ESP-3837

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 10 (2025): Published

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Peng Wang, Mohd Yasim Mazuki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Peng Wang, & Mohd Yasim Mazuki. (2025). Does outdoor education work equally for everyone? Examine influence of OEP on mental health and well-being in university students. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(10), ESP-3837. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.3837

Does outdoor education work equally for everyone? Examine influence of OEP on mental health and well-being in university students

Peng Wang

Faculty of Sport Science and Coaching, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, 35900, Malaysia ; Department of Physical Education, Hengshui College of Vocational Technology, Hengshui, 053000, China

Mohd Yasim Mazuki

Faculty of Sport Science and Coaching, Sultan Idris Education University, Tanjong Malim, Perak, 35900, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.3837


Keywords: outdoor education; moderating effects; demographic factors; mental health; well-being

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between outdoor education programs (OEPs) and mental health outcomes among Chinese university students, with a specific focus on demographic moderators. Adopting a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design, 240 first-year undergraduates from Hengshui University were purposively sampled and assigned to either an experimental group (n=120) participating in a 5-day OEP or a waitlist control group (n=120). Data were collected using validated Mandarin versions of the GHQ-12 and GWB scales, and analyzed via paired t-tests, ANOVA, and independent samples t-tests to assess intervention effects and demographic influences. The results indicated three key outcomes: (1) The outdoor education program led to substantial improvements in positive emotions and self-confidence, reductions in negative emotions and stress. (2) Demographic factors significantly moderated mental health outcomes (χ²=3.258, F=9.819, p=0.002), yet no statistically significant effects were observed on well-being (χ²=1.709, F=1.578, p=0.210). (3) Treatment effects varied significantly across gender, age, academic discipline, and place of residence (p < 0.05), while prior outdoor experience and household income showed no moderating effects on mental health or well-being; The results contribute to theoretical frameworks by demonstrating the moderating effects of demographic variables on OEP efficacy, aligning with social cognitive theory and cultural adaptation models. Practically, these findings advocate for the development of demographic-specific OEPs to address differential needs, particularly among female students, physical education majors, and urban residents.

References

[1]. 1.Hunt, J., & Eisenberg, D. (2010). Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.008

[2]. 2.Stallman, H. M. (2010). Psychological distress in university students: A comparison with general population data. Australian Psychologist, 45(4), 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2010.482109

[3]. 3.Mahmoud, J. S., Staten, R., Hall, L. A., & Lennie, T. A. (2012). The relationship among young adult college students’ depression, anxiety, stress, demographics, life satisfaction, and coping styles. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(3), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2011.632708

[4]. 4.Saleh, D., Camart, N., & Romo, L. (2017). Predictors of stress in college students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019

[5]. 5.Stowell, A. W., Smith, A. M., & Williams, K. A. (2021). Social connectedness and mental health in outdoor education programs. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 77, 101732.

[6]. 6.Beiter, R., Nash, R., McCrady, M., Rhoades, D., Linscomb, M., Clarahan, M., & Sammut, S. (2015). The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 173, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054

[7]. 7.Jackson, M. D., Kivel, B. D., & Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of outdoor education on the mental health and well-being of youth: A systematic review. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(1), 3-20.

[8]. 8.Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

[9]. 9.Solomonian, L., Barbaro, D. B., Onah, R. O., Wilson, M. W., & Rose, Z. R. (2022). Effects of outdoor learning school-based education programs on pediatric health. Natural Medicine Journal, 14(1).

[10]. 10.Sprague, N., Berrigan, D., & Ekenga, C. C. (2020). An analysis of the educational and health-related benefits of nature-based environmental education in low-income Black and Hispanic children. Health Equity, 4(1), 198-210. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2019.0118

[11]. 11.Ekenga, C. C., Sprague, N., & Shobiye, D. M. (2019). Promoting health-related quality of life in minority youth through environmental education and nature contact. Sustainability, 11(13), 3544. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133544

[12]. 12.Trapasso, E., Knowles, Z., Boddy, L., Newson, L., Sayers, J., & Austin, C. (2018). Exploring gender differences within forest schools as a physical activity intervention. Children, 5(10), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/children5100138

