Published
2025-10-28
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Runitha Menon Janardanan, Sarfraz Aslam, Sharareh Shahidi Hamedani, Atif Saleem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Advancing sustainable service quality in higher education institutions: Enhancing student satisfaction and loyalty
Runitha Menon Janardanan
Faculty of Education and Humanities, UNITAR International University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Sarfraz Aslam
Faculty of Education and Humanities, UNITAR International University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Sharareh Shahidi Hamedani
Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, 47301 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Atif Saleem
School of Education, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4012
Keywords: service quality; student satisfaction; student loyalty; private higher education institutions; SERVQUAL
Abstract
This research examines the relationship between service quality, student satisfaction, and loyalty in private higher education institutions (PHEIs), utilizing the SERVQUAL model. This research used a quantitative survey across various PHEIs in Malaysia to measure service quality and its effect on students' satisfaction and loyalty. One hundred sixty-six respondents completed a 49-item questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale. The study reveals a strong correlation between service quality and student satisfaction, with empathy and assurance identified as the strongest predictors of student satisfaction and loyalty. These findings underscore the strategic role of supportive and trustworthy service in strengthening competitiveness among Malaysia's PHEIs. The findings offer a guide for private higher education institutions (PHEIs) to better match their academic and support services with what students expect. The insights also support policymakers and leaders in developing strategies to enhance student satisfaction, foster loyalty, and promote the long-term growth of the sector.
References
[1]. 1.Amjad, A. I., Aslam, S., Abid, N., Tabassum, U., & Shafqat, F. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Overcoming Teachers’ Hurdles in Implementing Gamification for Society 5.0 Education. SAGE Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340269 (Original work published 2025)
[2]. 2.Amjad, A. I., Aslam, S., Habib, M., Sial, Z. A., & Shahidi Hamedani, S. (2025). Society 5.0‘s impact on STEM help-seeking: unpacking teacher-student interactions. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2483527
[3]. 3.Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring Service Quality in Higher Education: HEdPerf versus SERVPREF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1), 31-47. doi:10.1108/02634500610641543
[4]. 4.Abdullah, N. A. (2012). Performance Measurement in Malaysia's Higher Education. Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, 1-10.
[5]. 5.Abdullah, N. R., Rosli, N. A., & Ramasamy, R. (2021). Private Higher Education Institutions (PHEIs) in Malaysia: An Assessment of Service Quality and Students' Satisfaction. International Journal of Management, Accounting, Governance and Education, 1(2), 46-54.
[6]. 6.Abualrejal, H. M., Alqudah, A. Z., Ali, A. A., Saoula, O., & AlOrmuza, T. K. (2022). University Parcel Centre Services Quality and Users’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutions: A Case of Universiti Utara Malaysia. Proceedings of international conference on emerging technologies and intelligent systems: ICETIS 2021, 322, 885-895. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-85990-9_70
[7]. 7.Abu-Rumman, A., & Qawasmeh, R. (2021). Assessing International Students' Satisfaction of a Jordanian University Using the Service Quality Model. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1742-1760. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ayman-Abu-Rumman/publication/357224344_Assessing_international_students'_satisfaction_of_a_Jordanian_university_using_the_service_quality_model/links/6307a7ed5eed5e4bd11ba445/Assessing-international-students-satisfacti
[8]. 8.Ahmad, S. B., & Loke, S. H. (2022). Unfolding the Moving-In Experience of International Students at a Malaysian Private Tertiary Institution. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 441-453.
[9]. 9.Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2014-0008
[10]. 10.Ali, M., Wood-Harper, T., & Ramlogan, R. (2020). A Framework Strategy to Overcome Trust Issues on Cloud Computing Adoption in Higher Education. In B. Gupta (Ed.). Modern Principles, Practices, and Algorithms for Cloud Security, 162-183. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1082-7.ch008
[11]. 11.ALi, S. R., Shariff, N. A., Said, N. S., & Mat, K. A. (2018). Service Quality in Higher Educaton in Malaysia: Perception of Undergraduate Students in a Malaysia Public Universtity. e-Academia Journal University Teknologi MARA Terengganu, 7(2), 138-145. Retrieved from https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/JeA/article/view/4696
[12]. 12.Altbach, P. (2019). Private Higher Education: Global trends and Indian realities. In D. Agarwal & A.P. Mishra (Eds), Private higher education in India: A vision for the future. Springer, 1-14.
