Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    8977
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    7930
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7918
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7295
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    5787

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 7 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3843

Published

2025-07-26

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Manli Feng, Yuan-Cheng Chang, Yujian Lu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Manli Feng, Yuan-Cheng Chang, & Yujian Lu. (2025). A study on college students’ materialistic values in gratitude education at universities in Xinjiang, China. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(7), ESP-3843. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3843
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

A study on college students’ materialistic values in gratitude education at universities in Xinjiang, China

Manli Feng

Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand

Yuan-Cheng Chang

Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand

Yujian Lu

Guangdong Gountry Garden Polytechnic,528312, Guangdong, China


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3843


Keywords: Materialistic values; prosocial behavior; perceived social support; gratitude


Abstract

Universities serve as the bases for cultivating high-quality modern talents. College students play an important role in promoting sustainable education development. Their prosocial behaviors are not only related to personal growth and social harmony but also from the foundation of civilization progress. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of college students’ materialistic values on their prosocial behavior, as well as the moderating effects of perceived social support and gratitude. The theoretical basis of this study is the value conflict theory, and the research subjects are college students from undergraduate institutions in Xinjiang. Through convenience sampling, this study surveyed students from eight undergraduate institutions, with four each from the northern and southern parts of Xinjiang, distributing 720 formal questionnaires and collecting 687 valid ones. The results show that materialistic values have a significant negative prediction on college students’ prosocial behavior; that is, the higher the level of materialistic values among college students, the lower their tendency to engage in prosocial behavior. Both perceived social support and gratitude have significant moderating effects on the relationship between materialistic values and prosocial behavior.


References

[1]. 1.Olmos-Gómez, M. D. C., Portillo-Sánchez, R., Mohamed-Mohand, L., & Estrada-Vidal, L. I. (2024). Promotion of values education factors involved in prosocial behaviors and volunteering. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(2), 411-431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihp e14020028

[2]. 2.Hales, G. E. (2021). Perceptions of Pro-Social Behavior: Culture, Norms, and Reciprocity. Michigan State University.

[3]. 3.Godfrey, J. C. (2022). Pro-social giving and reciprocity in the Global South. In K. Biekart & A. Fowler (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Civil Society (pp. 215-227). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364653 212_Godfrey_J_C_2022_Pro-social_giving_and_reciprocity_in_the_Global_South_In_K_Biekart_A_Fowler_Eds_A_Research_Agenda_for_Civil_Society_pp_215-223_Cheltenham_UK_Northhampton_MA_USA_Edward_Elgar

[4]. 4.Hales, S., & Tyler, M. (2022). Heroism and/as injurious speech: Recognition, precarity, and inequality in health and social care work. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(4), 1199-1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12832

[5]. 5.Jiang, W., Liu, H., & Jiang, J. (2021). The development of materialism in emerging adulthood: Stability, change, and antecedents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220925234

[6]. 6.Lv, M., Zhang, M., Huang, N., & Fu, X. (2023). Effects of materialism on adolescents’ prosocial and aggressive behaviors: The mediating role of empathy. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), Article e863. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100863

[7]. 7.Talbert, M. (2021). Psychopaths and symmetry: A reply to nelkin. Philosophia, 49(3), 1233-1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00300-8

[8]. 8.Roberts, W., & Ertubey, C. (2022). Flow the wu-wei way: A thematic analysis of charity runners’ experience of wu-wei in enhancing wellbeing and flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 12(4), 38-41. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v12i4.2129

[9]. 9.Li, Z., Sial, M. S., Wu, H., Căpușneanu, S., & Barbu, C. M. (2023). The role of CSR information on social media to promote the communicative behavior of customers: An emotional framework enriching behavioral sciences literature. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 126-129. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020126

[10]. 10.Crone, E. A., & Achterberg, M. (2022). Prosocial development in adolescence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2(44), 220-225. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.copsyc. 2021. 09.020

[11]. 11.Telle, N. T., & Pfister, H. R. (2016). Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: A neglected link. Emotion Review, 8(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/175407 3915586817

[12]. 12.Areias, S., Disterheft, A., & Gouveia, J. P. (2023). The role of connectedness in pro-environmental consumption of fashionable commodities. Sustainability, 15(2), Article e1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021199

[13]. 13.Raval, N., & Lalvani, S. (2022). The moral economy of platform work. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 9(1-2), 144-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389308422283

[14]. 14.Oyekan, D. O. (2021). Unleashing the power of gratitude. Xlibris Corporation.

