Published
2025-08-31
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xihui Chen, Ooi Boon Keat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The relationship among General English Proficiency, Academic Self-efficacy, school-related information and Perceived English for Academic Purposes Competence
Xihui Chen
1 Nanjing University of Finance & Economics Hongshan College, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; 2 Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
Ooi Boon Keat
Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.4026
Keywords: Perceived English for academic purposes competence; general English proficiency; academic self-efficacy; school type; undergraduate
Abstract
This study examined the relationship among general English proficiency, academic self-efficacy, school-related information and perceived English for academic purposes (EAP) competence. In a questionnaire survey conducted with a sample of 543 Chinese undergraduate students who had participated in EAP courses or related activities, participants reported their CET-4 scores, as well as self-rated levels of academic self-efficacy and perceived competence in English for Academic Purposes, using a five-point Likert scale. Perceived EAP competence was positively associated with both general English proficiency and academic self-efficacy. Furthermore, academic self-efficacy mediated the relationship between general English proficiency and perceived EAP competence. Although school location did not moderate the relationship between general English proficiency and perceived EAP competence, school type emerged as a significant moderating variable. These results of the study offer practical implications for the effective design of EAP courses and activities, both within and across institutions, aimed at promoting the sustainable development of perceived EAP competence among undergraduate students.
References
[1]. 1.BALEAP (British Association of Lecturers in English for Academic Purposes). Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes [Z/OL], 2008. https: //www. Baleap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016 /04 /teap-competency-framework.
[2]. 2.Bai, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Q., and Zhou, Y. A Comparative Study of Academic English Course Between Western Countries and China. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research,2021, 4(12): 527-540.
[3]. 3.Caren Casama Orlanda-Ventayen. Impact of English Language Courses and English Proficiency on Academic Performance of Junior Business Administrators. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 2019, 24(4): 163-175.
[4]. 4.Gong, R. A. Comparative Exploration of the Conceptual Spectrum of EAP Teaching for Undergraduates in Chinese and Foreign Colleges and Universities. Foreign Language World, 2018, (1): 62-70.
[5]. 5.Zhang, X., Ardasheva, Y., & Austin, B. W. Self-efficacy and English public speaking performance: A mixed method approach. English for Specific Purposes, 2020, 59: 1-16.
[6]. 6.Li, H. A Study on the Impact of English Writing Self-efficacy on the Writing Performance of Non-English Major College Students. Theory and Practice of Foreign Language Teaching, 2017, (03): 57-63+79.
[7]. 7.Yang, H. Y. An empirical study on the relationship between self-efficacy, reading strategies, and reading achievement in higher vocational English reading. Overseas English, 2022, (09): 230-232.
[8]. 8.Lv, S. A practical study on students’ self-efficacy and university English listening teaching. Journal of Zhangjiakou Vocational and Technical College, 2023, (04): 73-76.
[9]. 9.Chen, X. Exploring the Model of English for Academic Purposes Course in Independent Colleges Based on Needs Analysis Theory. University, 2020, (28): 37-38.
[10]. 10.Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Cai, Y. H. Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 2009, 19(4): 499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004
[11]. 11.Wu, Y. Universal beliefs and specific practices: students’ math self-efficacy and related factors in the United States and China. International Education Studies, 2016, 9(12): 61-74. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p61
[12]. 12.Wang, C. H., Harrison, J., Cardullo, V., & Lin, X. Exploring the relationship among international students’English self-efficacy, using English to learn self-efficacy, and academic self-efficacy. Journal of International Students, 2018, 8(1): 233-250. https://doi.org/10.32674/ jis. v8i1.163
[13]. 13.Pajares, F. Self-efficacy Beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2003, 19(2): 139-158.
[14]. 14.Taghizadeh, M., & Khalili, M. Predictive Role of General and Academic Vocabulary Knowledge in Academic Reading Comprehension. Paper presented at 7th National Congress on Applied Research, 2020.
[15]. 15.Wen, Q. The Application of Output-Driven Hypothesis in College English Teaching: Reflections and Suggestions. Foreign Language World, 2013, (6): 14-22.
[16]. 16.Wibowo, A. Investigating Factors Affecting Listening Comprehension Skills in University Students. TEKILA: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 2022, 1(1): 9-16.
[17]. 17.Zhou,Y., Sheridan, S., & Zhang, Q. The effectiveness of online learning activities in a blended EAP course: relationships between language proficiency, online engagement, and language performance, Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 2025, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2024-0024.
[18]. 18.Shi, X. English language proficiency, academic language difficulties and self-efficacy: a comparative study of international and home students in UK higher education [PhD thesis]. University of York; 2023.
[19]. 19.Curle, S., Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., & Altay , M. Predictors of English Medium Instruction academic success: English proficiency versus first language medium. System, 2020, 95: 1-29.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.system.2020.102378
[20]. 20.Cai, J. A Study of ESP Programme Models in Universities Based on Needs Analysis. Foreign Language Education, 2012, (3): 47-50.
[21]. 21.Zheng, C., Liang, J. ,& Tsai , C. Validating an Instrument for EFL Learners’ Sources of Self-Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy and the Relation to English Proficiency. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2017, 26(6): 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0352 -3
[22]. 22.Zhang, X., Dai, S., Ardasheva, Y., & Hong, Y. Relationships Among English Language Proficiency, Self-efficacy, Motivation, Motivational Intensity, and Achievement in an ESP/EAP Context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2023, 52(6): 3019-3038.
[23]. 23.Wang, Y., Shen, B., & Yu, X. A latent profile analysis of EFL learners’ self-efficacy: Associations with academic emotions and language proficiency. System, 2021, 103: 102633.
