Published
2026-02-13
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meng Duan, Lee Hoi Yeh*

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Visual ritual and political dissemination: The Confucian imagery mechanisms in a mirror for the emperor during the Ming Dynasty
Meng Duan
Faculty of Arts, Sustainability and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Perak, Malaysia
Lee Hoi Yeh
Faculty of Arts, Sustainability and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim 35900, Perak, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4490
Keywords: A Mirror for the Emperor; Confucian ritual system; visual culture; political dissemination; regional reproduction
Abstract
This study focuses on the important visual text "A Mirror for the Emperor", exploring how it transforms Confucian "rites" into social norms through visual mechanisms. Unlike previous studies that mainly remained within the fields of textual analysis or political history, this paper approaches it from the perspective of visual culture and etiquette dissemination, analyzing its unique value as a "visual etiquette mechanism". Methodologically, this study combines Panofsky's three-level analysis method of iconography, visual semiotics, and political etiquette theory to conduct in-depth interpretations of the three core images: "Appointing Talents for Governance", "Warning Stelae and Criticism Boards", and "Filial Piety Ascending to Heaven". At the same time, this study pays attention to its regional reconfiguration in Shandong, Henan, and Shaanxi, revealing the recontextualization process of these images in local academies, temples, and families. Additionally, this study draws on Cosmological Ethics and normative social psychology to examine how these visual symbols construct the paradigm of normative compliance. The research on Ming Dynasty etiquette images also confirms that the visual presentation of natural symbols reinforces society's understanding of "the harmony between heaven and man", thereby extending the political admonition consciousness to a widespread reverence for cosmic order and social order. The research results indicate that the visual mechanism of "A Mirror for the Emperor" mainly manifests in four aspects: Firstly, through elements such as postures, objects, and spaces, it constructs a stable visual grammar, making "rites" have systematic expressibility; Secondly, the images align with the political tensions of the Wanli period and become symbols of admonition; Thirdly, the regional re-production realizes the cycle of "central generation - local adaptation", promoting the diffusion of the ritual system in grassroots society; Fourthly, the visual medium transforms ethical norms into daily learnable postures, strengthening social integration. The academic contributions of this study can be summarized as four points: expanding the artistic history perspective beyond textual studies; emphasizing the cultural function of etiquette in visual communication; integrating iconography and etiquette theory to reveal the interaction mechanism between visual and power; and placing Chinese etiquette images within the academic discourse of global visual culture and cross-cultural comparison.
References
[1]. 1.Rawson, J. (1999). Ancient China: Art and archaeology. British Museum Press.
[2]. 2.Ebrey, P. B. (1991). Confucianism and family rituals in imperial China: A social history of writings about rites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[3]. 3.Rawson, J. (2012). Ordering the world: The power of visual representations in early Chinese ritual (British Museum Research Publication 189). British Museum.
[4]. 4.Zhang, J. (2014). Transforming All Under Heaven: A Study of Ritual and Custom Reform in Early Ming China. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
[5]. 5.Lin, L.-C. (2015). A study on the late Ming woodblock printing of A Mirror for the Emperor, Illustrated and Explained. The National Palace Museum Research Quarterly, 33(2), 83–142.
[6]. 6.Elkins, J. (2019). Visual studies and its global turn. Visual Studies, 34(2), 101–115.
[7]. 7.Chen, J. (2020). The political function of Dijian Tushuo in the Wanli period. Ming Studies, 75.
[8]. 8.Clunas, C. (2017). Chinese painting and its audiences. Princeton University Press.
[9]. 9.Connexions. (2014). Visual interculturality. Connexions – International Professional Communication Journal, 2(1), 95–118.
[10]. 10.Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026.
[11]. 11.Yu, X., & Luo, S. (2022). The ethical value of traditional Chinese ecological motifs in contemporary visual communication. Modern Communication, 44(9), 75–82.
[12]. 12.Yang, X.-K. (2000). Ritual and Chinese cultural tradition . Social Sciences in China, (3), 4–16.
