Environment and Social Psychology

Perceived Principal's Instructional Leadership and Creative Teaching Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing Among University Teachers in Jiangsu of China

Juan Wan

Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210

Man Jiang

Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, 10210

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i8.4054

Keywords: University teachers; principal instructional leadership; knowledge sharing; teacher creative teaching behavior; teacher motivation; emotional state; psychological factors

---

Abstract

This study investigates how teachers' perceived instructional leadership of university presidents influences their creative teaching behaviors in Jiangsu, China, and examines the mediating role of knowledge sharing. Drawing on social exchange theory, this current study surveyed 770 teachers from four universities in Jiangsu; 738 valid responses were returned, yielding a 95.84% response rate. Results indicate that teachers' creative teaching behaviors differ significantly by gender, years of teaching experience, and highest degree earned; perceived instructional leadership exerts a significant positive effect on creative teaching behaviors; and teachers' knowledge sharing is positively related to creative teaching behaviors. Crucially, knowledge sharing serves as a full mediator in this relationship. Furthermore, teachers' psychological factors (such as intrinsic motivation and emotional state) play a key role in creative teaching behavior. Moreover, teachers' psychological factors (e.g., intrinsic motivation, emotional state) are identified as key antecedents influencing these mediated pathways.

---

References

[1]. 1. Li, W. Y., Quan, L., Luo, C., Dong, X. B., & Fan, Y. E. (2023). Analysis of the implementation path and effectiveness of "Three-All Education" based on the cultivation of innovative undergraduate talents: A case study of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. Research and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), 6. http://www.cxcybjb.com/CN/abstract/abstract5165.shtml

[2]. 2. Hao, Y., & Huang, X. (2023). The influence of principal instructional leadership on teacher job satisfaction and its mechanism. Contemporary Education Forum, (6), 40–49. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7111154221

[3]. 3. McDougall, T., & Phillips, M. (2024). Contextual considerations in TPACK: Collaborative processes in initial teacher education. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100207

[4]. 4. McDougall, T., & Phillips, M. (2024). Contextual considerations in TPACK: Collaborative processes in initial teacher education. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100207

[5]. 5. Mwamwenda, T. S. (2020). Introduction to educational psychology for college and university students in Africa. Ponte, 76(9), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2020.9.19

[6]. 6. Smith, L., & Jones, M. (2020). Innovation in higher education teaching: A study of teachers’ motivations and methods. Journal of Higher Education, 91(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2020.1757601

[7]. 7. Wang, L. X. (2024). Strengthening classroom instructional leadership of university teachers under the background of “Internet+ Education.” Western Quality Education, (2), 114–118. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7111266498&from=Qikan_Search_IndEx

[8]. 8. Deng, Y. (2022). Exploration of problems and countermeasures of creative teaching in illustration design courses in mainland China universities. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 11(3), 139–144. http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/11-3/free/14.pdf

[9]. 9. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2015). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(2), 127--152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21212

[10]. 10. Halbesleben, J. R., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2015). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334--1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527130

[11]. 11. Vennebo, K. F. (2017). Innovative work in school development: Exploring leadership enactment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215617944

[12]. 12. Hou, H. X. (2018). Can principals’ leadership styles influence teachers’ teaching innovation?—Also on the mediating effect of school organizational innovation atmosphere. Educational Science, 34(1), 26–32. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=675247494&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[13]. 13. Hanum, N. A., Supriyanto, A., & Timan, A. (2020). Developing teacher quality: Principals’ efforts to improve the quality of elementary schools. Elementary School: Study of Educational Theory and Practice, 29(1), 38–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um009v29i12020p038

[14]. 14. Han, L. (2021). On the connotation, characteristics, and development of perceived principal instructional leadership. Teaching and Management, 34(12), 13–17. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7106074194

[15]. 15. Chen, S., Rong, J., & Guo, S. (2023). How to make students feel happy at school: An exploration of the mechanisms of perceived principal instructional leadership. Educational Research, 10(2), 88–100. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7109133836

[16]. 16. Kilag, O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the role of instructional leadership in teacher professional development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63–73. https://journals.researchsynergypress.com/index.php/aqr/article/view/1380

