Environment and Social Psychology

Objectifying working animals: The interplay of morality, empathy, and social norms

Jinglin Li

College of State Governance, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

Xiaofu Pan

College of State Governance, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

Cuiping Gou

College of State Governance, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

Kexiao Liu

College of State Governance, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4436

Keywords: working animals; objectification; moral sensitivity; empathy toward animals; social norms

---

Abstract

Working animals such as police dogs, guide dogs, and draft animals occupy an ambiguous position between indispensable tools and sentient partners, rendering their objectification a pressing ethical concern. Although philosophical work on speciesism and animal capabilities is extensive, the psychological mechanisms that inhibit or reinforce the objectification of working animals remain insufficiently explored. The present study examines how moral sensitivity, empathy toward animals, and perceived social norms jointly shape attitudes toward the objectification of working animals and tests a dual-pathway mediation model. A two-wave cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a Chinese community sample (N = 875), and data were analyzed using structural equation modeling with bootstrapped mediation tests. Moral sensitivity, empathy, and protective social norms each showed significant direct negative associations with objectification attitudes. Empathy and social norms partially mediated the link between moral sensitivity and objectification, with the social-norm pathway accounting for a larger proportion of the total effect. These findings suggest that resistance to the objectification of working animals is jointly driven by internal moral identity, cross-species emotional resonance, and the perceived strength of protective social norms. The study extends social-psychological theories of moral motivation and norms to the domain of human–animal relations and provides a theoretical basis for interventions that seek to reduce animal objectification by enhancing moral sensitivity, cultivating empathy toward animals, and strengthening protective social norms.

---

References

[1]. 1.Somers, K., & Soldatic, K. (2020). Productive bodies: How neoliberalism makes and unmakes disability in human and non-human animals. In Disability and Animality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014270-4

[2]. 2.Köllen, T., & Schneeberger, D. (2023). Avoiding unnecessary suffering: Towards a moral minimum standard for humans' responsibility for animal welfare. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12565

[3]. 3.Herbst, C. (2022). Reform the Animal Welfare Act: Recognize Animal Sentience and Protect All Animals Who Think, Feel, and Suffer. Washburn Law Journal, 62, 535–560.

[4]. 4.Satz, A. B. (2017). Animals as vulnerable subjects: Beyond interest-convergence, hierarchy, and property. In M. Nussbaum & R. Devlin (Eds.), Nussbaum and law (pp. 47–68). Routledge. https://lawcommons.lclark.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1229&context=alr

[5]. 5.Nussbaum, M. C. (2023). Justice for animals: Our collective responsibility. Simon & Schuster.

[6]. 6.Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. University of California Press.

[7]. 7.Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: New York Review/Random House.

[8]. 8.Hills, A. M. (1995). Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals. Anthrozoös, 8(3), 132–142.

[9]. 9.Cornish, A., Raubenheimer, D., & McGreevy, P. (2020). What we know about the public’s level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries. Animals, 10(6), 860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060860

[10]. 10.Zickfeld, J. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., & Fiske, A. P. (2019). Mapping the moral motives of moral elevation: From universal prosociality to tribalism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000528

[11]. 11.Hötzel, M. J., et al. (2022).​Should we use animals in research and farming? A perspective on animal welfare and ethics in a digitized world. Frontiers in Animal Science, 3, 927391. DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2022.927391

[12]. 12.Tijms, S. H. W., & Oude Lansink, A. (2023). Adoption of precision livestock farming in dairy farming: A system dynamics approach. Sustainability, 15(7), 6124. DOI: 10.3390/su15076124

[13]. 13.Dumitrascu-Biris, R., & Garcia, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence ethics in PLF: Farmer's perspective. Journal of Agricultural Informatics, 14(1), 45–58. DOI: 10.3390/jai14010045

[14]. 14.Judge, P., & Sutherland, B. (2015). Conscious in the Machine: The Plight of the Animal in Industrial Culture.

[15]. 15.Vessier, I., Blokhuis, H., Halachmi, I., Klimpel, S., Meunier, B., Mialon, M., Nielsen, P., Norton, T., Fernández, A., Silberberg, M., & Sloth, K. (2017). Precision livestock farming and animal welfare. , 746-750.

