Published
2025-11-30
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shue Wu, Xinwei Su

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
How Does Short-Form Video Marketing Influence Consumers' Purchase Intention?
Shue Wu
International College, Krirk University, Bangkok, 10220, Thailand
Xinwei Su
International College, Krirk University, Bangkok, 10220, Thailand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.4196
Keywords: Content quality; Emotional resonance; Brand trust; Perceived value; Purchase intention
Abstract
With the explosive growth of the digital economy, short-form videos have become a dominant marketing tool; however, existing research has insufficiently explained how and why short-form video content quality shapes consumer purchase intention through psychological mechanisms. To fill this gap, this study develops an S–O–R–based structural model to examine the influence of short-form video content quality on consumers’ purchase intentions and to test the mediating roles of emotional resonance, brand trust, and perceived value. A total of 389 valid responses were collected using an online questionnaire, and the proposed hypotheses were empirically tested through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that content quality significantly enhances emotional resonance and brand trust, which subsequently increase perceived value and ultimately drive purchase intention. Moreover, all three mediating effects were statistically supported. This study enriches digital marketing and consumer psychology literature by uncovering the internal decision-making pathways triggered by short-form video stimuli. Practically, the findings offer actionable guidance for brands to optimize content creativity, enhance emotional interaction, strengthen trust-building strategies, and maximize value perception in short-form video marketing.
References
[1]. 1.Zhang, X., Y. Wu, and S. Liu, Exploring short-form video application addiction: Socio-technical and attachment perspectives. Telematics and informatics, 2019. 42: p. 101243.
[2]. 2.Yin, X., et al., Attention marketing in fragmented entertainment: How advertising embedding influences purchase decision in short-form video apps. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024. 76: p. 103572.
[3]. 3.Yin, X., et al., Understanding the purchase decisions of silver consumers in short-form video platforms from the perspective of existence, relatedness, and growth needs. Behavioral Sciences, 2023. 13(12): p. 1011.
[4]. 4.Meng, L.M., et al., The impact of content characteristics of Short-Form video ads on consumer purchase Behavior: Evidence from TikTok. Journal of Business Research, 2024. 183: p. 114874.
[5]. 5.Luo, C., et al., Influence of short video content on consumers purchase intentions on social media platforms with trust as a mediator. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 16605.
[6]. 6.Wahyudi, M.A., et al., The Impact of Short-Form Video Marketing, Influencer Relatability, and Trust Signals on Gen Z’s Purchase Intention. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 2025. 6(1): p. 855-864.
[7]. 7.Mehrabian, A. and J.A. Russell, An approach to environmental psychology. 1974: the MIT Press.
[8]. 8.Park, J. and Y. Jung, Unveiling the dynamics of binge-scrolling: A comprehensive analysis of short-form video consumption using a Stimulus-Organism-Response model. Telematics and Informatics, 2024. 95: p. 102200.
[9]. 9.Zhu, K., et al. Check for updates Exploring the Impact of Music in Short-Form Travel Videos on Users' Emotional Resonance, Sharing Intention and Impulsive Travel. in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2024: ENTER 2024 International eTourism Conference, Izmir, Türkiye, January 17-19. 2024. Springer Nature.
[10]. 10.Kapoor, K., et al., A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 2021. 128: p. 94-108.
[11]. 11.Yang, Z., S. Wang, and T.H. Yoon, The effect of short‐form video on travel decision‐making process: An integration of AIDA and MGB models. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2024. 26(1): p. e2632.
[12]. 12.Li, H. and X. Tu, Who generates your video ads? The matching effect of short-form video sources and destination types on visit intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2024. 36(3): p. 660-677.
[13]. 13.Liu, Q., S.-K. Yu, and Y. Yang, The effects of sponsorship disclosure in short-form video: A moderated mediation model of sponsorship literacy and perceived features of sponsored short-form video. Computers in Human Behavior, 2024. 150: p. 107969.
[14]. 14.YAO, J. and S. KIM, Perceived Authenticity through Short Video: Audience Perceptions of Emerging Independent Fashion Designers Self-Presentations. International Journal of Contents, 2021. 17(4).
