ESP-3921

Published

2025-08-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Wagih M. E. Salama, Hazem Ahmed Khairy, Mohamed Ahmed Suliman, Nouran Saber Fahmy

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Wagih M. E. Salama, Hazem Ahmed Khairy, Mohamed Ahmed Suliman, & Nouran Saber Fahmy. (2025). How organizational politics drives non-green behavior in hotels: A moderated mediation model of psychological withdrawal and green self-efficacy. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(8), ESP-3921. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3921

How organizational politics drives non-green behavior in hotels: A moderated mediation model of psychological withdrawal and green self-efficacy

Wagih M. E. Salama

Department of Social Studies, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Alhasa, 31982, Saudi Arabia

Hazem Ahmed Khairy

Hotel Management Department, Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, University of Sadat City, Sadat City, 11787, Egypt.

Mohamed Ahmed Suliman

Department of Social Studies, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Alhasa, 31982, Saudi Arabia

Nouran Saber Fahmy

Hotel Management Department, Alson Higher Institute for Tourism and Hotel Management, Cairo, 11829, Egypt.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.3921


Keywords: Perceptions of organizational politics; Non-green behavior; Psychological withdrawal; Green self-efficacy; Hotel Industry

Abstract

This study investigates how perceptions of organizational politics (POP) influence non-green behavior (NGB) among employees in five-star hotel enterprises in Egypt, highlighting the mediating role of psychological withdrawal (PW) and the moderating effect of green self-efficacy (GSE). Data were collected through a structured survey of 402 employees from 23 five-star hotels. Using PLS-SEM via WarpPLS 7.0, the findings indicate that POP significantly increases both NGB and PW. PW also positively influences NGB and mediates the relationship between POP and NGB. Moreover, GSE moderates the PW–NGB relationship, buffering the negative impact of psychological withdrawal. These results underscore the psychological mechanisms by which political work environments undermine sustainable behavior and highlight the protective role of self-efficacy. The study offers practical implications for hospitality management seeking to promote pro-environmental conduct in politically complex organizational settings.

References

[1]. 1.Chakraborty, P. P. (2024). Tourism in transition in sustainable world: Embracing technology and sustainability in the post-pandemic era. In Special Interest Trends for Sustainable Tourism (pp. 348-374). IGI Global.

[2]. 2.Al-Romeedy, B. S., Khairy, H. A., Abdelrahman Farrag, D., Alhemimah, A., Salameh, A. A., Gharib, M. N., & Fathy Agina, M. (2025). Green Inclusive Leadership and Employees’ Green Behavior in Tourism and Hospitality Businesses: Do Green Psychological Climate and Green Psychological Empowerment Matter?. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 1-38.

[3]. 3.Khairy, H. A., Badwy, H. E., & Khreis, S. H. A. (2025a). Perceived Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Innovation in the Hotel Business: The Mediating Role of Green Intrinsic Motivation. In Navigating Trust in Sustainability Reporting and Assurance (pp. 317-356). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

[4]. 4.Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of management, 18(1), 93-116.

[5]. 5.Al-Romeedy, B. S., & Khairy, H. A. (2024). Organizational politics and employee job performance in the tourism and hospitality industry: workplace stress and counterproductive work behavior. Tourism Review, 79(8), 1457-1473.

[6]. 6.Karatepe, O. M., Rezapouraghdam, H., & Hassannia, R. (2020). Job insecurity, work engagement and their effects on hotel employees’ non-green and nonattendance behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87, 102472.

[7]. 7.Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.

[8]. 8.Sagie, A., Birati, A., & Tziner, A. (2002). Assessing the costs of behavioral and psychological withdrawal: A new model and an empirical illustration. Applied psychology, 51(1), 67-89.

[9]. 9.Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory. Research in organizational behavior, 18(1), 1-74.

[10]. 10.Mughal, M. F., Cai, S. L., Faraz, N. A., & Ahmed, F. (2022). Environmentally specific servant leadership and employees’ pro-environmental behavior: mediating role of green self efficacy. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 305-316.

[11]. 11.Patwary, A. K., Mohd Yusof, M. F., Bah Simpong, D., Ab Ghaffar, S. F., & Rahman, M. K. (2023). Examining proactive pro-environmental behaviour through green inclusive leadership and green human resource management: an empirical investigation among Malaysian hotel employees. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(5), 2012-2029.