[17]. 17. Huayamave, K. V. G., León, M., Reyes, M. F. V., & Beade, I. G. (2023). Curricular innovation as a strategy for improvement in educational careers. Profesorado, Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 27(3), 45–61. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/92573

[18]. 18. Lin, S. D., & Fu, X. Q. (2024). Instructional leadership in secondary vocational schools: Connotations, issues, and strategies for improvement. China Adult Education, (6), 67–73. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7112535415&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[19]. 19. Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of organizational behavior, 38(2), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057

[20]. 20. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789

[21]. 21. Bibi, S., & Ali, A. (2017). Knowledge sharing behavior of academics in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(4), 550–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-11-2016-0077

[22]. 22. Zhong, Y. W., Li, Y. Y., Han, X. Q., & Huang, H. Y. (2024). How principal instructional leadership influences differentiated teaching ability: A chained mediation of teachers’ achievement motivation and job conscientiousness. Journal of Educational Scholarship, (3), 13–22. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7111942451

[23]. 23. Regmi, D. N. (2024). Unlocking the power of cascading teaching: A key strategy for effective knowledge transfer and professional development. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(7), 2297–2301. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/de7a/c2da1179bd6c98cab17e9bc092bf5fd402e9.pdf

[24]. 24. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2772990

[25]. 25. Sindayen, C. D., & De Leon, R. Z. (2023). Lived experiences of public school teachers in teaching computer system servicing in the new normal. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 4(8), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.823.49933

[26]. 26. Luna, D., da Costa, C. L., da Conceição Passeggi, M., & Sarmento, T. (2023). Construindo a pesquisa e o conhecimento com professores para uma inovação sustentável em educação: Um estudo com narrativas e autoetnografia. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 16(se1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v16.nsel.81-90

[27]. 27. Wuryo, W. D., Sukarno, G., & Swasti, I. K. (2024). Analysis of knowledge sharing culture and competence on performance mediated by commitment: Study on emergency room nurses at Citra Medika Hospital Sidoarjo. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(2), 1965–1974. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1476

[28]. 28. Tudge, J. R. H., Payir, A., Merçon-Vargas, E., Cao, H., Liang, Y., Li, J., & O'Brien, L. (2016). Still misused after all these years? A reevaluation of the uses of Bronfenbrenner's bioecological theory of human development. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12165

[29]. 29. Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job demands–resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 34(1), 1-21. http://doi.org.10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695

[30]. 30. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512

[31]. 31. Jiang, Y. (2024). Keep the mission in mind and strive to take the lead in building an educational powerhouse. Jiangsu Educational Research, 2024(3), 3–7. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7111850435

[32]. 32. Li, D. Z., & Ni, T. (2024). Strengthening the foundation for new productive forces development through higher education. The Masses, 2024(13), 60–61. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7112559069&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[33]. 33. Jiangsu Provincial People’s Government. (2022). Provincial Department of Education: Interpretation of the "14th Five-Year" Education Development Plan of Jiangsu Province. https://www.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2022/1/18/art_84419_10319758.html

[34]. 34. Han, Y. (2023). The impact of divergent thinking on teachers' creative teaching behavior: The chain mediating role of creative teaching efficacy and class innovation climate. Journal of Guangdong Second Normal University, 43(3), 98–112. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7109904868

[35]. 35. Brauer, R., Ormiston, J., & Beausaert, S. (2024). Creativity-fostering teacher behaviors in higher education: A transdisciplinary systematic literature review. Review of educational research, 00346543241258226

[36]. 36. https://journals-sagepub-com.1458.top/doi/pdf/10.3102/00346543241258226

[37]. 37. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

[38]. 38. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). Power and dependence. The Social Psychology of Groups, 7, 100–125. https://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=zh-CN&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_ylo=1959&as_yhi=1959&q=Thibaut&btnG=

[39]. 39. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003

[40]. 40. Ishak, K. A., & Bohari, A. M. (2016). Relationship value, relationship quality and loyalty among Malaysian franchises. International Journal of Organizational & Business Excellence, 1(1), 1–9. https://tinyurl.com/yvcm6mns

[41]. 41. Wang, W. T., & Hou, Y. P. (2015). Motivations of employees’ knowledge sharing behaviors: A self-determination perspective. Information and Organization, 25(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.11.001

[42]. 42. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623

[43]. 43. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.

