Published
2025-08-23
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nurshahira Ibrahim, Najibah Zakariya, Tengku Intan Suzila Tengku Sharif, Maziah Mahmud, Koray Çetinceli, Seher Yastıoğlu, Tuğrul Yılmazer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Educational pathways to prevention: An interdisciplinary framework for understanding and addressing student delinquency in school environments
Nurshahira Ibrahim
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pahang Campus, Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, 26400, Malaysia
Najibah Zakariya
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam Branch, 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
Tengku Intan Suzila Tengku Sharif
Academy of Language Studies (APB), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pahang Branch, Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, 26400, Malaysia
Maziah Mahmud
Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pahang Campus, Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, 26400, Malaysia
Koray Çetinceli
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Trade and Logistics, Süleyman Demirel University, Merkez/Isparta, 32260, Türkiye
Seher Yastıoğlu
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, 15200, Türkiye
Tuğrul Yılmazer
Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business, Süleyman Demirel University, Merkez/Isparta, 32260, Türkiye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3902
Keywords: delinquency; students, education; prevention strategies; school interventions
Abstract
Student delinquency remains a pervasive and multifaceted challenge within educational institutions, necessitating a comprehensive exploration of its underlying causes and potential interventions. This concept paper aims to elucidate the complex interplay of factors contributing to delinquent behavior among students, drawing upon a diverse array of theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this research synthesizes insights from psychology, neuroscience, sociology, and education to develop a nuanced understanding of student delinquency. The paper examines individual, familial, peer, school, and community-level risk factors, while also considering the neurobiological underpinnings of adolescent decision-making and impulse control. Furthermore, it critically evaluates existing intervention strategies, explores the school-to-prison pipeline phenomenon, and investigates the role of school climate and technology in shaping student behavior. Through a rigorous analysis of these multifaceted dimensions, this concept paper aims to contribute to the development of more effective, evidence-based strategies for preventing and addressing student delinquency. By implementing these strategies, educators and policymakers can foster positive educational environments and promote long-term societal well-being.
References
[1]. 1.Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2011). Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 90-98.
[2]. 2.Khan, M. B. U., & Tang, Y. (2023). Influence of Childhood Adversity on Students’ Delinquent Activities: Interplay with Neighborhood Context and Delinquent Peer Association. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 6677530, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6677530.
[3]. 3.Boabeng, J. E., Yao, D. W. J., Addo, A. O., & Odum, J. K. (2022). A Review On Juvenile Delinquency and Academic performance of Students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Research, Volume 08, pp. 988-1002. DOI: 10.53075/Ijmsirq4364654764753
[4]. 4.Kennedy, T.D., Detullio, D., Millen, D.H. (2020). Risk and Protective Factors for Delinquency. In: Juvenile Delinquency. Springer Briefs in Psychology (). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38250-6_3
[5]. 5.Lu, X., & Lai, M. (2024). Exploring the Association Between Juvenile Delinquency and Its Influence Factor Within the Online Learning Contexts. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 175-179. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/48/20231649
[6]. 6.Carroll, A., Green, S., Houghton, S., & Wood, R. (2003). Reputation Enhancement and Involvement in Delinquency Among High School Students. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 50(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912032000120444
[7]. 7.Cui, K., Fong, T.C. & Yip, P.S.F. Latent heterogeneity of deviant behaviors and associated factors among ethnic minority adolescents: a latent class analysis. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 18, 93 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-024-00771-7
[8]. 8.Laure, S., Damayanti, Y., Benu, J., & Ruliati, L. (2020). Kesejahteraan Sekolah dan Kenakalan Remaja Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Journal of Health and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.35508/jhbs.v2i2.2192
[9]. 9.Famela Ayuni, & Febrina Dafit. (2023). Peran guru dalam mengatasi kenakalan siswa sdn 83 pekanbaru. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(3), 1250 - 1257. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i3.1586
[10]. 10.Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 59-68.
[11]. 11.Zhuoma, L. (2024). The Importance of Preventing Juvenile Delinquency. Economics, Law and Policy, 7 (3), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.22158/elp.v7n3p162
[12]. 12.Damião, D. B. (2020). Conduta Delinquente: Um Estudo Sobre As Consequências Da Delinquência. Psicologia: Um Olhar Do Mundo Real, Volume 1, 68-73. DOI: 10.37885/200500271.