[13]. 13.Angell, R. J., Heffernan, T. W., & Megicks, P. (2008). Service Quality in Postgraduates Education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 236-254. doi:/10.1108/09684880810886259
[14]. 14.Anis, A., & Islam, R. (2019). Prioritised challenges and critical success factors for delivering quality in Malaysian private higher education institutions. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 465-492.
[15]. 15.Anselmsson, J. (2006). Sources of customer satisfaction with shopping malls: A comparative study of different customer segments. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 16(1), 115-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960500453641
[16]. 16.A'rifian, N. I., Daud, N. S., Romzi, A. F., & Shahri, N. H. (2019). A Comparative Study on Graduates' Employment in Malaysia by Using Data Mining. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1366(012120). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1366/1/012120
[17]. 17.Arokiasamy, A. (2012). The Effect of Marketing Mix and Customer Perception on Brand Loyalty. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 4, 1-11. doi:10.9790/487X-0420111
[18]. 18.Arokiasamy, L., Ismail, M., Ahmad, A., & Othman, J. (2011). Predictors of academics’ career advancement at Malaysian private universities. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(6), 589-605.
[19]. 19.Arumugam, T. (2021, November 1). Improving the Quality of Education. Retrieved from New Straits Times: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2021/11/741635/improvingquality-education.
[20]. 20.Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). “It gives you that sense of hope”: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon, 6(1), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945
[21]. 21.Ayanbode, O. F., Fagbe, A., Owolabi, R., Oladipo, S., & Ewulo, O. R. (2022). Students' interactions, satisfaction and perceived progress in an online class: Emphirical evidence from Babcock university Nigeria. Cogent Education, 9(1).
[22]. 22.Bahagian Perancangan Strategik Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (2023). Laporan Kajian Pengesahan Graduan 2022. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi.
[23]. 23.Baik, C. L. (2019). How universities can enhance student mental wellbeing: The Student Perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 674-687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1576596
[24]. 24.Balan, J. (1990). Private Universities within the Argentine Higher Educational System: Trends and Prospects. Higher Education Policy, 3(2), 13-17.
[25]. 25.Becket, N., & Brookes, M. (2008). Evaluating quality management in university departments. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(2), 123-142.
[26]. 26.Bekhet, H. A., AL-Alak, B. A., & El-Refae, G. A. (2014). Developing student satisfaction perception model for. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 7(4), 404-418. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hussain-Bekhet/publication/344902812_Developing_student_satisfaction_perception_model_for_public_and_private_universities_in_Malaysia/links/5f984267458515b7cfa1bf2a/Developing-student-satisfaction-perception-model-for-
[27]. 27.Bernama. (2021). 12MP Formulated Holistically to Strengthen Higher Education- Noraini. Retrieved from Astro Awani: https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/12mpformulated-holistically-strengthen-higher-education-noraini-322749
[28]. 28.Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
[29]. 29.Chui, T. B., Ahmad, M. S., Bassim, F. b., & Zaimi, N. b. (2016). Evaluation of Service Quality of Private Higher Education Using Service Improvement Matrix. Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 224, 132-140. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.417
[30]. 30.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha adn the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
[31]. 31.Da, C. W., Abdul, A., & Lim, A. (2015). Private Higher Education in Malaysia. In: K.M. Joshi & S. Paivandi, eds., Private Higher Education. A Global Perspective, 341-385.
[32]. 32.Da, W. C. (2007, June). Public and Private Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia: Competing, Complementary or Crossbreeds As Education Providers. Kajian Malaysia, 25.
