Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    8986
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8006
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7925
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7342
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    5851

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 10 (2025): Published > Research Articles
ESP-4195

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 10 (2025): Published

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Yan Zhao, Jian-Hao Huang

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Yan Zhao, & Jian-Hao Huang. (2025). The association between perceived rule-oriented school ethical climate and university students’ unethical behavior. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(10), ESP-4195. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4195
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

The association between perceived rule-oriented school ethical climate and university students’ unethical behavior

Yan Zhao

Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand

Jian-Hao Huang

Department of Education, National Chengchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan (R.O.C.) ; Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok, Thailand


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4195


Keywords: rule-oriented ethical climate; school ethical climate; unethical behaviour; undergraduates; social learning theory


Abstract

In recent years, the influence of school contexts on university students’ behaviour has become an important topic in educational research. As one of the key factors, the perception of a rule-oriented school ethical climate may play a role in shaping students’ values and behavioural tendencies. In particular, students’ unethical behaviour is considered to be closely associated with their perception of the school’s ethical climate, which makes it a topic worthy of further examination. This study aims to investigate the association between students’ perceptions of a rule-oriented school ethical climate and their unethical behaviour. A two-wave survey was conducted with a sample of 525 university students from three institutions in Henan Province, China. Participants completed self-reported questionnaires in class, including measures of rule-oriented school ethical climate and unethical behaviour. All descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and regression analyses were performed using SPSS software. Regression analyses revealed a significant association between students’ perceptions of a rule-oriented school ethical climate and their unethical behaviour. These findings are discussed in detail in the results section. Overall, the study underscores the importance of strengthening students’ perceptions of a rule-oriented school ethical climate for the well-being of the broader university community.


References

[1]. 1.Victor B, Cullen JB. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 1988; 33(1):101–125. doi:10.2307/2392857

[2]. 2.Din QMU, Tahir A, Xiaojuan Y, et al. Ethical climate in higher education: The interplay of leadership, moral efficacy, and team cohesion in diverse cultural contexts. Acta Psychologica 2025; 255:104986. doi:10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2025.104986

[3]. 3.Grojean MW, Resick CJ, Dickson MW, et al. Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 2004; 55(3):223–241. doi:10.1007/S10551-004-1275-5

[4]. 4.Wimbush JC, Shepard JM. Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics 1994; 13(8):637–647. doi:10.1007/BF00871811

[5]. 5.Arnaud A. Conceptualizing and measuring ethical work climate: Development and validation of the ethical climate index. Business and Society 2010; 49(2):345–358. doi:10.1177/0007650310362865

[6]. 6.Parisse C, Marini M, Pagliaro S, et al. The role of organisational ethical climate in shaping students’ class identification and their educational outcomes. Social Psychology of Education 2025; 28(1):178. doi:10.1007/S11218-025-10136-3

[7]. 7.Cohen J, McCabe EM, Michelli NM, et al. School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record 2009; 111(1):180–213. doi:10.1177/016146810911100108

[8]. 8.Susilowati N, Kusmuriyanto K, Abiprayu KB. Encouraging student ethical behavior through ethical climate in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) 2021; 15(2):213–222. doi:10.11591/EDULEARN.V15I2.19271

[9]. 9.Kadivar P, Kohoulat N, Abdolahi MH, et al. Perception of school moral atmosphere and elementary students’ moral development. International Journal of School Health 2016; 3(4):1–6. doi:10.17795/INTJSH-35963

[10]. 10.Wuletu DA, Hussein JO, Bareke ML. Exploring school culture and climate: The case of Dilla university community school. Heliyon 2024; 10(11):E31684. doi:10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E31684

[11]. 11.Birtch TA, Chiang FFT. The influence of business school's ethical climate on students' unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 2014; 123(2):283–294. doi:10.1007/S10551-013-1795-Y

[12]. 12.Cheng YC, Hung FC, Hsu HM. The relationship between academic dishonesty, ethical attitude and ethical climate: The evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021; 13(21):1615. doi:10.3390/SU132111615

[13]. 13.McCabe DL, Butterfield KD, Treviño LK. Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2006; 5(3):294–305. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2006.22697018

[14]. 14.Cheng YC, Ho WS, Chang SH, et al. A structural equation model for cyber academic dishonesty in higher education: Evidence from Taiwan. Accountability in Research 2024; 31(7):724–750. doi:10.1080/08989621.2023.2293955

[15]. 15.Yusuf A, Pervin N, Román-González M. Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2024; 21(1):21. doi:10.1186/S41239-024-00453-6

[16]. 16.Agrawal S. Examining the perceived ethical climate and faculty commitment in private higher secondary schools in Nepal. Journal of Productive Discourse 2025; 3(1):39–58. doi:10.3126/PROD.V3I1.78466

[17]. 17.Deredzai M, Goronga P. Promoting trust and psychological safety in team environments: Insights for universities. In: Burris-Melville TS, Burris ST (editors). Developing effective and high-performing teams in higher education. IGI Global; 2024. pp. 29–56.