[13]. 13.Sarker, I. (2023). A Study on Juvenile Delinquency in Bangladesh its Causes and Consequences. East African Scholars Multidiscip Bull, 6(4), 30-36. DOI: 10.36349/easjmb.2023.v06i04.001.
[14]. 14.Haveripet, P. (2013). Causes and consequences of juvenile delinquency in India. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 5, 29-31.
[15]. 15.Zai, A. F., Akhter, S., & Rasheed, N. (2022). Collaborative Efforts for Breaking the Cycle of Juvenile Delinquency. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (IJETIR), Volume 2, Issue 9, 31-37. DOI: 10.48175/IJETIR-8074
[16]. 16.Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
[17]. 17.Zheng, J. (2023). 1Analyzing the Developmental Processes and Influencing Factors of Children’s Emotional Recognition, Expression, and Regulation Abilities: A Comprehensive Review. Studies in Psychological Science, 1(2), 1-16. doi:10.56397/SPS.2023.09.01.
[18]. 18.Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217-237.
[19]. 19.Loeber, R., Burke, J., & Pardini, D. A. (2009). Perspectives on oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and psychopathic features. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(1‐2), 133-142.
[20]. 20.Moreira, D., Azeredo, A.A., Ramião, E., Figueiredo, P., Barroso, R., & Barbosa, F. (2024). Systematic Exploration of Antisocial Behavior. European Psychologist. 29(2), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000527
[21]. 21.Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. I., Van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(6), 749-775.
[22]. 22.Yan, S., & Augustine, B. (2023). Parental Monitoring, Exposure to Family Violence, and Delinquency: A Latent Class Analysis on Arizona Youth. Victims & Offenders, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2023.2189192
[23]. 23.Sun, W., Wang, M., Zheng, F., & Wang, Y. (2024). From Nurture to Deviance: A Study on Parenting Style and Juvenile Delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 46(5), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2024.2361051
[24]. 24.Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
[25]. 25.Liu , X. (2024). The Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Criminal Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 42, 674-679. https://doi.org/10.54097/cw3rfj72
[26]. 26.Demuth, S., & Brown, S. L. (2004). Family structure, family processes, and adolescent delinquency: The significance of parental absence versus parental gender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41(1), 58-81.
[27]. 27.Hoffmann, J. P. (2023).Family structure, unstructured socializing, and delinquent behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 87, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102086.
[28]. 28.Besemer, S., Ahmad, S. I., Hinshaw, S. P., & Farrington, D. P. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the intergenerational transmission of criminal behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 161-178.
[29]. 29.Järvinen, A., Lichtenstein, P., D'Onofrio, B.M., Fazel, S., Kuja-Halkola, R. and Latvala, A. (2024), Health, behavior, and social outcomes among offspring of parents with criminal convictions: a register-based study from Sweden. J Child Psychol Psychiatr, 65: 1590-1600. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14003
[30]. 30.Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. G. (2009). Social learning theory. In J. Miller (Ed.), 21st Century criminology: A reference handbook (pp. 323-332). Sage Publications.
[31]. 31.Jones, M.S., Pierce, H., & Shoaf, H. (2023). Early exposure to adverse childhood experiences and delinquent peer association among youth. Family Relations, 72(5), 2991-3009. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12856
[32]. 32.Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013). The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 114-120.
[33]. 33.Koele, I. J., Hoorn, J. V., Ellen R. A. Bruijn, D., Güroğlu, B. (2023). Neural processing of observed performance-based errors and rewards in the context of friends and unfamiliar peers across adolescence, Neuropsychologia, Volume 188,108619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108619.
[34]. 34.Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1013-1057.
[35]. 35.Murray, J.M., Sánchez-Franco, S.C., Sarmiento, O.L. et al. Selection homophily and peer influence for adolescents’ smoking and vaping norms and outcomes in high and middle-income settings. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 615 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02124-9
[36]. 36.Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the Social Development Research Group. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252-261.
[37]. 37.Wilkins NJ, Krause KH, Verlenden JV, et al. School Connectedness and Risk Behaviors and Experiences Among High School Students — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2021. MMWR Suppl 2023;72(Suppl-1):13–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su7201a2
[38]. 38.Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. Crime and Justice, 20, 145-264.
[39]. 39.Motti-Stefanidi, F., Pavlopoulos, V., & Asendorpf, J. (2023). Cascades linking school achievement and engagement to the acculturation of immigrant-origin youth. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(6), 1021–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2023.2184338
[40]. 40.Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Williams, N. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546-564.
