Published
2025-07-20
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xi Luo, Hsuan-Po Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Impact of college students' perceived classroom management on their learning strategies: The mediating effect of academic emotions and the moderating effect of growth mindset
Xi Luo
1 Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand 2 Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, 330031, China
Hsuan-Po Wang
Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i7.3896
Keywords: college students; classroom management; learning strategies; academic emotions; growth mindset
Abstract
College students in Jiangxi Province, China, are the research object in this study, the purpose of which is to use the control value theory to explore the impact of perceived classroom management on students’ learning strategies, with a focus on the mediating role of academic emotions and the moderating role of a growth mindset. According to the results, the perceived classroom management of college students in Jiangxi Province, China, has a significant and positive impact on their learning strategies, academic emotions play a significant mediating role between these two factors, and a growth mindset plays a significant moderating role between them. It is suggested by the results of this study that colleges and universities should improve teachers' classroom management capabilities, pay close attention to the stimulation and maintenance of college students' positive emotions, and strengthen the cultivation of their growth mindset to effectively promote the optimisation of their learning strategies and improve their learning efficiency.
References
[1]. 1.Calin, MF, Sandu, ML, & Petcu, M. (2022). Evaluating learning strategies in high school students. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 28 (1), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v28i1.5901
[2]. 2.Saqr, M., Matcha, W., Uzir, NA, Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., & López-Pernas, S. (2023). Transferring effective learning strategies across learning contexts matters: A study in problem-based learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 39 (3), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8303
[3]. 3.Hariri, H., Karwan, DH, Haenilah, EY, Rini, R., & Suparman, U. (2021). Motivation and learning strategies: Student motivation affects student learning strategies. European Journal of Educational Research , 10 (1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.39
[4]. 4.Charbonnier, E., Le Vigouroux, S., Puechlong, C., Montalescot, L., Goncalves, A., Baussard, L., Gisclard, B., Philippe, AG, & Lespiau, F. (2023). The effect of intervention approaches of emotion regulation and learning strategies on students' learning and mental health. The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing , 60(2) , Article e1159962. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00469580231 15 9962
[5]. 5.Endres, T., Leber, J., Böttger, C., Rovers, S., & Renkl, A. (2021). Improving lifelong learning by fostering students' learning strategies at university. Psychology Learning & Teaching , 20 (1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 14757 2572095 2025
[6]. 6.Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Vanthournout, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Analyzing change in learning strategies over time: A comparison of three statistical techniques. Studies in Educational Evaluation , 39 (1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.10.006
[7]. 7.Biwer, F., de Bruin, A., & Persky, A. (2023). Study smart – impact of a learning strategy training on students' study behavior and academic performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education , 28 (1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10149-z
[8]. 8.Cayubit, R. F. O. (2022). Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09382-x
[9]. 9.Muna, F., Nurhuda, A., Maghfuroh, A., & Lathif, N. M. (2024). Conceptions of classroom management in education. Jurnal BELAINDIKA, 6(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v6i1.140
[10]. 10.Vairamidou, A., & Stravakou, P. (2020). Teachers’ perspective on classroom management in primary education-A case study. Journal of Education and Human Development, 9(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v9n1a13
[11]. 11.Hamdy Ragab, M., Mohamed Hussien, N., & Saad Soliman, E. (2022). Classroom management and its relation to Students’ academic performance as perceived by academic teaching staff and nursing students. Journal of Nursing Science Benha University, 3(1), 553–568. https://doi.org/10. 21608/jnsbu. 2022.215173
[12]. 12.Palomero-Gallagher, N., & Amunts, K. (2022). A short review on emotion processing: A lateralized network of neuronal networks. Brain Structure and Function, 227(2), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02331-7
[13]. 13.Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (pp. 3–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-001
[14]. 14.Izard, C. E. (2010). The many meanings/aspects of emotion: Definitions, functions, activation, and regulation. Emotion Review, 2(4), 363–370. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 175 4073910374661
[15]. 15.Agatinto, Maria. Luz. O., & Ado, Neil. Ryan. B. (2024). Metacognitive strategies and achievement emotions as predictors of students’ academic self-efficacy in learning science. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15837
[16]. 16.Chen, X., & Lu, L. (2022). How classroom management and instructional clarity relate to students’ academic emotions in Hong Kong and England: A multi-group analysis based on the control-value theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 98, Article e102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102183
[17]. 17.Pekrun, R. (2024). Control-value theory: from achievement emotion to a general theory of human emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 36(3), Article e83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7
[18]. 18.Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1745691618 804166
