Published
2025-09-28
Section
Review Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shihui Hua, Azlin Norhaini Mansor, Khairul Azhar Bin Jamaludin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy for school improvement: A systematic review of empirical studies
Shihui Hua
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia
Azlin Norhaini Mansor
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia
Khairul Azhar Bin Jamaludin
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i9.4119
Keywords: instructional leadership; PRISMA; student outcome; systematic literature review; teacher self-efficacy
Abstract
This study addresses a crucial aspect of school success in the context of current educational reforms by methodically examining how instructional leadership indirectly affects student outcomes through teacher self-efficacy. In order to synthesise methodological approaches, research trends, and conceptual frameworks across various educational contexts, bibliometric mapping and qualitative content analysis were integrated into a systematic literature review of 34 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025, adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The results demonstrate that by defining school missions, overseeing instructional programs, and creating a supportive learning environment, instructional leadership raises teacher self-efficacy and boosts teachers' confidence in their ability to deliver instruction, manage the classroom, and engage students. Although the review shows a preponderance of quantitative designs, a narrow cross-cultural breadth, and a dearth of longitudinal and mixed-methods research, which limit subtle contextual insights, these processes do contribute to increased student accomplishment. The report offers evidence-based suggestions for leadership development programs that aim to improve student learning outcomes by increasing teacher efficacy. In addition to highlighting methodological and contextual priorities for future research, this review adds originality and value to the field by providing an integrative conceptual framework that elucidates the psychological processes connecting instructional leadership to educational outcomes.
References
[1]. 1.S. Gümüş, P. Hallinger, R. Cansoy, and M. Su, ‘Instructional leadership in a centralized and competitive educational system: a qualitative meta-synthesis of research from Turkey’,Journal of Educational Administration, 59(6), 702–720, 2021, doi: 10.1108/JEA-04-2021-0073.
[2]. 2.He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0
[3]. 3.Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Tülübaş, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). A bibliometric review of the knowledge base on mentoring for the professional development of school administrators. Sustainability, 15(4), 3027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043027
[4]. 4.K. Leithwood, J. Sun, and R. Schumacker, ‘How School Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Test of “The Four Paths Model”’, Educational Administration Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 570–599, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0013161X19878772.
[5]. 5.Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2024). Principals’ digital instructional leadership during the pandemic: Impact on teachers’ intrinsic motivation and students’ learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(4), 934-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221113411
[6]. 6.S. Gumus, M. S. Bellibas, M. Esen, and E. Gumus, ‘A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 25–48, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1741143216659296.
[7]. 7.Hallinger and J. Kovačević, ‘A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018’, Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0034654319830380.
[8]. 8.C. Y. Tan, L. Gao. and M. Sh . ‘Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes’,Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469-490, 2022, doi:10.1177/1741143220935456.
[9]. 9.J. Grissom, A. Egalite, and C. Lindsay, ‘How Principals Affect Students and Schools’.Wallace Foundation, 2(1), 30-41, 2021, http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis.
[10]. 10.Nguyen, D. (2020). Distributed leadership in a multicultural context: case study from Vietnam-Finland International School. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202006043963
[11]. 11.Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
[12]. 12.Gordon, D., Blundell, C., Mills, R., & Bourke, T. (2023). Teacher self-efficacy and reform: a systematic literature review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50(3), 801-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00526-3
[13]. 13.Kamran, M. (2025). Educational Leadership in a Digital Era: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities. AL-ĪMĀN Research Journal, 3(01), 188-199. https://alimanjournal.com/ojs/index.php/home/article/view/119
[14]. 14.M. S. Bellibas and S. Gümüş, ‘A systematic review of educational leadership and management research in Turkey: Content analysis of topics, conceptual models, and methods’, Journal of Educational Administration, 57(6), 731-747, 2019, doi: 10.1108/JEA-01-2019-0004.
