Published
2025-09-15
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chen Wei, Manus Kaewboucha, Chalisa Apiwathnasorn

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Reimagining hanfu: An intergenerational psychological analysis of user needs and design preferences via the Kano-AHP framework
Chen Wei
International College, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Bangkok, Thailand ; School of Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International College of Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-Ok, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand
Manus Kaewboucha
School of Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International College of Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-Ok, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand
Chalisa Apiwathnasorn
School of Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International College of Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-Ok, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.4029
Keywords: Hanfu; Consumer Psychology; Generational Marketing; Consumer Decision-Making; Kano Model; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Cultural Heritage Products; Identity Expression; Customer Needs Analysis; Product Design Preferences
Abstract
The revitalization of Hanfu, the traditional Chinese dress, has recently experienced a marked cultural revival that cannot be reduced to the sphere of fashion but rather points to the complex psychological preconditions of identity construction, heritage maintenance, and consumer choice among the representatives of different generational groups. The current study employs a composite Kano Model-Analytic Hierarchy Process (Kano-AHP) framework to explore intergenerational differences in psychological needs and decision-making priorities upon which Hanfu consumption is based. Through rigorous quantitative analysis of survey data from 552 Chinese consumers across four generational cohorts (Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Baby Boomers), the research categorizes nine core Hanfu attributes into Must-Be, One-Dimensional, and Attractive needs using the Kano Model, while quantifying their relative importance in purchase decisions through AHP weighting. Results reveal significant intergenerational divergence (χ² = 127.43, p < 0.001) in attribute perception and prioritization. Younger consumers (Gen Z, Millennials) prioritize identity expression and aesthetic innovation, classifying Modern Design Integration (weight: 0.248) and Community Acceptance (weight: 0.201) as primary "Attractive" delighters. Conversely, older cohorts (Gen X, Boomers) emphasize cultural authenticity and functional comfort, with Historical Accuracy (weight: 0.324) and Fabric Quality (weight: 0.284) categorized as essential "Must-Be" requirements. A unified framework provides practical advice to the designers, marketers and cultural institutions so as to develop generation-specific strategies that would synchronise product development with the generation-specific psychological profiles and decision-making calculi, thus developing sustainable cultural engagement and market growth.
References
[1]. 1.S. Zuo, N. Shaari, N. A. M. Ali, and S. Z. Abidin, “Kansei evaluation on Hanfu style diversities based on user perception and acceptance,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Kansei Eng. Emot. Res. (KEER), Barcelona, Spain, 2022, pp. 455–458, doi:10.5821/conference-9788419184849.47.
[2]. 2. X. Li, Y. Niu, J. Xu, “Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity,” Behav. Sci. (Basel), vol. 13, no. 8, Art. 689, 2023, doi:10.3390/bs13080689.
[3]. 3. H. Zhang, K. Huang, W.-Y. Feng, J. Zhu, “Authentic well-being in the third space among Hanfu-wearing Chinese tourists: A PERMA analysis,” Tour. Manag. Perspect., vol. 47, Art. 101106, 2023, doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101106.
[4]. 4. H. Li and L. Shi, “Applied research on the design of protective clothing based on the Kano–QFD–PUGH method,” PLOS One, vol. 19, no. 10, e0312045, 2024, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0312045.
[5]. 5. E. Lamçe and A. Braimllari, “Consumer preferences in the fashion industry: A comparative analysis in developing and developed countries,” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, vol. 16, no. 2, 2024, doi:10.13033/ijahp.v16i2.1186.
[6]. 6. E. Lamçe and A. Braimllari, “Evaluating the criteria for choosing a clothing brand using Analytic Hierarchy Process,” in Proc. 10th Textile Conf. & 4th Conf. Eng. Entrepreneurship, Tirana, Albania, Jan. 2024, pp. 65–74, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-48933-4_7.
[7]. 7. B. Ma, Y. Wong, C. C. Teo, and S. Sun, “How do consumers’ fashion lifestyles differentiate their logistics preferences for fashion products?,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 79, 103798, 2024, doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103798.
[8]. 8. H. E. Kim, J. H. Kwon, and J.-J. Kim, “Neural correlates of garment fit and purchase intention in the consumer decision-making process and the influence of product presentation,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 15, Art. 609004, 2021, doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.609004.
[9]. 9. P. Šimek and T. Sadílek, “Generation Z fashion shopping behaviour during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: the effect of sustainable consumption,” Ekon. Istraz., vol. 37, no. 1, 2024, doi:10.1080/1331677X.2024.2341222.