[12]. 12.Vu, T. D., Nguyen, T. T. N., Nguyen, H. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2025). Sustainable management in the hospitality industry: The influence of green human resource management on employees’ pro-environmental behavior and environmental performance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights.

[13]. 13.Zaman, S. I., Qabool, S., Anwar, A., & Khan, S. A. (2025). Green human resource management practices: a hierarchical model to evaluate the pro-environmental behavior of hotel employees. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 8(4), 1217-1249.

[14]. 14.Atshan, N. A., Al‐Abrrow, H., Abdullah, H. O., Khaw, K. W., Alnoor, A., & Abbas, S. (2022). The effect of perceived organizational politics on responses to job dissatisfaction: the moderating roles of self‐efficacy and political skill. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(2), 43-54.

[15]. 15.Yan, Z., Mansor, Z. D., Choo, W. C., & Abdullah, A. R. (2021). Mitigating effect of psychological capital on employees’ withdrawal behavior in the presence of job attitudes: Evidence from five-star hotels in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 617023.

[16]. 16.Bani-Melhem, S., Mohd-Shamsudin, F., Khassawneh, O., Hamouche, S., & Koleva, P. (2025). Unlocking the secrets of expat employees: the role of diversity leadership, work adjustment and self-esteem in inhibiting psychological withdrawal behaviour. Management Research Review, 48(2), 165-185.

[17]. 17.Demastus, J., & Landrum, N. E. (2024). Organizational sustainability schemes align with weak sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 707-725.

[18]. 18.Salama, W. M., Suliman, M. A., Hassanin, M., Khairy, H. A., Al Asrag, A. S. A., & Fahmy, N. S. (2024). Catalyzing green competitiveness in hotel and tourism businesses: leveraging digital dynamic capability and green creativity. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2978.

[19]. 19.Al-Husain, R. A., Jasim, T. A., Mathew, V., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Khairy, H. A., Mahmoud, H. A., ... & Alsetoohy, O. (2025). Optimizing sustainability performance through digital dynamic capabilities, green knowledge management, and green technology innovation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24217.

[20]. 20.Miah, M., Rahman, S. M., Biswas, S., Szabó-Szentgróti, G., & Walter, V. (2024). Effects of green human resource management practices on employee green behavior: the role of employee’s environmental knowledge management and green self-efficacy for greening workplace. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.

[21]. 21.Nisar, Q. A., Haider, S., Ali, F., Gill, S. S., & Waqas, A. (2024). The role of green HRM on environmental performance of hotels: Mediating effect of green self-efficacy & employee green behaviors. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 25(1), 85-118.

[22]. 22.Vigoda‐Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees' performance: An empirical examination of two competing models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683.

[23]. 23.Salama, W. M., Khairy, H. A., Badwy, H. E., Afify, S. M., Alrefae, W. M. M., & Soliman, S. A. E. M. (2025a). How abusive leadership could harm employee job engagement in hotel businesses? The roles of perceived organizational politics and presenteeism. Intangible Capital, 21(1), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.3104.

[24]. 24.Su, W., & Xie, C. (2023). The impact of organizational politics on work engagement—the mediating role of the doctrine of the mean. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1283855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283855.

[25]. 25.Selenko, E., Schilbach, M., Brieger, S. A., Van Hootegem, A., & De Witte, H. (2025). The Political Consequences of Work: An Integrative Review. Journal of Management, 51(6), 2355-2388. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241301337.

[26]. 26.Abou-Chadi, T., & Kurer, T. (2021). Economic Risk within the Household and Voting for the Radical Right. World Politics 73(2), 482-511. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0043887121000046.

[27]. 27.Abrassart, A., Wolter, S.C. Rejecting education as the basis of the social prestige of occupations (2023). the role of polarized political ideologies and parties in Switzerland. Acta Polit 58, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00230-7.

[28]. 28.Antonucci, L., D’Ippoliti, C., Horvath, L., & Krouwel, A. (2021). What’s Work Got to Do with It? How Precarity Influences Radical Party Support in France and the Netherlands. Sociological Research Online, 28(1), 110-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211020321 .

[29]. 29.Rooduijn, M. (2018). What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review 10: 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773917000145.

