Environment and Social Psychology

Empowering learning engagement in higher education with active learning experiences in STEM classrooms

Michael Angelo A. Legarde

Graduate Education Department, Palawan State University, Puerto Princesa City 5300, Philippines

Mercibelle Del Mundo

College of Engineering and Technology, Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

Jason V. Chavez

School of Business Administration, Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

Ayessa Bahang Jailani

Senior High School Department, Mindanao State University-Sulu, Capitol Site, Patikul, Sulu 7401, Philippines

Kier P. Dela Calzada

Extension Program Delivering Unit, Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

Aldrin Rey C. Quisay

College of Education and Liberal Arts, Zamboanga State College of Marine Sciences and Technology, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

Kia P. Piñero-Abdurajak

College of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Zamboanga State College of Marine Sciences and Technology, Zamboanga City 7000, Philippines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.3878

Keywords: Academic boredom; active learning; instructional attitude; student engagement; teacher enthusiasm

---

Abstract

Students often feel disengaged in class discussions due to ineffective teaching methods, such as passive lectures and over-reliance on learning materials, which lack interactive elements like group work or open discussions. Repetitive, simplistic content further diminishes interest by failing to challenge them. Uninspired teaching attitudes and outdated, irrelevant learning materials undermine motivation and fail to connect studies with real-world applications. This paper explored how active learning experiences in classrooms encourage students to participate in class activities and discussions. Fifteen science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) college students were purposely sampled for this study. Their experiences in learning STEM-related subjects were explored through one-on-one interviews, allowing for the collection of detailed narratives. The findings revealed that several active learning strategies effectively engaged students in the learning process. The relevance of learning materials to real-world contexts significantly enhanced engagement, as students valued instructors who connected theoretical concepts to practical applications and current events. The flipped classroom approach also emerged as a powerful method, enabling students to transition from passive learning to active participation through discussions and hands-on activities during class presentations. Teachers’ energy and passion for the subject not only enlivened even challenging or monotonous material but also inspired students to engage more actively, which transforms the classroom dynamic into one of motivation and intellectual curiosity. Timely and constructive feedback was essential in maintaining student engagement, as it guided improvement, encouraged reflection, and supported a collaborative learning atmosphere. Rather than passively receiving information, students actively engage through activities such as discussions, problem-solving, hands-on tasks, and group projects.

---

References

[1]. 1.Vale, I. P., & Barbosa, A. (2020). Gallery Walk: an active strategy for solving problems with multiple solutions. Journal of Mathematics Education , 17 , e020018-e020018.

[2]. 2.Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2023). Active learning strategies for effective mathematics teaching and learning. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 573-588.

[3]. 3.Edwards, S. (2015). Active learning in the middle grades: This article offers examples of developing students’ participation as a central tenet of ideal middle level education that is intellectually active, socially active, and physically active. Middle School Journal, 46(5), 26-32.

[4]. 4.Lucke, T., Dunn, P. K., & Christie, M. (2017). Activating learning in engineering education using ICT and the concept of ‘Flipping the classroom’. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 45-57.

[5]. 5.Cunningham, C. A. (2021). John Dewey and curriculum studies. In the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

[6]. 6.Li, 2020 (reference not found in References list)

[7]. 7.Abdurasul, R.T., Samilo, P.J.E., Cabiles, N.V.A., et al., 2025. Preservation Habits towards Sustainable Use of the Filipino Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(5): 358–372. DOI:

[8]. 8.Adalia, H.G., Españo, A.C., Eustaquio, M.T.L., et al., 2025. Perspectives on Superiority Humor towards Grammatical Errors. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(8): 72–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.8425Affandi, G., Hadi, C., & Nawangsari, N. A. (2024). Academic Boredom in School Context: A Systematic Scoping Review. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Psychology, ISPsy 2023, 18-19 July 2023, Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia.

[9]. 9.Hendrickson, P. (2021). Effect of active learning techniques on student excitement, interest, and self-efficacy. Journal of Political Science Education, 17(2), 311-325.

[10]. 10.Bangahan, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[11]. 11.Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on psychological science, 7(5), 482-495.

[12]. 12.Macklem, G. L. (2014). The academic emotion of boredom: The elephant in the classroom. In Boredom in the classroom: addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[13]. 13.Zeng, Y., Wei, J., Zhang, W., & Sun, N. (2024). Online class-related boredom and perceived academic achievement among college students: the roles of gender and school motivation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-10.

[14]. 14.Berry, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[15]. 15.Chavez, J. V. (2022). Narratives of bilingual parents on the real-life use of English language: Materials for English language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journals, 13(3).