[13]. 13.Cohen, A. A., Ferrucci, L., Fülöp, T., Gravel, D., Hao, N., Kriete, A., Levine, M. E., Lipsitz, L. A., Olde Rikkert, M. G., Rutenberg, A., Stroustrup, N., & Varadhan, R. (2022). A complex systems approach to aging biology. Nature Aging, 2(7), 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00252-6

[14]. 14.Sheldrake, R., & Reiss, M. (2022). Children’s interests and orientations towards nature: Views from young children in England. Contributions from Biology Education Research, 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89480-1_22

[15]. 15.Donaldson, G. B., & Donaldson, J. E. (1958). Outdoor education: A new frontier. Harper & Brothers.

[16]. 16.Prince, H. E. (2018). Changes in outdoor learning in primary schools in England, 1995 and 2017: Lessons for good practice. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1548363

[17]. 17.Avci, B., & Gumus, H. (2020). The effects of outdoor education on academic performance and memory of primary school students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 82, 139-158.

[18]. 18.Bragg, R. (2016). Outdoor learning and mental health. Natural England Commissioned Report.

[19]. 19.Yang, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Liu, X. (2022). The effect of a health education program on Chinese tertiary students’ well-being, self-efficacy, and health-related behaviors. Journal of American College Health, 70(8), 753-760.

[20]. 20.White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., ... & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9, 7730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3

[21]. 21.Tillmann, S., Tobin, D., Avison, W., & Gilliland, J. (2023). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 77(5), 298-305.

[22]. 22.Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2023). Green exercise and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Environment International, 171, 107658.

[23]. 23.Fen, W., Yuan, L., & Li, J. (2016). Disciplinary differences in environmental identity development: A longitudinal study of Chinese university students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.08.003

[24]. 24.Zhang, Y., & Chen, M. (2019). Urban-rural disparities in nature accessibility: A case study of eastern China. Sustainability, 11(12), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123415

[25]. 25.Li, C., & Wong, N. (2018). Gender differences in nature therapy: A longitudinal study of Chinese university students. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 34, 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.019

[26]. 26.Mygind, L., Kjeldsted, E., Hartmeyer, R., Mygind, E., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Mental, physical, and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 47(8), 848-857. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494819864719

[27]. 27.Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

[28]. 28.Zhou, X., & Chen, J. (2021). STEM vs. humanities: Divergent outcomes of campus-based outdoor education in Beijing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631899

[29]. 29.Wang, P., Zhao, S., & Gu, D. (2022). Nature deficit disorder in Chinese urban youth: Evidence from a national survey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104257

[30]. 30.Prince, H. E. (2020). Outdoor experiences and sustainability of positive youth development: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2020.1736110

[31]. 31.Babbie, E. R. (2005). The practice of social research 10th edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

[32]. 32.Baumgartner, T. A., & Hensley, L. D. (2006). Conducting and reading research in health and performance (4th ed.).McGraw Hill.

[33]. 33.Bell, A. (2003). A narrative approach to research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 95-110.

[34]. 34.Vaske, J. J. (2008). Survey research and analysis: Application in park, recreation and human dimension. Venture Publishing, Inc.

[35]. 35.Aivazidis, C., Lazaridou, M., & Hellden, G. F. (2006). A comparison between a traditional and an online environmental educational program. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(4), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.3200/joee.37.4.45-54

[36]. 36.Goldberg, D., Gater, R., Sartorius, N., et al. (1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27(1), 191-197.

[37]. 37.Liang, Y., Wang, L., & Yin, X. (2016). The factor structure of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in young Chinese civil servants. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, Article 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0539-y.

[38]. 38.McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford University Press.

[39]. 39.Zhang, J. (2019). Validation of the General Well-Being Scale for Chinese university students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 33(4), 301-305.

[40]. 40.Byrne, B. M. (2016). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology, 5(1), 51-65.

[41]. 41.Sui, G., Liu, G., Jia, L., Wang, L., & Yang, G. (2018). The association between ambient air pollution exposure and mental health status in Chinese female college students: A cross-sectional study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 28517-28524.