[16]. 16.Bukhari, S. S. U. H., & Qureshi, S. M. (2021). Socioeconomic impact and welfare assessment of working donkeys in Pakistan. Veterinary World, 14(8), 2169–2176. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.2169-2176

[17]. 17.Pradhan, S. K., Tripathi, H., Gupta, A. K., & Dixit, A. K. (2020). Welfare assessment and socioeconomic contribution of draught animals in Nepal. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 52, 2547–2555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02343-y

[18]. 18.Norris, S. L., Forman, S., Agnew, K., Broughan, J. M., & Huntington, B. (2022). The burden of animal health in low-income settings: A neglected component of human development. One Health, 15, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100408

[19]. 19.Serpell, J. A. (2004). Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare, 13(S1), S145–S151. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/animal-welfare/article/abs/factors-influencing-human-attitudes-to-animals-and-their-welfare/

[20]. 20.Gray, P. (1998). Sacred cows and sympathetic pigs: Cultural attitudes to animals and animal slaughter. Anthrozoös, 11(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000574

[21]. 21.Nussbaum, M. (2006). The Capabilities Approach and Human Development. In Human Development Report 2006: Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis. United Nations Development Programme.

[22]. 22.[] Tulloch, G. (2011). Animal ethics: the capabilities approach. Animal Welfare.

[23]. 23.Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 249–291.

[24]. 24.Gruen, L. (2015). Entangled empathy: An alternative ethic for our relationships with animals. Brooklyn, NY: Lantern Books.

[25]. 25.Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651

[26]. 26.Churchland, P. S. (2011). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton University Press.

[27]. 27.Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Harvard University Press.

[28]. 28.Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Moral foundations theory and moral development and education. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 271-280.

[29]. 29.Cai, Z. (2024). Empathy and morality from the perspective of neuroscience. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 46(5), 41–48.

[30]. 30.Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.003

[31]. 31.Marshall, J., Watts, A. L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Do psychopathic individuals possess a theory of mind? A meta-analytic review. Cognition, 165, 10–25.

[32]. 32.Crimston, C. R., Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., & Bastian, B. (2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086

[33]. 33.Knight, S., Vrij, A., Bard, K., & Brandon, D. (2009). Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use. Journal of Social Issues, 65(3), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01608.x

[34]. 34.Hussar, K. M., & Harris, P. L. (2010). Children who choose not to eat meat: A study of early moral decision-making. Social Development, 19(3), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00547.x

[35]. 35.Proctor, H. S., Carder, G., & Cornish, A. R. (2013). Searching for animal sentience: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Animals, 3(3), 882–906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3030882

[36]. 36.Bekoff, M., & Pierce, J. (2009). Wild justice: the moral lives of animals. University of Chicago Press.

[37]. 37.Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.

[38]. 38.Seara-Cardoso, A., Dolberg, H., Neumann, C., Roiser, J., & Viding, E. (2013). Empathy, morality and psychopathic traits in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 328-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2013.03.011.

[39]. 39.Bernhardt, B., & Singer, T. (2012). The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 1-23.

[40]. 40.Mathur, V. A., Harada, T., Lipke, T., & Chiao, J. Y. (2016). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 134, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.076

[41]. 41.Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.

[42]. 42.Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234.

[43]. 43.Delon, N. (2018). Social norms and farm animal protection. Palgrave Communications, 4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0194-5.

[44]. 44.Roughley, N. (2019). Might we be essentially normative animals? In N. Roughley & K. Bayertz (Eds.), The normative animal?: On the anthropological significance of social, moral, and linguistic norms (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0001

[45]. 45.Haile, M., Jalil, A., & Tasoff, J. (2020). Changing Hearts and Plates: The Effect of Animal-Advocacy Pamphlets on Meat Consumption. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3753878.

[46]. 46.McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996).The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x

[47]. 47.Brambell, L. S. (1965). Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

[48]. 48.Guo, Q., Li, H., & Li, S. (2022). Analysis of psychological driving factors of farmers’ pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 36(6), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2022.147

[49]. 49.Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale [JJ. Journal of Adolescence, 2006, 29(4), 589-611.

[50]. 50.Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

[51]. 51.Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

[52]. 52.Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

[53]. 53.Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (2007). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237006

[54]. 54.Smith, P. K., & Garon, A. (2006). Empathy and moral development. Psychology Press.

[55]. 55.Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

[56]. 56.Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879