Published
2025-11-18
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Li Wang, Jian-Hong Ye, Congjin Miao*, Jun Wang , Ling Pan , Henan Wu , Kun Zha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
The Sustainable Development of Chinese Vocational Undergraduate Teachers’ Professional Competencies: A Social Cognitive Theory and Career Motivation Theory Perspective
Li Wang
Faculty of Education and Music, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Hainan, 571126,China
Jian-Hong Ye
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
Congjin Miao
Faculty of Maritime, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Hainan, 571126, China
Jun Wang
Automotive engineering Department, Jiangxi Ganzhou Technician College, Jiangxi, 341000, China
Ling Pan
Faculty of continuing education, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Hainan, 571126, China
Henan Wu
Human resources office, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Hainan, 571126, China
Kun Zha
School of Foreign Languages, Chongqing College , Science & Technology, Chongqing , 400044, China
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i11.4217
Keywords: Influencing factors; organizational environment; professional competence; socio-psychological factors; sustainable development; teachers competencies; vocational undergraduate
Abstract
The United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development underscores the significance of high-quality education and equitable learning opportunities. As a critical component of educational practice, teachers' professional competency development profoundly influences educational quality. Grounded in Social Cognitive Theory and Career Motivation Theory, this study explores the sustainable development of Chinese vocational undergraduate faculty’s professional competencies, focusing on the interactive effects of socio-psychological factors (e.g., motivation, cognition, group dynamics) and environmental factors (e.g., organizational support, resource availability) on career development. Employing a mixed-methods approach, a questionnaire survey was conducted with 267 vocational undergraduate teachers, supplemented by in-depth interviews with 21 faculty members. The findings revealed an average professional competency score of 3.81, indicating a moderately high level, with development influenced by both organizational environmental factors (perceived resource accessibility, institutional trust) and socio-psychological factors (self-efficacy, career identity, achievement motivation, group dynamics, research engagement, and experiential learning). Recommendations include enhancing achievement motivation, fostering organizational equity, and strengthening institutional trust to promote the sustainable development of teachers' professional competencies.
References
[1]. 1.UNESCO (2015). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good ? United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
[2]. 2.Westheimer, J. (2020). Can education transform our world? Global citizenship education and the UN’s 2030 agenda for sustainable development. In W. Antonia (ed.). Grading goal four: tensions, threats, and opportunities in the sustainable development goal on quality education (pp.1-2.), Brill.
[3]. 3.Shen, H., & Luo, J. (2021). Higher education and investment in knowledge: A perspective from talent policies in mainland China. In T. Aarrevaara, M. Finkelstein, G. A. Jones, & J. Jung (eds.), Universities in the knowledge society. The changing academy-the changing academic profession in international comparative perspective (pp.83-102), Springer.
[4]. 4.Li, D., & Yao, Q. (2024). A pathway towards high-quality development of the manufacturing industry: Does scientific and technological talent matter?. Plos one, 19(3), e0294873.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294873
[5]. 5.Tang, Y. (2021). Research on the role of ideological and political education on the cultivation of innovative talents under the threshold of systemic theory. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4, 105-112. https://doi.org/doi: 10.25236/FER.2021.041319.
[6]. 6.Lai, Y. C., & Peng, L. H. (2019). Effective teaching and activities of excellent teachers for the sustainable development of higher design education. Sustainability, 12(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010028
[7]. 7.Ye, J.-H., Chen, M.-Y., & Hao, Y.-W. (2023/07). Editorial: Teaching and learning in higher education: The role of emotion and cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1230472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230472
[8]. 8.Sund, P., & Wickman, P. O. (2008). Teachers’ objects of responsibility: something to care about in education for sustainable development? Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951681
[9]. 9.Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1, pp. 141-154). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice hall
[10]. 10.Nhu, N. T., Loi, N. T. N., & Thao, N. T. P. (2016). Factors affecting secondary and high school teachers’ professional competence in Ethnic Minority Areas–A case of Tay Nguyen,Vietnam. International Journal of Education and Research, 4, 151-164. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2016/November-2016/13.pdf.
[11]. 11.Mallarangan, A. D. D., Rahman, A., Nur, S., Lathifah, Z. K., & Lubis, F. M. (2024). Analysis Of The Influence Of Continuous Training Development And Education On Professional Competence Of Teachers In Public Schools. Journal on Education, 6(2), 13449-13456.https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.5194
[12]. 12.Tang, S. Y., Wong, A. K., & Cheng, M. M. (2016). Configuring the three-way relationship among student teachers' competence to workin schools, professional learning and teaching motivation in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 344-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.09.001.
[13]. 13.Sorge, S., Stender, A., & Neumann, K. (2019). The development of science teachers’ professional competence. In H. Anne, C. Rebecca, B. Andreas (eds.), Repositioning pedagogicalc ontent knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp.151-166). Springer Singapore.
[14]. 14.Langelaan, B. N., Gaikhorst, L., Smets, W., & Oostdam, R. J. (2024). Differentiating instruction: Understanding the key elements for successful teacher preparation and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 140, 104464.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104464
[15]. 15.Kanwal, S., Jafri, Q. A., Sajjad, W., Qaswar, A., & Iqbal, K. (2024). Relationship between teachers’ reflective practices and their performance at higher secondary level. Remittances Review, 9(2), 882-906.DOI: https://doi.org/10.33282/rr.vx9i2.50
[16]. 16.Hachfeld, A., Hahn, A., Schroeder, S., Anders, Y., & Kunter, M. (2015). Should teachers be colorblind? How multicultural and egalitarian beliefs differentially relate to aspects of teachers' professional competence for teaching in diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.001
[17]. 17.Fessler, R. &. Christensen, J. C. (1992). The teacher career cycle:Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Allyn & Bacon.
