Published
2025-10-29
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anas Akram Mohammed, Ibrahim Khilel Khinger, Omar Ahmed Hassan Khamees, Majid Fadhil Ziboon, Thamer Kadum Yousif Al Hilfi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Human rights and environmental justice: A legal framework for sustainable ecosystem management
Anas Akram Mohammed
Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq
Ibrahim Khilel Khinger
Al-Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq
Omar Ahmed Hassan Khamees
Al-Mamoon University College, Baghdad 10012, Iraq
Majid Fadhil Ziboon
Al-Rafidain University College Baghdad 10064, Iraq
Thamer Kadum Yousif Al Hilfi
Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.3970
Keywords: Environmental justice; human rights law; legal frameworks; sustainable ecosystem management; compliance; governance; socio-environmental inequality
Abstract
The article discusses the human rights approach towards environmental justice and sustainable ecosystems governance. The urgency for integrative legislation that addresses environmental and social dimensions together has become acute with rising ecological malaise and social and environmental inequities. This study adopts a multidimensional methodology with a structured legal analysis, econometric modeling, comparisons between regional case studies, and scenario-based simulations. Based on data drawn from international treaties, national laws, environmental datasets, and judicial decisions in five regions of the globe, this allowed for an evaluation of the efficiency and institutional performance. The evidence shows stronger environmental benefits for jurisdictions where legal activation is robust, systems of compliance with the law are strict, and community participation is incorporated more organically into environmental governance. Statistical tests have shown that socioeconomic inequities, like income and education divides have a very close relationship with environmental harm, pointing to the need for the kind of redistributive legal frameworks. In addition, predictive modeling further ratifies that legal interventions translate into long-term ecological resilience coupled with increased indices of compliance. Comparative evidence from Bangladesh and the EU context supports this claim, showing that integrative legal frameworks not only enhance compliance but also create measurable improvements in ecosystem resilience and socio-environmental equity. The discussion provides recommendations for future research and policy development, such as expanding temporal modeling, incorporating indigenous legal systems, and aligning legal interventions with climate finance and biodiversity policies. This study further feeds into the emerging discourse on environmental human rights and provides evidence that can be used to tailor fair systems of law that are equally able to promote environmental sustainability as well as social justice.
References
[1]. 1.Bint-E-Basar KT, Tasnim KS. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND JUSTICE SYSTEM IN BANGLADESH: ISSUES AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK. Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities. 2024;10(1):46-57.
[2]. 2.Bueno N, Bernaz N, Holly G, Martin-Ortega O. The EU Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CSDDD): The Final Political Compromise. Business and Human Rights Journal. 2024;9(2):294-300.
[3]. 3.Widjaja G. Legal and environmental responsibility towards justice in industrial pollution. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2024;8(8).
[4]. 4.Sulyok K. Transforming the Rule of Law in Environmental and Climate Litigation: Prohibiting the Arbitrary Treatment of Future Generations. Transnational Environmental Law. 2024.
[5]. 5.Takada M. Challenges and Opportunities of Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice in the Face of Climate Change and Ecological Crisis in Japan. . International Journal of Sociology. 2024;8(1):53 – 65.
[6]. 6.Cain L, Hernandez-Cortes D, Timmins C, Weber P. Recent Findings and Methodologies in Economics Research in Environmental Justice. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2024;18(1):116-42.
[7]. 7.Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2133-61.
[8]. 8.Hendrastiti TK, Setiahadi, R., Kusujiarti, S. ., Pratiwi, D., & Safrudi, H. I. Essential Ecosystem Area Policies as a Means to Promote Participatory and Inclusive Conservation in Forest Landscape Governance: Centering Perspectives of Marginalized Women in Taman Kili-Kili, Indonesia. . Forest and Society. 2024;8(1):140-53.
[9]. 9.Cannon CEB. Critical Environmental Injustice: A Case Study Approach to Understanding Disproportionate Exposure to Toxic Emissions. Toxics [Internet]. 2024; 12(4).
[10]. 10.Xing Z, Guo J, Zhang Z, Xue T, Yang M, Wu W. Research on the Impact of Environmental Inequality on Labor Mobility—A Study Based on the China General Social Survey (CGSS). Sustainability [Internet]. 2024; 16(22).
[11]. 11.Shen J, Wang S, Wang Y. Environmental Inequality in Peri-Urban Areas: A Case Study of Huangpu District, Guangzhou City. Land [Internet]. 2024; 13(5).
[12]. 12.Gilmour T, Stacey J. Access to Environmental Justice in Canadian environmental impact assessment. FACETS. 2024;9:1-18.
[13]. 13.Le K. GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF UN’S SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business. 2024;2:3857-65.
[14]. 14.Alkassaabeh FY, Al-Zoubi MAK. LEGAL FRAMEWORKS FOR FACING ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION CRIMES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JORDANIAN LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. 2024;12(4):e3565.
[15]. 15.Alubaidi AH. HUMAN RIGHT TO ENVIRONMENT. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. 2024;12(4):e3563.
[16]. 16.Harsya RMK, Bhaskoro, A., Sinaga, H., Koynja, J. J., & Judijanto, L. . Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development: Assessing Legal Frameworks for a Balanced Future. . Global International Journal of Innovative Research. 2024;1(3):274–81.
[17]. 17.Mehta M, Hocaoglu M. Factors Affecting Compliance for Patients Post First Episode Psychosis. BJPsych Open. 2023;9(S1):S62-S.
[18]. 18.Habiba U. Protecting the Environment with Human Rights: Mechanism Rooted in Anthropocentric Approach. Human Rights in the Global South (HRGS). 2024;2:104-19.
[19]. 19.Yuliyanto E, Alatiqoh, M. M., & Alfaruq, A. H. . Inter-correlation between Human Rights and Environmental Justice: A Discourse of Right to a Good and Healthy Environment in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development. 2022;1(2):213-36.
[20]. 20.Rachuri SN, Malavalli A, Parasa NS, Bassin P, Srinivasa S. Modeling the impact of policy interventions for sustainable development. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; Macao, P.R.China2023. p. Article 841.
[21]. 21.Dzwigol H, Kwilinski A, Lyulyov O, Pimonenko T. The Role of Environmental Regulations, Renewable Energy, and Energy Efficiency in Finding the Path to Green Economic Growth. Energies [Internet]. 2023; 16(7).
[22]. 22.Valette M, Newey S, Schreckenberg K, Dawson TP. Woodland expansion and upland management strategy dilemmas for biodiversity and carbon storage in the Cairngorms national park. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2024;12.
[23]. 23.Hannan MA, Shepherd P. Sustainable Development and Environment Conservation: A Comparative Study on Protecting Environmental Human Rights. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2024.
[24]. 24.Başkent EZ. A Framework for Characterizing and Regulating Ecosystem Services in a Management Planning Context. Forests. 2020;11:102.
[25]. 25.Halkis M, Waldani I. Rethinking Nature’s Rights: An Ethical Framework for Sustainable Coexistence. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024.
[26]. 26.Khosravi Mashizi A, Sharafatmandrad M. Investigating tradeoffs between supply, use and demand of ecosystem services and their effective drivers for sustainable environmental management. Journal of environmental management. 2021;289:112534.