[41]. 41.Battjes, K., & Zane Kaplan, L. (2023). Zero Tolerance vs Restorative Justice in the United States. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(4), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1414
[42]. 42.Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443-478.
[43]. 43.Brundidge, T. F., & Leban, L. (2024). The conditioning role of perceptions of collective efficacy in the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and delinquency, Journal of Criminal Justice, Volume 90, 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102143.
[44]. 44.Hawkins, J. D., Herrenkohl, T. I., Farrington, D. P., Brewer, D., Catalano, R. F., Harachi, T. W., & Cothern, L. (2000). Predictors of youth violence. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, 1-11.
[45]. 45.Brown et al., (2025). Associations Between Neighborhood Resources and Youths’ Response to Reward Omission in a Task Modeling Negatively Biased Environments. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Volume 64, Issue 4, 463 – 474.
[46]. 46.Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
[47]. 47.Gearhart M. C. (2024). The Multilevel Factor Structure of Social Cohesion, Mutual Efficacy, and Informal Social Control: A Case for Practice-Informed Research. Social work, 69(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swae002
[48]. 48.Blakemore, S. J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3‐4), 296-312.
[49]. 49.Parr, A.C., Sydnor, V.J., Calabro, F.J., & Luna, B. (2024). Adolescent-to-adult gains in cognitive flexibility are adaptively supported by reward sensitivity, exploration, and neural variability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 58, 101399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101399.
[50]. 50.Marquez-Ramos, F., Alarcon, D., Amian, J. G., Fernandez-Portero, C., Arenilla-Villalba, M. J., & Sanchez-Medina, J. (2023). Risk Decision Making and Executive Function among Adolescents and Young Adults. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020142
[51]. 51.Silvers, J. A., McRae, K., Gabrieli, J. D., Gross, J. J., Remy, K. A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence. Emotion, 12(6), 1235-1247.
[52]. 52.Fombouchet, Y., Pineau, S., Perchec, C., Lucenet, J., & Lannegrand, L. (2023). The development of emotion regulation in adolescence: What do we know and where to go next? Social Development, 32(4), 1227-1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12684
[53]. 53.Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59(12), 1133-1143.
[54]. 54.Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Blevins, K. R., Daigle, L., & Unnever, J. D. (2002). The relationship of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder to crime and delinquency: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4(4), 344-360.
[55]. 55.Barbuti, M., Maiello, M., Spera, V., Pallucchini, A., Brancati, G. E., Maremmani, A. G. I., Perugi, G., & Maremmani, I. (2023). Challenges of Treating ADHD with Comorbid Substance Use Disorder: Considerations for the Clinician. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(9), 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093096
[56]. 56.Loeber, R., Burke, J. D., Lahey, B. B., Winters, A., & Zera, M. (2000). Oppositional defiant and conduct disorder: A review of the past 10 years, part I. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(12), 1468-1484.
[57]. 57.Eisenberg, N., Zuffianò, A., Spinrad, T. L. (2024). Are prosocial tendencies relevant for developmental psychopathology? The relations of prosocial behavior and empathy-related responding to externalizing problems, internalizing problems, and autism spectrum disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 36(5):2207-2217. doi:10.1017/S0954579424000063
[58]. 58.Chassin, L., Sher, K. J., Hussong, A., & Curran, P. (2013). The developmental psychopathology of alcohol use and alcohol disorders: Research achievements and future directions. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4pt2), 1567-1584.
[59]. 59.Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 111-126.
[60]. 60.Juraska, J.M. (2024). The last stage of development: The restructuring and plasticity of the cortex during adolescence especially at puberty. Developmental psychobiology, 66(2), e22468. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22468
[61]. 61.Galvan, A., Hare, T. A., Parra, C. E., Penn, J., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2006). Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(25), 6885-6892.
[62]. 62.Wahlstrom, D., White, T., & Luciana, M. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for changes in dopamine system activity during adolescence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 631-648.
[63]. 63.McEwen, B. S., & Morrison, J. H. (2013). The brain on stress: Vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron, 79(1), 16-29.
[64]. 64.Sheppard, M., Rasgado-Toledo, J., Duncan, N.W., Elliott, R., Garza-Villarreal, E.A., & Muhlert, N. (2024). Noradrenergic alterations associated with early life stress. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 164, 105832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105832.