[18]. 18.Fessler, R. (1985). A model for teacher professional growth and development. In P. J. Burke, & R. G. Heideman (ed.), Career-long teacher education (pp.181-193). Springfield.
[19]. 19.Lynn, S. K. (2002). The winding path: Understanding the career cycle of teachers. The clearing house, 75, 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650209604926.
[20]. 20.Glatthorn. (1995). A teacher development. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International eEncyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp.41-45). Elsevier Science.
[21]. 21.Brady, J., & Wilson, E. (2021). Teacher wellbeing in England: Teacher responses to school-level initiatives. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 45-63.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1775789
[22]. 22.Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32(1), 47-63.https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
[23]. 23.Rhoades, G. (2020). Taking college teachers’ working conditions seriously: Adjunct faculty and negotiating a labor-based conception of quality. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(3), 327-352.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1664196
[24]. 24.London, M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of management review, 8(4), 620-630.
[25]. 25.Kwon, M., & Choi, Y. (2022). Exploring Categories of Self-Development of Novice Physical Education Teachers through Teacher Learning Community Activities. Sustainability, 14(7), 3718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073718
[26]. 26.Grangeat, M., & Gray, P. (2007). Factors influencing teachers' professional competence development. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59, 485-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820701650943.
[27]. 27.Li, X. Y., He, X., & Wan, Y. Q. (2013). An empirical study on the factors influencing the professional competence development of female college teachers--based on survey data from eight colleges and universities in Jiangxi Province. Chinese Adult Education, 12, 107-112. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFD2013&filename=ZCRY201312045&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=eaHXozJ-BJotgfUlvaQUQYqAXg0Nl2MoVHZ5xHHgkp4sVBAhsLry_nSRV5C6URou.
[28]. 28.Ye, J.-H., Chen, M.-Y., Hao Y.-W. (2023/03). Editorial: Exploring the psychology of vocational education: From the perspective of literacy promotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1167176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1167176
[29]. 29.Guleva, M. A. (2020). Vocational education in China and prospects of its development. Asia and Africa Today, 12, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750012799-0.
[30]. 30.Fang, L., Guan, Z. W., & Cai, Y. J. (2022). Construction and validation of teachers’ professional competence model for vocational education at undergraduate level. Vocational and Technical Education, 08, 52-59.
[31]. 31.Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall.
[32]. 32.Krosnick, J. A. (2018). Questionnaire design The Palgrave handbook of survey research, Springer, 439-455.
[33]. 33.Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 11(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087
[34]. 34.Coleman, P. (2022). Validity and reliability within qualitative research for the caring sciences. Int. J. Caring Sci. 14, 2041–2045. URL: http://www.internationaljournalofcaringsciences.or.
[35]. 35.Muzari, T., Shava, G. N., and Shonhiwa, S. (2022). Qualitative research paradigm, a key research design for educational researchers, processes and procedures: a theoretical overview. Indiana J, Humanities and Soc. Sci. 3, 14–20. (1)_14-20_61f38990115064.95135470.pdfttps://indianapublications.com/articles/ IJHSS_3
[36]. 36.Khoa, B. T., Hung, B. P., and Hejsalem-Brahmi, M. (2023). Qualitative research in social sciences: data collection, data analysis and report writing. Intern. J. Public Sector Performance Manag. 12, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1504/ IJPSPM.2023.132247
[37]. 37.Yang, C. D. (2015). An empirical study on the professional development of young English teachers in applied technology undergraduate colleges. Journal of Changchun College of Engineering (Social Science Edition), ,02, 150-152. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2015&filename=CGCS201502042&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=BpYlK4ag6UTqR6b5baLeYVoymUfZ510HioPy5DPHWUypUAS9zlUx7hy8e5qJ7ffA.
[38]. 38.Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2010). Validity and reliability of qualitative research in education. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 17, 29-50. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0002.
[39]. 39.Romlah, O. Y., Bodho, S., Latief, S., & Akbar, H. (2021). Empowering the quality of school resources in improving the quality of education. Bulletin of Science Education, 1, 27-44. http://repository.unh.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/91.
[40]. 40.Wolcott, H. F.(1994).Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Sage.
[41]. 41.Kibrit, G., Altinay, F., Dagli, G., Altinay, Z., Sharma, R., Shadiev, R., Tlili , A., Celebi, M., Jemni, M., & Bastas, M. (2022). Evaluation of sustainability and accessibility strategies in vocational education training. Sustainability, 14, Article e12061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912061.
[42]. 42.Luo, S., & Sun, Y.(2020). Do Selective R&D incentives from the Government promote substantive innovation? Evidence from Shanghai technological enterprises. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 28, 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1758586.
[43]. 43.Vlaev, I., King, D., Darzi, A., & Dolan, P. (2019). Changing health behaviors using financial incentives: A review from behavioral economics. BMC public health,19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7407-8.
[44]. 44.Lin, T.-C., & Lee, Y.-S., & Ye, J.-H. (2024/01). A study on Taiwan's vocational senior high school teachers' teaching identity and teaching transformation when facing a new competency-based curriculum. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1290551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1290551
[45]. 45.Skoryk, T., & Grytsyk, N. (2020). The oretical analysis of the factors influencing modern teachers’ professional success. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 38, 209-213. https://doi.org/10.23856/3868.
[46]. 46.Neves, R. M., Lima, R. M., & Mesquita, D. (2021). Teacher competences for active learning in engineering education. Sustainability, 13, Article e9231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169231.
[47]. 47.Shah, Z., Kennedy, C. S., Xie, Y., Rahim, M. S., Mahdavi, M., & Levula, A. (2022). Teacher views on teaching sustainability in higher education institutes in Australia. Sustainability, 14, Article e8431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148431.