[10]. 10. N. Kumari, X. Yan, Q. Du, and H. Memon, “Relationship analysis among apparel brand image, self-congruity, and consumers’ purchase intention,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22, Art. 12770, 2021, doi:10.3390/su132212770.
[11]. 11. K. Miyashiro, K. Sasaki, T. Ishikawa, and H. Mori, “A study about perceptions of kimono among college students and kimono enthusiasts: Is it difficult to move in a kimono?,” F1000Research, vol. 13, 287, 2024, doi:10.12688/f1000research.149040.3.
[12]. 12. L. Chao, X. Lou, and T. Chi, “Exploring the modern Qipao through the lens of U.S. generation Z consumers,” in Proc. Int. Textile and Apparel Assoc. (ITAA) Conf., 2024, doi:10.31274/itaa.18592.
[13]. 13. Y. Hwangbo, Y.-S. Yang, M.-S. Kim, and Y. Kim, “The effectiveness of Kano–QFD approach to enhance competitiveness of technology-based SMEs through transfer intention model,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, Art. 7885, 2020, doi:10.3390/su12197885.
[14]. 14. M. A. Ara, M. S. Tamanna, M. Ali, et al., “A hybrid AHP and statistical validation approach for sustainable supplier selection in apparel industry,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 6, Art. 538, 2025, doi:10.1007/s43621-025-01416-1.
[15]. 15. F. Magwegwe and A. Shaik, “Theory of planned behavior and fast fashion purchasing: an analysis of interaction effects,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 43, pp. 28868–28885, 2024, doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06465-9.
[16]. 16. Y. J. Ma, H. J. Gam, and J. Banning, “Perceived ease of use and usefulness of sustainability labels on apparel products: Application of the Technology Acceptance Model,” Fashion Text., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2017, doi:10.1186/s40691-017-0093-1.
[17]. 17. I. C. Moretti, A. Braghini Jr., and J. C. Colmenero, “Using the analytic hierarchy process for selecting prototypes in the development process of fashion garment products,” Acta Sci. Technol., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 367–374, 2017, doi:10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i3.30053.
[18]. 18. L. M. Ceballos and S. Min, “Product experiences of clothing attachment in baby boomers in the United States,” Fashion Text., vol. 7, Art. 12, 2020, doi:10.1186/s40691-020-0206-0.
[19]. 19. H. Xu and H.-Y. Song, “Key factors influencing Chinese consumers’ demand for naturally dyed garments: Data analysis through KJ method and Kano model,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 3, Art. 1189, 2024, doi:10.3390/su16031189.
[20]. 20. Q. Jiang, L.-C. Chen, and J. Zhang, “Perception and preference analysis of fashion colors: Solid color shirts,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 8, Art. 2405, 2019, doi:10.3390/su11082405.
[21]. 21. F. Baytar, Y. Kim, M. Maher, and W. Zong, “Preferences of dress design elements for mass customization targeting women in the U.S.,” in Proc. Int. Textile and Apparel Assoc. (ITAA) Conf., 2022, doi:10.31274/itaa.13767.
[22]. 22. L.-M. van der Westhuizen and S. Kuhn, “Handmade clothing consumption as a means of self-expression,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag., vol. 28, no. 3, 2023, doi:10.1108/JFMM-07-2021-0175.
[23]. 23. L. Chao, X. Lou, T. Chi, “Exploring the modern Qipao through the lens of U.S. generation Z consumers,” Int. Textile Apparel Assoc. Proc., 2024, doi:10.31274/itaa.18592.
[24]. 24. Y. Gao and J. Liang, “The impact of AI-powered try-on technology on online consumers’ impulsive buying intention: The moderating role of brand trust,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 7, Art. 2789, 2025, doi:10.3390/su17072789.
[25]. 25. C. D’Souza, W. Wong, N. El Haber, and A. R. Brouwer, “Online impulse purchases versus planned purchases and the role of visual attributes,” J. Global Fash. Mark., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 254–272, 2024, doi:10.1080/20932685.2024.2361884.
[26]. 26. S.-J. Chang and E. Lee, “Materialism, conspicuous consumption, and brand engagement in self-concept: A study of teenagers,” Curr. Issues Pers. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2022, doi:10.5114/cipp.2022.112836.
[27]. 27. H. R. Zafar and T. Ahmad, “Relationship of hedonic and utilitarian values with Indian consumers’ purchase intention toward fashion apparel,” Manag. Res. Rev., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 703–723, 2015, doi:10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0225.