[19]. 19.Claro, S., & Loeb, S. (2024). Students with growth mindset learn more in school: Evidence from California’s CORE school districts. educational researcher, 53(7), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.3102/001318 9X241242393
[20]. 20.Zarrinabadi, N., & Lou, N. M. (2022). Mindsets in language learning and teaching: An introduction to the special issue. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(3), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2080955
[21]. 21.Miu, A., & Yeager, D. (2015). Preventing depressive symptoms by teaching adolescents that people can change: Nine-month effects of a brief incremental theory of personality intervention. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), Article e48317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614548317
[22]. 22.Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10. 1037/ amp0000794
[23]. 23.Marder, J., Thiel, F., & Göllner, R. (2023). Classroom management and students’ mathematics achievement: The role of students’ disruptive behavior and teacher classroom management. Learning and Instruction, 86, Article e101746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101746
[24]. 24.Iheoma, N. E., & Uchenna, O. P. (2020). Effective classroom management: A panacea for enhancing students learning experience and satisfaction in higher education. British Journal of Education, 8(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10. 37745/bje/ vol8. no1.pp10-19.2020
[25]. 25.Schiefele, U. (2017). Classroom management and mastery-oriented instruction as mediators of the effects of teacher motivation on student motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.004
[26]. 26.Bolkan, S. (2016). The importance of instructor clarity and its effect on student learning: Facilitating elaboration by reducing cognitive load. Communication Reports, 29(3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1067708
[27]. 27.Ljusberg, A. (2011). The structured classroom. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110902763433
[28]. 28.Jiménez, L., García, A.-J., López-Cepero, J., & Saavedra, F.-J. (2018). The brief-ACRA scale on learning strategies for university students. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2017.03.001
[29]. 29.Nugroho, R. A. (2016). The use of microstrategies in students’ translation: A study on classroom translation process and product. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), Article e316. https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v2i1.316
[30]. 30.Papleontiou-louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development, 7(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530300200184
[31]. 31.Panayiotou, M., Humphrey, N., & Wigelsworth, M. (2019). An empirical basis for linking social and emotional learning to academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2019.01.009
[32]. 32.Marashi, H., & Assgar, F. (2019). EFL teachers’ effective classroom management and learners’ anxiety and learning strategies. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2019.120698
[33]. 33.Batool, S., Bhatti, R. U., & Waseem, M. (2023). Impact of classroom management strategies on academic achievements of students at the elementary level. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 4(2), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2023.4214
[34]. 34.Jaramillo, A., & Ermann, M. (2012). Noise in the classroom. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 11(1), Article e015005. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4772719
[35]. 35.Ennis, R. P., Lane, K. L., & Oakes, W. P. (2018). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction: Self-monitoring in an elementary resource classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(3), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X. 2017. 1408055
[36]. 36.Noviyanti, A. K., & Setyaningtyas, E. W. (2017). Partisipasi pembelajaran siswa dalam pembelajaran dengan classroom rules. Prasasti: Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.10071
[37]. 37.Nasir, S., Mustafa, S., & Ahmad, M. (2022). Increasing learning outcomes through the student team heroic leadership and provision of structured tasks strategies. Edukasi: Jurnal pendidikan dan pengajaran, 9(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.19109/ ejpp. v9i1. 11680
[38]. 38.Xu, X., & Gong, S. (2009). Academic emotions and its influencing factors. Advances in Psychological Science, 17(1), 92–97. https://journal.psych.ac.cn/ adps/EN/Y2009/V17/I01/92
[39]. 39.Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
[40]. 40.Williams-Johnson, M., Cross, D., Hong, J., Aultman, L., Osbon, J., & Schutz, P. (2008). “There are no emotions in math”: How teachers approach emotions in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 110(8), 1574–1610. https://doi.org/10. 1177/016146 810811000801
[41]. 41.Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0034654307310317
[42]. 42.Kumschick, I. R., Tschopp, C., Troesch, L. M., & Tettenborn, A. (2024). Disruption management interacts with positive and negative emotions in the classroom: Results from a simulation-based study. Education Sciences, 14(9), Article e966. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090966
[43]. 43.Kumari, M., & Biswas, D. S. (2024). Classroom management strategies and their influence on student social behavior. International Journal of Humanities, Engineering, Science and Management, 5(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.59364/ ijhesm.v5i1.272
[44]. 44.Howley, M. (2015). Structured teaching and eclectic classroom practice for children with autism in special schools: A case of mindful blending [Doctoral dissertation, University of Northampton]. Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research. http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/7847/
[45]. 45.Hu, Y., Fang, C., Wu, J., Mi, L., & Dai, P. (2024). Investigating the interrelationship among academic emotions, classroom engagement, and self-efficacy in the context of EFL learning in smart classrooms in China. Australian Journal of Psychology, 76(1), Article e2300460. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00049530.2023.2300460
[46]. 46.Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), Article e76. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s1 2909-020-01995-9
