Published
2025-10-29
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Xuezhu Yan*, Nurhazlina Mohd Ariffin, Ahmad Shukri Abdul Hamid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
A Systematic Review of Teacher Bias and Its Effects on Student Academic Achievement: A Social-Psychological Perspective
Xuezhu Yan
School Of Applied Psychology, Social Work & Policy,College of Arts & Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia
Nurhazlina Mohd Ariffin
School Of Applied Psychology, Social Work & Policy,College of Arts & Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia
Ahmad Shukri Abdul Hamid
School Of Applied Psychology, Social Work & Policy,College of Arts & Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4057
Keywords: Teacher bias; Academic achievement; Equity in education; Gap in achievement; Implicit bias; Ethnicity and race; Socioeconomic status; K–12 Education
Abstract
One of the biggest obstacles to educational equity is teacher bias, which can be based on a student's race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background. The degree to which this prejudice results in significant disparities in students' academic performance necessitates a thorough, methodical synthesis, even if its existence is generally accepted. The empirical data on how teacher prejudice affects K–12 student achievement is compiled and evaluated in this review. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards to find quantitative studies published up until July 2025 that examined the relationship between teacher bias and objective academic achievement while adjusting for confounding variables. An initial screening identified 7 studies as potentially eligible; however, after applying the final inclusion criteria and manual searches, 15 studies met all requirements and were included in the review. In a variety of foreign contexts, the data consistently shows a statistically significant negative correlation between student academic achievement and teacher bias. Even after adjusting for students' prior success, test scores, grades, and teacher expectations were all negatively correlated with implicit and explicit biases against low-SES and minority students. The results demonstrate that teacher bias is a powerful factor that actively contributes to and maintains educational gaps rather than just being a conceptual mistake. This review emphasizes the critical need for institutional reforms and comprehensive, evidence-based anti-bias interventions for educators that aim to eliminate the ways in which bias impedes social mobility and student learning.
References
[1]. 1.Assari, S., & Zare, H. (2024). The Cost of Opportunity: Anti-Black Discrimination in High Resource Settings. Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 4(2), 92.
[2]. 2.Berliner, D. C. (2013). Inequality, Poverty, and the Socialization of America's Youth for the Responsibilities of Citizenship. Theory into Practice, 52(3), 203-209.
[3]. 3.Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A Conceptual Review of Positive Teacher Interpersonal Communication Behaviors in the Instructional Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708490.
[4]. 4.Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4.
[5]. 5.Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. E., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why Can't We Just Get Along? Interpersonal Biases and Interracial Distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88.
[6]. 6.Sivadasan, S., Lewis, J., & Chinaka, L. (2022). Implicit and Unconscious Bias: Racial Biases of Teachers. In Encyclopedia of Teacher Education (pp. 796-800). Springer Nature Singapore
[7]. 7.Greenwald, A. G., & Krieger, L. H. (2006). Implicit Bias: Scientific Foundations. California Law Review, 94(4), 945-967.
[8]. 8.Broadfoot, T. (1978). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Comparative Education, 14(1), 75-82.
[9]. 9.Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47-68.
[10]. 10.Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical Race Methodology: Counter-Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Education Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23-44.
[11]. 11.Farid, S., Abbasi, S. U. R. S., & Mahmood, Q. K. (2021). Modelling Bourdieusian Social Reproduction Theory. Social Indicators Research, 157(1), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02649-z
[12]. 12.Gillborn, D. (2006). Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and Anti-Racism in Educational Theory and Praxis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(1), 11-32.
[13]. 13.Smith, A. N. (2020). Critical Race Theory: Disruption in Teacher Education Pedagogy. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 3(1), 52–71.
[14]. 14.Chang, J. (2011). A Case Study of the “Pygmalion Effect”: Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement. International Education Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v4n1p198
[15]. 15.Szumski, G., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Exploring the Pygmalion Effect: The Role of Teacher Expectations, Academic Self-Concept, and Class Context in Students’ Math Achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101787.