[28]. 28. S. W. Lee and K.-T. Wu, “Attitudes and purchasing habits among young consumers toward “Made in (COUNTRY)” labeling and its effect on brand perception,” Int. J. Mark. Stud., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2023, doi:10.5539/ijms.v15n1p38.
[29]. 29. F. S. Eskiler and İ. T. Dursun, “The influence of m-commerce apps on young consumers’ impulse buying behavior: A study with Generation Z in Turkey,” Int. J. Inf. Manage. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 125–147, 2022, doi:10.11648/j.ijims.20220402.15.
[30]. 30. P. Birtchnell, “A city’s impetus for fashion identity: Attitudes to cultural heritage in fashion among new consumers,” City Cult. Soc., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 331–339, 2016, doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2016.12.002.
[31]. 31. Y. Cho, J. Ryu, S. H. Jung, and D. Collier, “Our environment, our responsibility: The role of the environment in ethical and sustainable fashion consumption,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 135, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.049.
[32]. 32. R. J. Lutz and S. B. Thompson, “Impulsive buying of fashion jewelry: Effects of positive and negative mood states,” J. Fash. Mark. Manag., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 375–389, 2020, doi:10.1108/JFMM-12-2018-0194.
[33]. 33. J. Li, T. Chan, D. Zhou, and M. Zhuang, “The structural relationship between Chinese college students’ personality and online shopping orientation,” Front. Psychol., vol. 8, Art. 238, 2017, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00238.
[34]. 34. V. Jain and S. Aggarwal, “Factors affecting Indian consumers’ attitude toward counterfeit luxury brands,” Int. Mark. Rev., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 535–557, 2015, doi:10.1108/IMR-03-2014-0128.
[35]. 35. S. E. Kim and C. An, “Etiquettes and ethics in fashion buying: The roles of gender, endorsement, and conformity,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 68, Art. 103079, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103079.
[36]. 36. A. Sengupta and A. Raman, “Fashionscapes: Cultural transference and ‘ethnic chic’ in global apparel trade,” Eur. J. Mark., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 834–857, 2019, doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2017-0891.
[37]. 37. H. Tang and X. Sun, “The interplay of product category and sales promotion: An eye-tracking study on online apparel shopping,” Electron. Commer. Res. Appl., vol. 52, Art. 101114, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101114.
[38]. 38. M. Schmitt, A. Glavas, “Positive brand associations and brand sustainability: A systematic review of CSR communication channels,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 415–447, 2019, doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3490-x.
[39]. 39. J. Lu, H.-H. Yang, and J. Yang, “Consumer responses to brand communities: The roles of consumer participation and satisfaction,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 696–709, 2013, doi:10.1002/mar.20606.
[40]. 40. C. Liu and Y. Bai, “Does shopping on WeChat matter? Effects of social commerce use on customer loyalty and citizenship behaviors,” Internet Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 971–991, 2020, doi:10.1108/INTR-12-2019-0679.
[41]. 41. M. Bi, Q. Fang, X. Ji, and C. Xu, “Consumer preferences for traditional and fashionable components in Hanfu clothing: An eye-tracking study,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, Art. 2416, 2020, doi:10.3390/su12062416.
[42]. 42. S. Q. Peng, “A study on consumer preferences for ethnic fashion in the context of national rejuvenation,” in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Cult. Indust. Enrich., Shijiazhuang, China, 2023, pp. 167–174.
[43]. 43. K. M. Lee, M. Jang, and J. J. Hu, “Kano model application in service marketing: Prioritizing customer satisfaction attributes,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1095–1109, 2021, doi:10.1002/mar.21564.
[44]. 44.Z. Shuangxi, N. Shaari, N. A. M. Ali, and S. Z. Abidin, “Kansei evaluation of Hanfu style diversities based on user perception and acceptance,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Kansei Eng. and Emot. Res. (KEER 2022), Barcelona, Spain, Sep. 2022, doi:10.5821/conference-9788419184849.47.
[45]. 45.X. Li, Y. Niu, and J. Xu, “Factors affecting purchase intention of Hanfu: considering product identification, cultural motivation, and perceived authenticity,” Behav. Sci. (Basel), vol. 13, no. 8, art. 689, 2023, doi:10.3390/bs13080689.
[46]. 46.A. Shi, F. Huo, and G. Hou, “Effects of design aesthetics on the perceived value of a product: A neuroaesthetic perspective,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, art. 670800, 2021, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.670800.
[47]. 47.H. E. Kim, J.-H. Kwon, and J.-J. Kim, “Neural correlates of garment fit and purchase intention in the consumer decision-making process and the influence of product presentation,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 15, p. 609004, 2021, doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.609004.