[15]. 15.Zhang, D. (2022). The relationship between gratitude and adolescents’ prosocial behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article e1024312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024312

[16]. 16.Sawyer, K. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., Stillwell, E. E., Duffy, M. K., Scott, K. L., & Adair, E. A. (2022). Being present and thankful: A multi-study investigation of mindfulness, gratitude, and employee helping behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000903

[17]. 17.Froh, J. J., Bono, G., & Emmons, R. (2010). Being grateful is beyond good manners: Gratitude and motivation to contribute to society among early adolescents. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9163-z

[18]. 18.Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 946-955. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2010-09990-007

[19]. 19.Bouckenooghe, D., Buelens, M., Fontaine, J., & Vanderheyden, K. (2005). The prediction of stress by values and value conflict. The Journal of Psychology, 139(4), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.4.369-384

[20]. 20.Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1540- 4560.1994.tb01196.x

[21]. 21.Kasser, T. (2016). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033344

[22]. 22.Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free Press.

[23]. 23.Mulligan, K. (2004). The nature of value conflict and its consequences for public opinion. The Ohio State University.

[24]. 24.Graham, J., Meindl, P., Koleva, S., Iyer, R., & Johnson, K. M. (2015). When values and behavior conflict: Moral pluralism and intrapersonal moral hypocrisy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(3), 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc 3.12158

[25]. 25.Burroughs, J. E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348-370. https://doi.org/10.1086/344429

[26]. 26.Leung, K. (1997). Negotiation and reward allocations across cultures. In P. C. Earley & M. Erez (Eds.), New perspectives on international industrial /organizational psychology (pp. 640-675). The New Lexington Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-36742-021

[27]. 27.Morris, M. W., Williams, K. Y., Leung, K., Larrick, R., Mendoza, M. T., Bhatnagar, D., Li, J., Kondo, M., Luo, J. L., & Hu, J. C. (1998). Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(4), 729-747. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490050

[28]. 28.Kim, H., Callan, M. J., Gheorghiu, A. I., & Matthews, W. J. (2017). Social comparison, personal relative deprivation, and materialism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(2), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12176

[29]. 29.Kasser, T. (2011). Materialistic value orientation. In L. Bouckaert & L. Zsolnai (Eds.), Handbook of spirituality and business (pp. 204-211). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230321458_25

[30]. 30.Van Kleef, G. A., & Lelieveld, G. J. (2022). Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029

[31]. 31.Uçanok Tan, B. (2023). Effects of materialist values and work centrality on organizational citizenship behaviors. Sage Open, 13(4), Article e2158244023 1214466. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231214466

[32]. 32.Yang, Z., Fu, X., Yu, X., & Lv, Y. (2018). Longitudinal relations between adolescents' materialism and prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adolesc ence. 2017.11.013

[33]. 33.Briggs, E., Landry, T., & Wood, C. (2007). Beyond just being there: An examination of the impact of attitudes, materialism, and self-esteem on the quality of helping behavior in youth volunteers. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v18n02_02

[34]. 34.Froh, J. J., Emmons, R. A., Card, N. A., Bono, G., & Wilson, J. A. (2011). Gratitude and the reduced costs of materialism in adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9195-9

[35]. 35.Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., & Lowrey, T. M. (2018a). Coping with loneliness through materialism: Strategies matter for adolescent development of unethical behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3329-x

[36]. 36.Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304

[37]. 37.Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021). Social support at work: An integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2485

[38]. 38.Chen, D., Miao, X., Ma, Y., & Tang, Y. (2022). The relationship between social support and goal pursuit among Chinese college students: The mediating role of just-world beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article e1051884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051884

[39]. 39.Christopher, A. N., Kuo, S. V., Abraham, K. M., Noel, L. W., & Linz, H. E. (2004). Materialism and affective well-being: The role of social support. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(3), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.015

[40]. 40.Gentina, E., Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Vitell, S. J., & Rose, G. M. (2018b). An integrative model of the influence of parental and peer support on consumer ethical beliefs: The mediating role of self-esteem, power, and materialism. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1173-1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3137-3

[41]. 41.Schwartz, S. (2013). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In S. Schwartz (Ed.), The psychology of values (pp. 1-24). Psychology Press.