[33]. 33.Devan, A. (2021). History of Malaysian Education System: Year 1824 to 2025. Social Sciences Education eJournal, 4(7), 1-11. doi:10.2139/ssrn.373572
[34]. 34.Fadzil, N. F., Samad, P. N., Nawawi, A. F., & Puteh, N. Z. (2022). Towards a High Standards of Excellence in Malaysia's Higher Education Institutions: Obstacles and Enablers. Journal of Administrative Science, 19(2), 162-192. Retrieved from http:jas@uitm.edu.my
[35]. 35.Fahimirad, M., Nair, P. K., Kotamjani, S. S., & Mah, M. (2019). Integration and Development of Employability Skills into Malaysian Higher Education Context: Review of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 26-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n6p26
[36]. 36.Farahmandian, S., Minavand, H., & Afshardost, M. (2013). Perceived Service Quality and Student Satisfaction in Higher Education. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 12(4), 65-74. Retrieved from https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol12-issue4/L01246574.pdf
[37]. 37.Galloway, L. (1998). Quality perceptions of internal and external customers: a case study in educational administration. The TQM Magazine, 10(1), 20-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789810197774
[38]. 38.Ganbold, B., Park, K., & Hong, J. (2023). Study of Educational Service Quality in Mongolian Universities. Sustainability, 15(1), 580. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010580
[39]. 39.Gebauer, H., Gustafsson, A., & Witell, L. (2011). Competitive Advantage Through Service Differentiation by Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Business Rsearch, 64, 1270-1280. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.015
[40]. 40.Goi, C. L., & Goi, M. T. (2009). Rebranding of Higher Educational Insitutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(No. 9), 170-177.
[41]. 41.Golzar, J., Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2022). Convenience Sampling. International Journal of Education and Language Studies, 72-77. Retrieved from https://www.ijels.net/article_162981_06fc448b8914d42316b8d44829c88188.pdf
[42]. 42.Goumairi, O., Aoula, E.-S., & Souda, S. B. (2020). Application of the SERVQUAL Model for the Evaluation of the Service Quality in Moroccan Higher Education: Public Engineering School as a Case Study. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(5), 223-229. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p223
[43]. 43.Grapragasem, S., Krishnan, A., & Mansor, A. N. (2014). Current Trends in Malaysian Higher Education and the Effect on Education Policy and Practice: An Overview. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 85-93. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p85
[44]. 44.Gronroos, C. (1982). An Applied Service Marketing Theory. European Journal of Marketing, 16(7), 30-41.
[45]. 45.Hadikoermoro, S. (2002). A Comparison of Public and Private University Students' Expectations and Perceptions of Service Quality in Jakarta, Indonesia. Unpublished D.B.A.
[46]. 46.Hanif, R. Z., Handayani, N. U., & Lestari, A. D. (2022). Students perspective in service quality for improvement in higher education: A case in industrial engineeting department, Diponegoro University, Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0100255
[47]. 47.Har, C. O., Ramasamy, R., & Binati, R. W. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG STUDENTS’ LOYALTY, COMMITMENT AND TRUST IN PRIVATE UNIVERSITY, MALAYSIA. BERJAYA Journal of Services & Management, 9, 31-42. Retrieved from https://journal.berjaya.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Jan-2018_31-42.pdf
[48]. 48.Hasan, H. F. (2008). Service Quality and Student Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions. International Business Research, 1(3), 163-175. Retrieved from https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/31753676/982-2957-1-PB-libre.pdf?1392470470=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3D982_2957_1_PB.pdf&Expires=1697380077&Signature=Ehihb6hnNVu2W1c9B0sbMwNZNU4xTWW6lKMT74GMs4CxfSw40DXmTk~rNTcNhOKl6IY6AKG8N-7
[49]. 49.Hashim, R., & Rahman, S. A. (2018). The role of service quality, student engagement, and perceived value in enhancing student satisfaction and loyalty in private higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(2), 262-278.
[50]. 50.Hassan, S. B., & Shamsudin, M. F. (2019). Measuring the Effect of Service Quality and Corporate Image on Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in Higher Learning Institute of Technical and Vocational Educatio and Training. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(5C), 533-538. doi:10.35940/ijeat.E1077.0585C19
[51]. 51.Hassan, S., Shamsudin, M. F., & Mustapha, I. (2019). The Effect of Service Quality and Corporate Image on Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in TVET Higher Learning Institutes (HLIs). Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(4), 77-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.04.009
[52]. 52.Hassan, S., Shamsudin, M. F., Hasim, M. A., Mustapha, I., Jaafar, J., Adruthdin, K. F., . . . Ahmad, R. (2019). Mediating Effect of Corporate Image and Students' Satisfaction on the Relationship Between Service Quality and Students' Loyalty in TVET HLIs. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(Supp. 1), 93-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.s1.7
[53]. 53.Hou, A. Y.-C., Hill, C., Chen, K. H., & Tsai, S. (2018). A comparative study of international branch campuses in Malaysia, Singapore, China, and South Korea: regulation, governance, and quality assurance. Asia Pacific Education(19), 543-555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9550-9
[54]. 54.Huang, H. T., & Hede, W. B.-M. (2012). Strategic marketing of educational institutions. Paper presented at the ANZMAC 2010: Doing more with less: Proceedings of the 2010 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.anzmac2010.org/proceedings/pdf/anzmac10Final00468.pdf
[55]. 55.Ian, S. F., & Tax, S. S. (1996). Planning for Service Quality: An Intergrative Approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7(4), 58-77. doi:10.1108/09564239610129959
[56]. 56.Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K., Akintade, D., . . . S.C.L.Koh. (2021). A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosytems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resource, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
[57]. 57.Ibrahim, M. Z., Ab Rahman, M. N., & Yasin, R. M. (2012). Assessing students' perceptions of service quality in technical educational and vocational training (TVET) institutions in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 56, 272-283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.655
[58]. 58.Ibrahim, M., & Cheong, L. S. (2016). A study of determinants of student loyalty in the higher education context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 99-109.