[16]. 16.Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., ... & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and Correlates of Implicit Attitudes and Stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36-88.
[17]. 17.Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372.
[18]. 18.Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O’Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses.
[19]. 19.Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. ESRC Methods Programme Version, 1(1), b92.
[20]. 20.Magowan, L. (2023). Centre Assessment Grades in 2020: A Natural Experiment for Investigating Bias in Teacher Judgements. Journal of Computational Social Science, 6(2), 609–653.
[21]. 21.Ollrogge, K., Frühauf, M., Mros, T., Böttger, J., Höhne, E., McElvany, N., Zander, L., & Hannover, B. (2022). Can I Dismiss the Stereotype – As My Teacher Did? Influence of Stereotype Activation and an Immigrant Teacher on Student Learning. Social Psychology of Education, 25(4), 745–766.
[22]. 22.Lorenz, G. (2021). Subtle Discrimination: Do Stereotypes Among Teachers Trigger Bias in Their Expectations and Widen Ethnic Achievement Gaps? Social Psychology of Education, 24(2), 537-571.
[23]. 23.Cherng, H. Y. S. (2017). If They Think I Can: Teacher Bias and Youth of Color Expectations and Achievement. Social Science Research, 66(2017), 170-186.
[24]. 24.Chin, M. J., Quinn, D. M., Dhaliwal, T. K., & Lovison, V. S. (2020). Bias in the Air: A Nationwide Exploration of Teachers’ Implicit Racial Attitudes, Aggregate Bias, and Student Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 566–578.
[25]. 25.Kisfalusi, D. (2023). Are Equally Competent Roma-Minority Students Perceived as Less Smart Than Their Non-Roma Classmates? Journal for Multicultural Education, 17(4), 443-457.
[26]. 26.Neuenschwander, M. P., & Garrote, A. (2024). Biased Teacher Expectations of Students with Migration Backgrounds: Analysis with Nationality Stereotype Clusters. Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung.
[27]. 27.Ayala, M. C. (2022). Academic Achievement in Math and Language of Migrant and Local Students: The Role of Teachers' Educational Expectations and Ethnic Composition. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30, 40-40.
[28]. 28.Olczyk, M., Kwon, S. J., Lorenz, G., Casoni, V. P., Schneider, T., Volodina, A., Waldfogel, J., & Washbrook, E. (2022). Teacher Judgements, Student Social Background, and Student Progress in Primary School: A Cross-Country Perspective. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 26(2), 443–468.
[29]. 29.Doyle, L., Harris, P. R., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2024). Quality and Quantity: How Contexts Influence the Emergence of Teacher Bias. Social Psychology of Education, 27(4), 1855-1882.
[30]. 30.Peter, S., Karst, K., & Bonefeld, M. (2024). Objective Assessment Criteria Reduce the Influence of Judgmental Bias on Grading. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1386016.
[31]. 31.Wyness, G., Macmillan, L., Anders, J., & Dilnot, C. (2023). Grade Expectations: How Well Can Past Performance Predict Future Grades? Education Economics, 31(4), 397-418.
[32]. 32.Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[33]. 33.Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797.
[34]. 34.Pearman, F. A., Curran, F. C., Fisher, B., & Gardella, J. (2019). Are Achievement Gaps Related to Discipline Gaps? Evidence from National Data. AERA Open, 5(4), 2332858419875440.
[35]. 35.Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2023). Roles of Socioeconomic Status, Ethnicity and Teacher Beliefs in Academic Grading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 91-112.
[36]. 36.Nash, R. (1990). Bourdieu on Education and Social and Cultural Reproduction. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(4), 431–447.
[37]. 37.Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and Transformation of Inequalities in Schooling: The Transformative Potential of the Theoretical Constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 79–89.
[38]. 38.Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
[39]. 39.Gershenson, S., Hart, C. M., Hyman, J., Lindsay, C. A., & Papageorge, N. W. (2022). The Long-Run Impacts of Same-Race Teachers. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(4), 300-342.