[15]. 15.W. Hammad, E. A. Samier, and A. Mohammed, ‘Mapping the field of educational leadership and management in the Arabian Gulf region: A systematic review of Arabic research literature’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 6-25, 2022, doi: 10.1177/1741143220937308.
[16]. 16.I. Oplatka and K. Arar, ‘The research on educational leadership and management in the Arab world since the 1990s: A systematic review’, Review of Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 267–307, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1002/rev3.3095.
[17]. 17.D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, ‘Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement’, International journal of surgery, 8(5), 336-341. 2010, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.
[18]. 18.A. Bandura, ‘SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY: An Agentic Perspective’,Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
[19]. 19.P. Hallinger and J. Murphy, ‘Instructional Leadership in Effective Schools’, ERIC: Education Resources Information Center. United States of America. Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/1j4qspi on 02 Aug 2025. COI: 20.500.12592/1j4qspi.
[20]. 20.Z. Anselmus Dami, B. Budi Wiyono, A. Imron, B. Burhanuddin, A. Supriyanto, and M. Daliman, ‘Principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership in the perspective of principal strengthening training: work engagement, job satisfaction and motivation to leave’, Cogent Education, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2064407, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2064407.
[21]. 21.Y. Akman, ‘The Relationships among Teacher Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy and Teacher Performance’, Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 720–744, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.30831/akukeg.930802.
[22]. 22.H. A. Bada, T. F. Tengku Ariffin, and H. B. Nordin, ‘The Effectiveness of Teachers in Nigerian Secondary Schools: The Role of Instructional Leadership of Principals’, International Journal of Leadership in Education, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 44–71, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2020.1811899.
[23]. 23.M. S. Bellibas and Y. Liu, ‘Multilevel analysis of the relationship between principals’ perceived practices of instructional leadership and teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions’, JEA, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 49–69, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1108/JEA-12-2015-0116.
[24]. 24.S. Bozkurt, Ö. Çoban, M. Özdemir, and N. Özdemir, ‘How Leadership, School Culture, Collective Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Socioeconomic Status Affect Student Achievement’, Education and Science, vol. 46, no. 207, pp. 465–482, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.15390/EB.2021.9338.
[25]. 25.C. Brandmo, D. Tiplic, and E. Elstad, ‘Antecedents of department heads’ job autonomy, role clarity, and self-efficacy for instructional leadership’, International Journal of Leadership in Education, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 411–430, May 2021, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2019.1580773.
[26]. 26.R. Cansoy and H. Parlar, ‘Examining the relationship between school principals’ instructional leadership behaviors, teacher self-efficacy, and collective teacher efficacy’, IJEM, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 550–567, May 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-04-2017-0089.
[27]. 27.S. Chen and J. Rong, ‘The Moderating Role of Teacher Collegiality in the Relationship Between Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy’, Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 21582440231217884, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231217884.
[28]. 28.Ö. Çoban, N. Özdemir, and M. Ş. Bellibaş, ‘Trust in principals, leaders’ focus on instruction, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy: testing a multilevel mediation model’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 95–115, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/1741143220968170.
[29]. 29.C. A. Daing and L. C. Mustapha, ‘School administrators’ instructional leadership skills and teachers’ performance and efficacy in senior high schools in the national capital region, Philippines’, IJEPRR, vol. 10, no. 1, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.15739/IJEPRR.23.001.
[30]. 30.Elfira et al., ‘How does principal’s instructional leadership shape teacher performance mediated by teacher self-efficacy in Indonesian education context?’, Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1401394, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1401394.
[31]. 31.R. D. Goddard, L. P. Bailes, and M. Kim, ‘Principal Efficacy Beliefs for Instructional Leadership and their Relation to Teachers’ Sense of Collective Efficacy and Student Achievement’, Leadership and Policy in Schools, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 472–493, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/15700763.2019.1696369.
[32]. 32.P. Hallinger and R. Hosseingholizadeh, ‘Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high- and low-performing principals’, Educational Management Administration, 48(4), 595-616, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1741143219836684.