[59]. 59.Ishak, N. H., Ali, Z. M., & Zawawi, R. (2021). STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION ON SERVICES QUALITY: COMPARISON BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN KLANG VALLEY. Journal Design + Built, 14(1), 113-125. Retrieved from https://spaj.ukm.my/jsb/index.php/jdb/article/view/562
[60]. 60.Ismail, A., Roslan, L., Ismail, H. B., & Salleh, N. A. (2021). Students' Satisfaction towards Academic Advising Service. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 17(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14497
[61]. 61.Ismail, N. A., Abd Manaf, N., & Jaafar, M. (2020). Exploring the factors influecing students's satisfaction and loyalty in private universities: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(6), 1311-1322.
[62]. 62.Jerab, D. A., & Mabrouk, T. (2023). Strategic Excellence: Achieving Competitive Advantage through Differentiation Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-15. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4575042
[63]. 63.Jia-Haur, G., Yen-Nee, G., & Ramayah, T. (2017). Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in Malaysia Private Higher Education Institutions. Global Business and Management Research, 9(4), 315-327. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/f199fc0f657e71f5d183100b6cbced2c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=696409
[64]. 64.Khattab, F. (2018). Developing a Service Quality Model for Private Higher Education Institutions in Lebanon. Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 3(1), 24-33. Retrieved from http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/pdf_files/JMMR%20Vol%203(1)/4.Farah%20Khattab.pdf
[65]. 65.Kokalan, O., Yumusak, I. G., & Gurleyen, S. O. (2022). The Service Quality of Public and Foundation (Private) Universities in Turkey from the Perspectives of Turkish and International Students. TEM Journal, 11(2), 820-828. doi:10.18421/TEM112-40
[66]. 66.Kwek, C. L., Lau, T. C., & Tan, H. P. (2010). Education Quality Process Model and Its Influence on Students' Perceived Service Quality. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(8), 154-165. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Teck-Chai-Lau-2/publication/45266859_Education_Quality_Process_Model_and_Its_Influence_on_Students'_Perceived_Service_Quality/links/546d96860cf2193b94c58880/Education-Quality-Process-Model-and-Its-Influence-on-Students
[67]. 67.Latip, M. S., Newaz, F. T., & Ramasamy, R. (2020). Students' Perception of Lecturers' Competency and the Effect on Institution Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Students' Satisfaction. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 183-195. doi:https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.9155
[68]. 68.Lee, L. M. (2017). Determinants of student's loyalty in the Malaysian private higher education industry. Universiti Utara Malaysian Electronic Theses and Dissertation.
[69]. 69.Lim, S. W., & Nor, M. A. (2017). Determinants of student satisfaction in higher education: A case study from Malaysia. Quality Assurance in Education, 25(2), 168-182.
[70]. 70.Macaulay, S., & Cook, S. (1994). Performance Management as the Key to Customer Service. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26, 3-8. doi:10.1108/00197859410073736
[71]. 71.Malaysia. (2001). Education in Malaysia: A Journey to Excellence. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, Educational Planning and Research Division.
[72]. 72.Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. (2021). A Study On The Impact of Covid-19 On Graduate Employability. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER).