[42]. 42.Adebayo, D. O. (2005). Ethical attitudes and prosocial behaviour in the Nigeria police: Moderator effects of perceived organizational support and public recognition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 684-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510628767

[43]. 43.Nguyen, H. T. T. (2023). Integrating the valence theory and the norm activation theory to understand consumers’ e-waste recycling intention. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 21(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cjpre.2023.03.003

[44]. 44.Qiu, S., Sankar, S., Dooley, L. M., Huang, N., & Tang, W. (2023). How materialism relates to attitude toward corporate social responsibility among Chinese college students? Mediation role of environmental concern. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1591

[45]. 45.Guo, Y. (2017). The influence of social support on the prosocial behavior of college students: The mediating effect based on interpersonal trust. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 158-163. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1160906

[46]. 46.Chen, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, C., Shi, Y., & Nie, P. (2024). Materialism and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of social context. Journal of Psychological Science, 47(5), 1204-1212. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20240519

[47]. 47.Emmons, R. A., Froh, J., & Rose, R. (2019). Gratitude. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 317-332). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000138-020

[48]. 48.Kasser, T., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Sheldon, K. M. (2004). Materialistic values: Their causes and consequences. In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 11-28). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10. 1037/10658-002

[49]. 49.Karns, C. M., Moore III, W. E., & Mayr, U. (2017). The cultivation of pure altruism via gratitude: A functional MRI study of change with gratitude practice. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article e302497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum. 2017. 00599

[50]. 50.Bartlett, M. Y., Condon, P., Cruz, J., Baumann, J., & Desteno, D. (2012). Gratitude: Prompting behaviours that build relationships. Cognition & Emotion, 26(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.561297

[51]. 51.Zhang, L., Li., W., Ye, Y., Yang, K., Jia, N., & Kong, F. (2022). Being grateful every day will pay off: A daily diary investigation on relationships between gratitude and well-being in Chinese young adults. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(6), 853-865. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2131606

[52]. 52.Ma, L. K., Tunney, R. J., & Ferguson, E. (2017). Does gratitude enhance prosociality? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 601-635. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000103

[53]. 53.Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1467- 9280.2006. 01705.x

[54]. 54.Roberts, J. A., Tsang, J. A., & Manolis, C. (2015). Looking for happiness in all the wrong places: The moderating role of gratitude and affect in the materialism–life satisfaction relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(6), 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1004553

[55]. 55.Li, J., & Guo, Y. (2009). Revision of the Materialistic Values Scale among college students. Psychological Research and Behavior Management, 7(4), 280-283. https://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/32780455.html

[56]. 56.Kou, Y., Hong, H., Tan, C., & Li, L. (2007). Revision of the Prosocial Tendencies Scale for adolescents. Psychological Development and Education, 9(12), 112-117. https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_detail_thesis/0201295675421.html

[57]. 57.Jiang, Q. (2001). Perceived Social Support Scale. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science, 10(10), 41-43. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2016.01.014

[58]. 58.McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112

[59]. 59.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[60]. 60.Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

[61]. 61.Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., ... & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x

[62]. 62.Scott, H. R., Pitman, A., Kozhuharova, P., & Lloyd-Evans, B. (2020). A systematic review of studies describing the influence of informal social support on psychological wellbeing in people bereaved by sudden or violent causes of death. BMC Psychiatry, 2(10), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.16944/v2

[63]. 63.Gillman, J. C., Turner, M. J., & Slater, M. J. (2023). The role of social support and social identification on challenge and threat cognitive appraisals, perceived stress, and life satisfaction in workplace employees. Plos One, 18(7), Article e0288563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288563

[64]. 64.Hazlett, L. I., Moieni, M., Irwin, M. R., Haltom, K. E. B., Jevtic, I., Meyer, M. L., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2021). Exploring neural mechanisms of the health benefits of gratitude in women: A randomized controlled trial. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 9(5), 444-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2021.04.019

[65]. 65.Peng, M., & Dai, B. (2023). Social support and left-behind children’s social adaptation: The mediating role of self-esteem. Social Indicators Research, 170(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03074-0

[66]. 66.Kumar, A., & Epley, N. (2023). Undersociality is unwise. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 33(1), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1336



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com