Login Register

Environment and Social Psychology

  • Home
  • About the Journal
    • Focus and Scope
    • Peer Review Process
    • Open Access Policy
    • Publishing Ethics
    • Erratum & Withdrawal Policies
    • Copyright & Licence
    • Indexing & Archiving
    • Article Processing Charges (APC) Payment
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Article
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Submissions
  • Editorial Team
  • Announcements
  • Special Issues
Apply for Editorial Board Submit an Article

editor-in-chief

Editor-in-Chief

Prof. Dr. Paola Magnano
Kore University of Enna
Italy

Prof. Dr. Gabriela Topa
Social and organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia
Spain

indexing-and-archiving

Indexing & Archiving

issn

ISSN

ISSN: 2424-8975 (Online)

ISSN: 2424-7979 (Print)

apc

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

US$1700

frequency

Publication Frequency

Monthly since 2024

Most Viewed

  • The Role of Social Support and Environment: The Mediating Effect of College Students’ Psychology and Behavior
    8986
  • The sustainable practice of education fairness in China: The influence of college students’ perceptions of senior teachers' support on students’ well-being
    8006
  • The Balance Between Resource Development And Environmental Protection Is “Social Contracting”: The Case Of LAPSSET Project In Kenya
    7925
  • Analyzing impacts of campus journalism on student’s grammar consciousness and confidence in writing engagements
    7342
  • A trip down memory lane: Sustaining collective memory through old shophouses in Jalan Mendaling Kajang, Selangor
    5851

Keywords

Home > Archives > Vol. 10 No. 10 (2025): Published > Review Articles
ESP-4255

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 10 (2025): Published

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Yihong Peng, Bity Salwana Alias*, Azlin Norhaini Mansor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Yihong Peng, Bity Salwana Alias, & Azlin Norhaini Mansor. (2025). From teacher methods to school sustainability: A systematic literature review. Environment and Social Psychology, 10(10), ESP-4255. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4255
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

  • Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

From teacher methods to school sustainability: A systematic literature review

Yihong Peng

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia

Bity Salwana Alias

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia

Azlin Norhaini Mansor

Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i10.4255


Keywords: school sustainability; teacher methods; pedagogical impact; systematic literature review; PRISMA


Abstract

The effects of teaching strategies on school sustainability over a ten-year period are examined in this systematic literature review (SLR). Using the PRISMA technique, the study thoroughly analysed six databases and identified 80 papers that need further investigation. Content analysis was refined iteratively, starting with automatic analysis using Leximancer. The researcher's point of view influenced the analysis's final development. The study underlined the wide range of applications and enduring effects of teaching practices on school sustainability, underscoring their vital role in improving academic standards and ensuring the adaptability and durability of educational institutions. In order to shape successful educational practices, direct professional development, and inform policy frameworks that promote long-term institutional resilience, this SLR tackles significant gaps in the literature and presents numerous important improvements. Adopting multidisciplinary, emotionally intelligent, culturally sensitive, and technologically advanced techniques is also essential to the future of sustainability in teaching ethics. Future studies can support more inclusive, transformative, and successful sustainability teaching methods in a variety of educational contexts by tackling these new areas.


References

[1]. 1.Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R., & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309

[2]. 2.Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Opportunity to Foster the Sustainable Development of Teaching in Higher Education. Sustainability, 12(20), 8525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208525

[3]. 3.Icihnose, T. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Methods and Approaches of ESD for 2030 Sustainable Development Goals; From Analysis of the Questionnaire Survey to the School Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012072

[4]. 4.Biasutti, M., Concina, E., & Frate, S. (2019). Social Sustainability and Professional Development: Assessing a Training Course on Intercultural Education for In-Service Teachers. Sustainability, 11(5), 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051238

[5]. 5.Clarke, D. A. G., & Mcphie, J. (2016). From places to paths: Learning for Sustainability , teacher education and a philosophy of becoming. Environmental Education Research, 22(7), 1002–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1057554

[6]. 6.Wu, W., Hu, R., Tan, R., & Liu, H. (2022). Exploring Factors of Middle School Teachers’ Satisfaction with Online Training for Sustainable Professional Development under the Impact of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(20), 13244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013244