[73]. 73.Malaysian Investment Development Authority. (2024). Education Services. Retrieved from Malaysian Investment Development Authority: https://www.mida.gov.my/industries/services/education-services/
[74]. 74.Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA). (2017, February 2024). Self-Assessment Report. Selangor: Malaysian Qualification Agency. Retrieved from Malaysian Qualification Agency: https://www.mqa.gov.my/new/aqaf.cfm#gsc.tab=0
[75]. 75.Malaysian Qualification Agency. (2023, May 22). MQA At A Glance. Retrieved from Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA) Web Site: https://www.mqa.gov.my/new/profil_MQA.cfm#gsc.tab=0
[76]. 76.Malaysian Qualification Agency. (2024). Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA). Retrieved from https://www.mqa.gov.my/
[77]. 77.Malaysian Qualification Register . (2024, March 08). Search for Qualification . Retrieved from Malaysian Qualification Register (MQA): https://www2.mqa.gov.my/mqr/english/eakrbyipts.cfm
[78]. 78.Mansori, S., Vaz, A., & Ismail, Z. M. (2014). Service Quality, Satisfaction and Student Loyalty in Malaysian Private Education. Asian Social Science, 10(7), 57-66. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n7p57
[79]. 79.Mansori, S., Vaz, A., & Ismail, Z. M. (2014). Service Quality, Satisfaction and Student Loyalty in Malaysian Private Education. Asian Social Science, 10(7), 57-66. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n7p57
[80]. 80.Mardhiah, A. (2022, November 02). Private universities keeping up with current demands. Retrieved from The Malaysian Reserve: https://themalaysianreserve.com/2022/11/02/private-universities-keeping-up-with-current-demands/
[81]. 81.Marginson, S. (2018). Public/private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 322-337.
[82]. 82.Marimuthu, T. (2008). The Role of the Private Sector in Higher Education in Malaysia. In: Johnson, D., Maclean, R. (eds) Teaching: Professionalization, Development and Leadership. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8186-6_18
[83]. 83.Mattsson, J. (1992). A Service Quality Model Based on an Ideal Value Standard. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 3(3), 18-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239210015148
[84]. 84.Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysian Education Blueprint (Higher Education) 2015-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.um.edu.my/docs/um-magazine/4-executive-summary-pppm-2015-2025.pdf
[85]. 85.Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2020). Way Forward for PHEIs 2020-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia, Department of Higher Education. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. Retrieved from https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/index.php/ms/penerbitan/74-way-forward-for-private-higher-education-institution-education-as-an-industry-2020-2025
[86]. 86.Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). (2024, February 03). FAQ SETARA dan MyQUEST 2022. Retrieved from Department Of Higher Education, Ministry Of Higher Education: https://jpt.mohe.gov.my/portal/index.php/en/setara-myquest
[87]. 87.Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). (2024). Ministry of Higher Education Official Portal. Retrieved from Ministry of Higher Education Official Portal: https://www.mohe.gov.my/en/corporate/about-us/introduction
[88]. 88.Mohammed, N. H., Salleh, S. M., Hamzah, S. F., Sakina, H., & Yusof, M. (2023). Mediating Effect of Institutional Image on the Relationship between Student Satisfaction adn Student Loyalty in Higher Learning Institutions Using the HEdPREF Model. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 19(1), 72-82. doi:10.24191/ajue.v19i1.21221
[89]. 89.Mukherjee, P., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). Private higher education systems and its quality in India. International Journal of Applied Services Marketing Perspectives, 2(2), 359-365.
[90]. 90.Munteanu, C., Ceobanu, C., Bobalca, C., & Anton, O. (2010). An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 124-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022483
[91]. 91.Nair, P. K., & Fahimirad, M. (2019). A Qualitative Research Study on The Importance of Life Skills on Undergraduate Students' Personal and Social Competencies. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 71-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p71
[92]. 92.Najimdeen, A. H., Amzat, I. H., & Ali, H. b. (2021). The Impact of Service Quality Dimensions on Students' Satisfaction: A Study of International Students in Malaysian Public Universities. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 9(2), 89-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v9i2.324
[93]. 93.New Straits Times. (2024, March 05). Malaysia to Bolster Stronger Higher Education Exchanges with Turkiye and Other International Counterparts, says Zambry. Retrieved from New Straits Times Business Times: https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2024/03/1021349/malaysia-bolster-stronger-higher-education-exchanges-turkiye-and-other
[94]. 94. Nguyen, H. V., Vu, T. D., Saleem, M., & Yaseen, A. (2024). The influence of service quality on student satisfaction and student loyalty in Vietnam: The moderating role of the university image. Journal of Trade Science, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-12-2023-0032
[95]. 95. Osman, P. D. (2023, May 4). Private Higher Learning Institutions Have Vital Role in National Agenda. Retrieved from New Strait Times: https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2023/05/905698/private-higher-learning-institutions-have-vital-role-national
[96]. 96.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 41-50.
