Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9058
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8196
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7960
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7529
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6093

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3780

Published

2025-08-27

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jinghong Zhou, Mageswaran Sanmugam, Bosede Iyiade Edwards

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Jinghong Zhou, Mageswaran Sanmugam, & Bosede Iyiade Edwards. (2025). Teachers’ behavior and attitude towards using traditional chinese toys in preschool instruction: A TAM inquiry. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), ESP-3780. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3780
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Teachers’ behavior and attitude towards using traditional chinese toys in preschool instruction: A TAM inquiry

Jinghong Zhou

Centre for Instructional Technology & Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

Mageswaran Sanmugam

Centre for Instructional Technology & Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

Bosede Iyiade Edwards

Centre for Instructional Technology & Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3780


Keywords: Traditional Chinese toys; preschool education; TAM; preschool teacher; cultural perception


Abstract

 

Preschool education is a critical stage of children's growth. However, teachers face many challenges including inequitable access to teaching resources in preschool environments. This not only affect teachers' job quality, willingness to teach, and career development, but may also indirectly affect children's physical and mental health, as well as educational outcomes. Educational approach emphasizing child-directed learning, hands-on activities, and a prepared environment including concepts like play as pedagogy has been shown in many studies to improve learner engagement. Such approaches form the basis of methodologies like the Montessori and the use of toys in pre-school education. The limitation of modern toys has led to the exploration of alternatives like Traditional Chinese toys (TCT) with their potential for ease of use, graphic cognition, and diverse play. Users’ acceptance, perceived usability, ease of use and intention to use technology has however been central to the introduction of technologies in various contexts, including education. Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study explored preschool teachers' satisfaction and willingness to use TCT in teaching. A questionnaire was administered to 235 preschool teachers teaching with TCT. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling. The results indicate that teachers' overall satisfaction and willingness to continue using the TCT are high. Perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) were the main factors influencing teachers' satisfaction and the main drivers of their willingness to continue using, with PEU having a stronger influence. Among the preschool teachers who were tested, the mean values of teachers from preschool major backgrounds were higher than those of teachers from non-preschool major backgrounds, reflecting the higher acceptance of TCT among teachers from preschool major backgrounds. Findings suggest that more easy-to-use and interesting teaching resources should be developed to reduce teachers' cognitive load, promote children's development, and facilitate sustainable education. Future research should focus on designing instructional adaptations of TCT in different cultural contexts and longitudinally tracking and evaluating their long-term effects on teachers' and preschooler's multidimensional development.


References

[1]. 1.E. Laszlo, "Culture and development," World Futures, vol. 34, no. 3–4, pp. 225–230, 1992, doi: 10.1080/02604027.1992.9972308.

[2]. 2.Y. Kuang, "Research on Chinese Traditional Toy Design Based on Sensory Experience," M.S. thesis, Xihua Univ., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202301&filename=1022693269.nh

[3]. 3.N. Chen, Y. Jiang, H. Li, and Y. Liu, “Playing to learn in China vs in the Western World,” in Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021), pp. 414–421, Feb. 2022. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220131.075

[4]. 4.S. Fangping, "Labor in the game: The way of children's labor education," Front. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.25236/FER.2024.070418.

[5]. 5.S. R. Fernsebner, “A people’s playthings: toys, childhood, and Chinese identity, 1909–1933,” Postcolonial Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 269–293, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/1368879032000162167

[6]. 6.K. G. Alimovna and B. A. Abduraufovna, "Innovative approaches to creating a developmental environment for preschool children," Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://webofjournals.com/index.php/1/article/view/3458

[7]. 7.M. Kalogiannakis and S. Papadakis, “Pre-service kindergarten teacher’s acceptance of ‘ScratchJr’ as a tool for learning and teaching computational thinking and science education,” The Journal of Emergent Science, no. 15, pp. 31–34, 2019, ASE in partnership with the Primary Science Teaching Trust (PSTT).

[8]. 8.S. Papadakis, “Apps to promote computational thinking and coding skills to young age children: A pedagogical challenge for the 21st century learners,” Educational Process: International Journal (EDUPIJ), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 2022.

[9]. 9. J. Chen, Toys and Education. Beijing, China: Dolphin Books, 2012.

[10]. 10.S. Bartan and F. Alisinanoglu, “Preschool teachers' views on sensory education,” Southeast Asia Early Childhood, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2024.

[11]. 11.F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989.

[12]. 12.M. Godsk, "Power to the teachers!: Empowering teachers to author web-based learning material with easy-to-use tools," in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Eur. Univ. Inf. Syst., University of Tartu, 2006, pp. 278–282.

