ESP-3892

Published

2025-07-28

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 7 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Thi Lua Mai, Nguyen Quang Vinh, Manh Hien Luc

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Thi Lua Mai, Nguyen Quang Vinh, & Manh Hien Luc. (2025). Knowledge management and research motivation in higher education: Exploring the moderating role of AI proficiency. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(7), ESP-3892. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3892

Knowledge management and research motivation in higher education: Exploring the moderating role of AI proficiency

Thi Lua Mai

University of Economics - Technology for Industries

Nguyen Quang Vinh

Thuongmai University

Manh Hien Luc

University of Labour and Social Affairs


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3892


Keywords: knowledge management; research motivation; research self-efficacy; AI proficiency; higher education; PLS-SEM

Abstract

In the context of higher education's growing emphasis on research productivity and digital transformation, this study investigates how knowledge management (KM) infrastructure and KM processes influence university lecturers’ research motivation, with research self-efficacy serving as a mediator and AI proficiency acting as a moderator. Drawing on Social Cognitive Theory and Task–Technology Fit Theory, a conceptual model was developed and empirically tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with data collected from 295 academic staff members at public and private universities in Vietnam. The findings reveal that both KM infrastructure and KM processes significantly enhance research motivation, both directly and indirectly through research self-efficacy. Moreover, AI proficiency not only has a direct positive effect on research motivation and self-efficacy but also strengthens the relationship between research self-efficacy and research motivation. These results underscore the critical importance of fostering institutional KM systems, cultivating psychological capabilities, and equipping faculty with digital competencies—particularly AI literacy—to drive sustainable academic engagement. The study offers theoretical contributions to the literature on knowledge management and academic motivation, as well as practical implications for higher education institutions aiming to build research-capable environments in the digital era.

References

[1]. 1.M. D. Santoro and P. E. Bierly, “Facilitators of knowledge transfer in university-industry collaborations: A knowledge-based perspective,” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 495–507, 2006.

[2]. 2.N. Salo, “Knowledge management in education in Indonesia: An Overview,” Global Journal of human social science, vol. 11, no. 1, 2011.

[3]. 3.S. S. Abu-Naser, M. J. Al Shobaki, and Y. M. Abu Amuna, “Knowledge Management Maturity in Universities and its Impact on Performance Excellence" Comparative study",” 2016.

[4]. 4.Đ. Đ. Anh and Đ. Lê Anh, “Quản trị tri thức của sinh viên trong các trường đại học trong bối cảnh kinh tế số,” Tạp chí Kinh tế và Phát triển, no. 301, pp. 83–92, 2022.

[5]. 5.N. Ngoc-Tan and A. Gregar, “Knowledge management and its impacts on organisational performance: An empirical research in public higher education institutions of Vietnam,” Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, vol. 18, no. 02, p. 1950015, 2019.

[6]. 6.N. M. Ngoc and N. H. Tien, “Quality of scientific research and world ranking of public and private universities in Vietnam,” International journal of public sector performance management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023.

[7]. 7.H. T. L. Nguyen, “A review of university research development in Vietnam from 1986 to 2019,” Higher education in market-oriented socialist Vietnam: New players, discourses, and practices, pp. 63–86, 2020.

[8]. 8.M. Franco and H. Haase, “University–industry cooperation: Researchers’ motivations and interaction channels,” Journal of Engineering and technology Management, vol. 36, pp. 41–51, 2015.

[9]. 9.J. McGurk and A. Baron, “Knowledge management–time to focus on purpose and motivation,” Strategic HR Review, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 316–321, 2012.

[10]. 10.M. M. Paladhi and V. Maruthaveeran, “Evaluating AI literacy proficiency among LIS researchers in ASEAN,” Library hi tech news, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 6–8, 2024.

[11]. 11.D. Zhao, “The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: An analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), pp. 1–32, 2024.

[12]. 12.A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory of personality,” Handbook of personality, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 154–196, 1999.

[13]. 13.L. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi, and K. Umemoto, “A theory of organizational knowledge creation,” International journal of technology Management, vol. 11, no. 7–8, pp. 833–845, 1996.

[14]. 14.A. D. Smith, “Knowledge management strategies: A multi‐case study,” Journal of knowledge management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 6–16, 2004.

[15]. 15.D. L. Miltiadis and P. Athanasia, “Project management as a knowledge management primer: the learning infrastructure in knowledge-intensive organizations: projects as knowledge transformations and beyond,” The Learning Organisation, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 237–250, 2003.

[16]. 16.N. T. Pham et al., “Research on knowledge management models at universities using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP),” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020809.

[17]. 17.M. Lashkary, E. K. Matin, B. H. Kashani, and K. Kasraei, “Investigating the knowledge management implementation in distance education system in Iran,” in Information and Knowledge Management, 2012, pp. 61–69.

[18]. 18.A. Alzghoul and K. M. Aboalganam, “Investigating the effect of knowledge management systems on university performance: The interplay of intellectual and human capital,” Knowledge and Performance Management, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 93, 2025.