[30]. 30.Malik, O. F., & Sillah, K. (2024). The bright and dark sides of organizational politics: a moderated mediation model of honesty-humility and anger. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2440123.

[31]. 31.Beehr, T. A., & Gupta, N. (1978). A note on the structure of employee withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90040-5.

[32]. 32.Peng P, Li X. (2023). The hidden costs of emotional labor on withdrawal behavior: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion, and the moderating effect of mindfulness. BMC Psychol. 11(1):342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01392-z.

[33]. 33.Zhang J, Su D, Smith AP, Yang L. (2023). Reducing Work Withdrawal Behaviors (When Faced with Work Obstacles: A Three-Way Interaction Model. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 6;13(11):908. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110908.

[34]. 34.He, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wei, Y. (2024).The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Illegitimate Tasks on Employee Creativity: Positive and Negative Coping Perspectives. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2024, 17, 485–500.

[35]. 35.Zhu, L., Cai, H., & Jin, X. (2024). Testing the Process of Coworker Incivility to Work Withdrawal Behavior: The Moderated Mediation Effects of Employee Resilience in Achieving Organizational Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(20), 9018.

[36]. 36.Fan, P.; Zhang, H.; Yang, S.; Yu, Z.; Guo, M. Do Illegitimate Tasks Lead to Work Withdrawal Behavior among Generation Z Employees in China? The Role of Perceived Insider Status and Overqualification. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 702.

[37]. 37.Gan, Y., Li, S., Liu, C., Deng, J., & Gao, J. (2025). The Mediating Role of Subjective Norms and Green Self-Efficacy in Marine Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors Among Chinese University Students. Sustainability, 17(5), 2224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052224

[38]. 38.Gan, Y., Gao, J., Zhang, J., Wu, X., Zhang, T., & Shao, M. (2022). University students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to marine environment pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16671.

[39]. 39.Hasebrook, J. P., Michalak, L., Wessels, A., Koenig, S., Spierling, S., & Kirmsse, S. (2022). Green Behavior: Factors Influencing Behavioral Intention and Actual Environmental Behavior of Employees in the Financial Service Sector. Sustainability, 14(17), 10814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710814.

[40]. 40.Xu, Y., Du, J., Khan, M. A. S., Jin, S., Altaf, M., Anwar, F., & Sharif, I. (2022). Effects of subjective norms and environmental mechanism on green purchase behavior: An extended model of theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 779629.

[41]. 41.Dioba, A., Kroker, V., Dewitte, S., & Lange, F. (2024). Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behavior Change: A Review of Qualitative Research. Sustainability, 16(20), 8776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208776.

[42]. 42.Nielsen, R. S., Gamborg, C., & Lund, T. B. (2024). Ecoguilt and ecoshame in everyday life: An exploratory study of the experiences, triggers, and reactions. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, Article 1357656. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1357656.

[43]. 43.Li, M. L. (2020). Review of Consumers’ Green Consumption Behavior. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10, 585-599. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2020.103039.

[44]. 44.Elshaer, I. A., Azazz, A. M. S., Mansour, M. A., & Fayyad, S. (2025). Perceived greenwashing and employee non-green behavior: the roles of prevention-focused green crafting and work alienation. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2449592.

[45]. 45.Munerah, S., Koay, K. Y., & Thambiah, S. (2021). Factors influencing nongreen consumers’ purchase intention: A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLSSEM) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, Article 124192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124192.

[46]. 46.Aktürk, C., & Yeşiltaş, M. (2024). Seasonal employee leadership and turnover intention in the hospitality and tourism industry: Serial mediation model workplace ostracism and work alienation. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 41(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1728.

[47]. 47.Cai, H., Zhu, L., & Jin, X. (2024). Validating the Causal Relationship between Quantum Leadership and Employee Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Organizational Sustainability. Sustainability, 16(18), 7884. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187884.

[48]. 48.Choi, H.-M. (2024). Stress at the Crossroads: Work–Family Conflict and Work Withdrawal Behavior. Sustainability, 16(16), 6975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166975.

[49]. 49.Kuriakose, V., S., S., Wilson, P.R. and MR, A. (2019), "The differential association of workplace conflicts on employee well-being: The moderating role of perceived social support at work", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 680-705. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2018-0063.