[13]. 13.S. C. Kong and Y. Yang, "A human-centred learning and teaching framework using generative artificial intelligence for self-regulated learning development through domain knowledge learning in K–12 settings," IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., early access, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2024.3392830.

[14]. 14.Z. Jing, "The Evolution, Present Practices, and Future Directions of Early Childhood Education and Care in China," Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, Art. no. e12880, 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12880.

[15]. 15.X. Yu, D. Liu, and D. Li, "Visual Analysis of the Integration of Traditional Chinese Culture into Preschool Education," Educ. Rev. USA, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1171–1177, 2023, doi: 10.26855/er.2023.08.024.

[16]. 16.K. M. Hall-Kenyon, R. V. Bullough, K. L. MacKay, and E. E. Marshall, "Preschool teacher well-being: A review of the literature," Early Childhood Educ. J., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 153–162, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10643-013-0595-4.

[17]. 17.A. Henriksson, M. Fridberg, and L. Leden, "Preschool Children’s Agency in Play-activities with Science Content," Early Childhood Educ. J., early access, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10643-024-01729-2.

[18]. 18.R. Stein, M. Garay, and A. Nguyen, "It matters: Early childhood mental health, educator stress, and burnout," Early Childhood Educ. J., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 333–344, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10643-022-01438-8.

[19]. 19.Y. Li, B. H. H. Ching, H. X. Wu, T. T. Chen, and C. C. He, "Beneficial or debilitating: a qualitative inquiry into Chinese preschool teachers’ workload-related stress mindset," Early Years, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 61–78, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09575146.2022.2090518.

[20]. 20.A. W. Baulos, J. L. García, and J. J. Heckman, Perry Preschool at 50: What Lessons Should Be Drawn and Which Criticisms Ignored? Cambridge, MA, USA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2024, NBER Working Paper No. w32972. DOI: 10.3386/w32972

[21]. 21.E. R. K. Waty et al., "Needs Analysis of Science and Mathematics Teaching Materials in Supporting Early Childhood Learning for Kindergarten Teachers," in *Proc. 6th Sriwijaya Univ. Learn. Educ. Int. Conf. 2024 (SULE-IC 2024)*, Atlantis Press, 2025, pp. 196–208, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-390-0_16.

[22]. 22.M. Kalogiannakis and S. Papadakis, “The use of developmentally mobile applications for preparing pre-service teachers to promote STEM activities in preschool classrooms,” in Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 82–100, doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch005.

[23]. 23.K. Yildirim, "A case study on the use of materials by classroom teachers," Ph.D. dissertation, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12513/1793

[24]. 24.A. Otterborn, B. Sundberg, and K. Schönborn, "The impact of digital and analog approaches on a multidimensional preschool science education," Res. Sci. Educ., early access, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11165-023-10133-6.

[25]. 25.T. Yang and X. Hong, "The Educational Technology Divide in Glocalisation: A Perspective for Interpreting Early Childhood Teachers’ Practices of ICT Implementation," Early Educ. Dev., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 150–168, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10409289.2023.2231321.

[26]. 26.E. Zalli, "Globalization and education: exploring the exchange of ideas, values, and traditions in promoting cultural understanding and global citizenship," Interdiscip. J. Res. Dev., vol. 11, no. 1 S1, p. 55, 2024, doi: 10.56345/ijrdv11n1s109.

[27]. 27.M. Cochran-Smith and S. L. Lytle, Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 1993.

[28]. 28.H. Ye, "Research on Strategies for Improving the Quality of Talent Cultivation of Preschool Education Majors in Independent Colleges under the Guidance of the 'Strong Teachers Plan'," J. Lang. Cult. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2025, doi: 10.70267/csa86k77.

[29]. 29.L. Weng and S. Huang, "Research on Strategies to Enhance Professional Identity of Undergraduate Preschool Education Normal College Students," Adv. Vocat. Tech. Educ., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 56–61, 2024, doi: 10.23977/avte.2024.060308.

[30]. 30.Y. Qiu, "Research Review on Kindergarten Curriculum Gamification in China," Open Access Libr. J., vol. 6, Art. no. e5934, 2019, doi: 10.4236/oalib.1105934.