[16]. 16.Eustaquio, M.T.L., Mohammad, F.O., Cuilan, J.T., et al., 2025. Self-motivation and personalized strategies for enhancing English language proficiency in professional contexts. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(7): 611–624. DOI:

[17]. 17.Mills, 20 (reference not found in References list)

[18]. 18.Weybright, E. H., Schulenberg, J., & Caldwell, L. L. (2020). More bored today than yesterday? National trends in adolescent boredom from 2008 to 2017. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(3), 360-365.

[19]. 19.Affandi, 2024 (reference not found in References list)

[20]. 20.But, 2023 (reference not found in References list)

[21]. 21.Tam, K. Y., Van Tilburg, W. A., Chan, C. S., Igou, E. R., & Lau, H. (2021). Attention drifting in and out: The boredom feedback model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(3), 251-272.

[22]. 22.Zhao, Y., & Yang, L. (2022). Examining the relationship between perceived teacher support and students’ academic engagement in foreign language learning: Enjoyment and boredom as mediators. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 987554.

[23]. 23.Hunte, R., Cooper, S. B., Taylor, I. M., Nevill, M. E., & Boat, R. (2022). Boredom, motivation, and perceptions of pain: Mechanisms to explain the effects of self-control exertion on subsequent physical performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 63, 102265.

[24]. 24.Sharp, J. G., Sharp, J. C., & Young, E. (2020). Academic boredom, engagement and the achievement of undergraduate students at university: A review and synthesis of relevant literature. Research Papers in Education, 35(2), 144-184.

[25]. 25.Radeljić, M., Selimović, H., Opić, S., Mulaosmanović, N., & Selimović, Z. (2020). The impact of creative teaching approach on reducing boredom in teaching process. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 22(1), 143-173.

[26]. 26.Dragoslavić, M., & Bilić, V. (2021). Adolescents’ academic boredom as predictor of peer violence. Pedagogika, 142(2), 140-165.

[27]. 27.Anakin, M., & McDowell, A. (2021). Enhancing students’ experimental knowledge with active learning in a pharmaceutical science laboratory. Pharmacy Education, 21, 29-38.

[28]. 28.Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257.

[29]. 29.Vîrgă, 2022 (reference not found in References list)

[30]. 30.O'Dea, M. K., Igou, E. R., van Tilburg, W. A., & Kinsella, E. L. (2022). Self-compassion predicts less boredom: The role of meaning in life. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 111360.

[31]. 31.Qin, W. (2022). EFL teachers’ immediacy and professional commitment on students’ boredom: a review of literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 808311.

[32]. 32.Bieg, S., Dresel, M., Goetz, T., & Nett, U. E. (2022). Teachers' enthusiasm and humor and its' lagged relationships with students' enjoyment and boredom-A latent trait-state-approach. Learning and Instruction, 81, 101579.

[33]. 33.Hirvonen, 2020 (reference not found in References list)

[34]. 34.Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

[35]. 35.Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., ... & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483.

[36]. 36.Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.

[37]. 37.Garcia, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[38]. 38.Lotulung, M. S. D. (2023). Highschool student engagement in active learning classrooms. Journal on Education, 5(2), 2729-2741.

[39]. 39.Fernandez, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[40]. 40.Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 47(1), 61-79.

[41]. 41.Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advance in Physiology Education, 30, 159-167.

[42]. 42.Lamorinas, D.D., Luna, L.A., Lai, M.N.D., et al., 2025. A General Perspective on the Factors Influencing the Low Preferences of Gen Z College Students towards the Filipino Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(3): 451–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8482

[43]. 43.Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 82(3), 300-329.

[44]. 44.Michael, J., & Modell, H. I. (2003). Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn. Routledge.

[45]. 45.Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic medicine, 67(9), 557-65.

[46]. 46.Milem, 20 (reference not found in References list)

[47]. 47.Leon, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[48]. 48.Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. The Journal of higher education, 68(6), 599-623.

[49]. 49.Braxton, J. M., Milem, J. F., & Sullivan, A. S. (2000). The influence of active learning on the college student departure process: Toward a revision of Tinto’s theory. The journal of higher education, 71(5), 569-590.

[50]. 50.Hunter, A., & Eastwood, J. D. (2018). Does state boredom cause failures of attention? Examining the relations between trait boredom, state boredom, and sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 2483-2492.

[51]. 51.Bench, S. W., & Lench, H. C. (2013). On the function of boredom. Behavioral sciences, 3(3), 459-472.

[52]. 52.Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and brain sciences, 36(6), 661-679.

[53]. 53.Ohlmeier, S., Finkielsztein, M., & Pfaff, H. (2020). Why we are bored: Towards a sociological approach to boredom. Sociological Spectrum, 40(3), 208-225.