[50]. 50.Arshad, A.; Sun, P.Y.; Desmarais, F. (2021). Abusive supervision and employee empowerment: The moderating role of resilience and workplace friendship. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud , 28, 479–494.

[51]. 51.Salama, W. M. E., Khairy, H. A., Mansour, A. A., Alrefae, W. M., Afify, S. M., & Shehadat, A. T. A. (2025b). How AI awareness drives employee intention to leave in hotels: The mediating roles of job burnout and psychological contract breach. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 60, 1206-1220.

[52]. 52.Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640.

[53]. 53.Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in Conservation of Resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130.

[54]. 54.Westman, M., Hobfoll, S. E., Chen, S., Davidson, O. B., & Laski, S. (2004). Organizational stress through the lens of conservation of resources (COR) theory. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being (Vol. 4, pp. 167–220). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(04)04005-3.

[55]. 55.Weiss, H. M., & Beal, D. J. (2005). Reflections on Affective Events Theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings (Vol. 1, pp. 1–21). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S17469791(05)011016.

[56]. 56.AshtonJames, C. E., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). What Lies Beneath? A process analysis of Affective Events Theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. J. Härtel (Eds.), The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings (Vol. 1, pp. 23–46). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S17469791(05)011028.

[57]. 57.Woznyj, H. M., Shanock, L. R., Heggestad, E. D., & Banks, G. C. (2021). The role of events and affect in perceived organizational support: A withinperson approach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 36(6), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP1020200537.

[58]. 58.Hochwarter, W. A., Rosen, C. C., Jordan, S. L., Ferris, G. R., Ejaz, A., & Maher, L. P. (2020). Perceptions of Organizational Politics Research: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Management, 46(6), 879 907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319898506.

[59]. 59.Aggarwal, A. , Goyal, J. and Nobi, K. (2018) Examining the Impact of Leader-Member Exchange on Perceptions of Organizational Justice: The Mediating Role of Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8, 2308-2329. doi: 10.4236/tel.2018.811150.

[60]. 60.Jeong, Y., & Kim, M. (2022). Effects of perceived organizational support and perceived organizational politics on organizational performance: Mediating role of differential treatment. Journal of Business Research, 27(3), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.023.

[61]. 61.Asif, M., Ma, Z., Li, M. (2025). Authentic leadership: bridging the gap between perception of organizational politics and employee attitudes in public sector museums. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 47 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04310-9.

[62]. 62.Lee, S., Kim, J., & Byun, G. (2021). Are Leaders’ Perceptions of Organizational Politics Worsening Favorable Employee Outcomes? The Role of Ethical Leadership. Sustainability, 13(19), 10767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910767.

[63]. 63.Ferris, G. R., HarrellCook, G., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2000). Organizational politics: The nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 17, pp. 89–130). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X(00)17004-1.

[64]. 64.Danish, R. Q., Ali, M., Baker, M., & Islam, R. (2024). Influence of corporate social responsibility, green practices and organizational politics on sustainable business performance: The importance of employee pro-environmental behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(1), 54-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ1020230548.

[65]. 65.Blau, G. L. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitudes, and work outcomes: Exploration and implications for the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1742.

[66]. 66.Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2013). Stresses, swaps, and skill: An investigation of the psychological dynamics that relate work politics to employee performance. Human Performance, 26(1), 44 -65.https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2012.736901.

[67]. 67.Sun, S., & Chen, H. (2017). Is political behavior a viable coping strategy to perceived organizational politics? Unveiling the underlying resource dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(10), 1471–1489. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000239.

[68]. 68.De Clercq, D., Khan, M. A., & Ul Haq, I. (2021). Perceived organizational politics and turnover intentions: Critical roles of social adaptive behavior and emotional regulation skills. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.26.

[69]. 69.Valle, M., & Perrewe, P. L. (2000). Do politics perceptions relate to political behaviors? Tests of an implicit assumption and expanded model. Human Relations, 53(3), 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700533004.

[70]. 70.Zhang, J. (2023). Reducing work withdrawal behaviors when faced with obstructive stress: The mediating role of negative work rumination. Behavioral Sciences, 13(11), Article 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13110908.

[71]. 71.Chu, C. C. (2024). Hybrid work stressors and psychological withdrawal behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001023.