[40]. 40.Atteberry, A., & LaCour, S. E. (2021). Making a Tough Choice: Teacher Target-Setting and Student Achievement in a Teacher Performance System Using Student Learning Objectives. AERA Open, 7, 2332858420979778.
[41]. 41.Childs, T. M., & Wooten, N. R. (2023). Teacher Bias Matters: An Integrative Review of Correlates, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Race Ethnicity and Education, 26(3), 368-397.
[42]. 42.Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. In The Public Nature of Private Violence (pp. 93-118). Routledge.
[43]. 43.Dover, A. G. (2009). Teaching for Social Justice and K-12 Student Outcomes: A Conceptual Framework and Research Review. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 506-524.
[44]. 44.Gaias, L. M., Cook, C. R., Nguyen, L., Brewer, S. K., Brown, E. C., Kiche, S., ... & Duong, M. T. (2020). A Mixed Methods Pilot Study of an Equity‐Explicit Student‐Teacher Relationship Intervention for the Ninth‐Grade Transition. Journal of School Health, 90(12), 1004-1018.
[45]. 45.García, E., & Weiss, E. (2017). Education Inequalities at the School Starting Gate: Gaps, Trends, and Strategies to Address Them. Economic Policy Institute.
[46]. 46.Gil-Hernández, C. J., Pañeda-Fernández, I., Salazar, L., & Muñoz, J. C. (2024). Teacher Bias in Assessments by Student Ascribed Status: A Factorial Experiment on Discrimination in Education. Sociological Science, 11, 743-776.
[47]. 47.Glock, S., Dickert, J., & Kleen, H. (2025). Students’ Gender and Social Background: Intersectional and Dominance Effects in Preservice Teachers’ Stereotypical Judgments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1-10.
[48]. 48.Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early Teacher–Child Relationships and the Trajectory of Children's School Outcomes Through Eighth Grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638.
[49]. 49.Kiziltas, Y., Sata, M., & Elkonca, F. (2023). Classroom Teachers' Bias in Assessing Disadvantaged Primary School Students' Reading Comprehension Skills. Elementary School Forum (Mimbar Sekolah Dasar), 10(1), 106-121.
[50]. 50.Ladson-Billings, G. (2020). Just What is Critical Race Theory and What’s It Doing in a Nice Field Like Education? In Critical Race Theory in Education (pp. 9-26). Routledge.
[51]. 51.Lin, J. C. (2023). Exposing the Chameleon-Like Nature of Racism: A Multidisciplinary Look at Critical Race Theory in Higher Education. Higher Education, 85(5), 1085-1100.
[52]. 52.Munir, J., Faiza, M., Jamal, B., Daud, S., & Iqbal, K. (2023). The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Academic Achievement. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 695–705.
[53]. 53.Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 339-367.
[54]. 54.Quinn, D. M. (2020). Experimental Evidence on Teachers’ Racial Bias in Student Evaluation: The Role of Grading Scales. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(3), 375–392.
[55]. 55.Reardon, S. F. (2018). The Widening Academic Achievement Gap Between the Rich and the Poor. In Social Stratification (pp. 536-550). Routledge.
[56]. 56.Schoneveld, E., & Brummelman, E. (2023). “You Did Incredibly Well!”: Teachers’ Inflated Praise Can Make Children from Low-SES Backgrounds Seem Less Smart (But More Hardworking). NPJ Science of Learning, 8(1).
[57]. 57.Seo, E., & Lee, Y. K. (2021). Stereotype Threat in High School Classrooms: How It Links to Teacher Mindset Climate, Mathematics Anxiety, and Achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(7), 1410-1423.
[58]. 58.Swargiary, K. (2025). Educational Sociology: Theory, Practice, and Contemporary Challenges. ERA, US.
[59]. 59.Szekeres, H., Bruneau, E., & Doosje, B. (2025). Dual Pathway of Prejudice in Education: Teachers’ Paternalistic and Hostile Prejudice Affecting Minority Girls. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1).