[15]. 15.Lou, C. and S. Yuan, Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of interactive advertising, 2019. 19(1): p. 58-73.
[16]. 16.Liang, J., J. Wang, and K. Yao, How do short-form video creators select media platforms? research based on the extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2025. 41(14): p. 9083-9096.
[17]. 17.Xiao, L., X. Li, and J. Mou, Exploring user engagement behavior with short-form video advertising on short-form video platforms: a visual-audio perspective. Internet Research, 2024.
[18]. 18.Zhou, L. and J. Li, Tourist-generated short videos arousing aspirations to visit a place: Perceiving authenticity?, in Routledge Handbook of Trends and Issues in Tourism Sustainability, Planning and Development, Management, and Technology. 2023, Routledge. p. 301-312.
[19]. 19.Li, W., et al., The formation mechanism of the excessive use of short-form video apps: an IT affordance perspective. Information Technology & People, 2025. 38(6): p. 2413-2440.
[20]. 20.Yuan, J., et al., The effect of short-form video usage on self-expansion. Psychology of Popular Media, 2024.
[21]. 21.Huang, R., et al., The impact of brand experiences on brand resonance in multi-channel fashion retailing. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 2015. 9(2): p. 129-147.
[22]. 22.Rühlemann, C. and J. Trujillo, The effect of gesture expressivity on emotional resonance in storytelling interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024. 15: p. 1477263.
[23]. 23.Portal, S., R. Abratt, and M. Bendixen, The role of brand authenticity in developing brand trust. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2019. 27(8): p. 714-729.
[24]. 24.Gümüş, N. and Ş. Duyar, Examination of the Impact of Trust in Influencers and Perceived Content Quality on Brand Awareness, Consumer Interaction, and Purchase Intent: The Case of Türkiye. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 2024. 22(5): p. 596-611.
[25]. 25.Lee, H.K., W.B. Kim, and H.J. Choo, Consumer engagement with shopping platforms: focused on crowdsourcing and crowdsending. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 2025. 37(6): p. 1425-1446.
[26]. 26.Talwar, S., et al., Why do people purchase from online travel agencies (OTAs)? A consumption values perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2020. 88: p. 102534.
[27]. 27.Frank, B., et al., Affect versus cognition in the chain from perceived quality to customer loyalty: The roles of product beliefs and experience. Journal of Retailing, 2014. 90(4): p. 567-586.
[28]. 28.Tomkins, S.S., Affect theory, in Approaches to emotion. 2014, Psychology Press. p. 163-195.
[29]. 29.Rigby, B.D. and R. Lee, Creating emotional resonance in advertising language strategies and consumer identity. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 2024. 3(3): p. 1-13.
[30]. 30.Song, T. and Y.-C. Ho, Relational resonance and content creation. Management Science, 2025. 71(9): p. 7366-7389.
[31]. 31.Kouamé, S., et al., Creating and sustaining stakeholder emotional resonance with organizational identity in social mission-driven organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 2022. 65(6): p. 1864-1893.
[32]. 32.Kumaresan, R.C. and S. Chandramohan, Analyzing the impact of brand resonance on consumer purchase intentions for fast moving consumer goods: an empirical study. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología-Serie de Conferencias, 2024(3): p. 912.
[33]. 33.Morgan, R.M. and S.D. Hunt, The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 1994. 58(3): p. 20-38.
[34]. 34.Digdowiseiso, K., R. Lestari, and B. An’nisa, The effects of brand ambassador, digital marketing, and instagram use on brand trust: A case study of Scarlett whitening product. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 2021. 4(4): p. 12027-12033.
[35]. 35.Muslim, M., R.R. Mubarok, and N.H.S. Wijaya, The effect of brand image, brand trust and reference group on the buying decision of sneakers. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 2020. 1(2): p. 105-118.
[36]. 36.Busser, J.A. and L.V. Shulga, Involvement in consumer-generated advertising: Effects of organizational transparency and brand authenticity on loyalty and trust. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2019. 31(4): p. 1763-1784.