[7]. 7.Bevan, J., Blyth, R., Russell, B., Holtgrewe, L., Cheung, A. H. C., Austin, I., Shah, V., Butler, M., Fraser, S., Pabellan, V., Shoker, S., Corriero, A., Lok, P., Wieczorek, K., Przypasniak, Z., Boydell, J., Farrow, A., Gibson, P., Miller, E., … O’Hara, S. (2023). Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: A review of medical school curricula. Medical Teacher, 45(6), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2152190

[8]. 8.Opuni-Frimpong, N. Y., Essel, H. B., Opuni-Frimpong, E., & Obeng, E. A. (2022). Sustainable Development Goal for Education: Teachers’ Perspectives on Climate Change Education in Senior High Schools (SHS). Sustainability, 14(13), 8086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138086

[9]. 9.Jiang, M., Yu, H., He, J., Qian, G., & Bialas, M. (2023). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Instructional Models in Training In-Service Physical Education Teachers in Southwest China. Sustainability, 15(13), 9993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139993

[10]. 10.Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339(jul21 1), b2535–b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

[11]. 11.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj. 2021 Mar 29;372. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[12]. 12.Bramer, W. M., De Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.283

[13]. 13.Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., ... & Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for information, 34(4), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

[14]. 14.Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A Bibliometric Review of Open Innovation: Setting a Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12312

[15]. 15.Pucihar, A. (2020). The digital transformation journey: Content analysis of Electronic Markets articles and Bled eConference proceedings from 2012 to 2019. Electronic Markets, 30(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00406-7

[16]. 16.Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). EDUCATION 4.0: DEFINING THE TEACHER, THE STUDENT, AND THE SCHOOL MANAGER ASPECTS OF THE REVOLUTION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896

[17]. 17.Alkhawaldeh, A. (2017). School-based Teacher Training in Jordan: Towards On-school Sustainable Professional Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0014

[18]. 18.Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A. A., Abid, N., & Kumar, T. (2023). Challenges in Implementing STEM Education: Insights from Novice STEM Teachers in Developing Countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914455

[19]. 19.Jekabsone, I., & Ratniece, L. (2023). Integrating Sustainability Into Curriculum of Legal Education in Latvia: An Insight Into the Main Issues. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(2), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0016

[20]. 20.Şemin, F. K. (2019). The competencies of principals in ensuring sustainable education: Teachers’ views. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18273

[21]. 21.Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Rodríguez-Jiménez, C., Gómez-García, G., & Ramos Navas-Parejo, M. (2020). Educational Innovation in Higher Education: Use of Role Playing and Educational Video in Future Teachers’ Training. Sustainability, 12(6), 2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062558

[22]. 22.Sánchez-Prieto, J., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., Gómez-García, M., & Gómez-García, G. (2021). Incident Factors in the Sustainable Development of Digital Teaching Competence in Dual Vocational Education and Training Teachers. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 758–769. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030054

[23]. 23.Spahiu, M., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015). Effect of a Toolkit and a One-Day Teacher Education Workshop on ESD Teaching Content and Methods—A Study from Kosovo. Sustainability, 7(7), 8051–8066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078051

[24]. 24.Xu, P., & Yue, X. (2019). Talent leadership strategies enhance teacher’s professional competencies in 21st century education for sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 373(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/373/1/012003

[25]. 25.Ma, X., Jiang, M., & Nong, L. (2023). The effect of teacher support on Chinese university students’ sustainable online learning engagement and online academic persistence in the post-epidemic era. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1076552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076552

[26]. 26.Maashi, K. M., Kewalramani, S., & Alabdulkareem, S. A. (2022). Sustainable professional development for STEM teachers in Saudi Arabia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2189. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12597

[27]. 27.Sebastián-López, M., & De Miguel González, R. (2020). Mobile Learning for Sustainable Development and Environmental Teacher Education. Sustainability, 12(22), 9757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229757

[28]. 28.Tun, M. S. (2019). Fulfilling a new obligation: Teaching and learning of sustainable healthcare in the medical education curriculum. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1623870

[29]. 29.Vasconcelos, C., Torres, J., Vasconcelos, L., & Moutinho, S. (2016). Sustainable development and its connection to teaching geoethics. Episodes, 39(3), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i3/99771

[30]. 30.Yli-Panula, E., Jeronen, E., & Lemmetty, P. (2019). Teaching and Learning Methods in Geography Promoting Sustainability. Education Sciences, 10(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010005