[33]. 33.P. Hallinger, R. Hosseingholizadeh, N. Hashemi, and M. Kouhsari, ‘Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 800–819, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1741143217700283.
[34]. 34.D. M. Hompashe, ‘Does instructional leadership drive educational improvement in South Africa? Evidence from Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis’, Development Southern Africa, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 404–426, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2024.2309455.
[35]. 35.S. N. Ismail, Y. Don, F. Husin, and R. Khalid, ‘Instructional Leadership and Teachers' Functional Competency across the 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 135-152, 2018, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183348.pdf.
[36]. 36.I. Jalapang and A. Raman, ‘Effect of Instructional Leadership, Principal Efficacy, Teacher Efficacy and School Climate on Students’ Academic Achievements’, AJIS, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 82, May 2020, doi: 10.36941/ajis-2020-0043.
[37]. 37.K. G. Johnson and T. Williams, ‘Mathematics Instructional Leadership: Self-Efficacy Development for Elementary School Administrators’, Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 8(1), 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.32674/jsard.v8i1.3692.
[38]. 38.A. Ç. Kılınç, M. Ş. Bellibaş, and F. Bektaş, ‘Antecedents and outcomes of teacher leadership: the role of teacher trust, teacher self-efficacy and instructional practice’, IJEM, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1556–1571, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-04-2021-0148.
[39]. 39.A. Ç. Kılınç, M. Polatcan, O. Erdoğan, F. Sezgin, and S. Özdemir, ‘Investigating the association between principal learning-centred leadership and teacher instructional practices: the mediating roles of teacher self-efficacy and collective teacher efficacy’, Educational Studies, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 568–587, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2023.2279035.
[40]. 40.Y. Liu, L. Li, and C. Huang, ‘To what extent is shared instructional leadership related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance in China?’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 381–402, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/09243453.2022.2029746.
[41]. 41.X. Ma, and R. Marion, (2021). ‘Exploring how instructional leadership affects teacher efficacy: A multilevel analysis’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 188-207, 2021, doi:10.1177/1741143219888742.
[42]. 42.J. S. McBrayer et al., ‘Instructional Leadership Practices and School Leaders’ Self-Efficacy’, vol. 15, 2019. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol15/iss1/13.
[43]. 43.S. Mokhtar and A. Z. Abd Razak, ‘PRINCIPAL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP AND TEACHER SELF-EFFICACY AS A MEDIATING VARIABLE BETWEEN TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND TEACHER PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PRACTICES IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KELANTAN’, MOJEM, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 73–91, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.22452/mojem.vol12no3.5.
[44]. 44.H. T. Nguyen, N.-T. T. Vu, X. V. Ha, H.-V. T. Dinh, T. D. Truong, and B. L. Reynolds, ‘Principal instructional leadership and its influence on teachers’ professional development at Vietnamese primary schools’, Education 3-13, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 408–416, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/03004279.2023.2195409.
[45]. 45.S. Sumi̇Ati̇ and W. Ni̇Emted, ‘The impact of instructional leadership on Indonesian elementary teacher efficacy’, İlköğretim Online, pp. 2335–2346, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.764244.
[46]. 46.G. Özdemir, S. Şahin, and N. Öztürk, ‘Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Perceptions in Terms of School Principal’s Instructional Leadership Behaviours’, IJPE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 25–40, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.3.
[47]. 47.M. Qadach, C. Schechter, and R. Da’as, ‘Instructional leadership and teachers’ intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 617–634, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1741143219836683.
[48]. 48.A. Ridwan et al., ‘INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP AND TEACHER SELF-EFFICACY ON JOB SATISFACTION: THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF SCHOOL CLIMATE IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS’, Jur. Ilmh. Ilm. Ter. Un. Ja, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 732–745, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i2.37023.
[49]. 49.S. Sindhvad, U. Mikayilova, and E. Kazimzade, ‘Factors influencing instructional leadership capacity in Baku, Azerbaijan’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 81–98, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/1741143220938364.