[44]. 44. Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of organizational behavior, 39(3), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220

[45]. 45. Wu, H., & Lv, H. (2024). A meta-analysis on social exchange relationships and employee innovation in teams. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04101-2

[46]. 46. Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

[47]. 47. Wu, H., Lv, H. (2024). A meta-analysis on social exchange relationships and employee innovation in teams. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1555. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04101-2

[48]. 48. Herman, H. M., Huang, X., & Lam, W. (2013). Why does transformational leadership matter for employee turnover? A multi-foci social exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.07.005

[49]. 49. Khan, M. A., Ismail, F. B., Hussain, A., & Alghazali, B. (2020). The interplay of leadership styles, innovative work behavior, organizational culture, and organizational citizenship behavior. SAGE Open, 10(1), 2158244019898264. https://journals-sagepub-com.1458.top/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244019898264

[50]. 50. Yalçınkaya, S., Dağlı, G., Altınay, F., Altınay, Z., & Kalkan, Ü. (2021). The effect of leadership styles and initiative behaviors of school principals on teacher motivation. Sustainability, 13(5), 2711. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2711

[51]. 51. Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 796-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604

[52]. 52. Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2016). Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement. Society for Human Resource Management and Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(2016), 3–22. https://siop.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/docs/SIOP-SHRM%20White%20Papers/SHRM-SIOP%20POS.pdf

[53]. 53. Putri, P. V. H., & Surya, I. K. (2020). Transformational leadership workers and training structures with turnover intention with work results as a provision. American International Journal of Business Management (AIJBM), 3(4), 46–58. https://www.aijbm.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/E344658.pdf

[54]. 54. Meshi, D., Tamir, D. I., & Heekeren, H. R. (2015). The emerging neuroscience of social media. Trends in cognitive sciences, 19(12), 771-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.004

[55]. 55. Lin, C. D., & Yu, G. L. (1992). Creativity and Innovation Education. Huayi Publishing House.

[56]. 56. Lin, C. D. (2001). Integrating Eastern and Western educational models to cultivate “T-shaped” talents. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Social Sciences Edition, (1), 5–11. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=4916409&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[57]. 57. Jin, T., & Wu, T. S. (2018). A study on the relationship between micro-lesson instructional design activities and teachers’ creative teaching behavior in vocational schools. China Vocational and Technical Education, 2018(29), 68–73. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=676825714&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[58]. 58. Yao, J., Liu, F., Lu, D. D., & Liang, J. (2021). The influence of nursing teachers’ beliefs and innovation efficacy on teaching innovation behavior. Science & Technology Vision, 22(35), 165–167. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7106230737

[59]. 59. Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226

[60]. 60. Yang, Z. (2018). A survey study on gender differences in the nurturing literacy and effectiveness of primary and secondary school teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 5(6), 24–36. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=676801332

[61]. 61. Le, X. Y. (2023). The connotation and formation mechanism of creative teaching behavior of kindergarten teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 10(3), 26–32. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7109469220&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[62]. 62. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

[63]. 63. Nakano, T. D. C., Oliveira, K. D. S., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37, e372116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116

[64]. 64. Quan, Y. T. (2008). The relationship between school organizational innovation climate, teacher creative motivation, and teacher creativity. [Master’s thesis, Shandong Normal University]. Baidu Scholar. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=6d9bd7a21c3126ee1aaad45e2776019e&site=xueshu_s

[65]. 65. Chu, Y. (2008). The relationship among elementary school teachers’ achievement goal orientation, creative teaching efficacy, and creativity [Master’s thesis, Shandong Normal University]. Baidu Scholar. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=45079b9507976199afa61a2ac127e92e

[66]. 66. Zeng, L., Yu, L., & Wang, J. (2021). Research on the innovative teaching behavior and influencing factors of middle-aged and elderly teachers. Psychology, (7), 1795–1807. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=HS723912021007019