[31]. 31.Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Ma, J., & Liu, Z. (2021). Investigating the Influencing Factors of Teachers’ Information and Communications Technology-Integrated Teaching Behaviors toward “Learner-Centered” Reform Using Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability, 13(22), 12614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212614

[32]. 32.Zhang, Y., Sun, S., Ji, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). The Consensus of Global Teaching Evaluation Systems under a Sustainable Development Perspective. Sustainability, 15(1), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010818

[33]. 33.Stevenson, R. B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J. A., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013

[34]. 34.Thompson, C. S. (2018). The Construct of ‘Respect’ in Teacher-Student Relationships: Exploring Dimensions of Ethics of Care and Sustainable Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(3), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I3/R3

[35]. 35.Ovcharuk, O., Ivaniuk, I., Soroko, N., Gritsenchuk, O., & Kravchyna, O. (2020). The use of digital learning tools in the teachers’ professional activities to ensure sustainable development and democratization of education in European countries. E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 10019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610019

[36]. 36.Al-Hail, M. A., Al-Fagih, L., & Koç, M. (2021). Partnering for Sustainability: Parent-Teacher-School (PTS) Interactions in the Qatar Education System. Sustainability, 13(12), 6639. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126639

[37]. 37.Bendtsen, M., Forsman, L., & Björklund, M. (2022). Exploring empowering practices for teachers’ sustainable continuing professional development. Educational Research, 64(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.2000338

[38]. 38.Ferreira, M., Martinsone, B., & Talić, S. (2020). Promoting Sustainable Social Emotional Learning at School through Relationship-Centered Learning Environment, Teaching Methods and Formative Assessment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0003

[39]. 39.Hsieh, Y.-Z., Lin, S.-S., Luo, Y.-C., Jeng, Y.-L., Tan, S.-W., Chen, C.-R., & Chiang, P.-Y. (2020). ARCS-Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data for Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation. Sustainability, 12(14), 5605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145605

[40]. 40.Liu, H., Chu, W., Fang, F., & Elyas, T. (2021). Examining the Professional Quality of Experienced EFL Teachers for Their Sustainable Career Trajectories in Rural Areas in China. Sustainability, 13(18), 10054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810054

[41]. 41.Leal Filho, W., Raath, S., Lazzarini, B., Vargas, V. R., De Souza, L., Anholon, R., Quelhas, O. L. G., Haddad, R., Klavins, M., & Orlovic, V. L. (2018). The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.017

[42]. 42.Garzón Artacho, E., Martínez, T. S., Ortega Martín, J. L., Marín Marín, J. A., & Gómez García, G. (2020). Teacher Training in Lifelong Learning—The Importance of Digital Competence in the Encouragement of Teaching Innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852

[43]. 43.Alkaher, I., & Carmi, N. (2024). Population growth as the elephant in the room: Teachers’ perspectives and willingness to incorporate a controversial environmental sustainability issue in their teaching. Environmental Education Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2296358

[44]. 44.Al-Thani, W. A., Ari, I., & Koç, M. (2021). Education as a Critical Factor of Sustainability: Case Study in Qatar from the Teachers’ Development Perspective. Sustainability, 13(20), 11525. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011525

[45]. 45.El-Aasar, M., Shafik, Z., & Abou-Bakr, D. (2024). Outdoor learning environment as a teaching tool for integrating education for sustainable development in kindergarten, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(4), 102629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102629

[46]. 46.Huang, L., Zhang, W., Jiang, H., & Wang, J.-L. (2023). The Teaching Quality Evaluation of Chinese-Foreign Cooperation in Running Schools from the Perspective of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 15(3), 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031975

[47]. 47.Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability—A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010001

[48]. 48.Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, T. H., & Tran, T. K. (2020). STEM Education in Secondary Schools: Teachers’ Perspective towards Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(21), 8865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218865

[49]. 49.Peedikayil, J. V., Vijayan, V., & Kaliappan, T. (2023). Teachers’ attitude towards education for sustainable development: A descriptive research. Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN, 2252(8822), 8822. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23019

[50]. 50.Tascı, B. G. (2015). “Sustainability” Education by Sustainable School Design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 868–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.199

