Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9058
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8196
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7960
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7529
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6093

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 6 (2025): Published > Review Articles
ESP-3807

Published

2025-06-19

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 6 (2025): Published

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jinhui Zhuge, Wan Srihani Wan Mohamed, Shureen Faris Abdul Shukor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Zhuge, J., Wan Mohamed, W. S., & Faris Abdul Shukor, S. (2025). A review of effects of visual landscape and soundscape perception on elderly walking intentions: Case studies in urban residential neighborhood. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(6), ESP-3807. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3807
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

A review of effects of visual landscape and soundscape perception on elderly walking intentions: Case studies in urban residential neighborhood

Jinhui Zhuge

Faculty of Design and Architecture,Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan 43400, Malaysia ; Faculty of Art and Design, Guilin Tourism University, Guilin, 541006, China

Wan Srihani Wan Mohamed

Faculty of Design and Architecture,Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan 43400, Malaysia

Shureen Faris Abdul Shukor

Faculty of Design and Architecture,Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan 43400, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3807


Keywords: elderly mobility; urban soundscapes; visual landscapes, walkability; sensory integration


Abstract

This systematic literature review aims to assess the effects of visual landscapes and soundscape environments on elderly people's intention to walk in urban residential areas. The findings summarize and discuss various visual features, such as environmental greening and exterior beautification, as well as sound features, focusing on the restorative properties of natural sounds and noise phobia. Perceived risks, such as inadequate lighting and the walkability of environments, are identified as significant factors influencing elderly mobility. The spatial impact of sound emphasizes the integration of both visual and auditory design elements. The results show that coordinated visual and auditory stimuli enhance walking intentions, while disharmonious sounds reduce the desire to move. Based on studies conducted in different urban settings, this review consolidates qualitative findings and offers best-practice advice for policymakers and urban planners. The results suggest a need for multi-sensory, elder-accessible designs that foster movement, improve mood, and encourage social interactions in urban environments for older adults. Future research should focus on experimental investigations into sensory integration and cross-cultural studies to expand the knowledge base for urban planning practices.


References

[1]. 1.World Health Organization. (2018). Age-friendly environments in Europe: A handbook of domains for policy action.

[2]. 2.Toftager, M., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U., Bentsen, P., Grønbæk, M., ... & Kamper-Jørgensen, F. (2011). Distance to green space and physical activity: a Danish national representative survey. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8(6), 741-749.

[3]. 3.Rosso, A. L., Auchincloss, A. H., & Michael, Y. L. (2011). The urban built environment and mobility in older adults: a comprehensive review. Journal of aging research, 2011(1), 816106.

[4]. 4.Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2018). Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

[5]. 5.Spano, G., Dadvand, P., & Sanesi, G. (2021). The benefits of nature-based solutions to psychological health. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 646627.

[6]. 6.World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.

[7]. 7.Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International journal of environmental research and public health, 7(3), 1036-1046.

[8]. 8.Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228.

[9]. 9.Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2014). Sidewalks: Conflict and negotiation over public space. MIT Press.

[10]. 10.Michael, Y. L., Green, M. K., & Farquhar, S. A. (2006). Neighborhood design and active aging. Health & Place, 12(4), 734-740.

[11]. 11.Kang, J. (2007). Urban sound environment. CRC Press.

[12]. 12.Payne, S. R. (2009). Soundscapes within urban parks: their restorative value. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).

[13]. 13.South, E. C., Kondo, M. C., Cheney, R. A., & Branas, C. C. (2015). Neighborhood blight, stress, and health: a walking trial of urban greening and ambulatory heart rate. American journal of public health, 105(5), 909-913.

[14]. 14.Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

[15]. 15.Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2012). Systematic approaches to reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence. Qualitative Health Research, 21(3), 373–378.

[16]. 16.Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, xiii-xxiii.

[17]. 17.Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10.

[18]. 18.Koohsari, M. J., Nakaya, T., & Oka, K. (2018). Activity-friendly built environments in a super-aged society, Japan: current challenges and toward a research agenda. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(9), 2054.

[19]. 19.Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

[20]. 20.Sugiyama, T., Giles-Corti, B., Summers, J., du Toit, L., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2013). Initiating and maintaining recreational walking: a longitudinal study on the influence of neighborhood green space. Preventive medicine, 57(3), 178-182.

[21]. 21.Gardener, M. A., & Lemes de Oliveira, F. (2020). Urban environment cues for health and well-being in the elderly. Cities & Health, 4(1), 117-134.

[22]. 22.Timms, P., & Tight, M. (2010). Aesthetic aspects of walking and cycling. Built Environment, 36(4), 487–503.

[23]. 23.Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

[24]. 24.Deng, L., Luo, H., Ma, J., Huang, Z., Sun, L. X., Jiang, M. Y., & Li, X. (2020). Effects of integration between visual stimuli and auditory stimuli on restorative potential and aesthetic preference in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 53, 126702.

[25]. 25.Song, F., et al. (2010). Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 14(8), iii-ix.

[26]. 26.Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage Publications.

[27]. 27.Oselinsky, V., Keren, N., & Katz, R. (2023). Using virtual reality to simulate perceived walking experience for the elderly in urban environments. Sustainability, 15(5), 4189

[28]. 28.Hashimoto, S., Hatano, A., & Yoshioka, M. (2010). Elderly users’ sense of presence and walkthrough experiences in virtual reality environments. Gerontechnology, 9(2), 184-195.

[29]. 29.Yigitcanlar, T., Han, H., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2021). Smart cities: An effective urban technology research and development strategy for future cities. Cities, 117, 103312



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com