[13]. 13.[Wu, E.(2019). The conflict of etiquette between rulers and ministers in the Ming Dynasty and the struggle for discourse power in the ritual system Beijing Social Sciences, (10), 35-45
[14]. 14.Shih, S.-C. (2008). Imperial admonitions and pictorial traditions in Ming China. Artibus Asiae, 68(1), 55–78.
[15]. 15.Wang, X. (2021). Ritual imagery and political legitimacy in late Ming painting . Art Research, (4), 88–102.
[16]. 16.Li, J. (2022). Confucian ritual and pictorial transmission in Ming–Qing local society . Journal of Chinese Social History, 44(3), 55–70.
[17]. 17.Zhao, Y. (2023). Iconography of filial piety in Ming visual culture . Literature & Art Studies, (9), 112–126.
[18]. 18.Ma, J. (2022). Ethical order in murals of Ming and Qing ancestral halls and local society . Literary Research (10), 102–113.
[19]. 19.O’Neill, J. (2020). Natural symbols in traditional visual culture: A carrier of ecological awareness.Environmental Communication, 14(5), 623-638.
[20]. 20.Callicott, J. B., & Nelson, M. P. (2019). East Asian environmental ethics and visual culture. Environmental Ethics, 41(3), 245-263.
[21]. 21.Murray, J. (2007). Mirror of morality: Chinese narrative illustration and Confucian moral values. University of Hawai‘i Press.
[22]. 22.Zhang, M. (2024). Central-local interaction in the dissemination of Dijian Tushuo. Local Culture Research, 12(2), 45-61.
[23]. 23.Panofsky, E. (1972). Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
[24]. 24.Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (4th ed.). Routledge.
[25]. 25.Petersen, A. (2021). Political ritual theory and East Asian artistic traditions. Asian Studies Review, 45(2), 289-306.
[26]. 26.Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory, ritual practice. Oxford University Press.
[27]. 27.Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 25(11), 172–180.
[28]. 28.Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. University of Chicago Press.
[29]. 29.Chen, L. (2024). Daotong shengxian tu and the ritual function of Confucian painting. Art Bulletin, 106(1), 45-68.
[30]. 30.Lee, J., & Khairani, S. (2018). Aesthetic-based educational practice: Qualitative interpretation of teaching strategies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(14), 1321-1332.
[31]. 31.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[32]. 32.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(1), 155-168.
[33]. 33.Finn, S. (2020). Visual media and cultural memory: The transmission of historical narratives. Memory Studies, 13(4), 435-451.
[34]. 34.Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (2022). Visual presentation of moral exemplars enhances prosocial motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 567-585.
[35]. 35.Trudel, R., Klein, J., Sen, S., & Dawar, N. (2020). Feeling good by doing good: a selfish motivation for ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 39-49.
[36]. 36.Zhang, M. (2024). Traditional ritual images in contemporary culture: The transnational communication of Mazu’s visual symbols. Local Culture Research, 12(3), 78-92.
[37]. 37.Cao, G., & Wang, S. (2022). Narrative strategies of court didactic images in late Ming: A case study of Dijian Tushuo. Palace Museum Journal, (6), 68–79.
[38]. 38.Chen, J. (2020). The political function of Dijian Tushuo in the Wanli period. Ming Studies, 75, 56-78.
[39]. 39.Lee, H. Y., & Khairani, M. Z. (2018). Pelaksanaan PBS guru-guru PSV Hilir Perak dan Bagan Datuk dalam pengajaran dan pelajaran berasaskan estetik [Implementation of PBS among art teachers in Hilir Perak and Bagan Datuk in aesthetic-based teaching and education]. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni dan Pendidikan Seni, 6, 1–10.
[40]. 40.Desai, K., & Kouchaki, M. (2017). Moral symbols: A necklace of garlic against unethical requests. Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 12104.
[41]. 41.Liu, Z.-W. (2020). Local society and the dissemination of ritual: Focusing on Ming–Qing ancestral hall images . Historical Archives, (4), 90–101.
[42]. 42.Research Group. (2024). Concepts and methods of ancient Chinese farming image studies. Chinese Social Sciences Net.
[43]. 43.Sun, Y. (2024). Ritual texts and visual translation: A cross-cultural perspective.Cross-Cultural Studies, 10(1), 23-41.