[67]. 67. Chang, Y., Guo, Y., Li, A., Li, S., & Liu, F. (2020). A study on the relationship between teacher self-efficacy and creative teaching behavior: A survey based on Jiangsu Province. Journal of Multimedia & Network Teaching in China, (25), 115–117. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=00002GGJ5V4O7JP0MPDO0JPXMLR

[68]. 68. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1086/461445

[69]. 69. Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1982). The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 309–339. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052003309

[70]. 70. Schechter, C. (2012). The professional learning community as perceived by Israeli school superintendents, principals and teachers. International Review of Education, 58, 717–734. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11159-012-9327-z

[71]. 71. Liu, H. Y., Tsai, H. M., Wang, I. T., & Chen, N. H. (2020). Predictors of self-perceived levels of creative teaching behaviors among nursing school faculty in Taiwan: A preliminary study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.101/6j.profnurs.2019.09.004

[72]. 72. Zahra, T. T., Ahmad, H. M., & Waheed, A. (2017). Impact of ethical leadership on innovative work behavior: Mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 27(1). https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A13%3A28814413/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A124443724&crl=c&link_origin=scholar.google.com.hk

[73]. 73. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010a). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118

[74]. 74. Xia, H. Y., Liu, M. T., & Gao, C. Y. (2019). How does school innovation drive influence teachers’ innovative behavior—A study from the perspective of knowledge management theory. Modern Educational Management, (12), 81–86. https://tinyurl.com/bdebbrzd

[75]. 75. Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The relationship of the creativity of public and private school teachers to their intrinsic motivation and the school climate for innovation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370

[76]. 76. Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel psychology, 70(1), 113-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183

[77]. 77. Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085

[78]. 78. Wu, Y. (2024). Research on factors influencing teachers’ willingness for knowledge sharing. Transactions on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 5, 189–198. https://wepub.org/index.php/TSSEHR/article/view/1082

[79]. 79. Gubbins, C., & MacCurtain, S. (2019). Understanding the relationship between structural empowerment and work engagement: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(3), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12715

[80]. 80. Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609

[81]. 81. Khan, H., Li, P. H., Chughtai, M. S., Mushtaq, M. T., & Zeng, X. Z. (2023). The role of knowledge sharing and creative self-efficacy on the self-leadership and innovative work behavior relationship. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), Article e100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100441

[82]. 82. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

[83]. 83. Li, S. (2023). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: A mediation model. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1185079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185079

[84]. 84. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003

[85]. 85. Li, S. (2023). The effect of teacher self-efficacy, teacher resilience, and emotion regulation on teacher burnout: A mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1185079. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185079

[86]. 86. Wei, G., Lu, J., & Qian, H. (2018). Principal instructional leadership: Chinese PIMRS development and validation. Chinese Education & Society, 51(5), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2018.1510688

[87]. 87. Zhang, J. H., Chu, Y. X., & Lin, C. D. (2008). The structure of the creative teaching behavior evaluation scale for teachers. Psychological Development and Education, 2008(3), 107–112. https://devpsy.bnu.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract461.shtml

[88]. 88. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

[89]. 89. Woo, B., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 1111–1125. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102

[90]. 90. Lundberg, S. (2020). Educational gender gaps. Southern economic journal, 87(2), 416-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12460

[91]. 91. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

[92]. 92. Bos-Nehles, A. C., & Veenendaal, A. A. (2019). Perceptions of HR practices and innovative work behavior: The moderating effect of an innovative climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2661–2683. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09585192.2017.1380680

[93]. 93. Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Ümarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education, 58(2), 808–817. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131511002491

[94]. 94. Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009

[95]. 95. Dong, Y., & Liu, L. (2024). How the scientific research evaluation system affects university teachers’ proactive innovative behavior: Based on a survey of teachers from 29 "Double First-Class" universities. Fudan Education Forum, (1), 85–93. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7111807138

[96]. 96. Zheng, J. Y., & Lü, W. G. (2022). The impact of knowledge sharing on the innovative behavior of university PE teachers under psychological empowerment. Journal of Physical Education, (2), 86–92. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7106859244