[51]. 51.Yeh, C. S.-H., & Barrington, R. (2023). Sustainable positive psychology interventions enhance primary teachers’ wellbeing and beyond – A qualitative case study in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104072

[52]. 52.Zhao, L., Wu, X., & Luo, H. (2022). Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Sustainability, 14(21), 14549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114549

[53]. 53.Betancourt-Odio, M. A., Sartor-Harada, A., Ulloa-Guerra, O., & Azevedo-Gomes, J. (2021). Self-Perceptions on Digital Competences for M-Learning and Education Sustainability: A Study with Teachers from Different Countries. Sustainability, 13(1), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010343

[54]. 54.Chen, J., Yang, Y., Xu, F., Xu, W., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Factors Influencing Curriculum Leadership of Primary and Secondary School Teachers from the Perspective of Field Dynamic Theory: An Empirical Investigation in China. Sustainability, 13(21), 12007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112007

[55]. 55.Fröberg, A., Wiklander, P., Baena-Morales, S., & Lundvall, S. (2023). How to teach about sustainable development in physical education? Examples from the perspectives of certified teachers in Sweden. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1294763. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1294763

[56]. 56.Lin, X.-F., Chen, L., Chan, K. K., Peng, S., Chen, X., Xie, S., Liu, J., & Hu, Q. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: A Design Frame Perspective. Sustainability, 14(13), 7811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137811

[57]. 57.Mróz, A., & Ocetkiewicz, I. (2021). Creativity for Sustainability: How Do Polish Teachers Develop Students’ Creativity Competence? Analysis of Research Results. Sustainability, 13(2), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020571

[58]. 58.Thor, D., & Karlsudd, P. (2020). Teaching and Fostering an Active Environmental Awareness Design, Validation and Planning for Action-Oriented Environmental Education. Sustainability, 12(8), 3209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083209

[59]. 59.Wamsler, C., Brossmann, J., Hendersson, H., Kristjansdottir, R., McDonald, C., & Scarampi, P. (2018). Mindfulness in sustainability science, practice, and teaching. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0428-2

[60]. 60.Id Babou, A., Selmaoui, S., Alami, A., Benjelloun, N., & Zaki, M. (2023). Teaching Biodiversity: Towards a Sustainable and Engaged Education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090931

[61]. 61.Colás-Bravo, P., Magnoler, P., & Conde-Jiménez, J. (2018). Identification of Levels of Sustainable Consciousness of Teachers in Training through an E-Portfolio. Sustainability, 10(10), 3700. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103700

[62]. 62.Ichinose, T. (2017). An Analysis of Transformation of Teaching and Learning of Japanese Schools that Significantly Addressed Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(2), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0013

[63]. 63.Thi Ngoc Lien, N., Thi To Khuyen, N., Thi Tho, N., Ngan Hoa, N., Thi Hanh, N., Cam Tho, C., Duy Hai, T., & Van Bien, N. (2021). Teachers’ feelings of safeness in school-family-community partnerships: Motivations for sustainable development in moral education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20798

[64]. 64.Lin, W., Yin, H., & Liu, Z. (2022). The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Growth Mindset in Teacher Professional Development: The Mediation of Teacher Self-Efficacy. Sustainability, 14(11), 6489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116489

[65]. 65.Pehoiu, G. (2019). Percept of Teachers Regarding Integration of Education for Environment and Sustainable Development in Primary Schools. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(2), 256. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/128

[66]. 66.Bernsteiner, A., Schubatzky, T., & Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C. (2023). Misinformation as a Societal Problem in Times of Crisis: A Mixed-Methods Study with Future Teachers to Promote a Critical Attitude towards Information. Sustainability, 15(10), 8161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108161

[67]. 67.Fiel’ardh, K., Fardhani, I., & Fujii, H. (2023). Integrating Perspectives from Education for Sustainable Development to Foster Plant Awareness among Trainee Science Teachers: A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability, 15(9), 7395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097395

[68]. 68.Ghorbani, S., Mirshah Jafari, S. E., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to Be: Teachers’ Competences and Practical Solutions: A Step Towards Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0002

[69]. 69.Imai, I., Tsuchiya, Y., Ogino, K., Ueno, K., Tomita, H., Makide, K., & Tominaga, K. (2022). Development of teaching material for green and sustainable chemistry in Japan. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2021-0029

