Environment and Social Psychology

Sustainability Reporting Maturity in East Java Local Governments

Dian Anita Nuswantara

Department of Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Ika Permatasari

Department of Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Susi Handayani

Department of Accounting, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Yuni Khoirotul Abdiyah

Department of Accounting, Universitas Airlangga

Pharatt Run

Department of Management Science, ISIC-RMUTK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4424

Keywords: public accountability; disclosure quality; institutional pressures; performance indicators; symbolic compliance; environmental metrics; narrative reporting; governance capacity

---

Abstract

This study explores the maturity and functional orientation of sustainability reporting (SR) practices in Indonesian local government entities, focusing on whether disclosures function primarily as symbolic managerial communication or as substantive, performance-based accountability mechanisms. Using qualitative content analysis of sustainability-related documents from the East Java High Court and the Banyuwangi Water Resources Agency, the study applies the Public Sector Sustainability Disclosure Index (PSSDI) to assess disclosure depth and orientation. The findings reveal a consistent pattern across both cases: SR is dominated by narrative and policy-oriented disclosures emphasizing commitments and compliance, while measurable targets, outcome-based indicators, and integrated performance evaluation are largely absent. Although both entities selectively reference global frameworks such as the GRI Standards, these references operate mainly as normative signals rather than operational measurement systems. The limited use of quantitative metrics, absence of external assurance, and weak integration with public-sector performance management instruments indicate that SR remains at an early stage of institutionalization. The results suggest that legitimacy-seeking behavior and normative isomorphism exert a stronger influence on reporting practices than accountability or performance imperatives. Overall, the study provides empirical evidence of the symbolic nature of SR in subnational governments and highlights the need for a context-sensitive, performance-oriented reporting framework tailored to public-sector settings in developing countries.

---

References

[1]. 1.T. N. Hale, “Transparency, Accountability, and Global Governance,” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 73–94, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1163/19426720-01401006.

[2]. 2.A. Martins, D. Gomes, and M. C. Branco, “Managing Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure: An Accountability vs. Impression Management Framework,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 296, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su13010296.

[3]. 3.A. Kaur and S. K. Lodhia, “Sustainability accounting, accountability and reporting in the public sector: An overview and suggestions for future research,” Aug. 22, 2019, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2019-510.

[4]. 4.A. R. Domingues, R. Lozano, K. Ceulemans, and T. B. Ramos, “Sustainability reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 192, pp. 292–301, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.074.

[5]. 5.F. Farneti and J. Guthrie, “Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report,” Accounting Forum, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 89–98, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.04.002.

[6]. 6.A. Amran and R. Haniffa, “Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing country,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 141–156, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1002/bse.672.

[7]. 7.V. Pina, L. Torres, L. Ripoll, J. García-Rayado, and N. Arias, “Assessing the suitability of climate disclosure models for local governments,” Public Money & Management, pp. 1–11, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2543440.

[8]. 8.J. Dumay, J. Guthrie, and F. Farneti, “Gri Sustainability Reporting Guidelines For Public And Third Sector Organizations,” Public Management Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 531–548, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2010.496266.

[9]. 9.N. E. Landrum and B. Ohsowski, “Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 128–151, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1002/bse.1989.

[10]. 10.C. Deegan, “Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation,” Aug. 01, 2002. doi: 10.1108/09513570210435852.

[11]. 11.X. Olsthoorn, D. Tyteca, W. Wehrmeyer, and M. Wagner, “Environmental indicators for business: a review of the literature and standardisation methods,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 453–463, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00005-1.

[12]. 12.B. Lynch, “An examination of environmental reporting by Australian state government departments,” Accounting Forum, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 32–45, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.11.001.

[13]. 13.S. Xie and K. Hayase, “Corporate environmental performance evaluation: a measurement model and a new concept,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 148–168, Feb. 2007, doi: 10.1002/bse.493.

[14]. 14. M. Sichigea, M. I. Siminica, D. Circiumaru, S. Carstina, and N.-L. Caraba-Meita, “A Comparative Approach of the Environmental Performance between Periods with Positive and Negative Accounting Returns of EEA Companies,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7382, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12187382.

[15]. 15.A. Uyar, M. Karmani, C. Kuzey, M. Kilic, and C. Yaacoub, “Does Governance Quality Explain the Sustainability Reporting Tendency of the Public Sector? Worldwide Evidence,” International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 931–947, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1900243.

[16]. 16.A. Kaur, D. Argento, U. Sharma, and T. Soobaroyen, “‘Everything, everywhere, all at once’: the role of accounting and reporting in achieving sustainable development goals,” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 137–155, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1108/JPBAFM-01-2025-0011.

[17]. 17.Dinas PU Pengairan Kabupaten Banyuwangi, “Laporan Keberlanjutan 2019,” 2020.

[18]. 18.Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa Timur, “Laporan Keberlanjutan 2023: Integritas Berkelanjutan,” 2024.

[19]. 19.M. Safari and A. Areeb, “A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective,” Accounting Forum, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 344–375, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1080/01559982.2020.1736759.

[20]. 20.D. A. Nuswantara, L. Venusita, I. Permatasari, Hariyati, and R. P. Sari, “A Hybrid IFRS–GRI Measurement Model for Assessing Public-Sector Sustainability Reporting in Asian Governments,” Environment and Social Psychology , vol. Forthcoming, 2026.

[21]. 21.C. Mallen, J. Stevens, and L. J. Adams, “A Content Analysis of Environmental Sustainability Research in a Sport-Related Journal Sample,” Journal of Sport Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 240–256, May 2011, doi: 10.1123/jsm.25.3.240.

[22]. 22.P. Vourvachis and T. Woodward, “Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges,” Journal of Applied Accounting Research, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 166–195, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027.

[23]. 23.K. Krippendorff, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 : SAGE Publications, Inc., 2019. doi: 10.4135/9781071878781.

[24]. 24.A. Ball, S. Grubnic, and J. Birchall, Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. Sustainability accounting and accountability, 2014.

[25]. 25.S. C. Kuruppu, M. J. Milne, and C. A. Tilt, “Gaining, maintaining and repairing organisational legitimacy,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 2062–2087, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1282.

[26]. 26.V. Palea, S. Gordano, and A. Migliavacca, “Do firms practise what they preach? Corporate performance-communication decoupling on environmental SDGs and the impact of sustainability-oriented governance mechanisms,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 98–127, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2024-0705.

[27]. 27.V. X. Gu and D. C. Matisoff, “Symbolic or Substantive Action: Intent, Effort, and Results,” Bus. Strategy Environ., Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1002/bse.70545.

[28]. 28.C. de Villiers and D. Alexander, “The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting,” The British Accounting Review, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 198–212, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001.

[29]. 29.S. Bag, S. Routray, L. L. Zhang, and O. Grebinevych, “Balancing global standards and local needs: Digital technologies, social sustainability, and MSMEs,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 397, p. 128305, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128305.

[30]. 30.J. Wenzig, A. Nuzum, and S. Schaltegger, “Path dependence of accountants: Why are they not involved in corporate sustainability?,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2662–2683, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1002/bse.3263.

[31]. 31.I. A. Alkhataybeh, W. Hadid, L. Chen, and A. Helfaya, “Sustainability Reporting and External Assurance: Evidence From UK Listed Firms,” Bus. Strategy Environ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1684–1711, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.1002/bse.70233.