Published
2025-06-23
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lina Yu, Nur Saadah Mohamad Aun, Nor Jana Saim, Norulhuda Sarnon @Kusenin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Custodial grandparents and modern education dilemma: Insights from qualitative research
Lina Yu
Centre for Research in Psychology and Human Well-being, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia , School of Social Development, Shandong Women’s University, Jinan 250300, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Nur Saadah Mohamad Aun
Centre for Research in Psychology and Human Well-being, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia, Social Work Programme, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
Nor Jana Saim
Centre for Research in Psychology and Human Well-being, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia, Social Work Programme, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
Norulhuda Sarnon @Kusenin
Centre for Research in Psychology and Human Well-being, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia, Social Work Programme, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i6.3816
Keywords: modern parenting; custodial grandparents; technological barrier; emotional connection; China
Abstract
Custodial grandparents experience a lot of pressures and challenges when they are raising their grandchildren. However, little is known about the educational dilemmas they face because of the rapid advancement of modern technology. This study investigates the modern educational challenges of custodial grandparents in rural China. Data were gathered using a qualitative approach, with in-depth interviews and field notes. Thematic saturation was achieved after 15 participants. The results showed that the technological weakness and social isolation challenges greatly impact custodial grandparents’ parenting roles and psychological health. These findings provided valuable insights for policymakers and social service providers to develop targeted support for rural custodial grandparents in China. The study emphasizes the importance of improving custodial grandparents’ technological capacities and adapting to modern parenting styles.
References
[1]. 1.Clark, K. C., Kelley, S. J., Clark, P. C., & Lane, K. (2024). Needs of grandparents raising grandchildren: A qualitative study. The Journal of School Nursing, 40(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405221115700
[2]. 2.Generations United. (2017). Grandfamilies: First responders for children: Public policy. https://www.gu.org/what-we-do/public-policy/
[3]. 3.Dolbin-MacNab, M. L., & Yancura, L. A. (2018). International perspectives on grandparents raising grandchildren: Contextual considerations for advancing global discourse. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 86(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415016689565
[4]. 4.Smith, G. C., & Lee, J. (2021). Appraisals of self in the caregiver role as made by married custodial grandparents. Family Relations, 70(1), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12451
[5]. 5.Lee, Y., Blitz, L. V., & Srnka, M. (2015). Trauma and resiliency in grandparent-headed multigenerational families. Family and Society, 96, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2015.96.13
[6]. 6.Xu, Y., Wu, Q., Levkoff, S. E., & Jedwab, M. (2020). Material hardship and parenting stress among grandparent kinship providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of grandparents’ mental health. Child Abuse & Neglect, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104700
[7]. 7.Mendoza, A. N., Fruhauf, C. A., & MacPhee, D. (2020). Grandparent caregivers’ resilience: Stress, support, and coping predict life satisfaction. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 91(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415019843459
[8]. 8.Hansen, A. C., Brown, R., Keller, P., & Schoenberg, N. (2022). Sources of stress and strength: Contextualizing the experience of grandparents rearing grandchildren in Appalachia. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 20(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2020.1774461
[9]. 9.Hayslip, B., Fruhauf, C., & Dolbin-MacNab, M. (2019). Grandparents raising grandchildren: What have we learned over the past decade? The Gerontologist, 59(3), e152–e163. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx106
[10]. 10.Smith, G. C., Hayslip, B., Hancock, G., Strieder, F., & Montoro-Rodriguez, J. (2018). A randomized clinical trial of interventions for improving well-being in custodial grandfamilies. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(6), 816–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000457
[11]. 11.Lupton, D., & Pedersen, S. (2016). Parenting and digital media: From the early web to contemporary digital society. Sociology Compass, 10(8), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12398
[12]. 12.Kurt, I. (2023). Comprehensive review on parenting and technology: Opportunities and challenges in the 21st century. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 10(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26417/610cpd97
[13]. 13.Hodge, H., Carson, D., Carson, D., Newman, L., & Garrett, J. (2017). Using internet technologies in rural communities to access services: The views of older people and service providers. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016
[14]. 14.Tang, Y., Li, Q., & Wu, Y. (2024). The impact of the digital divide on rural older people’s mental quality of life: A conditional process analysis. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37109
[15]. 15.Wang, C. D., Hayslip, B., Sun, Q., & Zhu, W. (2019). Grandparents as the primary care providers for their grandchildren: A cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and U.S. samples. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 89(4), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018824722
[16]. 16.Anderson, L., Sheppard, P., & Monden, C. (2018). Grandparent effects on educational outcomes: A systematic review. Sociological Science, 5, 114–142. https://doi.org/10.15195/V5.A6
[17]. 17.Norman, H., Adnan, N. H., Nordin, N., Ally, M., & Tsinakos, A. (2022). The educational digital divide for vulnerable students in the pandemic: Towards the new Agenda 2030. Sustainability, 14(16), 10332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610332
[18]. 18.Razak, N. A., Nor, N. F. M., Abdullah, M. Y., Malek, J. A., Salman, A., & Wai, Y. S. (2010). A technology towards bridging the digital divide: Applications and acceptance. Selected Topics in Education and Educational Technology, 118–122.
