Published
2025-10-29
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jing Li, Chonlavit Sutunyarak*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The Role of Principals' Transformational Leadership and Kindergarten Organizational Climate in Shaping Teachers' Work Engagement: The Mediating Effect of Teachers' Self-Efficacy – Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China
Jing Li
Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International College of Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
Chonlavit Sutunyarak
Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International College of Interdisciplinary Studies (CBIS), Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-ok, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4072
Keywords: Transformational leadership; Organizational climate; Teacher work engagement; Self-efficacy; Early childhood education; Teacher motivation; Jiangsu Province
Abstract
This study examines how principals' transformational leadership and the kindergarten organizational climate are associated with kindergarten teachers' work engagement, with a particular focus on the mediating role of kindergarten teachers' self-efficacy. A survey was conducted with 415 full-time kindergarten teachers across Jiangsu Province, China. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), the relationships among transformational leadership, organizational climate, self-efficacy, and work engagement were tested. The findings show that principals' transformational leadership is positively associated with teachers' work engagement. In addition, a positive kindergarten organizational climate, characterized by effective communication and mutual support, is positively associated with kindergarten teachers' self-efficacy, which in turn is associated with higher work engagement. The results indicate that self-efficacy plays a partial mediating role in the associations between transformational leadership, organizational climate, and teachers' work engagement. This study extends work on transformational leadership by applying it to Chinese kindergartens and underscores the role of self-efficacy in understanding teacher engagement. It highlights the importance of a supportive environment for strengthening teacher motivation and performance. Practical implications suggest that principals should receive training in emotional intelligence and adaptability, while kindergartens should foster a collaborative climate to help bolster teachers' self-efficacy and sustain their engagement.
References
[1]. 1.Lazzari A, Vandenbroeck M. The impact of Early Childhood Education and Care on cognitive and non-cognitive development: A review of European studies. ResearchGate; 2013. doi:10.13140/2.1.2645.6004
[2]. 2.Fekkes M, Sluiter RMV, Fukkink RG. The Impact of Process Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care on Socio-Emotional Development: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2025; 22(5). doi:10.3390/ijerph22050775
[3]. 3.Chen YW, Liu BG. Research progress and future prospects of the relationship between preschool education quality and children's development based on scientific assessment. Early Childhood Education Research 2023; (2): 31–43. doi: 10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2023.02.003.
[4]. 4.Leung TY, Lam CB. Linking professional development opportunities to work performance among Chinese kindergarten teachers: The mediating roles of commitment and engagement. Education Sciences 2025. doi:10.3390/educsci15030342
[5]. 5.Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In: Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. Psychology Press; 2010. pp. 10–24.
[6]. 6.Ji Y. Does Teacher Engagement Matter? Exploring the Relationship Between Teachers' Engagement in Professional Development and Teaching Practice. International Journal of TESOL Studies 2021. doi:10.46451/ijts.2021.12.04
[7]. 7.Skaalvik EM, Skaalvik S. Teacher stress and teacher' self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession. Creative Education 2016; 7(13): 2092–2106. doi:110.4236/ce.2016.713182
[8]. 8.Hakanen JJ, Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology 2006; 47(5): 365–387. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
[9]. 9.Mao JP, Zhou ZZ, Wu YF. A comparative study of transformational leadership, authentic leadership, and teachers' work engagement in primary and secondary schools. J Teach Educ Res 2017; 29(2): 48–54. doi:10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2017.02.008.
[10]. 10.Pakarinen E, Penttinen V, Pakarinen E. Relations between kindergarten teachers' occupational well-being and the quality of teacher-child interactions. Early Childhood Education Journal 2020. doi:10.1080/10409289.2020.1785265
[11]. 11.Wang P, Deng X, Li X, Dong Y, Jiao R. Latent classes of principals' transformational leadership and the organizational climate of kindergartens. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 2015. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02015
[12]. 12.Hu BY, Li YH, Wang C, Reynolds BL, Wang S. The relation between school climate and preschool teacher stress: The mediating role of teachers' self-efficacy. J Educ Adm 2019; 57(6): 748–767. doi:10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0146
[13]. 13.Otrębski W. The correlation between organizational (school) climate and teacher job satisfaction—the type of educational institution moderating role. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(11): 6520. doi:10.3390/ijerph19116520
[14]. 14.Dinibutun SR, Kuzey C, Dinc MS. The effect of organizational climate on faculty burnout at state and private universities: A comparative analysis. Sage Open 2020; 10(1): 1-13. doi:10.1177/2158244020979175
[15]. 15.Zhang J. The relationship between school inclusive atmosphere and teachers' work engagement: The chain mediating role of inclusive education self-efficacy and inclusive education behavioral intention. [Master's thesis]. Central China Normal University; 2024. doi:10.27159/d.cnki.ghzsu.2024.000198.
