Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    8986
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8006
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7925
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7342
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    5851

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 9 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-4077

Published

2025-10-16

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 9 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Ruibo Liu, Pengfei Chen, Yongjiu Gao, Fangyu Xiang, Quan Su

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Liu, R., Chen, P., Gao, Y., Xiang, F., & Su, Q. (2025). The mechanism of professional learning communities in promoting teacher professional development: An empirical study of university physical education teachers based on collaborative culture. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(9), ESP-4077. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.4077
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

The mechanism of professional learning communities in promoting teacher professional development: An empirical study of university physical education teachers based on collaborative culture

Ruibo Liu

Dhurakij Pundit University, Chinese International College,Bangkok, 10210, Thailand

Pengfei Chen

Dhurakij Pundit University, Chinese International College, Bangkok, Thailand

Yongjiu Gao

Binzhou Polytechnic, College of Education, Binzhou, 256600, China

Fangyu Xiang

Dhurakij Pundit University, International College, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand

Quan Su

Dhurakij Pundit University, Chinese International College, Bangkok, 10210, Thailand


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.4077


Keywords: professional learning communities (PLCs); teacher professional development (TPD); physical education teachers; gender; teaching experience


Abstract

Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) are recognized as a key mechanism for teacher growth, yet little is known about their role among university Physical Education (PE) teachers. This study examined the associations between PLCs and professional development, considering gender and teaching experience.

Survey data were collected from 803 Chinese PE teachers using validated scales. Analyses included t tests, ANOVA, hierarchical regression with controls, and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Results showed that PLCs were significantly associated with professional development (β=.500, p<.001), explaining 26.3% of the variance. Gender differences were observed: male teachers scored higher than females (Hedges’ g=0.27, p<.001). Teaching experience also mattered: novice teachers (≤ 5 years) and senior teachers (> 25 years) reported higher scores than mid-career peers (6–25 years).

These findings highlight PLCs as a robust organizational resource linked to teacher development beyond background characteristics. Practical implications include differentiated measures: induction and mentoring for novices, leadership opportunities and support for women, and retraining or research incentives for senior staff. This study extends PLC theory to the underexplored context of university PE teachers and provides evidence-based recommendations for building collaborative and equitable faculty development systems.


References

[1]. 1.Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

[2]. 2.Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573

[3]. 3.Wang, N., & An, B. G. (2023). Improving teachers’ professional development through professional learning community: Voices from secondary school teachers at Malaysian Chinese independent schools. Heliyon, 9(7), e17515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17515

[4]. 4.Owen, S. M. (2016). Professional learning communities: Building skills, reinvigorating the passion, and nurturing teacher wellbeing and “flourishing” within significantly innovative schooling contexts. Educational Review, 68(4), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1119101

[5]. 5.van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J. M., Beijaard, D., & Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044328

[6]. 6.Hodkinson, A. (2009). Pre‐service teacher training and special educational needs in England 1970–2008: Is government learning the lessons of the past or is it experiencing a groundhog day? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903016891

[7]. 7.Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

[8]. 8.Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

[9]. 9.Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072002

[10]. 10.Wenger, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Wenger-Trayner.

[11]. 11.Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

[12]. 12.Olivier, D. F., & Hipp, K. K. (2010). Assessing and analyzing schools as professional learning communities. Demystifying professional learning communities. School leadership at its best. 29-42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303147083_Assessing_and_analyzing_schools_as_professional_learning_communities

[13]. 13.Marian, A. (2022). Teachers' Perceptions on the implementation of professional learning communities and the relationship to student achievement [Doctoral dissertation, Arkansas Tech University]. ATU Theses and Dissertations. https://orc.library.atu.edu/etds_2021/32

[14]. 14.Tannehill, D., MacPhail, A., Walsh, J., & Woods, C. (2020). Continuing professional development for physical education teachers in Europe. European Physical Education Review, 26(4), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20931531

[15]. 15.OECD (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS): Teacher questionnaire. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2018-MS-TeacherQuestionnaire-ENG.pdf

[16]. 16.Makopoulou, K., Armour, K. M. (2011). Physical education teachers' career-long professional learning: Getting personal. Sport Education and Society, 16(5), 571-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.601138

[17]. 17.Patton, K., & Parker, M. (2017). Teacher education communities of practice: More than a culture of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.013

[18]. 18.Zhao, Y., & McDougall, D. (2022). The complexity of professional identity: Chinese university teachers teaching in physical education teacher education (PETE) programmes. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791069

[19]. 19.Kools, M., & Stoll, L. (2016). What makes a school a learning organisation? OECD Education Working Papers, No. 137. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwm62b3bvh-en

[20]. 20.Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562

[21]. 21.Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement–A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.550467

[22]. 22.Ingersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323

[23]. 23.Pliogou, V., Tromara, S., Hajisoteriou, C., & Angelides, P. (2023). Preventing and combating school-related gender-based violence (SRGBV): Laying the foundations for a safe, equitable, and inclusive school. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1210904. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1210904

[24]. 24.Centeio, E., Mercier, K., Garn, A., Erwin, H., Marttinen, R., & Foley, J. (2021). The success and struggles of physical education teachers while teaching online during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(4), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0295

[25]. 25.Dogan, S., Tatik, R. S., & Yurtseven, Nihal. (2017). Professional learning communities assessment: adaptation, internal validity, and multidimensional model testing in turkish context. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 1203-1229. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1148355

[26]. 26.Lin, W. X. (2021). Environmental aesthetics and university teachers' professional development in China [Doctor's Thesis, Dhurakij Pundit University]. DPU Theses and Dissertations. https://libdoc.dpu.ac.th/thesis/Weixin.Lin.pdf

[27]. 27.Humphries, C. A., Hebert, E., Daigle, K., & Martin, J. (2012). Development of a Physical Education Teaching Efficacy Scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 16(4), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2012.716726

[28]. 28.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[29]. 29.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., and Podsakoff, N. P., (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 879.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com