[54]. 54.Reamico, 2025 (reference not found in References list)

[55]. 55.Pekrun, R. (2018). Control-value theory: A social-cognitive approach to achievement emotions. Big theories revisited, 2, 162-190.

[56]. 56.Happell, B., Bennetts, W., Platania‐Phung, C., & Tohotoa, J. (2016). Exploring the Scope of Consumer Participation in Mental Health Nursing Education: Perspectives From Nurses and Consumers. Perspectives in psychiatric care, 52(3).

[57]. 57.Polit, D. F. (2008). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Lippin cott.

[58]. 58.Chavez, J. V., & Ceneciro, C. C. (2023). Discourse analysis on same-sex relationship through the lens of religious and social belief systems. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1).

[59]. 59.Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science, 2(1), 17-41.

[60]. 60.Casula, M., Rangarajan, N., & Shields, P. (2021). The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research. Quality & Quantity, 55(5), 1703-1725.

[61]. 61.Szabelska, A., Pollet, T. V., Dujols, O., Klein, R. A., & IJzerman, H. (2021). A tutorial for exploratory research: An eight-step approach.

[62]. 62.Chavez, J. V., Garil, B. A., Padrique, C. B., Askali, S. T., & Indama, A. C. (2024). Assessing innovative and responsive young leaders in public service: Lens from community clientele. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9).

[63]. 63.Singh, A. (2021). An introduction to experimental and exploratory research. Available at SSRN 3789360.

[64]. 64.Hunter, D., McCallum, J., & Howes, D. (2019). Defining exploratory-descriptive qualitative (EDQ) research and considering its application to healthcare. Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 4(1).

[65]. 65.Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach.

[66]. 66.Olawale, S. R., Chinagozi, O. G., & Joe, O. N. (2023). Exploratory research design in management science: A review of literature on conduct and application. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 1384-1395.

[67]. 67.Subedi, K. R. (2021). Determining the Sample in Qualitative Research. Online Submission, 4, 1-13.

[68]. 68.Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J. A., & Lenton, S. (2015). Hidden populations, online purposive sampling, and external validity: Taking off the blindfold. Field methods, 27(1), 3-21.

[69]. 69.Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.

[70]. 70.Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.

[71]. 71.Jumalon, R. L., Chavez, J. V., Kairan, M. J., Abbas, K. D. A., Radjuni, A. J., Kadil, H. L. S., ... & Albani, S. E. (2024). Analysis on the implementation of inclusive classroom: Perception on compliances and obstructions of selected public-school teachers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9).

[72]. 72.Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University.

[73]. 73.Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Research Methods in Social Relations. London: Thomson Learning. Inc. UK.

[74]. 74.Gani, A., Imtiaz, N., Rathakrishnan, M., & Krishnasamy, H. N. (2020). A pilot test for establishing validity and reliability of qualitative interview in the blended learning English proficiency course. Journal of critical reviews, 7(05), 140-143.

[75]. 75.Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

[76]. 76.Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English linguistics research, 3(1), 39-45.

[77]. 77.Barrett, D., & Twycross, A. (2018). Data collection in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 21(3), 63-64.

[78]. 78.Kallio, A. A. (2015). Factional stories: Creating a methodological space for collaborative reflection and inquiry in music education research. Research Studies in Music Education, 37(1), 3-20.

[79]. 79.Elhami, A., & Khoshnevisan, B. (2022). Conducting an Interview in Qualitative Research: The Modus Operandi. Mextesol Journal, 46(1), 1-7.

[80]. 80.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.

[81]. 81.Ng, 2005 (reference not found in References list)

[82]. 82.McGehee, N. G. (2012). Interview techniques. In Handbook of research methods in tourism. Edward Elgar Publishing.

[83]. 83.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and psychotherapy research, 21(1), 37-4

[84]. 84.Finlay, L. (2021). Thematic analysis: the ‘good’, the ‘bad’ and the ‘ugly’. European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103-116.

[85]. 85.Langridge, D. (2004). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology. Harlow: Pearson.

[86]. 86.Jebreen, I. (2012). Using inductive approach as research strategy in requirements engineering. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 1(2), 162-173.

[87]. 87.Shaw, R. (2010). Embedding reflexivity within experiential qualitative psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 7(3), 233-243.

[88]. 88.Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25.

[89]. 89.Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing.

[90]. 90.Dzaiy, A. H. S., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(4), 328-351.

[91]. 91.Guo, Z., & Chang, Y. C. (2023). A Conceptual Research of College Students' Boredom, Learning Attitude, Academic Achievement, and Behavior. Educational Research and Reviews, 18(4), 63-72.

