Published
2025-11-25
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah Ali Abdulkareem, Aws Hamid Mohammed, Samer Adel Abd Hussein, Nazar F. Hassan, Waleed Nassar, Ruslan Frosiniak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Evaluating Legal and Governance Frameworks in Environmental Disasters: A Mixed-Methods Simulation of Response Efficiency, Compliance, and Stakeholder Engagement
Sarah Ali Abdulkareem
Al-Turath University, Baghdad 10013, Iraq
Aws Hamid Mohammed
Al-Mansour University College, Baghdad 10067, Iraq
Samer Adel Abd Hussein
Al-Mamoon University College, Baghdad 10012, Iraq
Nazar F. Hassan
Al-Rafidain University College, Baghdad 10064, Iraq
Waleed Nassar
Madenat Alelem University College, Baghdad 10006, Iraq
Ruslan Frosiniak
Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Kropyvnytskyi 25015, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.4128
Keywords: disaster governance; regulatory frameworks; stakeholder engagement; response efficiency; legal compliance; crisis management
Abstract
Addressing the effects of environmental disasters and their consequences, which can be solved through effective governance structures, legal frameworks, and mechanisms that indicate disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, is challenging for societies right now. The study reviews the impact of governance strategies and regulatory frameworks on response efficiency, resource allocation, legal compliance, and stakeholder engagement during environmental crises. However, existing research often examines these elements separately, leaving limited understanding of how legal, governance, and behavioral factors interact during disasters. This study aims to address that gap by evaluating their combined influence within a unified analytical framework.
The article used a structured mixed-methods approach combining quantitative statistical analysis with qualitative thematic evaluations. This approach also incorporates scenario-based simulations across five disaster types to test governance performance under controlled assumptions, allowing both qualitative and quantitative insights to be integrated consistently.
In each of the disaster simulations Response times indicated by 40% and resource allocation indicated in efficiency by 25–56%, indicating potential improvements under the simulated conditions. These values reflect modeled tendencies rather than predictions and should therefore be interpreted as indicative estimates within the boundaries of the simulation design. Additionally, high rates of legal compliance across all categories suggesting a positive association between enforcement mechanisms and compliance within the model. Future research should examine comparative governance across countries and the longer-term effects of legal frameworks on disaster risk reduction. Additional empirical work using multi-country datasets and real-time environmental indicators, such as: emerging contaminants, biological assessments, and climate-driven water-quality changes, will be essential for validating and expanding these results.
References
[1]. 1.Ahmadi SM, Balahang S, Abolfathi S. Predicting the hydraulic response of critical transport infrastructures during extreme flood events. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024;133:108573.
[2]. 2.Akhyar A, Zulkifley MA, Lee J, Song T, Han J, Cho C, et al. Deep artificial intelligence applications for natural disaster management systems: A methodological review. Ecological Indicators. 2024.
[3]. 3.Camps-Valls G, Fernandez-Torres M, Cohrs K-H, Höhl A, Castelletti A, Paçal A, et al. Artificial intelligence for modeling and understanding extreme weather and climate events. Nature Communications. 2025;16.
[4]. 4.Li H, Yu D, Zhang Y, Yuan Y. A two-stage robust optimization model for emergency service facilities location-allocation problem under demand uncertainty and sustainable development. Scientific Reports. 2025;15.
[5]. 5.Kalalo FP, Pinangkaan N, Rewah RM. STRATEGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL ARRANGEMENT AS AN EFFORT TO PREVENT NATURAL DISASTERS, FLOODS, AND LANDSLIDES IN NORTH SULAWESI. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES. 2023;3(1):47-57.
[6]. 6.Adanma U, & Ogunbiyi, E. . Evaluating the effectiveness of global governance mechanisms in promoting environmental sustainability and international relations. Finance & Accounting Research Journal. 2024;6(5).
[7]. 7.Dai J, Azhar A. Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development. Public Administration and Development. 2024;44(4):358-80.
