Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    9149
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8362
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    8011
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7762
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    6270

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Publishing > Research Articles
ESP-4146

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Joar V. Uy*, Lester D. Capending, Guillermo G. Flores, Wennie Ann Cale. Diana M. Bacala, Archie Lanciso Cristobal, Joselito Balanza Barba Jr.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Joar V. Uy, Lester D. Capending, Guillermo G. Flores, Wennie Ann Cale, Diana M. Bacala, Archie Lanciso Cristobal, & Joselito Balanza Barba Jr. (2026). Enforcement and Education: Cooperation between security personnel and educators on law enforcements in schools. Environment and Social Psychology, 11(2), ESP-4146. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4146
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Enforcement and Education: Cooperation between security personnel and educators on law enforcements in schools

Joar V. Uy

College of Criminal Justice and Sciences, Northwest Samar State University, Calbayog City, 6710

Lester D. Capending

College of Criminal Justice and Sciences, Northwest Samar State University, Calbayog City, 6710

Guillermo G. Flores

College of Criminology and Administration, ICCT Colleges Foundation, Inc., Cainta 1900, Rizal, Philippines

Wennie Ann Cale

Taguig City University, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa - Graduate School and Philippine College of Criminology, CCJ, - National Capital Region, Manila1003, Philippines

Diana M. Bacala

Philippine National Police – CARAGA Police Regional Office 13, Butuan City 8600, Philippines

Archie Lanciso Cristobal

Police Regional Office 5-Philippine National Police Region, Legazpi City 4500, Philippines

Joselito Balanza Barba Jr.

Philippine National Police, Taguig City University, Central Pacific Asia Colleges, Taguig City 1632, National Capital Region, Philippines


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4146


Keywords: Enforcement, Education, Cooperation, Security Personnel


Abstract

Maintaining a safe and supportive learning environment requires effective collaboration among all school stakeholders. While numerous studies have explored school safety and discipline separately, there remains a significant gap in understanding the dynamics of collaboration between educators and security personnel in the enforcement of school rules and policies. This exploratory study investigated how these two groups negotiate roles, responsibilities, and communication strategies in practice, and how their cooperation influences school safety, student behavior, and the overall learning environment. The study employed a qualitative research design, using one-on-one interviews with a purposive sample of 6 teachers and 6 security personnel from Samar, Rizal, Butuan City, Legaspi City, and Taguig City, Philippines. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to uncover recurring themes and patterns related to role-sharing, coordination mechanisms, and the perceived impact of collaboration on discipline and safety outcomes. The findings reveal that effective collaboration relies on clear role delineation, where teachers manage classroom behavior while security personnel handle broader safety concerns. Key coordination mechanisms identified include immediate radio communication, regular briefings, and post-incident debriefs. Ultimately, the study suggests that strong educator-security partnerships contribute to a safer, less punitive, and more conducive learning environment.


References

[1]. 1.Trump, K. S. (2011). Proactive school security and emergency preparedness planning (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

[2]. 2.Beger, R. R. (2003). Expansion of police power in public schools and the vanishing rights of students. Social Justice, 30(4), 119–130.

[3]. 3.Brown, B. (2005). Controlling crime and delinquency in the schools: An exploratory study of student perceptions of school security measures. Journal of School Violence, 4(4), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v04n04_07

[4]. 4.Garil, B. A., Entong, M. B. M., Muarip, V. C., et al. (2024). Language delivery styles in academic trainings: Analysis of speaker’s emotional connection to audience for lasting learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6533

[5]. 5.Carpio, L. B., Caburnay, A. L. S., Nolledo, S. M., et al. (2024). Technology-based teaching among nursing instructors: Confidence and apprehension in using simulation equipment for training. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8), 2591. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2591

[6]. 6.Fisher, B. W., Higgins, E. M., & Homer, E. M. (2019). School resource officers and exclusionary discipline in U.S. high schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adolescent Research Review, 4, 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0092-2

[7]. 7.Perumean-Chaney, S. E., & Sutton, L. M. (2013). Students and perceived school safety: The impact of school resource officers. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 11(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204012451757

[8]. 8.Ceneciro, C. C. (2025). Characterizing workshops promoting motivated engagement and retention beyond the sessions: Experiential narratives from education, language and social science instructors. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8373

[9]. 9.Calzada, K. P. D. (2024). Anti-dependency teaching strategy for innovation in the age of AI among technology-based students. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8), 3026. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.3026

[10]. 10.Quisay, A. R. C., & Aquino, M. E. C. (2024). Stress levels of science teachers when delivering distance education instruction in a state college during the COVID-19 pandemic. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2916. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2916

[11]. 11.Murro, R. A. (2024). Modular distance learning: Exploring the study habits and academic achievements of state-funded elementary school learners. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(8), 2462. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i8.2462

[12]. 12.Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006). The new American school: Preparation for post-industrial discipline. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(5), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690600958976

[13]. 13.American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63(9), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852

[14]. 14.Justice Policy Institute. (2011). Education under arrest: The case against police in schools. https://justicepolicy.org/research/education-under-arrest-the-case-against-police-in-schools/

