Published
2025-08-16
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yanyan Mu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Research on the impact mechanisms of institution-oriented human resource management systems on employee group psychology in dairy enterprises: A case study of regional representative dairy enterprises
Yanyan Mu
College of Business Administration, University of the Cordilleras, Gov. Pack Road, Baguio City, 2600, Philippines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.4019
Keywords: institutional environment; employee group psychology; human resource management; dairy enterprises; regional differences; social identity; psychological well-being
Abstract
Purpose: The current study explores the impact mechanisms of institution-oriented human resource management (HRM) systems on employee group psychology in dairy enterprises, with specific focus on the interactions between both formal and informal institutions in different regions in China. Methods: A comparative case study approach was used to explore three typical dairy enterprises in the eastern, central, and western regions. The process of gathering data included in-depth interviews with more than 60 participants, participatory observation, and document analysis. Template analysis was used to identify patterns and underlying mechanisms across the cases. Results: The study findings identify three mechanisms through which institutions shape employee psychological responses: convergence in the east, whereby formal and informal institutions create standardized psychological expectations and organizational identity; complementarity in the center, whereby regulated compliance and cultural adaptation coexist; and adaptation in the west, whereby informal institutions moderate the lack of formal regimes. Institutional action takes place within the context of regulatory limits and resource allocation to formal institutions, and informal institutions influence practices through social networks and cultural norms. The regional differences reflect deeper differences in economic development, historical context, and resource endowments. Conclusion: Institutional environments create systematic differences in employee psychological responses through multidimensional mechanisms. The psychological impact of dairy enterprise HRM systems cannot be evaluated using universal standards but must consider how institutional contexts shape employee mental models, organizational identification, and group dynamics. Different institutional combinations produce distinct management ecosystems, each with unique advantages and constraints. Practical Implications: Dairy enterprises should design psychologically-informed HRM strategies that consider local institutional contexts and their impact on employee mental health and group dynamics. Policymakers should recognize that psychological adaptation patterns differ across regions and develop institutional frameworks that support employee well-being and organizational identification. Industry associations could develop adaptive HRM frameworks that accommodate institutional diversity while maintaining essential quality standards.
References
[1]. 1.Chen, M., et al., Employee management and animal care: A comparative ethnography of two large-scale dairy farms in China. Animals, 2021. 11(5): p. 1260.
[2]. 2.Cheng, L., et al., Institutional environment, technical executive power and agricultural enterprise innovation performance. Cogent Business & Management, 2020. 7(1): p. 1743619.
[3]. 3.Zhelavska, N. and O. Homon, The impact of institutional theory on the development of the management system of agricultural enterprises. Ekonomichnyy analiz, 2024. 34(4): p. 684-692.
[4]. 4.Li, M., et al., Untangling human resource management and employee wellbeing relationships: Differentiating job resource HR practices from challenge demand HR practices. Human Resource Management Journal, 2024. 34(1): p. 214-235.
[5]. 5.Kelloway, E.K., J.K. Dimoff, and S. Gilbert, Mental health in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2023. 10(1): p. 363-387.
[6]. 6.Mills, K.E., D.M. Weary, and M.A. von Keyserlingk, Graduate Student Literature Review: Challenges and opportunities for human resource management on dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 2021. 104(1): p. 1192-1202.
[7]. 7.Tkachenko, O., et al., Regional human resource development in ASEAN: An institutional theory perspective. 2022, SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. p. 225-248.
[8]. 8.Cooke, F.L., M. Xiao, and Y. Chen, Still in search of strategic human resource management? A review and suggestions for future research with China as an example. Human Resource Management, 2021. 60(1): p. 89-118.
[9]. 9.Xiao, Q. and F.L. Cooke, Towards a hybrid model? A systematic review of human resource management research on Chinese state-owned enterprises (1993–2017). The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2020. 31(1): p. 47-89.
[10]. 10.Shahid, S., et al., Integrating sustainable development goals into HRM in emerging markets: an empirical investigation of Indian and Chinese banks. International Journal of Manpower, 2025. 46(4): p. 792-815.
