Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9058
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8196
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7960
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7529
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6093

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-3916

Published

2025-08-22

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Yanli Chen, Fathiyah Mohd Kamaruzaman*, M. Khalid M. Nasir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Chen, Y., Fathiyah Mohd Kamaruzaman, & M. Khalid M. Nasir. (2025). Anxiety and acceptance of digital tools among students majoring in media in vocational colleges. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), ESP-3916. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3916
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Anxiety and acceptance of digital tools among students majoring in media in vocational colleges

Yanli Chen

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

Fathiyah Mohd Kamaruzaman

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

M. Khalid M. Nasir

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3916


Keywords: Anxiety; technology acceptance; digital tools; media students; vocational colleges


Abstract

This paper analyses the effects of anxiety on the acceptance of the application of digital tools on Chinese vocational college media students and also factors that affect adoption of technology both psychologically and socially. The investigation of the direct correlation between anxiety and the assessments of the perceived ease of use (PEOU) and the perceived usefulness (PU) of digital-based tools was conducted via a mixed-methods method, both including quantitative and qualitative data. Survey involved 200 of the students but 20 others were interviewed to gain insight on the qualitative aspect. The findings indicate that mean total “CARS (Computer Anxiety Rating Scale) score was 3.22 and the average amount of anxiety was moderate. The negative relation between anxiety and the PEOU (-0.47) and PU (-0.45) also indicated a strong negative relation meaning that an increment in anxiety adversely affects how students understand digital tools. Besides, peer influence (r = 0.42 and 0.41, respectively) and institutional support positively correlated with PEOU and PU, as well as technology acceptance rate (r = 0.45). Qualitative annotations identified that complexity of software, fear of failure, and lack of prior knowledge were some of the significant causes of anxiety. The level of anxiety was lower among students who were being supported by their peers and were provided with correct amounts of institutional resources. The research findings summarise that anxiety and its impacts can be minimised by using peer network and institutional support which, in turn, greatly improves acceptance of digital tools by students. Some suggestions to educators and institutions entail the need to improve peer-assisted learning, enhance institutional support, and digitized tools to make them easy to use to encourage technology adoption and overcome anxiety.


References

[1]. 1.Liu XQ, Guo YX, Xu Y. Risk factors and digital interventions for anxiety disorders in college students: Stakeholder perspectives. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2023 Mar 6; 11(7):1442.

[2]. 2.Henderson J, Corry M. Teacher anxiety and technology change: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2021 Aug 8; 30(4):573-87.

[3]. 3.Nistor N, Göğüş A, Lerche T. Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: a European study. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2013 Aug; 61:733-49.

[4]. 4.Choukou MA, Sanchez-Ramirez DC, Pol M, Uddin M, Monnin C, Syed-Abdul S. COVID-19 infodemic and digital health literacy in vulnerable populations: a scoping review. Digital health. 2022 Feb; 8:20552076221076927.

[5]. 5.Oliveira C, Pereira A, Vagos P, Nóbrega C, Gonçalves J, Afonso B. Effectiveness of mobile app-based psychological interventions for college students: a systematic review of the literature. Frontiers in psychology. 2021 May 11; 12:647606.

[6]. 6.Mendoza GA, Jung I, Kobayashi S. A review of empirical studies on MOOC adoption: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology. 2017 Jun 30; 11(1).

[7]. 7.Berkeley L. Media education and new technology: A case study of major curriculum change within a university media degree. Journal of Media Practice. 2009 Jan 1; 10(2-3):185-97.

[8]. 8.Lin Y, Yu Z. An integrated bibliometric analysis and systematic review modelling students’ technostress in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2025 Feb 25; 44(4):631-55.

[9]. 9.Wei Y. Toward technology-based education and English as a foreign language motivation: A review of literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022 Apr 29; 13:870540.

[10]. 10.Das JK, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Khan MN, Mahmood W, Patel V, Bhutta ZA. Interventions for adolescent mental health: an overview of systematic reviews. Journal of adolescent health. 2016 Oct 1;59(4):S49-60.

[11]. 11.Cao W, Yu Z. Exploring learning outcomes, communication, anxiety, and motivation in learning communities: a systematic review. Humanities and social sciences communications. 2023 Nov 24;10(1):1-3.

[12]. 12.Sun H, Yuan C, Qian Q, He S, Luo Q. Digital resilience among individuals in school education settings: a concept analysis based on a scoping review. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2022 Mar 31;13:858515.

[13]. 13.Orsolini L, Pompili S, Salvi V, Volpe U. A systematic review on telemental health in youth mental health: focus on anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Medicina. 2021 Jul 31;57(8):793.

[14]. 14.Khademian F, Aslani A, Bastani P. The effects of mobile apps on stress, anxiety, and depression: overview of systematic reviews. International journal of technology assessment in health care. 2021 Jan;37(1):e4.

[15]. 15.Or CK, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2009 Jul; 16(4):550-60.

[16]. 16.Temkin AB, Schild J, Falk A, Bennett SM. Mobile apps for youth anxiety disorders: A review of the evidence and forecast of future innovations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2020 Aug; 51(4):400.

[17]. 17.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

[18]. 18.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[19]. 19.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

[20]. 20.Gerlich, R. N. (2023). Perceptions and acceptance of artificial intelligence: A multi-dimensional study. Journal of Technology in Education, 15(2), 45–62.

[21]. 21.Gerlich, R. N. (2024). Public anxieties about AI: Implications for corporate strategy and societal impact. Technology and Society, 12(1), 1–15.

[22]. 22.Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60.

[23]. 23.Kosmyna, N., et al. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt and its impact on learning. Cognitive Neuroscience Reports, 18(4), 211–229.

[24]. 24.Lee, J., et al. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort among youth. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 87–105.

[25]. 25.Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

[26]. 26.Garrido S, Millington C, Cheers D, Boydell K, Schubert E, Meade T, Nguyen QV. What works and what doesn’t work? A systematic review of digital mental health interventions for depression and anxiety in young people. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019 Nov 13; 10:759.

[27]. 27.Sharin AN. E-learning during COVID-19: a review of literature. Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia. 2021 May 18; 23(1):15-28.

[28]. 28.Lattie EG, Lipson SK, Eisenberg D. Technology and college student mental health: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2019 Apr 15; 10:246.

[29]. 29.Xu T, Wang H. High prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among remote learning students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology. 2023 Jan 10; 13:1103925.

[30]. 30.Labrague LJ, Al Harrasi M. Nursing students' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) using the technology acceptance model: A systematic review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2025 Apr 16.

[31]. 31.Hoge E, Bickham D, Cantor J. Digital media, anxiety, and depression in children. Pediatrics. 2017 Nov 1; 140(Supplement_2):S76-80.

[32]. 32.Marshall JM, Dunstan DA, Bartik W. The digital psychiatrist: in search of evidence-based apps for anxiety and depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 15; 10:831.

[33]. 33.Chugh R, Turnbull D, Cowling MA, Vanderburg R, Vanderburg MA. Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies. 2023 Dec; 28(12):16403-29.

[34]. 34.Montagni I, Tzourio C, Cousin T, Sagara JA, Bada-Alonzi J, Horgan A. Mental health-related digital use by university students: a systematic review. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020 Feb 1; 26(2):131-46.

[35]. 35.Ariefdjohan M, Reid D, Fritsch S. Youth Digital Dilemmas: Exploring the Intersection between Social Media and Anxiety. Pediatric Clinics. 2025 Apr 1;72(2):317-31.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com