[16]. 16.Chen CC, Lin YH. Relationships among school principals' work values, organizational climate, and organizational adaptation: Taiwan's 2018 TALIS data. Journal of Educational Administration 2023; 57(1). doi:10.1108/JEA-01-2023-0012
[17]. 17.Lai FY, Lin CC. Transformational leadership and job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. Sage Open 2020; 10(1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244019899085
[18]. 18.Song JH, Kolb JA, Lee UH, Kim HK. Role of transformational leadership in effective organizational knowledge creation practices: Mediating effects of employees' work engagement. Hum Resour Dev Q 2012; 23(1): 65–101. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21120.
[19]. 19.Mansor AN, Jamaludin KA. The influence of transformational leadership and teachers' trust in principals on teachers' working commitment. Human Soc Sci J 2021; 10(2): 1–15. doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00985-6
[20]. 20.Iman MZ, Veronica AM. Transformational leadership: Exploring secondary school leaders' perceptions on best practices. Edu Spectrum J 2025; 12(1): 1–15. doi:10.70063/eduspectrum.v2i1.92
[21]. 21.The State Council of the People's Republic of China. The Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on Implementing the Universal Two-Child Policy and Reforming and Improving Family Planning Service Management. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content_5033853.htm (accessed on 10 August 2025).
[22]. 22.Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Educational statistics data (2014–2023). http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2023/ (accessed on 10 August 2025)
[23]. 23.Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84(2): 191–215.
[24]. 24.Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk Hoy A. The influence of resources and support on teachers' efficacy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education 2001; 17(1): 1-15. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
[25]. 25.Xie YT, Shi ZF. The relationship between professional identity and junior high school teachers' work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and teacher metacognition. Psychol Res 2024; 17(6): 528–536. doi:10.19988/j.cnki.issn.2095-1159.2024.06.006.
[26]. 26.Burns JM. Leadership. Harper & Row; 1978.
[27]. 27.Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press; 1985.
[28]. 28.Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers' performance. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(12), 45-51. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326646177
[29]. 29.Jin F, Yao FY, Zhang SS, et al. The impact of transformational leadership on kindergarten teachers' organizational commitment: The mediating role of psychological contract. China Spec Educ 2020; (7): 82–89.
[30]. 30.Tian Y, Guo Y. How does transformational leadership relieve teacher burnout: The role of self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Psychol Rep 2024; 127(2): 936–956. doi:10.1177/00332941221125773
[31]. 31.Leithwood K, et al. School restructuring, transformational leadership and the amelioration of teacher burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping 1996; 9(3): 199–215. doi:10.1080/10615809608249402
[32]. 32.Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, et al. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol 2001; 86(3): 499–512. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.499
[33]. 33.Catalano H, et al. The impact of transformational leadership on leaders' performance in the context of early education institutions. Rev Rom Educ Multidim 2024; 16(4): 1–28. doi:10.18662/rrem/16.4/905
[34]. 34.Jin F. Management of kindergarten teachers from the perspective of psychological contract. J Educ Sci Res 2021; (6): 93–96.
[35]. 35.Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
[36]. 36.Tschannen-Moran M, Hoy AW. The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 2001; 17(2): 145–158. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
[37]. 37.Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. J Organ Behav 2004; 25(3): 293–315. doi:10.1002/job.248
[38]. 38.Lai F-Y, Tang H-C, Lin C-C. Transformational leadership and job performance: The mediating role of work engagement.Sage Open 2020; 10(1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244019899085.
[39]. 39.Yu X, Liu Z, Yin H. A framework for transformational leadership to enhance teachers' work performance in Chinese private universities. Front Psychol 2024;15:1331597. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331597.
[40]. 40.Lin W, Yin H, Liu Z. The roles of transformational leadership and growth mindset in teacher professional development: The mediation of teacher self-efficacy. Sustainability 2022;14(11):6489. doi:10.3390/su14116489.
[41]. 41.Kish, L. Statistical Design for Research. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
[42]. 42.Hair, J. F., et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education; 2010.
[43]. 43.Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology 2000; 14(3): 389-405. doi:10.1023/A:1022991115523.
[44]. 44.Li, X., Wang, P., & Wei, X. Measurement of kindergarten organizational climate and its relationship with teachers' teaching efficacy. Teacher Education Research 2017; 29(04): 60-66+83. doi:10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2017.04.010.
[45]. 45.Hoy, W. K., & Clover, S. I. R. Elementary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly 1986; 22(1): 93-110. doi:10.1177/0013161X86022001007.
[46]. 46. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2006; 66(4): 701-716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471.
[47]. 47.Wu, L., & Zhan, H. Y. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale (TSE) (short form). Psychological Technology and Application 2017; 5(11): 672-679. doi:10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2017.11.005.
[48]. 48.Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 2001; 17(7): 783-805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
[49]. 49.Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 1999; 6(1): 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
[50]. 50.Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Publications; 2023.