[8]. 8.Emmanuella N, Eneh, N., Adeniyi, A., Akpuokwe, C., Bakare, S., & Titor-Addingi, M. . Evaluating environmental legislation on disaster resilience: Data insights from Nigeria and the USA. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;21(02):1900–8.
[9]. 9.Ghorbani A, Siddiki S, Bravo G. Editorial: Institutional adaptation and transformation for climate resilience. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023;11.
[10]. 10.Majamba H. An Examination of the Humanitarianism-Disaster Management Nexus in Tanzania’s Policy and Legal Framework. HURIA JOURNAL OF THE OPEN UNIVERSITY OF TANZANIA. 2023;29.
[11]. 11.Faijue DD, Segui AO, Shringarpure K, Razavi A, Hasan N, Dar O, et al. Constructing a One Health governance architecture: a systematic review and analysis of governance mechanisms for One Health. The European Journal of Public Health. 2024;34:1086-94.
[12]. 12.Meng S. Environmental governance is critical for mitigating human displacement due to weather-related disasters. Communications Earth & Environment. 2024.
[13]. 13.Awah LS, Belle J, Nyam Y, Orimoloye I. A participatory systems dynamic modelling approach to understanding flood systems in a coastal community in Cameroon. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024.
[14]. 14.Fritz L, Baum C, Low S, Sovacool B. Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions. Nature Communications. 2024;15.
[15]. 15.Fu Q, Zhang X. Promoting community resilience through disaster education: Review of community-based interventions with a focus on teacher resilience and well-being. PLOS ONE. 2024;19.
[16]. 16.Santos M, Carvalho LC. AI-driven participatory environmental management: Innovations, applications, and future prospects. Journal of environmental management. 2025;373:123864.
[17]. 17.Tang L, Fan B, Li C, Zhao G. Empirical Evaluation of the Environmental Emergency Management Capability of Local Governments in China. Sustainability [Internet]. 2022; 14(11).
[18]. 18.Carvalho P, Spataru C. Gaps in the governance of floods, droughts, and heatwaves in the United Kingdom. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2023;11.
[19]. 19.Albahri A, Khaleel YL, Habeeb MA, Ismael R, Hameed Q, Deveci M, et al. A systematic review of trustworthy artificial intelligence applications in natural disasters. Comput Electr Eng. 2024;118:109409.
[20]. 20.Tehler H, Cedergren A, De Goër De Herve M, Gustavsson J, Hassel H, Lindbom H, et al. Evidence-based disaster risk management: A scoping review focusing on risk, resilience and vulnerability assessment. Progress in Disaster Science. 2024.
[21]. 21.Somers S, Svara J. Assessing and Managing Environmental Risk: Connecting Local Government Management with Emergency Management. Public Administration Review. 2009;69.
[22]. 22.Bignami DF, Ambrosi C, Bertulessi M, Menduni G, Pozzoni M, Zambrini F. Governance strategies and tools towards the improvement of emergency management of natural disasters in transboundary areas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024;111:104704.
[23]. 23.Adanma UM, Ogunbiyi EO. Evaluating the effectiveness of global governance mechanisms in promoting environmental sustainability and international relations. Finance & Accounting Research Journal. 2024.
[24]. 24.Ferrari F, Séllos-Knoerr V, Netto A. Disaster Rights: Public and Private Responsibility in Safeguarding Human Rights during Environmental Disasters. Life Style. 2023;10:e01551.
[25]. 25.Karasmanaki E, Mallinis G, Mitsopoulos I, Karteris A, Chrysafis I, Bakaloudis D, et al. Proposing a Governance Model for Environmental Crises. Land [Internet]. 2023; 12(3).
[26]. 26.McNaught R, Nalau J, Hales R, Pittaway E, Handmer J, Renouf J. Innovation and deadlock in governing disasters and climate change collaboratively - Lessons from the Northern Rivers region of New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024.