[19]. 19.Pandey, A., Littlewood, K., Cooper, L., McCrae, J., Rosenthal, M., Day, A., & Hernandez, L. (2019). Connecting older grandmothers raising grandchildren with community resources improves family resiliency, social support, and caregiver self-efficacy. Journal of Women & Aging, 31(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2018.1444940
[20]. 20.Bailey, S. J., Letiecq, B. L., Visconti, K., & et al. (2019). Rural Native and European American custodial grandparents: Stressors, resources, and resilience. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 34(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-019-09372-w
[21]. 21.Hayslip, B., Fruhauf, C. A., & Fish, J. (2021). Should I do this?: Factors influencing the decision to raise grandchildren among custodial grandparents. The Gerontologist, 61(5), 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa202
[22]. 22.Aziz, R. A. (2007). Grandparenting: Issues and challenges. Akademika, 70, 103–116.
[23]. 23.Bailey, S. J., Letiecq, B. L., & Porterfield, F. (2009). Family coping and adaptation among grandparents rearing grandchildren. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 7(2–3), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770902851072
[24]. 24.Teerawichitchainan, B., & Low, T. Q. Y. (2021). The situation and well-being of custodial grandparents in Myanmar: Impacts of adult children’s cross-border and internal migration. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113914
[25]. 25.Fokakis, Z. N., Nadorff, D. K., & McKay, I. T. (2020). Is raising your grandchild bad for your health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051753
[26]. 26.Li, K., Tang, F., Rauktis, M. E., & Jin, G. (2024). Factor structure and predictors of resilience among custodial grandparents. Journal of Family Issues. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231204946
[27]. 27.Adams, B. L. (2018). Paternal incarceration and the family: Fifteen years in review. Sociology Compass, 12(3), e12567. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12567
[28]. 28.Woods, T. (2020). Rural grandparenting through a family development lens: Implications for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2020.1737515
[29]. 29.Hayslip, B. Jr., Davis, S. R., Neumann, C. S., Goodman, C., Smith, G. C., Maiden, R. J., & Carr, G. F. (2012). The role of resilience in mediating stressor-outcome relationships among grandparents raising their grandchildren. In B. Hayslip Jr & G. C. Smith (Eds.), Resilient grandparent caregivers: A strengths-based perspective (pp. 48–69). Taylor & Francis Group.
[30]. 30.Hilton, C., Jones, S., Akers, N., Panagaki, K., & Sellwood, W. (2022). Self-report measures assessing aspects of personal recovery in relatives and other informal carers of those with psychosis: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 926981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926981
[31]. 31.Whitley, D. M., & Fuller-Thomson, E. (2018). Latino solo grandparents raising grandchildren: Health risks and behaviors. Hispanic Health Care International, 16(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540415318757219
[32]. 32.Zailani, S.M., Aun, N.S.M., & Kasim, A.C. (2022). Exploring social support needs amongst caregivers of learning disabilities. Sciences, 12, 1445–1453. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i1/12177
[33]. 33.Tang, F., Li, K., Rauktis, M.E., Farmer, E.M.Z., & McDaniel, S. (2022). Stress, coping, and quality of life among custodial grandparents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 66(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2022.2103764
[34]. 34.Ma, J., Fang, G., & Guo, K. (2023). Bridging the digital divide: The influence of digital feedback on the digital capabilities of the rural elderly. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231222208
[35]. 35.Mubarak, F., & Suomi, R. (2022). Elderly forgotten? Digital exclusion in the information age and the rising grey digital divide. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221096272
[36]. 36.Rogers, S.E. (2016). Bridging the 21st century digital divide. TechTrends, 60(2), 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0057-0
[37]. 37.Townsend, L., Sathiaseelan, A., Fairhurst, G., & Wallace, C. (2013). Enhanced broadband access as a solution to the social and economic problems of the rural digital divide. Local Economy, 28(6), 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094213496974
[38]. 38.Newman, L., Biedrzycki, K., & Baum, F. (2010). Digital technology access and use among socially and economically disadvantaged groups in South Australia. Journal of Community Informatics, 6(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v6i2.2554
[39]. 39.Hill, R., Betts, L.R., & Gardner, S.E. (2015). Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062
[40]. 40.Yao, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Liu, X., Chu, T., & Zeng, Y. (2021). Bridging the digital divide between old and young people in China: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(3), e125–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00032-5