[65]. 65.DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91.
[66]. 66.Alonso, M. A., González-Ortiz-de-Zárate, A., Gómez-Flechoso, M. Á., and Castrillón, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a Peer Mentoring on University Dropout and Academic Performance. Psicología Educativa, 30(1), 29 - 37. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2024a5
[67]. 67.Grossman, J. B., & Tierney, J. P. (1998). Does mentoring work? An impact study of the Big Brothers Big Sisters program. Evaluation Review, 22(3), 403-426.
[68]. 68.Herrera, C., DuBois, D., Heubach, J., & Grossman, J.B. (2023). Effects of the Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Community-Based Mentoring Program on social-emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes of participating youth: A randomized controlled trial. Children and Youth Services Review, Volume 144,106742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106742.
[69]. 69.Shin, E. J., & Kim, J. M. (2024). Development and Effectiveness of Character Education Program Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Study on University Students. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 24(10), 1-24. 10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.10.1
[70]. 70.Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451-476.
[71]. 71.Cuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Plessen, C. Y., Ciharova, M., Ebert, D., & Karyotaki, E. (2023). Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients. World Psychiatry, 22(1), 105-115.
[72]. 72.Satodiya, R.M., Bied, A., Shah, K., Parikh, T., & Ash, P. (2024). A Systematic Review of Multisystemic Therapy in Adolescent Sex Offenders. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 52, 51 - 60. DOI:10.29158/JAAPL.230117-23
[73]. 73.Curtis, N. M., Ronan, K. R., & Borduin, C. M. (2004). Multisystemic treatment: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 411-419.
[74]. 74.Littell, J., H., Pigott, T. D., Nilsen, K. H., Roberts, J., Labrum, T. K. (2023). Functional Family Therapy for families of youth (age 11–18) with behaviour problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(3), e1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1324.
[75]. 75.Alexander, J. F., & Robbins, M. S. (2011). Functional family therapy. In R. J. R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Adolescence (pp. 1080-1088). Springer.
[76]. 76.Firdasannah, A., Borualogo, I.S., & Kusdiyati, S. (2024). Functional Family Therapy to Address Teenage Behavior Problems in Theft Cases in LPKA Bandung. Psikostudia : Jurnal Psikologi. 13(1), 76-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v13i1
[77]. 77.Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213-231.
[78]. 78.Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2023). Autonomy-Supportive Teaching Enhances Prosocial and Reduces Antisocial Behavior via Classroom Climate and Psychological Needs: A Multilevel Randomized Control Intervention. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 45(1), 26-40. Retrieved May 2, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2021-0337
[79]. 79.Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529.
[80]. 80.Howard, J. L., Slemp, G. R., & Wang, X. (2024). Need Support and Need Thwarting: A Meta-Analysis of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness Supportive and Thwarting Behaviors in Student Populations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231225364
[81]. 81.Steenberghs, N., Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2023). Teacher-student relationships and engagement of high-ability students: An exploration from the perspective of the academic risk hypothesis. High Ability Studies, 34(2), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2023.2189573
[82]. 82.Doyle, N.B., Gomez Varon, J.A., Downer, J.T., & Brown, J.L. (2023). Testing the integration of a teacher coaching model and a social-emotional learning and literacy intervention in urban elementary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, Volume 132, 104232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104232.
[83]. 83.Downer, J. T., Doyle, N. B., Pianta, R. C., Burchinal, M., Field, S., Hamre, B. K., … Scott-Little, C. (2024). Coaching and Coursework Focused on Teacher–Child Interactions During Language/Literacy Instruction: Effects on Teacher Outcomes and Children’s Classroom Engagement. Early Education and Development, 35(5), 1032–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2024.2303604
[84]. 84.Braun SS, Bradshaw CP, Beahm LA, Budavari AC, Downer J, Ialongo NS and Tolan PH (2023) Predicting implementation of the PAX Good Behavior Game + MyTeachingPartner interventions. Front. Psychol. 14:1059138. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059138
[85]. 85.Glover, T.A., Reddy, L.A., & Crouse, K. (2023). Instructional coaching actions that predict teacher classroom practices and student achievement. Journal of school psychology, 96, 1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.006.
[86]. 86.Stinchcomb, J. B., Bazemore, G., & Riestenberg, N. (2006). Beyond zero tolerance: Restoring justice in secondary schools. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 123-147.