[97]. 97.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL : A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12.
[98]. 98.Patrinos, H. A. (1990). The Privatization of Higher Education in Colombia: Effects on Quality and Equity. Higher Education, 20(2), 161-173. doi:10.1007/BF00143699
[99]. 99.Policy Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2022). Higher Education Report: Malaysia, UNESCO National Commission in Alliance with [Higher Education Institution(s) or other organisations]. Malaysia: UNESCO World Higher Education Conference (WHEC2022), Section for Higher Education, Division of Education 2030.
[100]. 100.PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION ACT 1996. (2006). Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 (Act 555). Retrieved from IMU Library: https://i-lib.imu.edu.my/mod/page/view.php?id=440
[101]. 101.Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996. (2006). International Medical University Library. Retrieved from IMU Library: https://i-lib.imu.edu.my/pluginfile.php/572/mod_page/content/6/%20Private%20Higher%20Educational%20Institutions%20Act%201996%20%28Act%20555%29.pdf
[102]. 102.Qazi, M. A., Sharif, M. A., & Akhlaq, A. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to adoption of e-learning in higher education institutions of Pakistan during COVID-19: perspectives from an emerging economy. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(1), 31-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2022-0002
[103]. 103.Rajaendram, R. (2020, April 26 ). Road to Success. The Star. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2020/04/26/road-to-success
[104]. 104.Ramaiyah, A., Jayaprakash, J. C., & Zain, A. N. (2009). A research framework using SERVQUAL instrument to analyse the quality of services provided by private institutions of higher learning in Malaysia. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 3(4), 335-345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVCM.2009.031764
[105]. 105.Rasheed, H. M., He, Y., Khalid, J., Khizar, H. M., & Sharif, S. (2022). The relationship between e-learning and academic performance of students. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(3). doi:10.1002/pa.2492
[106]. 106.Sahney, S., Banwet, D., & Karunes, S. (2010). Quality Framework in Education Through Application of Interpretive Structural Modelling. The TQM Journal, 22(1), 56-71.
[107]. 107.Saliba, K., & Zoran, A. G. (2018). Measuring Higher Education Services Using the SERVQUAL Model. Journal of Universal Excellence, 4, 160-179. Retrieved from https://www.fos-unm.si/media/pdf/ip/ip_37_saliba_zoran.pdf
[108]. 108.Sann, R., Pei-Chun Lai, S.-Y. L., & Chen, C.-T. (2023). Multidimensional scale development and validation: university service quality (UNIQUAL). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights.
[109]. 109.Sarjit, S., Morshidi, A., & Norzaini. (2008). Globalization and Internationalization of Higher Education in Malaysia. Universiti Sains Malaysia Press, Penang, Malayisa.
[110]. 110.Seitova, M., Temirbekova, Z., Kazykhankyzy, L., Khalmatova, Z., & Celik, H. E. (2024). Perceived service quality and student satisfaction: a case study at Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University, Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1-16. doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1492432
[111]. 111.Selvam, P., Dominic, D. D., Goh, K., Wong, D., & Chen, Y. (2010). The Importance of Service Quality for Competitive Advantage - With Special Reference to Industrial Product. IJBIS, 6, 378-397. doi:10.1504/IJBIS.2010.035051
[112]. 112.Selvaratnam, V. (2022). Education: The past and the future. Malaysia's Leap Into the Future, 183-213. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7045-9_8
[113]. 113.Shekarchizadeh, A., Rasli, A., & Hon‐Tat, H. (2011). Business process management journal emerald article servqual in Malaysian universities: Perspectives of international students. Business Process Management Journal, 17, 67-81.
[114]. 114.Shin, J., & Harman, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: global and Asia-Pacific perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 1-13.