[27]. 27.Ahmed A, Abousekken M, Elemam W. The Role of Strategic Planning in Environmental Crisis Management Article Review and Case Study. International Journal of Environmental Studies and Researches. 2024;2:85-104.
[28]. 28.Pemmasani PK, & Abd Nasaruddin, M. A. Resilient it strategies for governmental disaster response and crisis management. International Journal of Acta Informatica. 2022;1(1):151-63.
[29]. 29.Gandra d’Almeida A, Coopersmith CM. Disaster management – preparation and planning for acute care facilities. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2024;30(3).
[30]. 30.Büyükkaraciğan N. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF CRISIS AND DISASTER2020.
[31]. 31.Rezvani S, Silva MJF, De Almeida NM. Urban Resilience Index for Critical Infrastructure: A Scenario-Based Approach to Disaster Risk Reduction in Road Networks. Sustainability. 2024.
[32]. 32.Shafian SA, Hu D. Integrating Machine Learning and Remote Sensing in Disaster Management: A Decadal Review of Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment. Buildings. 2024.
[33]. 33.Affandi E, Ng TF, Pereira JJ, Ahmad F, Banks VJ. Revalidation Technique on Landslide Susceptibility Modelling: An Approach to Local Level Disaster Risk Management in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Applied Sciences [Internet]. 2023; 13(2).
[34]. 34.Zhu H, Meng J, Yao J, Xu N. Feasibility of Emergency Flood Traffic Road Damage Assessment by Integrating Remote Sensing Images and Social Media Information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information [Internet]. 2024; 13(10).
[35]. 35.Finnigan G. Transforming Disaster and Emergency Health Policy for Contemporary Hazard Threats–a Multi-country Review. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2023;38(S1):s73-s.
[36]. 36.Fuka J, Baťa, R., Josková, K., & Krupka, J. . Study on the Impacts of Emergency on Economic, Environmental and Social Areas Using Mixed Methods Research. Emerging Science Journal. 2022;6(1).
[37]. 37.A.V. S. Financial and legal aspects of crisis management in Russia. Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)). 2023;7:60-6.
[38]. 38.Wang F, Xie Z, Liu H, Pei Z, Liu D. Multiobjective Emergency Resource Allocation under the Natural Disaster Chain with Path Planning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2022; 19(13).
[39]. 39.Zogheib C, Mahetaji K. Cross-Domain Information Integration in Government: Hierarchies and Responsibilities. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2024;61(1):469-80.
[40]. 40.Yabe T, Rao PSC, Ukkusuri SV, Cutter SL. Toward data-driven, dynamical complex systems approaches to disaster resilience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;119(8):e2111997119.
[41]. 41.Zreik M. Governing complex disasters in Southeast Asia: A focus on COVID-19 management in Malaysia. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2024;24(3):171-84.
[42]. 42.Benbada O. SS45-03 HIGHLIGHTING PATHS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND ADAPTATION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH LEGISLATION. Occupational Medicine. 2024;74(Supplement_1):0-.
[43]. 43.Etty T, van Zeben J, Carlarne C, Duvic-Paoli L-A, Huber B, Huggins A. Legal, Regulatory, and Governance Innovation in Transnational Environmental Law. Transnational Environmental Law. 2022;11(2):223-33.
[44]. 44.Dai J, Azhar A. Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development. Public Administration and Development. 2024.
[45]. 45.Foster R, Bell‐James J. Legal barriers and enablers to upscaling ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology. 2024;32.
[46]. 46.Sigmund Z, Radujković M, Atalić J. The Role of Disaster Risk Governance for Effective Post-Disaster Risk Management—Case of Croatia. Buildings [Internet]. 2022; 12(4).
[47]. 47.Adji I, Sumaryadi, I., Djohan, D., & Rowa, H. Collaborative Governance in the Management of Transportation Modes in DKI Jakarta Province. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik. 2023;13(2).
[48]. 48.Krogh AH, Røiseland A. Urban Governance of Disaster Response Capacity: Institutional Models of Local Scalability. 2024;21(1):27-47.