[87]. 87.Jain, S., Bassey, H., Brown, M. A., & Kalra, P. (2014). Restorative justice in Oakland schools: Implementation and impacts. Oakland Unified School District.
[88]. 88.Darling-Hammond, S. (2023). Fostering belonging, transforming schools: The impact of restorative practices. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/169.703
[89]. 89.Samimi, C., Han, T. M., Navvab, A., Sedivy, J. A., & Anyon, Y. (2023). Restorative practices and exclusionary school discipline: an integrative review. Contemporary Justice Review, 26(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2023.2204884
[90]. 90.Kubiszewski, V., Carrizales, A., & Lheureux, F. (2023). Can School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) improve adolescents’ perceptions of school climate?. Journal of School Psychology, 2023, 99, pp.101223. Doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.101223.
[91]. 91.Gage, N. A., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N. L., & Way, G. T. (2024). The Impact of the Missouri School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) on Disciplinary Exclusions. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 27(2), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241275691 (Original work published 2025)
[92]. 92.Austin, S.C., McIntosh, K., Smolkowski, K., Santiago-Rosario, M.R., Arbuckle, S.L., & Barney, N.E. (2024). Examining differential effects of an equity-focused schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports approach on teachers' equity in school discipline. Journal of school psychology, 104, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101284.
[93]. 93.Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496-528.
[94]. 94.Wilson Heenan, I., De Paor, D., Lafferty, N., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2023). The Impact of Transformational School Leadership on School Staff and School Culture in Primary Schools—A Systematic Review of International Literature. Societies, 13(6), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13060133
[95]. 95.Nese, R. N. T., Nese, J. F. T., Santiago-Rosario, M. R., Izzard, S., Newson, A., Pimentel-Mannan, I., Lissman, D. C., Daza, T., Triplett, D., & Malose, S. (2024). Improving Classroom Engagement and Reducing Exclusionary Discipline: A Quasi-Experimental Study of the Inclusive Skill-Building Learning Approach During COVID-19. Journal of Education, 205(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574241309893 (Original work published 2025)
[96]. 96.Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651-688.
[97]. 97.Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3-13.
[98]. 98.Brandisauskiene, A., Buksnyte-Marmiene, L., Cesnaviciene, J., & Jarasiunaite-Fedosejeva, G. (2023). The Relationship Between Teacher’s Autonomy-Supportive Behavior and Learning Strategies Applied by Students: The Role of Teacher Support and Equity. SAGE Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181384 (Original work published 2023)
[99]. 99.Flay, B. R., Allred, C. G., & Ordway, N. (2001). Effects of the Positive Action program on achievement and discipline: Two matched-control comparisons. Prevention Science, 2(2), 71-89.
[100]. 100.Austin, S. C., Hammond, M. A., & Seeley, J. R. (2024). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports and Substance Misuse in Secondary Schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 27(2), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007241276528 (Original work published 2025)
[101]. 101.Siebert, C. F., Holloway, S. D., DuBois, D. L., Bavarian, N., Lewis, K. M., & Flay, B. (2024). Identification of Important Factors When Measuring School Climate: Latent Construct Validation and Exploration. The Journal of school health, 94(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13394
[102]. 102.Jiménez, F., Calle, M., Quishpe, N., Cueva, J., y Torres, B., (2024) El rol de la disciplina en el rendimiento académico: un enfoque desde el comportamiento positivo. Reincisol, 3(6), pp. 6312 6324. https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V3(6)6312-6324
[103]. 103.Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ “connectedness” to school and social adjustment during middle school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 24(3), 243-262.
[104]. 104.Teesson, M., Birrell, L., Slade, T., Rewton. L. R., Olsen, N., Hides, L. et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of a universal, school-based, online programme for the prevention of anxiety, depression, and substance misuse among adolescents in Australia: 72-month outcomes from a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Digital Health, Volume 6, Issue 5, e334 - e344.
[105]. 105.Lange, C. M., & Sletten, S. J. (2002). Alternative education: A brief history and research synthesis. Project FORUM, National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
[106]. 106.Olarte, D. A., Tsai, M. M., Chapman, L., Hager, E. R., & Cohen, J. F. W. (2023). Alternative School Breakfast Service Models and Associations with Breakfast Participation, Diet Quality, Body Mass Index, Attendance, Behavior, and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, 15(13), 2951. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15132951
[107]. 107.Guerrero, S., Valcárcel, J. V., Rodríguez, A. (2024). Unveiling alternative schools: A systematic review of cognitive and social-emotional development in different educational approaches. Children and Youth Services Review, Volume 158,107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107480.