[18]. 18.Yang H. Examining first-year Chinese international students’ perceptions and experiences with non-academic misconduct policies and procedures [PhD thesis]. University of Southern California; 2025.

[19]. 19.Basmin B, Nursaeni N, Rahmadani E, et al. The effect of the school environment on student morality. Educational Journal of Learning Technology 2025; 3(1):74–84. doi:10.58230/EDUTECH.V3I1.68

[20]. 20.Smith PL, Oakley EF. Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students: Implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics 1997; 16(1):37–45. doi:10.1023/A:1017995530951

[21]. 21.Chen YJ, Tang TLP. Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students. Journal of Business Ethics 2006; 69(1):77–93. doi:10.1007/S10551-006-9069-6

[22]. 22.Nga JKH, Lum EWS. An investigation into unethical behavior intentions among undergraduate students: A Malaysian study. Journal of Academic Ethics 2013; 11(1):45–71. doi:10.1007/S10805-012-9176-1

[23]. 23.Knepp KA, Knepp MM. Academic entitlement decreases engagement in and out of the classroom and increases classroom incivility attitudes. Social Psychology of Education 2022; 25(5):1113–1134. doi:10.1007/S11218-022-09716-4

[24]. 24.Mohamed S. Teachers’ misconduct on students’ learning and performance in urambo district-tabora [PhD thesis]. The Open University of Tanzania; 2022.

[25]. 25.Trevino LK, Victor B. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal 1992; 35(1):38–64. doi:10.2307/256472

[26]. 26.Chiu CY, Gelfand MJ, Yamagishi T, et al. Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010; 5(4):482–493. doi:10.1177/1745691610375562

[27]. 27.Fazli A, Imani E, Abedini S. Faculty members' experience of student ethical problems: A qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. Electronic Journal of General Medicine 2018; 15(3):1–9. doi:10.29333/ejgm/84952

[28]. 28.Brugman D, Podolskij A, Heymans P, et al. Perception of moral atmosphere in school and norm transgressive behaviour in adolescents: An intervention study. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2003; 27(4):289–300. doi:10.1080/01650250244000272

[29]. 29.Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning theory. Prentice hall Englewood; 1977.

[30]. 30.Perry GM, Nixon CJ. The influence of role models on negotiation ethics of college students. Journal of Business Ethics 2005; 62(1):25–40. doi:10.1007/S10551-005-8177-Z

[31]. 31.Nejati M, Shafaei A. Leading by example: The influence of ethical supervision on students’ prosocial behavior. Higher Education 2018; 75(1):75–89. doi:10.1007/S10734-017-0130-4

[32]. 32.Schlaefli A, Rest JR, Thoma SJ. Does moral education improve moral judgment? A Meta-analysis of intervention studies using the defining issues test. Review of Educational Research 1985; 55(3):319–352. doi:10.2307/1170390

[33]. 33.Janmaimool P, Khajohnmanee S. Enhancing university students’ global citizenship, public mindedness, and moral quotient for promoting sense of environmental responsibility and pro-environmental behaviours. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2020; 22(2):957–970. doi:10.1007/S10668-018-0228-6

[34]. 34.Sun M, Piao M, Jia Z. The impact of alexithymia, anxiety, social pressure, and academic burnout on depression in Chinese university students: An analysis based on SEM. BMC Psychology 2024; 12(1):757. doi:10.1186/S40359-024-02262-Y

[35]. 35.Zhang C, Shi L, Tian T, et al. Associations between academic stress and depressive symptoms mediated by anxiety symptoms and hopelessness among Chinese college students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2022; 15:547–556. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S353778

[36]. 36.Zhou T, Cheng G, Wu X, et al. The associations between sleep duration, academic pressure, and depressive symptoms among chinese adolescents: Results from china family panel studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18(11):6134. doi:10.3390/IJERPH18116134

[37]. 37.Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2007; 34(3):304–312. doi:10.1007/BF02874555

[38]. 38.Stajkovic AD, Luthans F. Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: Goin beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics 1998; 26(4):62–74. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(98)90006-7

[39]. 39.Malesky A, Grist C, Poovey K, et al. The effects of peer influence, honor codes, and personality traits on cheating behavior in a university setting. Ethics and Behavior 2022; 32(1):12–21. doi:10.1080/10508422.2020.1869006

[40]. 40.Kelley PC, Chang PL. A typology of university ethical lapses: Types, levels of seriousness, and originating location. The Journal of Higher Education 2007; 78(4):402–429. doi:10.1080/00221546.2007.11772322

[41]. 41.Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1986; 4(3):359–373. doi:10.1521/JSCP.1986.4.3.359

[42]. 42.Bandura A. Applying theory for human betterment. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2019; 14(1):12–15. doi:10.1177/1745691618815165

[43]. 43.Bliese PD, Edwards JR, Sonnentag S. Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102(3):389–402. doi:10.1037/APL0000109

[44]. 44.Hobfoll SE, Freedy J. Conservation of resources: A general stress theory applied to burnout. In: Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T (editors). Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and research. Routledge; 1993. pp. 115–133.