[37]. 37.Huang, C. and R. Guo, The effect of a green brand story on perceived brand authenticity and brand trust: the role of narrative rhetoric. Journal of Brand Management, 2021. 28(1): p. 60-76.
[38]. 38.ur Rahman, A., et al., Bridging the gap: usability's role in connecting simplicity, interactivity, and brand trust. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2024. 12(2): p. 1284–1302-1284–1302.
[39]. 39.Zeithaml, V.A., Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 1988. 52(3): p. 2-22.
[40]. 40.Dam, T.C., Influence of brand trust, perceived value on brand preference and purchase intention. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 2020. 7(10): p. 939-947.
[41]. 41.Hernandez-Fernandez, A. and M.C. Lewis, Brand authenticity leads to perceived value and brand trust. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 2019. 28(3): p. 222-238.
[42]. 42.Werenowska, A. and E. Jaska, User-generated content in building brand trust, in Trust, Media and the Economy. 2025, Routledge. p. 117-128.
[43]. 43.Samarah, T., et al., The role of brand interactivity and involvement in driving social media consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty: the mediating effect of brand trust. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 2022. 16(4): p. 648-664.
[44]. 44.Sánchez-Fernández, R. and M.Á. Iniesta-Bonillo, The concept of perceived value: a systematic review of the research. Marketing theory, 2007. 7(4): p. 427-451.
[45]. 45.Fan, W., et al., How Content Attributes of Short Video Influence Online Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Value. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 2024. 15(3): p. 445-458.
[46]. 46.Wu, Y. and H. Huang, Influence of perceived value on consumers’ continuous purchase intention in live-streaming e-commerce—mediated by consumer trust. Sustainability, 2023. 15(5): p. 4432.
[47]. 47.Hentzen, J.K., et al., Artificial intelligence in customer-facing financial services: a systematic literature review and agenda for future research. International journal of bank marketing, 2022. 40(6): p. 1299-1336.
[48]. 48.Madi, J., M. Al Khasawneh, and A.O. Dandis, Visiting and revisiting destinations: Impact of augmented reality, content quality, perceived ease of use, perceived value and usefulness on E-WOM. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2024. 41(6): p. 1550-1571.
[49]. 49.Mainardes, E.W. and N.P.d. Freitas, The effects of perceived value dimensions on customer satisfaction and loyalty: a comparison between traditional banks and fintechs. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 2023. 41(3): p. 641-662.
[50]. 50.Dabbous, A. and K.A. Barakat, Bridging the online offline gap: Assessing the impact of brands’ social network content quality on brand awareness and purchase intention. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 2020. 53: p. 101966.
[51]. 51.Escalas, J.E. and B.B. Stern, Antecedents and Consequences of Emotional Responses to Advertising. Advances in Consumer Research, 2003. 30(1).
[52]. 52.Sahin, A., C. Zehir, and H. Kitapçı, The effects of brand experiences, trust and satisfaction on building brand loyalty; an empirical research on global brands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. 24: p. 1288-1301.
[53]. 53.Quynh, N.H., et al., The role of customer engagement in the interrelationship process: moderating effect of customer experience. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2020. 23(1): p. 64-86.
[54]. 54.Gallarza, M.G. and I.G. Saura, Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: an investigation of university students’ travel behaviour. Tourism management, 2006. 27(3): p. 437-452.
[55]. 55.Wu, H.-C. and T. Li, A Study of Experiential Quality, Perceived Value, Heritage Image, Experiential Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions for Heritage Tourists. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 2014. 41(8): p. 904-944.
[56]. 56.Craig, L., et al., The Biological Standard of Living in Comparative Perspective. 1998.
[57]. 57.Harman, H.H., Modern factor analysis. 1976: University of Chicago press.
[58]. 58.Hair, J.F., Black, Wc, Babin, Bj, & Anderson, Re (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 2010. 7.
[59]. 59.Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 1981. 18(1): p. 39-50.
[60]. 60.Hollebeek, L.D., R.K. Srivastava, and T. Chen, SD logic–informed customer engagement: integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2019. 47: p. 161-185.