[108]. 108.Vick, R. M., & Packard, B. W. L. (2008). Academic success strategy use among community-active urban Hispanic adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30(4), 463-480.
[109]. 109.Dougherty, S. M. (2023). Putting evidence on CTE to work. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(6), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217231161520 (Original work published 2023)
[110]. 110.Plank, S. B., DeLuca, S., & Estacion, A. (2008). High school dropout and the role of career and technical education: A survival analysis of surviving high school. Sociology of Education, 81(4), 345-370.
[111]. 111.Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(1), 10-43.
[112]. 112.Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
[113]. 113.Yao, J., Yao, J., Li, P., Xu, Y., & Wei, L. (2023). Effects of after school programs on student cognitive and non-cognitive abilities: A meta analysis based on 37 experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 17(1):2627-2649. Doi: 10.15354/sief.23.re228.
[114]. 114.Mahoney, J. L., & Stattin, H. (2000). Leisure activities and adolescent antisocial behavior: The role of structure and social context. Journal of Adolescence, 23(2), 113-127.
[115]. 115.Owen, K. B., Foley, B. C., Smith, B. J., Manera, K. E., Corbett, L., Lim, M., Phongsavan, P., Qualter, P., Ding, D., & Clare, P. J. (2024). Sport Participation for Academic Success: Evidence From the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 21(3), 238-246. Retrieved Jun 18, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0506
[116]. 116.Nguri, M. (2024). Effects of Sports Participation on Academic Performance in Adolescents. American Journal of Recreation and Sports, 3(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajrs.2048
[117]. 117.Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies. National Endowment for the Arts.
[118]. 118.Lewis, D. (2024). Impact of Theater Arts Participation on High School Students. American Journal of Arts, Social and Humanity Studies, 4(2), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajashs.2353
[119]. 119.Syngelaki, E. M., Moore, S. C., Savage, J. C., Fairchild, G., & Van Goozen, S. H. (2013). Executive functioning and risky decision making in young male offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(3), 274-293.
[120]. 120.Whittaker, R., Merry, S., Stasiak, K., McDowell, H., Doherty, I., Shepherd, M., … & Rodgers, A. (2012). MEMO—A mobile phone depression prevention intervention for adolescents: Development process and postprogram findings on acceptability from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), e13.
[121]. 121.TJ, S., & Kumar, R. (2024). Role of Modern Technology for Rehabilitation in Mitigation of Juvenile Recidivism: A Critical Appraisal. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2):11012-11018.
[122]. 122.Tapia, J. L., Aras, L. M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2024). Enhancing Executive Functions in Pediatric Epilepsy: Feasibility and Efficacy of a Computerized Cognitive Training Program. Children, 11(4), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11040484
[123]. 123.Sarpourian, F., Bahaadinbeigy, K., Fatemi Aghda, S.A., Fatehi, F., Ebrahimi, S., & Fallahnezhad, M. (2024). Effectiveness of computer-based telerehabilitation software (RehaCom) compared to other treatments for patients with cognitive impairments: A systematic review. Digital Health, 10.
[124]. 124.Berti, S., Grazia, V. & Molinari, L. Active Student Participation in Whole-School Interventions in Secondary School. A Systematic Literature Review. Educ Psychol Rev 35, 52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09773-x
[125]. 125.Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(3), 133-148.
[126]. 126.Zhang, Y., Fallon, L., Larson, M., Browning Wright, D., Cook, C. R., & Lyon, A. R. (2024). Associations among educators’ beliefs, intervention fidelity, and student outcomes in school-wide positive behavior interventions, and supports: A school-level moderated mediation analysis. School Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq000061
[127]. 127.Fleming, J. I., Grasley-Boy, N. M., Gage, N. A., Lombardo, M., & Anderson, L. (2023). Effects of Tiered SWPBIS Fidelity on Exclusionary Discipline Outcomes for Students With Disabilities: A Conceptual Replication. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 26(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007231193173 (Original work published 2024)
[128]. 128.Pharaswal, L., Latif A. (2023). The benefits of participating in extracurricular activities. GFNPSS-International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 4(9), 2384-2388.






