Published
2025-08-25
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Izzaty Mohamad, Abdullah Sanusi Othman, Nurshahira Ibrahim, Nadiatul Shakinah Abdul Rahman, Haslin Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Impact of psychological coaching on employee self-efficacy in Malaysia
Nur Izzaty Mohamad
School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, 11700, Malaysia
Abdullah Sanusi Othman
Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Malaysia
Nurshahira Ibrahim
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Bandar Jengka, Pahang, 236400, Malaysia
Nadiatul Shakinah Abdul Rahman
School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, 11700, Malaysia
Haslin Hasan
Faculty of Business, Information & Human Sciences Infrastructure, University of Kuala Lumpur, Kajang, 4300, Selangor, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3855
Keywords: corporate governance; employee self-efficacy; psychological coaching
Abstract
Psychological coaching is an essential developmental approach that many professionals experience throughout their careers. This study examines the relationship between psychological coaching and self-efficacy among employees in Malaysia. Data were collected through a survey of 242 employees working in corporate governance, selected using random sampling. Employing a quantitative research design, the proposed hypotheses were tested using SmartPLS software. The results indicate that key dimensions of psychological coaching namely motivational reinforcement, trust, and effective communication have a significant positive influence on employee self-efficacy. These findings are particularly valuable for administrators and managers, as they underscore the crucial role of psychological coaching in enhancing employee confidence and capabilities. Furthermore, the study provides practical guidance for organisations in formulating strategies that not only strengthen employee self-efficacy but also enhance overall well-being and productivity in the workplace.
References
[1]. 1.Mazzetti, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). The impact of engaging leadership on employee engagement and team effectiveness: A longitudinal, multi-level study on the mediating role of personal and team resources. PloS One, 17(6), e0269433.
[2]. 2.Huang, Z., Sindakis, S., Aggarwal, S., & Thomas, L. (2022). The role of leadership in collective creativity and innovation: Examining academic research and development environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1060412.
[3]. 3.Beattie, R. S. (2002). Developmental managers: Line managers as facilitators of workplace learning in voluntary organizations. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
[4]. 4.Ellinger, A. D., Watkins, K. E., & Bostrom, R. P. (1999). Managers as facilitators of learning in learning organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 105–125.
[5]. 5.Day, F. J. (2022). Psychologically informed leadership coaching positively impacts the mental well-being of 80 senior doctors, medical and public health leaders. BMJ Leader, 7(4), 301–303.
[6]. 6.Pedraza-Rodríguez, J., Ruiz-Vélez, A., Sánchez-Rodríguez, M. I., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2023). Management skills and organizational culture as sources of innovation for firms in peripheral regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122518
[7]. 7.Asghar, M. Z., Rasool, S. F., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Arif, S., & Bano, S. (2023). Integrating the technology acceptance model for social media-based learning with authentic leadership development: Symmetric and asymmetric modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1131133.
[8]. 8.Frank, A., & Brownell, J. (1989). Organizational communication and behaviour: Communicating to improve performance. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[9]. 9.Niu, X., Zhang, B., Simasiku, M., & Zhang, R. (2022). Managerial coaching behavior and subordinates’ learning effects in cross-cultural context: a moderated mediation study. Chinese Management Studies, 16(4), 885–903.
[10]. 10.Yeung, A. K., & Berman, B. (1997). Adding value through human resources: Reorienting human resource measurement to drive business performance. Human Resource Management, 36(3), 321–335.
[11]. 11.De Vos, A., Buyens, D., & Schalk, R. (2003). Psychological contract development during organizational socialization: Adaptation to reality and the role of reciprocity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(5), 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.205
[12]. 12.Zhao, H., & Liu, W. (2020). Managerial coaching and subordinates' workplace well-being: A moderated mediation study. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12280
[13]. 13.Mohamad, N. I., Sanusi, S., & Othman, A. S. (2024). The influence of managerial coaching on employee expertise: Promoting work motivation as a mediator. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 9(4), 565–578.
[14]. 14.Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363–423.
[15]. 15.Cao, T. T., & Le, P. B. (2024). Impacts of transformational leadership on organizational change capability: a two-path mediating role of trust in leadership. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 33(2), 157–173.
[16]. 16.Yuan, Y., Kong, H., Baum, T., Liu, Y., Liu, C., Bu, N., Wang, K., & Yin, Z. (2022). Transformational leadership and trust in leadership impacts on employee commitment. Tourism Review, 77(5), 1385–1399.
[17]. 17.Joo, B.-K. (B)., Yoon, S. K., & Galbraith, D. (2023). The effects of organizational trust and empowering leadership on group conflict: Psychological safety as a mediator. Organization Management Journal, 20(1), 4–16.