[50]. 50.T. Siriparp, P. Buasuwan, and S. Nanthachai,‘The effects of principal instructional leadership, collective teacher efficacy and teacher role on teacher self-efficacy: A moderated mediation examination’, KJSS, vol. 43, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.2.12.
[51]. 51.C. Skaalvik, ‘School principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership: relations with engagement, emotional exhaustion and motivation to quit’, Soc Psychol Educ, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 479–498, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11218-020-09544-4.
[52]. 52.C. Skaalvik, ‘Self-efficacy for instructional leadership: relations with perceived job demands and job resources, emotional exhaustion, job satisfaction, and motivation to quit’, Soc Psychol Educ, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1343–1366, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11218-020-09585-9.
[53]. 53.L. M. Thien and P. Liu, ‘Linear and nonlinear relationships between instructional leadership and teacher professional learning through teacher self-efficacy as a mediator: a partial least squares analysis’, Humanit Soc Sci Commun, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 7, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02500-5.
[54]. 54.P. Hallinger, ‘Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership’,Cambridge Journal of education, 33(3), 329-352, 2003, doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005.
[55]. 55.A. M. Borden, ‘Relationships between Paraguayan principals’ characteristics, teachers’ perceptions of instructional leadership and school outcomes. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 203-227, 2011, doi: 10.1080/13603124.2010.482675.
[56]. 56.L. Li, P. Hallinger, and J. Ko, ‘Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong’, International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 76–100, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035.
[57]. 57.V. M. J. Robinson, C. E. L. Sinnema, and D. Le Fevre, ‘From Persuasion to Learning: An Intervention to Improve Leaders’ Response to Disagreement’, Leadership and Policy in Schools, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 260–296, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/15700763.2014.922997.
[58]. 58.H. N. Perera, C. Calkins and R. Part, R, ‘Teacher self-efficacy profiles: Determinants, outcomes, and generalizability across teaching level’, Contemporary educational psychology, 58, 186-203, 2019, doi: 0.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.006.
[59]. 59.M. Corry and J. Stella, ‘REVIEW ARTICLE Teacher self-efficacy in online education: a review of the literature’, Research in Learning Technology, 26, 2018, doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2047.
[60]. 60.M. S. Poulou, L. A. Reddy, and C. M. Dudek, ‘Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation’, School Psychology International, 40(1), 25-48, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0143034318798045.
[61]. 61.F. Lauermann, ‘Linking teacher self-efficacy and responsibility with teachers’ self-reported and student-reported motivating styles and student engagement’,Learning and Instruction, 76, 101441, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101441.
[62]. 62.Y. F. Zakariya, ‘Effects of school climate and teacher self-efficacy on job satisfaction of mostly STEM teachers: a structural multigroup invariance approach’, IJ STEM Ed, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 10, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00209-4.
[63]. 63.L. Yang, J. Chi-Kin Lee, D. Zhang, and J. Chen, ‘Examining the relationships among teaching assistants’ self-efficacy, emotional well-being and job satisfaction’, Teachers and Teaching, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 835–861, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13540602.2023.2265825.
[64]. 64.I. Burić and L. Kim, ‘Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs:An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling’,Learning and instruction, 66, 101302, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302.
[65]. 65.E. Aboagye, J. A. Yawson, and K. N. Appiah, ‘COVID-19 and E-Learning: The Challenges of Students in Tertiary Institutions’,Social Education Research, 1-8, 2021, doi: 10.37256/ser.212021422.
[66]. 66.N. Mockler, ‘Teacher professional learning under audit: reconfiguring practice in an age of standards’, Professional Development in Education, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 166–180, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2020.1720779.
[67]. 67.Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023, July). The scientific evolution of social justice leadership in education: structural and longitudinal analysis of the existing knowledge base, 2003–2022. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 8, p. 1139648). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1139648