[19]. 19.L. D. Basileo, B. Otto, M. Lyons, N. Vannini, and M. D. Toth, “The role of self-efficacy, motivation, and perceived support of students’ basic psychological needs in academic achievement,” in Frontiers in Education, Frontiers Media SA, 2024, p. 1385442.

[20]. 20.S. Bećirović, E. Polz, and I. Tinkel, “Exploring students’ AI literacy and its effects on their AI output quality, self-efficacy, and academic performance,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 29, 2025.

[21]. 21.H. Wu and H. Wang, “Is being intrinsically motivated a mixed blessing? The differential effects of daily intrinsic motivation on employee functioning,” Tour Manag, vol. 107, p. 105073, 2025.

[22]. 22.A. Kianto, M. Vanhala, and P. Heilmann, “The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction,” Journal of knowledge management, 2016.

[23]. 23.S. P. Singh and H. K. Sharma, “Impact of work motivation on job satisfaction of teachers in professional education,” The International Journal of Research Publication’s. Research Journal of social science and management, vol. 6, no. 05, pp. 90–96, 2016.

[24]. 24.B. Stensaker, P. Maassen, M. Borgan, M. Oftebro, and B. Karseth, “Use, updating and integration of ICT in higher education: Linking purpose, people and pedagogy,” High Educ (Dordr), vol. 54, pp. 417–433, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9006-3.

[25]. 25.C. N. L. Tan, “Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: the role of knowledge management,” High Educ (Dordr), vol. 71, pp. 525–556, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9922-6.

[26]. 26.M. Nili, A. N. Isfahani, and M. H. Tanhaei, “Knowledge sharing and its impact on employees’ motivation,” International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 142–152, 2013.

[27]. 27.K. Levecque, F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and L. Gisle, “Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students,” Res Policy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 868–879, 2017.

[28]. 28.Y. Owusu-Agyeman, O. Larbi-Siaw, B. Brenya, and A. Anyidoho, “An embedded fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for evaluating lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and learning,” Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 55, pp. 46–57, 2017.

[29]. 29.B. Hemmings and R. Kay, “Journal ratings and the publications of Australian academics,” Issues in Educational Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 234–243, 2010.

[30]. 30.R. Fullwood, J. Rowley, and J. McLean, “Exploring the factors that influence knowledge sharing between academics,” J Furth High Educ, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1051–1063, 2019.

[31]. 31.B. D. Lund, T. Wang, N. R. Mannuru, B. Nie, S. Shimray, and Z. Wang, “ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing,” J Assoc Inf Sci Technol, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 570–581, 2023.

[32]. 32.S. Nah, J. McNealy, J. H. Kim, and J. Joo, “Communicating artificial intelligence (AI): Theory, research, and practice,” 2020, Taylor & Francis.

[33]. 33.Y. K. Dwivedi, A. Sharma, N. P. Rana, M. Giannakis, P. Goel, and V. Dutot, “Evolution of artificial intelligence research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research topics, trends, and future directions,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 192, p. 122579, 2023.

[34]. 34.D. L. Goodhue and R. L. Thompson, “Task-technology fit and individual performance,” MIS quarterly, pp. 213–236, 1995.

[35]. 35.R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions,” Contemp Educ Psychol, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2000, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

[36]. 36.A. Fiedler and J. Döpke, “Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses,” International Review of Economics Education, vol. 49, p. 100321, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2024.100321.

[37]. 37.Y. H. Yeo et al., “Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Clin Mol Hepatol, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 721, 2023, doi: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0098.

[38]. 38.J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications, 2021.

[39]. 39.B. Hemmings and R. Kay, “Research self‐efficacy, publication output, and early career development,” International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 562–574, 2010, doi: 10.1108/09513541011080028.

[40]. 40.M. Jofreh, A. Yasini, H. F. Dehsorkhi, and A. Hayat, “The relationship between EFL teachers’ quality of work life and job motivation,” Middle East J Sci Res, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 338–346, 2013, doi: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.3.1748.

[41]. 41.J. C. Nunnally and I. H. Bernstein, Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.

[42]. 42.P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J.-Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.,” Journal of applied psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, p. 879, 2003.

[43]. 43.C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.

[44]. 44.J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, and R. C. M. & S. M. Henseler J., “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J Acad Mark Sci, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015.

[45]. 45.O. Götz, K. Liehr-Gobbers, and M. Krafft, “Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach,” in Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications, Springer, 2009, pp. 691–711.

[46]. 46.J. Cohen, “1988: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,” 1988.

[47]. 47.W. W. Chin, “Bootstrap cross-validation indices for PLS path model assessment,” in Handbook of partial least squares, Springer, 2010, pp. 83–97.

[48]. 48.J. F. Hair Jr, G. Tomas. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray, Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. 2021.

[49]. M. Carvache-Franco, O. Regalado-Pezúa, O. Carvache-Franco, and W. Carvache-Franco, “Sociodemographic aspects, satisfaction, loyalty, and motivations in religious tourism,” Cogent Soc Sci, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2401145, 2024.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com