[18]. 18.Mitson, R., Qin, S., & Men, R. L. (2024). The value of employee trust during turbulent times: Exploring vigilant leadership communication and employee psychological well-being. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 18(3), 228–248.
[19]. 19.Men, L. R., Qin, Y. S., Fitzsimmons, A. B., DiStaso, M. W., & Heffron, E. (2024). An integrated framework for exploring the impact of leadership communication on employee trust during disruptive crisis times. International Journal of Business Communication, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884241226567
[20]. 20.González-Cánovas, A., Trillo, A., Bretones, F. D., & Fernández-Millán, J. M. (2024). Trust in leadership and perceptions of justice in fostering employee commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1359581.
[21]. 21.Viitala, R., Laiho, M., Pajuoja, M., & Henttonen, K. (2023). Managerial coaching and employees’ innovative work behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503231221693
[22]. 22.Podder, P., & Saha, H. (2024). Mediating effects of occupational self-efficacy on the relationship of authentic leadership and job engagement. Business Analyst Journal, 45(1), 41–59.
[23]. 23.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
[24]. 24.Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (pp. 153–179). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
[25]. 25.Tanskanen, J., Mäkelä, L., & Viitala, R. (2018). Linking managerial coaching and leader-member exchange on work engagement and performance. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2419–2442.
[26]. 26.Kim, J. S., Park, J. G., & Yoon, S. W. (2024). How does leaders' managerial coaching impact followers' in-role and extra-role behaviors? The mediating roles of intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. Evidence-based HRM, 12(4), 799–815.
[27]. 27.Kang, E. (2020). The relationship between reinforcement of employee’s customer-centric behavior and employee motivation factors. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(7), 338–347.
[28]. 28.Jokanović Đajić, M., Ciric Lalic, D., Vujičić, M. D., Stankov, U., Petrovic, M., & Đurić, Ž. (2024). Development and validation of the project manager skills scale (PMSS): An empirical approach. Heliyon, 10(3), e25055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25055
[29]. 29.Gutiérrez-Puertas, L., Márquez-Hernández, V. V., Ortíz-Rodríguez, B., Aguilera-Manrique, G., & Gutiérrez-Puertas, V. (2023). Effective communication between nursing professionals and patients after the implementation of mask-wearing requirements in the clinical setting: A cross-sectional study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 25(4), 676–684.
[30]. 30.Musheke, M. M., & Phiri, J. (2021). The effects of effective communication on organizational performance based on the systems theory. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9, 659–671.
[31]. 31.Ayob, A. (2017). Effective communication in business. Journal of Modern Languages, 9(1), 105–109.
[32]. 32.Arendt, J. F. W., Pircher Verdorfer, A., & Kugler, K. G. (2019). Mindfulness and leadership: Communication as a behavioral correlate of leader mindfulness and its effect on follower satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 414486.
[33]. 33.Sharma, D., & Jindal, P. (2024). Neuroleadership through effective communication in organization and employee development. In Neuroleadership development and effective communication in modern business (Chapter 6). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
[34]. 34.Daud, A., Djunaedi, Marliani, L., Kurniawanto, H., Fatmasari, & Purnama, C. (2025). Analysis of factors that impact self-efficacy in terms of locus control learning orientation and work environment characteristics. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 1380–1393.
[35]. 35.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[36]. 36.Khan, H., Rehmat, M., Butt, T. H., Farooqi, S., & Asim, J. (2020). Impact of transformational leadership on work performance, burnout and social loafing: a mediation model. Future Business Journal, 6, 40.
[37]. 37.Rittenberg, B. S. P., Holland, C. W., Barnhart, G. E., Gaudreau, S. M., & Neyedli, H. F. (2024). Trust with increasing and decreasing reliability. Human Factors, 66(12), 2569–2589.
[38]. 38.Dillard, J. P. (1990). The nature and substance of goals in tactical communication. In M. J. Cody & M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 70–90). Multilingual Matters.
[39]. 39.Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
[40]. 40.Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Wiley & Sons.
[41]. 41.Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389–444). Allyn and Bacon.
[42]. 42.Raosoft, I. (2010). Raosoft sample size calculator. http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
[43]. 43.Park, S., McLean, G. N., & Yang, B. (2008). Revision and validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skills. U.S. Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501617.pdf
[44]. 44.Peterson, D. B., & Little, B. (2005). Invited reaction: Development and initial validation of an instrument measuring managerial coaching skill. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 179–184.
[45]. 45.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
[46]. 46.Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319.
[47]. 47.Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.