[70]. 70.Letouzey-Pasquier, J., Gremaud, B., Blondin, S., & Roy, P. (2023). Development of teachers’ practices in the field of education for sustainable development (ESD): A discursive community of interdisciplinary practices focusing on the theme of chocolate. Environmental Education Research, 29(8), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2128056

[71]. 71.Nguyen, L.-H.-P., Bui, N.-B.-T., Nguyen, T.-N.-C., & Huang, C.-F. (2022). An Investigation into the Perspectives of Elementary Pre-Service Teachers on Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 14(16), 9943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169943

[72]. 72.Purwianingsih, W., Novidsa, I., & Riandi, R. (2022). Program for Integrating Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) into Prospective Biology Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.34772

[73]. 73.Uleanya, C., Uleanya, M. O., & Oluyemi, S. (2019). Revisiting high school teachers’ education: Solution to sustainable development in rural Africa. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653545. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653545

[74]. 74.Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). PuciharSustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development , and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1931

[75]. 75.Anđić, D., & Mažar, S. (2023). Teachers’ Connectedness to Nature, Education for Sustainable Development and the Contemporary Teaching of the Subject “Nature and Society” in Croatian Schools. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2023-0006

[76]. 76.Brown, S., Küçük, Z. D., Rickard, A., Lonergan, J., Abernethy, R., McNerney, L., McNerney, E., Foley, R., Behan, A., Byrne, A., Essel, B., Ffrench, J., Faull, J., & Cahalane, C. (2024). The role of teacher agency in using GIS to teach sustainability: An evaluation of a lower secondary school story mapping GIS initiative in Ireland. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 33(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2214044

[77]. 77.Colmenares-Quintero, R. F., Barbosa-Granados, S., Rojas, N., Stansfield, K. E., Colmenares-Quintero, J. C., Ruiz-Candamil, M., & Cano-Perdomo, P. (2022). Learning and Teaching Styles in a Public School with a Focus on Renewable Energies. Sustainability, 14(23), 15545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315545

[78]. 78.Holo, O. E., Kveim, E. N., Lysne, M. S., Taraldsen, L. H., & Haara, F. O. (2023). A review of research on teaching of computer programming in primary school mathematics: Moving towards sustainable classroom action. Education Inquiry, 14(4), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2072575

[79]. 79.Koç, A., & Bastas, M. (2019). The Evaluation of the Project School Model in Terms of Organizational Sustainability and Its Effect on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment. Sustainability, 11(13), 3549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133549

[80]. 80.Sadłowska-Wrzesińska, J., Piosik, K., & Nejman, Ż. (2022). Psychosocial Context of OSH-Remote Work of Academic Teachers in the Perspective of Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214783

[81]. 81.Chen, T.-C., Yu, J., & Golmohammadi, A.-M. (2022). Application of Sustainable Education Innovation in the Integrated Teaching of Theory and Practice Adopted in the Auto Chassis Course. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7737231

[82]. 82.Kwon, M., & Choi, Y. (2022). Exploring Categories of Self-Development of Novice Physical Education Teachers through Teacher Learning Community Activities. Sustainability, 14(7), 3718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073718

[83]. 83.Mubin, M. N., Kim, M., & Fauziah, A. (2023). Cluster-Mentoring for Sustainable Competency: A Case Study of PTK Training for Islamic Education Teachers in Junior High Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v20i1.6720

[84]. 84.Naidoo, J., & Reddy, S. (2023). Embedding Sustainable Mathematics Higher Education in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era Post-COVID-19: Exploring Technology-Based Teaching Methods. Sustainability, 15(12), 9692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129692

[85]. 85.Ozeren, E., Arslan, A., Yener, S., & Appolloni, A. (2020a). The Predictive Effect of Teachers’ Perception of School Principals’ Motivating Language on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy via a Cultural Context. Sustainability, 12(21), 8830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218830

[86]. 86.Sund, P., & Gericke, N. (2020). Teaching contributions from secondary school subject areas to education for sustainable development – a comparative study of science, social science and language teachers. Environmental Education Research, 26(6), 772–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1754341

[87]. 87.Peng, Y., Alias, B. S., Wan, X., & Mansor, A. N. (2024). Linking Curriculum Implementation To School SDG: A Systematic Review. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 4(2), e02019-e02019. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n02.pe02019



ISSN: 2424-8975
21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com