[42]. 42.Shek, D. T., & Liang, L. Y. (2018). Psychosocial factors influencing individual well-being in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: A six-year longitudinal study. Applied research in quality of life, 13, 561-584.

[43]. 43.Coolican, H. (2018). Research methods and statistics in psychology. Routledge.

[44]. 44.Sun, Y., Wang, M., Shen, J., Li, D., & Gao, L. (2023). Campus outdoor environment, learning engagement, and the mental health of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: From the perspective of students in different grades. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1143635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1143635

[45]. 45.Loose, T., Fuoco, D., Malboeuf-Hurtubise, C., Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., Gauvin, L., Chadi, N., ... & Geoffroy, M. C. (2024). A nature-based intervention and mental health of schoolchildren: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 7(11), Article e2444824. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44824

[46]. 46.Fang, B. B., Lu, F. J., Gill, D. L., Liu, S. H., Chyi, T., & Chen, B. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of outdoor education programs on adolescents' self-efficacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(5), 1932-1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211022709

[47]. 47.Down, M., Murphy, M. C., & others (2024). Outdoor adventure education for adolescent social and emotional wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2024.2386350

[48]. 48.Nguyen, N. N., & Trieu, Q. N. T. (2022, June). Research on Solutions to Improve Self-Worth Awareness Skills to Enhance Self-Study of Students in the Post-Covid Period. In 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Educational Technology (pp. 16-20). IEEE.

[49]. 49.Wang, P., Yasim, M. M., Chang, S., & Wu, L. (2024). A Literature Review of Outdoor Education Program on Mental Health and Well-Being. Asian Pendidikan, 4(2), 33-45.

[50]. 50.Minh, N. N., & Tien, N. H. (2024). Factors affecting the opportunities to study broad of students of the faculty of Business Administration of Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(1), 550-555.

[51]. 51.Obeagu, E. I., & Akinleye, C. A. (2024). Promoting social integration: blood transfusions and improved social well-being in HIV patients. Elite Journal of Public Health, 2(7), 25-34.

[52]. 52.Pirchio, S., Passiatore, Y., Panno, A., Cipparone, M., & Carrus, G. (2021). The effects of contact with nature during outdoor environmental education on students' wellbeing, connectedness to nature and pro-sociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 648458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648458

[53]. 53.Bhui, K., Newbury, J. B., Latham, R. M., Ucci, M., Nasir, Z. A., Turner, B., ... & Coulon, F. (2023). Air quality and mental health: Evidence, challenges and future directions. BJPsych Open, 9(4), Article e120. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.507

[54]. 54.Wu, Y., Zhou, Y., & Shi, L. (2023). Defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement on social support and bystander behaviors among primary school students: a multilevel moderated mediation model. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 36, 11.

[55]. 55.Park, C. L., Kubzansky, L. D., Chafouleas, S. M., Davidson, R. J., Keltner, D., Parsafar, P., ... & Wang, K. H. (2023). Emotional well-being: What it is and why it matters. Affective Science, 4(1), 10-20.

[56]. 56.Zeng, G. (2023). Experiential Learning and its Application in College English Intensive Reading Teaching. Journal of Social Science Humanities and Literature, 6(6), 93-101.

[57]. 57.Vermeesch, A. L., Ellsworth-Kopkowski, A., Prather, J. G., Passel, C., Rogers, H. H., & Hansen, M. M. (2024). Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bathing): A scoping review of the global research on the effects of spending time in nature. Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health, 13, 27536130241231258. https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241231258

[58]. 58.Ahad, A. A., Sanchez-Gonzalez, M., & Junquera, P. (2023). Understanding and addressing mental health stigma across cultures for improving psychiatric care: A narrative review. Cureus, 15(5), Article e38549. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38549

[59]. 59.Gilbertson, K., Ewert, A., Siklander, P., & Bates, T. (2022). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Human Kinetics.

[60]. 60.Kuhail, M. A., ElSayary, A., Farooq, S., & Alghamdi, A. (2022). Exploring immersive learning experiences: A survey. Informatics, 9(4), Article 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040075

[61]. 61.Lobe, B., & Morgan, D. L. (2021). Assessing the effectiveness of video-based interviewing: A systematic comparison of video-conferencing based dyadic interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3), 301-312.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com