[31]. 31.D. L. Ball and S. Feiman-Nemser, “Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators,” Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 401–423, 1988. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1988.11076050

[32]. 32.T. Koval, N. Оliinyk, T. Kryvosheya, and A. Khilya, "APPLICATION OF GAMIFICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION: TRAINING OF EARLY CHILDHOOD AND PRIMARY EDUCATION TEACHERS IN UKRAINE," in Proc. Int. Sci. Pract. Conf. ENVIRON. TECHNOL. RESOUR., vol. 2, 2024, pp. 183–187, doi: 10.17770/etr2024vol2.8051.

[33]. 33.E. J. Wilson, "Hard power, soft power, smart power," Ann. Amer. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., vol. 616, no. 1, pp. 110–124, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0002716207312618.

[34]. 34.A. Volchynskyi, Y. Smal, O. Malimon, and A. Kovalchuk, "Introduction of Folk Physical Culture Traditions in the Educational Process of Senior Preschool Children," Phys. Educ. Sport Health Cult. Mod. Soc., no. 2 (38), pp. 57–60, 2017, doi: 10.29038/2220-7481-2017-02-57-60.

[35]. 35.M. W. A. de Medeiros, W. T. Hattori, and M. E. Yamamoto, “Priming effects on prosocial behavior of children: A systematic review,” Trends in Psychology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 637–654, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-021-00076-0

[36]. 36.L. Gan, "Exploring the pathway of integrating chinese fine traditional culture into pre-school education," Front. Educ. Res., vol. 6, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.25236/FER.2023.060304.

[37]. 37.F. Alıncak, A. Yıkılmaz, and F. M. Uğurlu, "Evaluation of pre-school teachers' opinions on teaching with games," European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejae.v0i0.649

[38]. 38.F. U. Uljaevna, "Didactic games in preschool educational system," Probl. Sovrem. Nauki Obraz., no. 4-2 (149), pp. 27–29, 2020.

[39]. 39.D. Öner, "The using technology and digital games in early childhood: An investigation of preschool teachers' opinions," Inonu Univ. J. Grad. Sch. Educ., vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 138–154, 2020, doi: 10.29129/inujgse.715044.

[40]. 40.E. Seaga, "The Significance of Folk Culture in the Development of National Identity," Caribbean Q., vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 82–89, 1997, doi: 10.1080/00086495.1997.11829562.

[41]. 41.L. Fang, "A study on the traditional folk culture in preschool education," in Proc. 2016 Int. Conf. Manage. Sci. Innov. Educ., Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 586–588, doi: 10.2991/msie-16.2016.127.

[42]. 42.S. S. Haraldson, "Role of education in preserving traditional cultures and as development factor," Health Policy Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 289–302, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0165-2281(83)90001-2.

[43]. 43.P. R. Gondaliya, "Recommendations on how educational toys can help preschoolers to improve their social skills," Educ. Admin. Theory Pract., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 975–979, 2024, doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i3.1422.

[44]. 44.L. C. Luen, Y. Guo, and L. Jian, "Engaging Play and Toys Foster the Development of Multiple Intelligence in Preschool Children," Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 2155–2162, 2024, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i2/21011.

[45]. 45.C. E. DeCortin, What Makes a Toy Educational? The Impact of Educational Toys on Spatial Development in Preschoolers, M.S. thesis, Tufts University, 2015.

[46]. 46.M. Önder, "Contribution of Plays and Toys to Children's Value Education," Asian J. Educ. Train., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 146–149, 2018, doi: 10.20448/journal.522.2018.42.146.149.

[47]. 47.X. Wang, P. Ye, and T. Qiao, "Free play and pedagogical play: a multiple-case study of teachers’ views of play in Chinese early learning centers," Front. Educ., vol. 9, Art. no. 1359867, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1359867.

[48]. 48.C. Niu, "Research on play-based kindergarten curriculum reform in China: based on the analysis of three typical play modes," Int. J. Early Years Educ., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 401–418, 2023, doi: 10.1080/09669760.2023.2168520.

[49]. 49.D. W. Kritt, "Technology's covert socialization of children: High-tech toys," J. Thought, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 53–61, 2001.

[50]. 50.A. Henriksson, L. Leden, M. Fridberg, and S. Thulin, "Play-Activities with scientific content in early childhood education," Early Childhood Educ. J., early access, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10643-023-01593-6.

[51]. 51.C. L. Montallana, J. C. Tesado, D. L. Pagliawan, and F. D. C. Soniedo, "DOCUMENTING EASTERN VISAYAN INDIGENOUS TOYS AS EDUCATIONAL ALTERNATIVES TO ADDICTIVE MODERN GADGETRY," Acad. Res. Educ. Sci., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 329–339, 2023.

