Published
2025-11-18
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ZhengGui Chen*, JinWen Tang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Mechanism of brand authenticity on customer value co-creation: Mediating effect of brand trust
Zhenggui Chen
International college, Krirk University, Bangkok, 10110,Thailand
Jinwen Tang
International college, Krirk University, Bangkok, 10110,Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.3922
Keywords: Brand authenticity; brand trust; customer value co creation; perceived behavioral control; influence mechanism
Abstract
This study investigates the impact mechanism of brand authenticity on the importance of customers co-creation, highlighting how brand trust acts as a mediator and the moderating influence of perceived behavioral control. Utilizing quantitative research methodologies, 368 valid samples were gathered via questionnaire surveys, and statistical techniques, including Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), were used to analyze the data. The results indicate that brand authenticity positively influences brand trust, which acts as a powerful mediator in the connection between authenticity and customer value co-creation. Perceived behavioral control serves in the role of moderator in these relationships, enhancing the positive impact when consumers perceive higher control over their behavior. Brand authenticity directly affects customer value co-creation, highlighting its role as a key driver. The study contributes theoretically by providing an in-depth analysis of the mediating role of brand trust and exploring the moderating effect of perceived behavioral control. Practically, it offers strategies for brand managers to enhance customer value co-creation by strengthening brand authenticity and trust, providing significant guidance for brand management in the digital and globalized era.
References
[1]. 1.Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43-61.
[2]. 2.Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. J. (2008). The Quest for Authenticity in Consumption: Consumers' Purposive Choice of Authentic Cues to Shape Experienced Outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 838.
[3]. 3.Chen, Q., Huang, R., & Hou, B. (2021). Perceived authenticity of traditional branded restaurants (China): Impacts on perceived quality, perceived value, and behavioral intentions. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(5), 2950-2971.
[4]. 4.Aaker, D. A. (2019). Brand personality and authenticity's impact on brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 27(2), 123-137.
[5]. 5.James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (2022). Mediators, moderators, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Sage Publications.
[6]. 6.Yang, Z. H., Wang, D. S., & Li, T. T. (2023). A Study on the Influence Mechanism of the Authenticity of Brand Material Sources on Consumers' Brand Attitude.Journal of Economics and Management Research,06, 132-144.
[7]. 7.Zhao, Z., & Li, Z. (2023). An empirical Study of Authenticity Dimensions of Local Catering Brands and Its Influence Mechanism on Recommendation Intention in Tourism Context. Tropical Geography, 43(7), 1351-1363.
[8]. 8.Luo, L. (2023). The Relationship Between Community E-Commerce Identity, Brand Trust, and Consumer Loyalty. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(4), 512-528.
[9]. 9.Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
[10]. 10.Wu, Q., & Du, Y. Y. (2024). Research on the development path and implementation process of value co-creation in platform e-commerce enterprise ecosystem in China. Management Science, 41(2), 45-58.
[11]. 11.Ren, X. J., Li, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Co-creation strategy of platform ecological value under the "sharing+" model. Business Management Journal, 46(2), 89-103.
[12]. 12.Yu, R. Z. (2024). The mechanism of value co-creation in agricultural socialized services. Agricultural Economics, 35(2), 112-125.
[13]. 13.Qian, Y. (2024). The impact of nostalgic advertising types on customer brand attitudes: The mediating effect of brand authenticity. Marketing Science, 28(9), 156-168.
[14]. 14.Wang, X. W., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Influencing factors of users' value co-creation actions on metaverse platforms: A mixed methods research. Information Systems Research, 33(10), 245-263.
[15]. 15.Tao, C. C. (2024). The relationship between consumer fit, value co-creation, and innovation performance in cross-border e-commerce enterprises. International Business Research, 41(2), 78-92.
[16]. 16.Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. L. (2024). The impact mechanism of value co-creation in product experience sharing communities: A resource perspective. Journal of Business Research, 168(12), 89-102.
[17]. 17.Zheng, H. M., & Zhou, J. X. (2023). User participation in interactive film and television experiences based on value co-creation theory. Media Studies, 45(11), 34-48.
[18]. 18.Dong, J. J., Liu, J. S., & Lei, Y. Y. (2023). Innovation capability redundancy and value creation: The mediating role of brand trust. R&D Management, 51(13), 67-82.
[19]. 19.Yao, M. F., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2024). Dynamic capabilities, value co-creation and service dominant logic in innovative firms. Strategic Management Journal, 42(14), 145-162.
[20]. 20.Li, Z. P. (2024). Tourist value under service-led logic: A new perspective for tourism industry. Tourism Management, 85(12), 234-248.
[21]. 21.Zhang, W. Q., & Zhou, L. (2024). Channel innovation strategies of SME foreign trade enterprise brands in digital age: A service-oriented logic perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 32(12), 178-195.
[22]. 22.Gong, S. W., Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2024). Value co-creation path of fission entrepreneurship: An opportunity resource integration perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(15), 267-285.
[23]. 23.Wang, X. H., & Chen, J. Q. (2024). The impact of perceived platform sellers' pro-organizational unethical behavior on consumers' participation in value co-creation. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(16), 312-328.
[24]. 24.Zhang, J., Zhao, Y. D., & Yang, P. (2024). The impact of job autonomy among gig workers on sustained value co-creation behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(17), 423-439.
[25]. 25.Liu, H., & Wu, Y. Z. (2023). Regulatory dilemma and path optimization of online consumer trajectory information exchange: A social exchange theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(18), 556-573.
[26]. 26.Chen, X. Y., & Qiu, G. D. (2024). Digital transformation from product-led to service-led logic: The role of perceived behavioral control in value co-creation. Journal of Service Research, 27(19), 234-251.
[27]. 27.Sun, H. B., & Sun, X. B. (2024). How scenario services affect value co-creation in intelligent interconnected environment. Journal of Service Management, 35(20), 178-196.
[28]. 28.Zhang, X. J., & Zhang, Y. L. (2024). Pricing strategies for shared platforms considering user participation in value creation. Marketing Letters, 35(21), 445-462.
[29]. 29.Dong, J. J., Liu, J. S., & Lei, Y. Y. (2023). Innovation capability redundancy and value creation: The mediating role of brand trust. R&D Management, 51(13), 67-82.






