Management Forum, 3(3), 185–188.
[78]. 78.Li, Z. (2022). Characteristics and trends in unethical pro-organizational behavior research in business and management: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877419.
[79]. 79.Lowell, J. (2012). Managers and moral dissonance: Self-justification as a big threat to ethical management? Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 17–25.
[80]. 80.Chen, W., & Taylor, E. (2023). Resilience and self-control impairment. In Handbook of Resilience in Children, 175–211.
[81]. 81.Muhammad, S. T., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Stress, coping mechanisms, and organizational support: How employees deal with moral dilemmas. International Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 458–472.
[82]. 82.Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.
[83]. 83.Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.
[84]. 84.Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
[85]. 85.Payne, K. (2023). Doing bad things for good reasons: An examination of unethical pro-organizational behavior among professional engineers. ASCE Inspire, 11(14), 802–810.
[86]. 86.Laundon, A., Schmitt, M., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Understanding organizational justice in crisis contexts: The role of fairness and equity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 659–672.