[45]. 45.Lazarus RS. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer; 1984.

[46]. 46.Deshpande SP, George E, Joseph J. Ethical climates and managerial success in Russian organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 2000; 23(2):211–217. doi:10.1023/A:1005943017693

[47]. 47.Greenbaum RL, Hill A, Mawritz MB, et al. Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behavior: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management 2017; 43(2):585–609. doi:10.1177/0149206314535434

[48]. 48.Wang Y, Wang G, Chen Q, et al. Depletion, moral identity, and unethical behavior: Why people behave unethically after self-control exertion. Consciousness and Cognition 2017; 56:188–198. doi:10.1016/J.CONCOG.2017.09.007

[49]. 49.Whitman MV, Halbesleben JRB, Holmes O. Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2014; 35(1):38–53. doi:10.1002/JOB.1852

[50]. 50.Gino F. Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: Why people who value morality act immorally. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2015; 3:107–111. doi:10.1016/J.COBEHA.2015.03.001

[51]. 51.Baumeister RF, Alghamdi NG. Role of self-control failure in immoral and unethical actions. Current Opinion in Psychology 2015; 6:66–69. doi:10.1016/J.COPSYC.2015.04.001

[52]. 52.Chakroff A, Russell PS, Piazza J, et al. From impure to harmful: Asymmetric expectations about immoral agents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2017; 69:201–209. doi:10.1016/J.JESP.2016.08.001

[53]. 53.Okon MO, Ajah MO, Ekarika CB. Perception of school discipline and compliance with rules and regulations among public university students in Cross River State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas 2022; 3(2):212–222. doi:10.47434/JEREDA.3.2.2022.212

[54]. 54.Preiss DR, Arum R, Edelman LB, et al. The more you talk, the worse it is: Student perceptions of law and authority in schools. Social Currents 2016; 3(3):234–255. doi:10.1177/2329496515616813

[55]. 55.Ramsey CM, Spira AP, Parisi JM, et al. School climate: Perceptual differences between students, parents, and school staff. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2016; 27(4):629–641. doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1199436

[56]. 56.Viđak M, Buljan I, Tokalić R, et al. Perception of organizational ethical climate by university staff and students in medicine and humanities: A cross sectional study. Science and Engineering Ethics 2020; 26(6):3437–3454. doi:10.1007/S11948-020-00270-W

[57]. 57.Capp G, Astor RA, Gilreath TD. Advancing a conceptual and empirical model of school climate for school staff in California. Journal of School Violence 2020; 19(2):107–121. doi:10.1080/15388220.2018.1532298

[58]. 58.Berisha G, Oliveira L, Humolli E. To behave or not to behave ethically: A question of style? Business and Society Review 2023; 128(1):23–50. doi:10.1111/BASR.12298

[59]. 59.Al-Nuaimi MN, Al-Emran M. Development and validation of ICT unethical behavior scale among undergraduate students. Current Psychology 2024; 43(10):8760–8776. doi:10.1007/S12144-023-05038-6

[60]. 60.Chen Y, Pan Y, Cui H, et al. The contagion of unethical behavior and social learning: An experimental study. Behavioral Sciences 2023; 13(2):172. doi:10.3390/BS13020172

[61]. 61.Luo M, Huang W, Najjar L. The relationship between perceptions of a Chinese high school's ethical climate and students' school performance. Journal of Moral Education 2007; 36(1):93–111. doi:10.1080/03057240601185489

[62]. 62.Guo Z, Yang Y, Li W, et al. Longitudinal relations among Honesty-Humility, moral disengagement, and unethical behavior in adolescents: A between- and within-person analysis. Journal of Research in Personality 2023; 106:104401. doi:10.1016/J.JRP.2023.104401

[63]. 63.Milem JF. Attitude change in college students: Examining the effect of college peer groups and faculty normative groups. Journal of Higher Education 1998; 69(2):117–140. doi:10.1080/00221546.1998.11775130

[64]. 64.Jung I. Ethical judgments and behaviors: Applying a multidimensional ethics scale to measuring ICT ethics of college students. Computers and Education 2009; 53(3):940–949. doi:10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.05.011

[65]. 65.Julián M, Bonavia T. Understanding unethical behaviors at the university level: A multiple regression analysis. Ethics and Behavior 2021; 31(4):257–269. doi:10.1080/10508422.2020.1723101

[66]. 66.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 2003; 88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com