[115]. 115.Sin, M. C., Yusof, B. B., & Sin, K. Y. (2018). International Students' Satisfaction Level Towards Service Quality in Academic Aspect and Loyalty to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research In Business & Social Sciences, 8(10), 838-850. Retrieved from 10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/4783
[116]. 116.Singh, J. K., & Jamil, H. (2021). International education and meaningful contributions to society: Exploration of postgraduate international students’ perspectives studying in a Malaysian research university. International Journal of Educational Development, 81. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102331
[117]. 117.Singh, J. K., Schapper, J., & Jack, G. (2014). The Importance of Place for International Students' Choice of University: A Case Study at a Malaysian University. ASIE: Association for Studies in International Education, 18(5), 463-474. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314523990
[118]. 118.Sivalingam, G. (2007). Privatization of Higher Education in Malaysia. Oxford Round Table, 2007, No. 1, p. p. n1. 406 West Florida Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1098483.pdf
[119]. 119.Sohail, M. S., & Saeed, M. (2003). Private Higher Education in Malaysia: Students' satisfaction levels and strategic implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Managment, 25(2), 173-181. doi:10.1080/1360080032000122642
[120]. 120.Sutherland, D., Warwick, P., & Anderson, J. (2019). What factors influence student satisfaction with module quality? A comparative analysis in a UK business school context. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3 100312). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100312
[121]. 121.Tan, A. H., Muskat, B., & Zehrer, A. (2016). A systematic review of quality of student experience in higher education. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(2), 209-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-08-2015-0058
[122]. 122.Tan, C. L. (2018). Exploring the determinants of student loyalty in private higher education insitutions: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1, 99-116.
[123]. 123.Tan, P. S., Choong, Y. O., & Chen, I.-C. (2021). The effect of service quality on behavioural intention: the mediating role of student satisfaction and switching barriers in private universities. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1394-1413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2021-0122
[124]. 124.Tham, S. Y. (2019). Governing Private Higher Education in Malaysia: Change and Evolution. In: Darryl S.L. Jarvis & Ka Ho Mok, Transformations in Higher Education Governance in Asia: Policy, Politics and Progress, 123-138.
[125]. 125.Tham, S.-Y., & Chong, P.-Y. (2023). Transforming Malaysia's Higher Education: Policies and Progress. Asian Economic Policy Review, 9999, 1-18. doi:doi: 10.1111/aepr.12417
[126]. 126.Trivellas, P., & Dargenidou, D. (2009). Leadership and Service Quality in Higher Education: The Case of The Technological Educational Institute of Larissa. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(3), 294-310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690911004221
[127]. 127.UCSI University. (2023, August 24). Press Releases. Retrieved from UCSI University: https://www.ucsiuniversity.edu.my/ucsi-top-malaysia-graduate-employability#:~:text=KUALA%20LUMPUR%3A%20UCSI%20University%20is,previous%20edition%20of%20the%20survey.
[128]. 128.Vogt, M. A., & Schaffner, B. H. (2016). Evaluating interactive technology for an evolving case study on learning and satisfaction of graduate nursing students. Nursing Education in Practice, 19, 79-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.05.006
[129]. 129.W., C. J., & Creswel, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
[130]. 130.Wan, D., & Abdullah. (2021). Internationalisation of Malaysian Higher Education: Policies, Practices and the SDGs. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 23(3), 212-226. Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/2396-7404.htm
[131]. 131. Wider, W., Tan, F. P., Tan, Y. P., Lin, J., Fauzi, M. A., Wong, L. S., Tanucan, J. C. M., & Hossain, S. F. A. (2024). Service quality (SERVQUAL) model in private higher education institutions: A bibliometric analysis of past, present, and future prospects. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100805
[132]. 132.Yusof, N., Zaini, B. J., & Mansor, R. (2019). A Study on Factors Influencing Student Loyalty Towards Higher Learning Institutions. AIP Conference Proceeding 2138, 020001, 4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121037
[133]. 133.Zain, N. M., Aspah, V., Mohmud, N. A., Abdullah, N., & Ebrahimi, M. (2017). Challenges and Evolution of Higher Education in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Civilization Studies, 01(1), 78-87. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/199243832.pdf
[134]. 134.Zandi, G., Sivalingam, A. D., & Mansori, S. (2019). An Empirical Study in Human Resource Management to Optimize Malaysian School Counselling Department. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 32. doi:10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p32
[135]. Zeithaml, V. A. (1987). Defining and relating price, perceived quality and perceived value. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.