[24]. 24.Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 2019, 45(11): 2149-2161. https: //doi.org/10.1080/ 03075079. 2019.1590690
[25]. 25.Kim, V., & Thompson, G. The interplay between gender and major on content knowledge and self-beliefs in the English-medium instruction context: A comparative study between university students from Japan and South Korea. System, 2022, 107: 102824.
[26]. 26.Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bai, R., & Hu, J. Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System, 2014, 44: 24–33.
[27]. 27.Kitikanan, P., & Sasimonton, P. The Relationship between English Self-efficacy and English Learning Achievement of L2 Thai Learners. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 2017, 10(1): 148-163. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12P72
[28]. 28.Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with ques- tionnaire data. Language Awareness, 2014: 23(3), 255-274.
[29]. 29.Canaran, Ö., Bayram, İ., Doğan, M., & Baturay, M. H. Causal relationship among the sources of anxiety, self-efficacy, and proficiency in L2 listening. International Journal of Listening, 2024: 38(2), 105-117.
[30]. 30.Graham, S., & Macaro, E. The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning. Language Learning, 2008: 58(4), 747-783.
[31]. 31.Afifah, M., Ningrum, A.S., Wahyuni, S., & Syaifulloh, B. Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, and Emotional Intelligence: Do They Contribute to Speaking Performance?. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 2024.
[32]. 32.Khotimah, K., Amumpuni, R. S., & Arifin, S. Students’ Performance in Speaking Skill and Self-Efficacy: An Correlational Study. Jurnal Paedagogy, 2023, 10(2): 410-416.
[33]. 33.Arlinda, F. The correlation between EFL students’ self-efficacy in speaking and their speaking performance. Research on English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 2022, 10(01): 148-155.
[34]. 34.Naseri, M., & Zaferanieh, E. The Relationship between Reading Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Level of Iranian EFL Learners. World Journal of Education, 2012, 2(2): 64-75.
[35]. 35.Wang, C., & Pape, S. J. A probe into three Chinese boys’ self- efficacy beliefs learning English as a second language. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2007, 21: 364–377.
[36]. 36.Woodrow, L. College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 2011, 39(4): 510-522.
[37]. 37.Hetthong, R., & Teo, A. Does writing self-efficacy correlate with and predict writing performance?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2013, 2(1): 157-167.
[38]. 38.Ping, A. M., Baranovich, D. L., Manueli, M. K., & Siraj, S. Promoting self-regulation in vocabulary learning among Chinese EFL learners: A needs analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2015, 24(1): 137–146.
[39]. 39.Lee, K. K., Abbott, M., & Chen, N. Increasing students’ willingness to communicate: Drama-based approaches to language instruction in English for academic purposes classes. TESL Canada Journal, 2020, 37(3): 75-87.
[40]. 40.Genç, G., Kuluşaklı, E., & Aydın, S. Exploring EFL Learners’ perceived self-efficacy and beliefs on English language learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 2016, 41(2): 53-68. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.4
[41]. 41.Andrade, M. S. International students in English-speaking universities: Adjustment factors. Journal of Research in International Education, 2006, 5(2): 131-154.
[42]. 42.Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 2001, 4(1): 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
[43]. 43.Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., Yeung, A., & Craven, R. (2017). Competence self- perceptions. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application. The Guilford Press; 2017. 2, pp. 85–115.
[44]. 44.Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the Internet: data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, stress and coping, 1999, 12(2): 145-161.
[45]. 45.Pintrich, P. R. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), 1991.
[46]. 46.Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 2005, 40(2): 117–128.
[47]. 47.Bandura, A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents: Adolescence and education. 2006. 5, pp.307-337. https://doi. org/ 10.1017 /CBO9781107415324.004. Information Age.
[48]. 48.Ulfert-blank, A., & Schmidt, I. Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers & Education, 2022, 191: 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2022. 104626
[49]. 49.Han, J., Geng, X., & Wang, Q. Sustainable development of university EFL learners’ engagement, satisfaction, and self-efficacy in online learning environments: Chinese experiences. Sustainability, 2021, 13(21): 11655
[50]. 50.National College English Test Committee. (2016). National College English Test (Band 4) Syllabus. Retrieved from https://cet.neea.edu.cn/html1/folder/16113/1588-1.htm.
[51]. 51.Ağçam, R., & Babanoğlu, M. P. A comparative research on perceived EAP competencies of Turkish academics. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 2020, 10(4): 44-61. doi: https://dx.doi. org / 10.24093/ awej/vol10no4.4
[52]. 52.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. . Multivariate data analysis Pearson, 2018. pp. 95–120. https://doi. org/10, 1002(97811), 19409.
[53]. 53.Coleman J. S. Equality of educational opportunity. Integrated education, 1968, 6(5): 19-28.
[54]. 54.Wang, S., & Wang, H. A survey of the current situation of college English teaching in China and its reform and development direction. Foreign Languages in China, 2011,8(4): 4–11.
[55]. 55.Fang, C. Family background, school type, and educational attainment: An empirical analysis based on CGSS2008 data. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2019, 39(4): 121–144.
[56]. 56.Lillis T, Curry M J. Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. J Bus Tech Commun, 2011, 22: 179-198.
[57]. 57.Schools A. S. Big-Fish–Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept. American Psychologist, 2003, 58(5): 364-376.
[58]. 58.Wu, Y., & Huang, C. Secondary school type, social networks, and educational expectations. Sociological Studies, 2016, 31(4): 123–145.