[41]. 41.Md Fadzil, N.H., Shahar, S., Singh, D.K.A., Rajikan, R., Vanoh, D., Mohamad Ali, N., & Mohd Noah, S.A. (2023). Digital technology usage among older adults with cognitive frailty: A survey during COVID-19 pandemic. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231207594
[42]. 42.Jiang, Q.L., & Chen, Z.H. (2021). Positive aging of the silver surfing group: The mechanism by which internet use enhances subjective well-being of the elderly. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 43(12), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2021.12.007
[43]. 43.Cohn-Schwartz, E., Vitman-Schorr, A., & Khalaila, R. (2022). Physical distancing is related to fewer electronic and in-person contacts and to increased loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic among older Europeans. Quality of Life Research, 31(6), 1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02949-4
[44]. 44.Nguyen, M.H., Gruber, J., Marler, W., Hunsaker, A., Fuchs, J., & Hargittai, E. (2022). Staying connected while physically apart: Digital communication when face-to-face interactions are limited. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2046–2067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820985442
[45]. 45.Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K.D., & Erickson, F. (2016). The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356–401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X1668099
[46]. 46.Costache, L., Cojocaru, Ş., Cojocaru, D., & Bunea, O. (2023). Benefits of parental education in the school system: The influence of parental education on school culture and student participation. Quality in Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.33788/qie.23.01
[47]. 47.Waters, N.E., Ahmed, S.F., Tang, S., Morrison, F.J., & Davis-Kean, P.E. (2021). Pathways from socioeconomic status to early academic achievement: The role of specific executive functions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.09.008
[48]. 48.Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[49]. 49.Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[50]. 50.Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE Publications.
[51]. 51.Tang, Y., Li, Q., & Wu, Y. (2024). The impact of the digital divide on rural older people’s mental quality of life: A conditional process analysis. Heliyon, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37109
[52]. 52.Livingstone, S.M., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. Oxford University Press.
[53]. 53.Bayham, J., & Fenichel, E.P. (2020). Impact of school closures for COVID-19 on the US health-care workforce and net mortality: A modelling study. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e271–e278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30082-7
[54]. 54.O’Connell, M.E., Scerbe, A., Wiley, K., Gould, B., Carter, J., Bourassa, C., & Warry, W. (2018). Anticipated needs and worries about maintaining independence of rural/remote older adults: Opportunities for technology development in the context of the double digital divide. Gerontechnology, 17(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2018.17.3.001.00
[55]. 55.Hayslip, B., & Kaminski, P.L. (2005). Grandparents raising their grandchildren: A review of the literature and suggestions for practice. The Gerontologist, 45(2), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.2.262
[56]. 56.Ružić-Baf, M., Kadum, S., & Damić, M. (2020). The family and ICT. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 11(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.239.251
[57]. 57.Tsai, T.H., Chang, H.T., & Ho, Y.L. (2016). Perceptions of a specific family communication application among grandparents and grandchildren: An extension of the technology acceptance model. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0156680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156680
[58]. 58.Kekeh, M., Tonn, C., Dial, K., & Yancura, L. (2024). Grandparent caregivers’ lived experiences and resource needs/use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 67(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2024.2339988
[59]. 59.Zhao, C.C., & Zheng, X. (2024). Digital capital and power struggles in intergenerational caregiving: A study on smartphone use in rural left-behind children’s families. Jiangxi Normal University Journal (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 57(3), 75–86.
[60]. 60.Zheng, X., & Gao, Q. (2021). Social cocoon: Smartphones and left-behind children’s social interaction. Jiangxi Normal University Journal (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 54(6), 75–86.
[61]. 61.Burnett, C. (2016). The digital age and its implications for learning and teaching in the primary school. Cambridge Primary Review Trust.
[62]. 62.Taylor, M.F., Marquis, R., Coall, D.A., Batten, R., & Werner, J. (2017). The physical health dilemmas facing custodial grandparent caregivers: Policy considerations. Cogent Medicine, 4(1), 1292594. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2017.1292594
[63]. 63.Way, N., Okazaki, S., Zhao, J., Kim, J.J., Chen, X., Yoshikawa, H., Jia, Y., & Deng, H. (2013). Social and emotional parenting: Mothering in a changing Chinese society. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031204.