[72]. 72.Mathur, G., Gulati, C., Sankpal, S., & Kee, D. M. H. (2024). Work–life balance and withdrawal behaviors among knowledge workforce: High performance work system comes into play for managing boundaries. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22257.

[73]. 73.Carpenter, N. C., Berry, C. M., & Houston, L. (2017). Are counterproductive work behavior and withdrawal behavior different constructs or overlapping? Journal of Management, 43(8), 2537–2565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544743.

[74]. 74.Landells, E. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (2019). Perceived organizational politics, work meaningfulness, stress, and engagement: A mediational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01612.

[75]. 75.Xu, A., & Fan, B. (2022). Leader-signaled knowledge hiding and employee work withdrawal: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 1145. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19021145.

[76]. 76.Dreijerink, L., Handgraaf, M., & Antonides, G. (2021). Rationalizing inconsistent consumer behavior: Understanding negative spillover in pro-environmental action. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 583596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583596.

[77]. 77.Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of business and Psychology, 17, 245-260.

[78]. 78.Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 36(3), 557-589. https://doi.org/10.5465/256592.

[79]. 79.Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): Development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological measurement, 51(1), 193-205.

[80]. 80.Paillé, P., Mejía Morelos, J. H., Raineri, N., & Stinglhamber, F. (2019). The influence of the immediate manager on the avoidance of non-green behaviors in the workplace: A three-wave moderated-mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 723-740.

[81]. 81.Lehman, W. E., & Simpson, D. D. (1992). Employee substance use and on-the-job behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 309.

[82]. 82.Chen, Y.-S., Chang, C.-H., Yeh, S.-L., & Cheng, H.-I. (2015). Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Quality & Quantity, 49(3), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0041-8.

[83]. 83.The Egyptian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities. (2022). Hotel and tourism companies and establishments: Directory of hotel establishments and tourism companies, the Ministry of Tourism: Egypt. Retrieved from: https://mota.gov.eg/ar/.

[84]. 84.Cochran, W.G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed..New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

[85]. 85.Manley, S. C., Hair Jr, J. F., Williams Jr, R. I., & McDowell, W. C. (2021). Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4), 1805-1825.

[86]. 86.Kock, N. (2017). WarpPLS user manual: Version 6.0. ScriptWarp Systems: Laredo, TX, USA, 141, 47-60.

[87]. 87.Kock, N. (2019). From composites to factors: B ridging the gap between PLS and covariance‐based structural equation modelling. Information Systems Journal, 29(3), 674-706.

[88]. 88.Singh, R., Singh, C. D., & Singh, T. (2024). Structural equation modelling of core functional competencies based on partial least square method using WarpPLS 7.0. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 16(2), 215-230.

[89]. 89.Kock, N. (2021). WarpPLS User Manual: Version 7.0. Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems.

[90]. 90.Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of marketing research, 14(3), 396-402.

[91]. 91.Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.

[92]. 92.Ugwu, F., Nwali, A. C., Ugwu, L. E., Okafor, C. O., Ozurumba, K. C., & Onyishi, I. E. (2023). Mediating roles of employee cynicism and workplace ostracism on the relationship between perceived organizational politics and counterproductive work behavior. Career Development International, 28(3), 314-332.

[93]. 93.Aggarwal, A., Nobi, K., Mittal, A., & Rastogi, S. (2021). Does personality affect the individual's perceptions of organizational justice? The mediating role of organizational politics. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(3), 997-1026.

[94]. 94.Son, S., Yang, T. S., & Park, J. (2023). How organizational politics and subjective social status moderate job insecurity–silence relationships. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(2), 266-286.

[95]. 95.Karatepe, T., Ozturen, A., Karatepe, O. M., & Uner, M. M. (2022). Do Both Qualitative Job Insecurity and Quantitative Job Insecurity Trigger Hotel Employees’ Withdrawal Intentions and Non-Green Behaviors?. Co-Editors, 15.

[96]. 96.Khairy HA, Salama W, Suliman MA, et al. (2025b). Work-leisure conflict and job burnout in the hospitality industry: The buffering effects of psychological resilience and detachment. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(6): 3698. doi: 10.59429/esp.v10i6.3698

[97]. 97.Aggarwal, A., Chand, P. K., Jhamb, D., & Mittal, A. (2020). Leader–member exchange, work engagement, and psychological withdrawal behavior: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 423.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com