[15]. 15.Divinagracia, L. T. (2024). Macro and micromanagement practices of reading comprehension programs in selected grade schools in the post-pandemic. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i2.1664

[16]. 16.Espartero, M. M., Caldaza, K. P. D., & Prado, R. T. D. (2024). Analyzing the level of interest of high school students in solving mathematical problems in modular and face-to-face learning. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(4), 2167. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i4.2167

[17]. 17.Bondoc, R. S., Jr. (2023). Motivation and attitudes of college varsity players towards community-based sports initiatives: Precursor to grassroots sports program. Environment and Social Psychology, 8(2), 1702. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1702

[18]. 18.Garil, B. A. (2024). Socio-cultural factors affecting reading comprehension levels and demographic-based grammatical competence of higher education students. Forum for Linguistics Studies, 6(3), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6465

[19]. 19.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

[20]. 20.Arciaga, M. (2025). Discipline Is Not Security: Dismantling Disparities Should Be Top of Mind When Developing School Safety Policy in Georgia. IDRA Policy Brief. Intercultural Development Research Association.

[21]. 21.Theriot, M. T. (2009). School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.04.008

[22]. 22.May, D. C., Higgins, G. E., & Moore, C. A. (2016). School resource officers and students' feelings of safety at school. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014538444

[23]. 23.Devlin, H. (2011). The role of security officers in schools: A review of literature. School Safety Journal, 5(1), 45–58.

[24]. 24.Weisburst, E. K. (2019). Patrolling public schools: The impact of school police on student discipline and long-term education outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(2), 338–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22116

[25]. 25.Chavez, J. V., Gregorio, M. W., Araneta, A. L., & Bihag, C. D. (2024). Magna Carta for women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace: Policy awareness and organizational compliance. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(1), 1735. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1735

[26]. 26.James, N., & McCallion, G. (2013). School resource officers: Law enforcement officers in schools. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43126.pdf

[27]. 27.Theriot, M. T., & Orme, J. G. (2016). School resource officers and students’ feelings of safety at school. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014564472

[28]. 28.Leon, A. J. T. D., Jumalon, R. L., Chavez, J. V., & others. (2024). Analysis on the implementation of inclusive classroom: Perception on compliances and obstructions of selected public-school teachers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2537. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2537

[29]. 29.Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.615754

[30]. 30.Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480607085795

[31]. 31.Fisher, B. W., & Hennessy, E. A. (2016). School resource officers and exclusionary discipline in U.S. high schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014567449

[32]. 32.Skiba, R. J., Arredondo, M. I., & Rausch, M. K. (2011). New and developing research on disparities in discipline. Equity Project at Indiana University. https://www.indiana.edu/~equity

[33]. 33.Brown, B. (2006). Understanding and assessing school police officers: A conceptual and methodological comment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.001

[34]. 34.Chavez, J. V., Gregorio, A. M. W., Araneta, A. L., & others. (2024). Self-initiated protection behavior based on Magna Carta of Women: Women health workers, teachers, and minimum-wage earners in the workplace. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(7), 2363. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i7.2363

[35]. 35.Gastic, B. (2010). Metal detectors and feeling safe at school. Education and Urban Society, 42(4), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124510361873

[36]. 36.Rumberger, R. W., & Losen, D. J. (2016). The high cost of harsh discipline and its disparate impact. The Center for Civil Rights Remedies at UCLA. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu

[37]. 37.Nance, J. P. (2013). Students, police, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Washington University Law Review, 93(4), 919–987. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol93/iss4/5

[38]. 38.Bucoy, R. K., Enumerabellon, K. M., Amilhamja, A. J., & others. (2024). Knowledge deficits and analysis on comprehension of teachers on their common legal rights as teachers. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(9), 2559. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i9.2559

[39]. 39.Broll, R., & Howells, S. (2019). Student perceptions of school resource officers: An analysis of the roles, attitudes, and interactions that shape students’ experience. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2018-0034.r1

[40]. 40.Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2010). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for Black and White high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 904–934. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211398531

[41]. 41.Payne, A. A., & Welch, K. (2015). Restorative justice in schools: The influence of race on restorative discipline. Youth & Society, 47(4), 539–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12473125

[42]. 42.Dagoy, T. H. S., Ariban, A. I., Chavez, J. V., & others. (2024). Discourse analysis on the teachers' professional interest and integrity among teachers with multiple administrative functions. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(12), 2521. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v9i12.2521

[43]. 43.Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

[44]. 44.Cornell, D., Sheras, P., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2015). A retrospective study of school safety conditions in high schools using the Virginia threat assessment guidelines versus alternative approaches. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000091

[45]. 45.Astor, R. A., Guerra, N., & Van Acker, R. (2001). How can we improve school safety research? Educational Researcher, 30(5), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030005037

[46]. 46.Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375

[47]. 47.Osher, D., Bear, G. G., Sprague, J. R., & Doyle, W. (2010). How can we improve school discipline? Educational Researcher, 39(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357618

[48]. 48.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com