[47]. 47.Zhang, C.-M., Liu, H.-S., Chen, J.-J., Xu, L., & Wang, Z.-X. (2017). The relationship among previous academic achievement, academic motivation and strategies: The mediating effect of academic emotions. Psychological Science, 40(6), 1365-1371. https://jps.ecnu.edu.cn/EN/Y2017/V40/I6/1365
[48]. 48.Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi. org/ 10. 1037/ a0033546
[49]. 49.Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article e1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
[50]. 50.Palomero-Gallagher, N., & Amunts, K. (2022). A short review on emotion processing: A lateralized network of neuronal networks. Brain Structure and Function, 227(2), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02331-7
[51]. 51.Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10648-006-9029-9
[52]. 52.Mayer, R. E. (1988). Learning strategies: An overview. In C. E. Weinstein, E. T. Goetz, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Learning and study strategies (pp. 11–22). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-742460-6.50008-6
[53]. 53.Hosan, M. S., Weiyan, C., & Hosan, M. S. (2022). Classroom management in primary schools of Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. International Journal of Education, Learning and Development, 10(9), 19–54. https://doi.org/10.37745/ ijeld. 2013/vol10n91954
[54]. 54.Rammstedt, B., Grüning, D. J., & Lechner, C. M. (2022). Measuring growth mindset: Validation of a three-item and a single-item scale in adolescents and adults. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,40(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000735
[55]. 55.Song, J., Kim, S., & Bong, M. (2020). Controllability attribution as a mediator in the effect of mindset on achievement goal adoption following failure. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article e2943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02943
[56]. 56.Stanley, C., Heo, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Wanzek, J. (2023). Direct impact of mindset on reading-based outcomes in upper elementary students with reading difficulties. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article e1301957. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc. 2023.1301957
[57]. 57.Brandisauskiene, A., Buksnyte-Marmiene, L., Daugirdiene, A., Cesnaviciene, J., Jarasiunaite-Fedosejeva, G., Kemeryte-Ivanauskiene, E., & Nedzinskaite-Maciuniene, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviour and learning strategies applied by students: The role of students’ growth mindset and classroom management in low-SES-context schools. Sustainability, 14(13), Article e7664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137664
[58]. 58.Sudman, S. (1976). Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2919043
[59]. 59.McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 1082-989X.7.1.64
[60]. 60.Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/ 10.2753/ MTP1069-6679190202
[61]. 61.Koryczan, P. A., Piotrowski, P. P., Roj, W. M., Czerwiński, S. K., Atroszko, P. A. (2020). Validity and reliability of the polish version of the short hopelessness Scale. Health Psychology Report, 8(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10. 5114/hpr.2019.91428
[62]. 62.Shen, B., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Yu, X. (2023). Relationships between Chinese university EFL learners’ academic emotions and self-regulated learning strategies: A structural equation model. Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221144832
[63]. 63.Yip, M. C. W., & Chung, O. L. L. (2002). Relation of study strategies to the academic performance of Hong Kong university students. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 338–340. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.90.1.338
[64]. 64.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[65]. 65.Saxena, M., Bagga, T., Gupta, S., & Kaushik, N. (2022). Exploring common method variance in analytics research in the Indian context: A comparative study with known techniques. FIIB Business Review, 11(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145221099098
[66]. 66.Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., García Márquez, J. R., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., McClean, C. J., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
[67]. 67.MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s 15327906mbr3901_4
[68]. 68.Alegado, R. T. (2022). Perceived effects of classroom management strategies on students’ diversity conditions. Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 5(2), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.15
[69]. 69.Verdeflor, R. N., Tenedero, E. Q., Bordios, A. G., Panit, N. M., & Espinosa, C. G. (2024). Instructional management strategies for addressing low student engagement in mathematics. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(12), Article e3229. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.3229
[70]. 70.Hussain, M. A., Shahid, S., & Zaman, A. (2011). Anxiety and attitude of secondary school students towards foreign language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(2), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2011. 11.279
[71]. 71.Lazarides, R., & Buchholz, J. (2019). Student-perceived teaching quality: How is it related to different achievement emotions in mathematics classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 61(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2019.01.001
[72]. 72.Chao, M. M., Visaria, S., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Dehejia, R. (2017). Do rewards reinforce the growth mindset?: Joint effects of the growth mindset and incentive schemes in a field intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(10), 1402–1419. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000355
[73]. 73.Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10. 1177/ 13621688 20 933190
[74]. 74.Yang, Y. (2024). Relationship between inter-regional disparities in educational resources and economic development. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 35(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-704 8/35/20232053






