ESP-4446

Published

2026-02-05

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Publishing

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Junchi Du*

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.

Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.

Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.

This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.

By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:

  • Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
  • Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
  • Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
  • Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

 

Copyright Statement

1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.

2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.

3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.

About Licence

Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.

This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.

Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.

How to Cite

Junchi Du. (2026). Psychological pathways from energy poverty perception to clean energy adoption intention. Environment and Social Psychology, 11(2), ESP-4446. https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4446

Psychological pathways from energy poverty perception to clean energy adoption intention

Junchi Du

Faculty of Business and Communication, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan


DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4446


Keywords: energy poverty perception; clean energy adoption intention; environmental concern; perceived behavioral control; psychological pathways

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates how feelings of energy poverty affect Chinese residents’ plans related to the adoption of clean energy by using the theory of planned behavior and conservation of resources theory. It considers how environmental concern and perceived behavioral control act as mediators for this relationship.

Methodology: Data was obtained from the Chinese General Social Survey of 2021 in collaboration with the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) environmental module. A total of 2,187 adult participants made up the entire sample. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses. Additionally, Bootstrap mediation analysis was performed with 5,000 resamples.

Findings: Energy poverty perception had a significant negative direct influence on the adoption intention of clean energy (β = −0.14, P < 0.01). Environmental concern and perceived behavioral control both acted as significant partial mediators for the effect. The indirect effect via environmental concern was larger in magnitude (−0.091, 30.8% of total effect) compared to the indirect effect of perceived behavioral control (−0.064, 21.7%). The total indirect effect (52.5%) exceeded the direct effect (47.5%).

Conclusion: Energy poverty perception indirectly hinders the adoption intention of clean energy by reducing environmental prioritization and self-efficacy perceptions. The affective path was shown to have a relatively more significant effect.

Practical Implications: Policy interventions should cover the alleviation of energy poverty while also linking the benefits of clean energy in terms of health and economic gains to the shortage of resources.

References

[1]. 1.Lin, B. and Y. Wang, Does energy poverty really exist in China? From the perspective of residential electricity consumption. Energy Policy, 2020. 143: p. 111557.

[2]. 2.Abbas, K., et al., Do socioeconomic factors determine household multidimensional energy poverty? Empirical evidence from South Asia. Energy Policy, 2020. 146: p. 111754.

[3]. 3.Churchill, S.A., R. Smyth, and L. Farrell, Fuel poverty and subjective wellbeing. Energy economics, 2020. 86: p. 104650.

[4]. 4.Liu, Z., et al., Impact of energy poverty on the welfare of residents and its mechanism: an analysis based on CGSS data. China Soft Sci, 2020. 8: p. 143-163.

[5]. 5.Llorca, M., A. Rodriguez-Alvarez, and T. Jamasb, Objective vs. subjective fuel poverty and self-assessed health. Energy economics, 2020. 87: p. 104736.

[6]. 6.Churchill, S.A. and R. Smyth, Energy poverty and health: Panel data evidence from Australia. Energy economics, 2021. 97: p. 105219.

[7]. 7.Nie, P., Q. Li, and A. Sousa-Poza, Energy poverty and subjective well-being in China: New evidence from the China Family Panel Studies. Energy Economics, 2021. 103: p. 105548.

[8]. 8.Zhang, Z., et al., Household multidimensional energy poverty and its impacts on physical and mental health. Energy Policy, 2021. 156: p. 112381.

[9]. 9.Zhao, J., et al., Assessing energy poverty and its effect on CO2 emissions: the case of China. Energy economics, 2021. 97: p. 105191.

[10]. 10.Li, X., H. Yang, and J. Jia, Impact of energy poverty on cognitive and mental health among middle-aged and older adults in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2022. 9(1): p. 1-13.

[11]. 11.Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human behavior and emerging technologies, 2020. 2(4): p. 314-324.

[12]. 12.Yuriev, A., et al., Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020. 155: p. 104660.

[13]. 13.Demerouti, E., Job demands-resources and conservation of resources theories: How do they help to explain employee well-being and future job design? Journal of Business Research, 2025. 192(C).

[14]. 14.Kikko, Y. and T. Ishigaki, Divergent effects of environmental concern and risk perception on pro-environmental intention: an international study across 17 countries. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 7766.

[15]. 15.Alkire, S. and J. Foster, Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of public economics, 2011. 95(7-8): p. 476-487.

[16]. 16.Bednar, D.J. and T.G. Reames, Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States. Nature Energy, 2020. 5(6): p. 432-439.

[17]. 17.Healy, J.D. and J.P. Clinch, Fuel poverty, thermal comfort and occupancy: results of a national household-survey in Ireland. Applied Energy, 2002. 73(3-4): p. 329-343.

[18]. 18.Gunzler, D., et al., Introduction to mediation analysis with structural equation modeling. Shanghai archives of psychiatry, 2013. 25(6): p. 390.

[19]. 19.Hayes, A.F., Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2017: Guilford publications.

[20]. 20.Xie, L., et al., Who suffers from energy poverty in household energy transition? Evidence from clean heating program in rural China. Energy Economics, 2022. 106: p. 105795.

[21]. 21.Campos-Uscanga, Y., et al., Running in natural spaces: gender analysis of its relationship with emotional intelligence, psychological well-being, and physical activity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022. 19(10): p. 6019.

[22]. 22.Cezarino, L.O., et al., Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: Opportunities and challenges for sustainability integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. 362: p. 132224.

[23]. 23.Tawde, S., R. Kamath, and R. ShabbirHusain, ‘Mind will not mind’–Decoding consumers' green intention-green purchase behavior gap via moderated mediation effects of implementation intentions and self-efficacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023. 383: p. 135506.

[24]. 24.Chen, D., et al., Evaluating the effects of laver cultivation on tidal flat erosion: Toward sustainable environmental practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024. 366: p. 121830.

[25]. 25.Ho, V.C., et al., Assessing immediate emotions in the theory of planned behavior can substantially contribute to increases in pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers in Climate, 2024. 6: p. 1344899.

[26]. 26.Kotyza, P., et al., The predictive power of environmental concern, perceived behavioral control and social norms in shaping pro-environmental intentions: a multicountry study. Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 2024. 12: p. 1289139.

[27]. 27.Miller, L.B. and R.E. Rice, (Mis) matched direct and moderating relationships among pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors across and within 11 countries. Plos one, 2024. 19(6): p. e0304945.

[28]. 28.Ryan, S.C., et al., Short-term changes in mental health help-seeking behaviors following exposure to multiple social stressors and a natural disaster. Social Science & Medicine, 2024. 348: p. 116843.

[29]. 29.Wang, Y., et al., The impact of energy poverty on the health and welfare of the middle-aged and older adults. Frontiers in public health, 2024. 12: p. 1404014.

[30]. 30.Wu, L., Q. Liu, and L. Li, Can the household clean energy transition ameliorate health inequality? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024. 12: p. 1348234.

[31]. 31.Zhang, Z. and L. Hu, Is there a stronger willingness to pay for photovoltaic power generation with high education in China? Plos one, 2024. 19(4): p. e0296714.

[32]. 32.Rana, M., et al., Understanding the adoption of renewable energy technologies by households in South Asia: a theory of planned behavior perspective. Discover Sustainability, 2025. 6(1): p. 477.



21 Woodlands Close #02-10, Primz Bizhub,Postal 737854, Singapore

Email:editorial_office@as-pub.com