[92]. 92.Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18, 315-341.

[93]. 93.Perry, R. P., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R. H., & Pelletier, S. T. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of educational psychology, 93(4), 776.

[94]. 94.Borgonovi, F., Pokropek, M., & Pokropek, A. (2023). Relations between academic boredom, academic achievement, ICT use, and teacher enthusiasm among adolescents. Computers & Education, 200, 104807.

[95]. 95.Geng, L., Zheng, Q., Zhong, X., & Li, L. (2020). Longitudinal relations between students’ engagement and their perceived relationships with teachers and peers in a Chinese secondary school. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 171-181.

[96]. 96.Turner, J. C., & Christensen, A. L. (2020). Using state space grids to analyze teacher–student interaction over time. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 256-266.

[97]. 97.Durgungoz, A., & Durgungoz, F. C. (2022). “We are much closer here”: exploring the use of WhatsApp as a learning environment in a secondary school mathematics class. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 423-444.

[98]. 98.Pennings, H. J., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C., van der Want, A. C., & van Tartwijk, J. (2018). Interpersonal adaptation in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 55, 41-57.

[99]. 99.Tutal, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2023). Active Learning Improves Academic Achievement and Learning Retention in K-12 Settings: A Meta-Analysis. Journal on School Educational Technology (JSCH), 18(3).

[100]. 100.Bangahan S, Daguplo MGL, Hayudini MAA, et al. Role of tourism branding communication in shaping destination perceptions and visitor behavior engagement. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(6): 3272 doi:10.59429/esp.v10i6.3272

[101]. 101.Berry EB, Chavez JV, Gumpal BR, et al. A qualitative study on the effects of self-doubt on public speaking and audience reception among senior high school students. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(8): 3840 doi:10.59429/esp.v10i8.3840

[102]. 102.Chavez, J. V., & Del Prado, R. T. (2023). Discourse analysis on online gender-based humor: Markers of normalization, tolerance, and lens of inequality. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 55-71.

[103]. 103.Chavez, J. V., Adalia, H. G., & Alberto, J. P. (2023). Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 1541-1541.

[104]. 104.Chavez, J. V., Libre, J. M., Gregorio, M. W., & Cabral, N. P. (2023). Human resource profiling for post-pandemic curriculum reconfiguration in higher education. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7(2), 1975.

[105]. 105.Chavez JV, Quinto JB, Samilo PJE, et al. Intentional learning styles and practices of parents towards their children: Strengthening discipline for language learning. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(8): 3830 doi:10.59429/esp.v10i8.3830

[106]. 106.Chavez JV, Samilo PJE, Cabiles NVA. How should parents balance the learning of Filipino and English at home?: Consistent teaching behaviors towards children. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(8): 3838 doi:10.59429/esp.v10i8.3838

[107]. 107.Clark, C. E. J., & Post, G. (2021). Preparation and synchronous participation improve student performance in a blended learning experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 187-199.

[108]. 108.Dagoy THS, Ariban AI, Chavez JV, et al. Discourse analysis on the teachers’ professional interest and integrity among teachers with multiple administrative functions. Environment and Social Psychology 2024; 9(12): 2521. Doi:10.59429/esp.v9i12.2521

[109]. 109.Fernandez CMB, Chavez JV, Jr. BFC, et al. Assessing the utilitarian value of economics and business on personal beliefs and practices among working students. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(5): 3228. Doi:10.59429/esp.v10i5.3228

[110]. 110.Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.(Original work published 1970). Ibrahim, A.(Autumn, 1999). Becming black: rap and hip-hop, race, gender, identity, and the politics of ESL learning. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 349-367.

[111]. 111.Garcia CS, Lastam JMP, Chavez JV, et al. Discourse analysis on learners halting their education due to early marriage. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(1): 2558. Doi:10.59429/esp.v10i1.2558

[112]. 112.Leon AJTD, Jumalon RL, Chavez JV, et al. Analysis on the implementation of inclusive classroom: Perception on compliances and obstructions of selected public-school teachers. Environment and Social Psychology. 2024; 9(9): 2537. Doi: 10.59429/esp.v9i9.2537

[113]. 113.Raffaelli, Q., Mills, C., & Christoff, K. (2018). The knowns and unknowns of boredom: A review of the literature. Experimental brain research, 236, 2451-2462.

[114]. 114.Reamico DMD, Bangahan S, Hayudini MAA, et al. Strategizing marketing initiatives from tourism-seeking behaviors among travelers. Environment and Social Psychology 2025; 10(7): 3880 doi:10.59429/esp.v10i7.3880

[115]. 115.Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers College.