[97]. 97. Chang, C. M., Hsieh, H. H., Chou, Y. H., & Huang, H. C. (2021). The relationship between physical education teachers’ perceptions of principals’ transformational leadership and creative teaching behavior at junior and senior high schools: A cross-level moderating effect on innovative school climates. Sustainability, 13(15), 8184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158184

[98]. 98. Kiral, E., & Suçiçegi, A. (2017). The relationship between teachers’ perception of school principals’ instructional leadership and organisational commitment level. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences, 6(1), 95–109. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1254691

[99]. 99. Ghavifekr, S., Ibrahim, M. S., Chellapan, K., Sukumaran, K., & Subramaniam, A. (2017). Instructional leadership practices of principal in vocational and technical college: Teachers’ perception. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 3(1), 48–67. https://malindojournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJEM/article/view/6094

[100]. 100. Sarikaya, N., & Erdogan, Ç. (2016). Relationship between the instructional leadership behaviors of high school principals and teachers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 72–82. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1089789

[101]. 101. Groenewald, E., Kilag, O. K., Cabuenas, M. C., Camangyan, J., Abapo, J. M., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). The influence of principals’ instructional leadership on the professional performance of teachers. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(6), 433–443. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376784755

[102]. 102. Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons.

[103]. 103. Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2024). Principals’ digital instructional leadership during the pandemic: Impact on teachers’ intrinsic motivation and students’ learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 934–954. https://journals-sagepub-com.1458.top/doi/pdf/10.1177/17411432221113411

[104]. 104. Lassiter, C., Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Smith, D. (2022). How leadership works: A playbook for instructional leaders. Corwin Press. https://books.google.co.th/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=Ma9gEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=How+leadership+works:+A+playbook+for+inst&ots=hm1hyuuHeB&sig=zBKmnFxg1-sBV6UyfAp8WqS0G4U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=How%20leadership%20works%3A%20A%20playbook%20for%20inst&f=false

[105]. 105. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.

[106]. 106. Shmeleva, E. A., Kislyakov, P. A., Luneva, L. F., & Maltseva, L. D. (2015). Psychological factors of the readiness of teachers to ensure social security in the educational environment. Psychology in Russia, 8(1), 74. http://doi.org.10.11621/pir.2015.0107

[107]. 107. Xiao, Z. X., & Lou, J. J. (2016). A study on the mechanism of the influence of organizational culture and psychological ownership on knowledge sharing in knowledge-based teams. Journal of Agricultural Library and Information Science, 28(4), 13–16. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=668453417

[108]. 108. Yang, S., & Yu, K. (2019). The impact of organizational trust on teachers’ knowledge sharing: The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating role of communication satisfaction. Educational Research and Experiment, (2), 39–45. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7001981120

[109]. 109. Song, F., & Zhang, Z. S. (2022). Pressure, compensation mechanism and knowledge sharing: An analysis based on evolutionary game theory. Operations Research and Management, 31(8), 15. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7107949091&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[110]. 110. Zhang, D. Q. (2018). Mechanisms and strategies for teachers’ knowledge sharing. Journal of Chinese Education, 2018(2), 95–98. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=674473086

[111]. 111. Li, Y. (2015). Reform of laboratory safety management systems to meet the needs of innovative experimental teaching. Research & Exploration in Laboratory, 34(11). https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=667611262&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[112]. 112. Xiong, H. Q. (2020). Promoting the integration and innovation of theoretical and experimental teaching through virtual simulation experimental teaching. Experimental Technology & Management, 37(5). https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7102219809

[113]. 113. Ai, Q., Liu, C., & You, L. (2019). Privacy protection and countermeasures for academic users accessing foreign academic databases. Library and Information Service, 63(10), 12–20. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7001882393

[114]. 114. Hua, X. Y. (2015). Analysis and countermeasures of the current situation of primary and secondary school teachers’ utilization of online literature resources. Teaching and Management: Theory Edition, (1), 29–31. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=663556489&from=Qikan_Search_Index

[115]. 115. Zhou, H. L. (2022). A brief discussion on sample space in probability statistics. Mathematics Learning and Research, (24), 11–13. https://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=7108019611