[52]. 52.S. Hashmi, R. E. Vanderwert, H. A. Price, and S. A. Gerson, "Exploring the benefits of doll play through neuroscience," Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 14, Art. no. 560176, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.560176.

[53]. 53.Piaget, J. (1962). The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger clinic, 26(3), 120.

[54]. 54.M. Montessori, Dr. Montessori's own handbook. New York, NY, USA: Schocken, 1914.

[55]. 55.G. Güven, O. Sakarya, and S. Yumugan, "Educational and cultural values of ancient toys: Integration into the 2024 Preschool Education Model," Pedagogical Perspect., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 93–113, 2025, doi: 10.29329/pedper.2025.93.

[56]. 56.J.-S. Lee, H. Cho, G. Gay, B. Davidson, and A. Ingraffea, “Technology acceptance and social networking in distance learning,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 50–61, 2003.

[57]. 57.B. Szajna, "Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model," Manage. Sci., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 85–92, Jan. 1996.

[58]. 58.S. Y. Yousafzai, G. R. Foxall, and J. G. Pallister, "Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1," J. Model. Manage., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 251–280, 2007, doi: 10.1108/17465660710834453.

[59]. 59.A. Şakir, "Augmented reality in preschool settings: a cross-sectional study on adoption dynamics among educators," Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 2954–2977, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2024.2428361.

[60]. 60.R. Xu, A. Bautista, and W. Yang, "Learning Satisfaction with Online Teaching Video Cases Among Pre-Service Preschool Teachers in China," Early Educ. Dev., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 77–95, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10409289.2023.2214163.

[61]. 61.A. Ibrahim and E. Shiring, "The relationship between educators’ attitudes, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use of instructional and web-based technologies: Implications from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)," Int. J. Technol. Educ., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 535–551, 2022, doi: 10.46328/ijte.285.

[62]. 62.J. Su, Y. Wang, and Z. Li, "Investigating User Acceptance of Mobile Cultural Applications in China: An Expanded Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)," Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 2920-2935, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2024.2406614.

[63]. 63.D. Rad et al., "A Preliminary Investigation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Early Childhood Education and Care," BRAIN. Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 518–533, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain/article/view/1247

[64]. 64.I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1980.

[65]. 65.S. Brown, A. Massey, M. Montoya‐Weiss, and J. Burkman, “Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 11, pp. 283–295, 2002.

[66]. 66.R. H. Bradley, “Social-cognitive development and toys,” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 11–29, 1985.

[67]. 67.J. Trawick-Smith, H. Russell, and S. Swaminathan, "Measuring the effects of toys on the problem-solving, creative and social behaviours of preschool children," Early Child Dev. Care, vol. 181, no. 7, pp. 909–927, 2010, doi: 10.1080/03004430.2010.503892.

[68]. 68.N. A. Stepanova, L. N. Sannikova, N. I. Levshina, S. N. Yurevich, and G. V. Ilina, "Methodological performance evaluation by teachers in preschool educational institutions," Int. J. Cogn. Res. Sci. Eng. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 67–80, 2018, doi: 10.5937/jerseeI802067A.

[69]. 69.N. Melnyk et al., "The establishment and development of professional training for preschool teachers in Western European countries," Rev. Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 208–233, 2021, doi: 10.18662/rrem/13.1/369.

[70]. 70.S. Handayani, A. Kartika, and S. Sugoto, "The overview of training needs on differentiated instruction for early childhood teachers," in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Early Childhood Educ. (ICECE 2016), Atlantis Press, 2016, pp. 75–83, doi: 10.2991/icece-16.2017.13.

[71]. 71.C. I. Büyükbaykal, “Communication technologies and education in the information age,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 174, pp. 636–640, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.594

[72]. 72.K. Vogeley and A. Roepstorff, "Contextualising culture and social cognition," Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 511–516, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.006.

[73]. 73.L. Mariani, "Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy," Perspect. J. TESOL Italy, vol. XXIII, no. 2, 1997. [Online]. Available: http://www.learningpaths.org/papers/papersupport.htm

[74]. 74.C. C. Yang, C. W. Fan, K. M. Chen, S. C. Hsu, and C. L. Chien, "As a happy kindergarten teacher: the mediating effect of happiness between role stress and turnover intention," Asia-Pac. Educ. Res., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 431–440, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40299-018-0403-4.

[75]. 75.L. L. Johnson and G. M. Kim, "Experimenting with game-based learning in preservice teacher education," Engl. Teach. Pract. Crit., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 78–93, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1108/ETPC-10-2019-0125.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com