[11]. 11.Paruzel, A., M. Danel, and G.W. Maier, Scrutinizing social identity theory in corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020. 11: p. 580620.
[12]. 12.Ashforth, B.E. and F.A. Mael, Back to the future: What we’d change in “social identity theory and the organization”(Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14, 20–39). Journal of Management Inquiry, 2024. 33(4): p. 329-335.
[13]. 13.Halkias, D., et al., The multiple case study design: Methodology and application for management education. 2022: Routledge.
[14]. 14.Neubert, M., Extension of theory in leadership and management studies using the multiple-case study design. International Leadership Journal, 2020.
[15]. 15.Becker-Ritterspach, F., et al., Exploring the interaction of firm-level change and national institutional environments in shaping employment and union relations: a comparative case study of four European airlines. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2019. 30(2): p. 276-305.
[16]. 16.Brooks, J., et al., The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative research in psychology, 2015. 12(2): p. 202-222.
[17]. 17.Oktarina, S., et al., The role of human capital and social capital in agricultural institutional development in rural areas. Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal, 2022. 22(2): p. 77-85.
[18]. 18.Sirenko, N., I. Baryshevska, and O. Melnyk, Theoretical aspects of institutional support for the development of agricultural enterprises. 2020.
[19]. 19.Freeman, K., et al., Up-skilling human capital for value-chain competitiveness in Uruguay. Vol. 5. 2021: Food & Agriculture Org.
[20]. 20.Horie, N. and K. Kumo, Human resource management in transition, in The Economics of Transition. 2020, Routledge. p. 239-262.
[21]. 21.Putsenteil, P., et al., The role of institutions in the development of agriculture. 2020.
[22]. 22.Bingyang, W., U. Chaiwiwat, and T. Wongkumchai, Application of Confucianism in Human Resource Management for State-own Enterprises in China. Academic Journal of Local Development, 2025. 4(1): p. 27-38.
[23]. 23.Bhoir, M. and V. Sinha, Employee well-being human resource practices: a systematic literature review and directions for future research. Future Business Journal, 2024. 10(1): p. 95.
[24]. 24.Ullah, A., et al., Role of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices in Managing Dairy Farms of Australia. NICE Research Journal, 2023. 16(2): p. 87-118.
[25]. 25.Dalwai, T., V. Scafarto, and S.S. Mohammadi, National culture, institutional quality and firm R&D investment: evidence from the Asia-pacific IT industry. Eurasian Business Review, 2025. 15(1): p. 29-59.
[26]. 26.Mohammad, T., et al., HRM, institutional complementarities, and performance: The case of the healthcare sector in Jordan. European Management Journal, 2024.
[27]. 27.Schotter, A.P., K. Meyer, and G. Wood, Organizational and comparative institutionalism in international HRM: Toward an integrative research agenda. Human Resource Management, 2021. 60(1): p. 205-227.
[28]. 28.Ren, S., et al., Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research. Human Resource Management, 2023. 62(3): p. 251-265.
[29]. 29.Hassard, J. and J. Morris, The impact of human resource management practices on managerial work: Institutional constraints, strategic actions and organizational outcomes. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 2021: p. 0143831X241265551.
[30]. 30.Antonazzo, L., D. Stroud, and M. Weinel, Institutional complementarities and technological transformation: IVET responsiveness to Industry 4.0–meeting emerging skill needs in the European steel industry. Economic and industrial democracy, 2023. 44(1): p. 25-46.
[31]. 31.Konieczna, I., RESOURCES AND COMPETENCIES IN THE AREA OF EMPLOYMENT–A COMPARISON OF DAIRY COOPERATIVES FROM ŚWIĘTOKRZYSKIE AND MAŁOPOLSKIE VOIVODESHIPS. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie, 2023(181).
[32]. 32.Saravanan, M.V. and K. Ravichandran, A Study on the Role of Human Resource Management Practices on the Business Performance of Dindigul District Cooperative Milk Producer Union Ltd. 2021.






