Published
2026-02-25
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qidi Sun, Hyuntae Kim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which means that anyone can reuse and redistribute the materials for non-commercial purposes as long as you follow the license terms and the original source is properly cited.
Author(s) shall retain the copyright of their work and grant the Journal/Publisher rights for the first publication with the work concurrently licensed since 2023 Vol.8 No.2.
Under this license, author(s) will allow third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content under the condition that the authors are given credit. No permission is required from the authors or the publisher.
This broad license intends to facilitate free access, as well as the unrestricted use of original works of all types. This ensures that the published work is freely and openly available in perpetuity.
By providing open access, the following benefits are brought about:
- Higher Visibility, Availability and Citations-free and unlimited accessibility of the publication over the internet without any restrictions increases citation of the article.
- Ease of search-publications are easily searchable in search engines and indexing databases.
- Rapid Publication – accepted papers are immediately published online.
- Available for free download immediately after publication at https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP

Copyright Statement
1.The authors certify that the submitted manuscripts are original works, do not infringe the rights of others, are free from academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, and that there are no disputes over the authorship scheme of the collaborative articles. In case of infringement, academic misconduct and confidentiality issues, as well as disputes over the authorship scheme, all responsibilities will be borne by the authors.
2. The author agrees to grant the Editorial Office of Environment and Social Psychology a licence to use the reproduction right, distribution right, information network dissemination right, performance right, translation right, and compilation right of the submitted manuscript, including the work as a whole, as well as the diagrams, tables, abstracts, and any other parts that can be extracted from the work and used in accordance with the characteristics of the journal. The Editorial Board of Environment and Social Psychology has the right to use and sub-licence the above mentioned works for wide dissemination in print, electronic and online versions, and, in accordance with the characteristics of the periodical, for the period of legal protection of the property right of the copyright in the work, and for the territorial scope of the work throughout the world.
3. The authors are entitled to the copyright of their works under the relevant laws of Singapore, provided that they do not exercise their rights in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Journal.
About Licence
Environment and Social Psychology is an open access journal and all published work is available under the Creative Commons Licence, Authors shall retain copyright of their work and grant the journal/publisher the right of first publication, and their work shall be licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this licence, the author grants permission to third parties to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute and/or copy the content with attribution to the author. No permission from the author or publisher is required.
This broad licence is intended to facilitate free access to and unrestricted use of original works of all kinds. This ensures that published works remain free and accessible in perpetuity. Submitted manuscripts, once accepted, are immediately available to the public and permanently accessible free of charge on the journal’s official website (https://esp.as-pub.com/index.php/ESP). Allowing users to read, download, copy, print, search for or link to the full text of the article, or use it for other legal purposes. However, the use of the work must retain the author's signature, be limited to non-commercial purposes, and not be interpretative.
Click to download <Agreement on the Licence for the Use of Copyright on Environmental and Social Psychology>.
How to Cite
Synergistic Effects of Natural Soundscape and Artificial Music: The Dual Moderation of Music Playback in Forest Environments on Tourists' Environmental Empathy and Pro-Environmental Behavior
Qidi Sun
Sejong University, Department of Applied Music,Seoul, Korea
Hyuntae Kim
Sejong University, Department of Applied Music,Seoul, Korea
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v11i2.4532
Keywords: Natural soundscape; music playback; environmental empathy; pro-environmental behaviour; forest tourism environments; soundscape perception
Abstract
Urban forest environments are increasingly integrating controlled music playback; however, the interaction between natural soundscapes (NS) and their influence on tourists' psychological and behavioral responses, remains unclear, particularly regarding emotional resonance, nature alignment, and environmentally responsible actions. The research aim is to examine how the combined presence of NSs and artificial music (AM) produces synergistic effects, and how music playback moderates’ tourists' environmental empathy (EE) and pro-environmental behavior. Data were obtained through an on-site experimental questionnaire approach conducted with 250 tourists in forest recreation settings, involving tourists exposed to different acoustic conditions. Measurements focused on Acoustic Environment Types (AET), Music Playback Moderation (MPM), EE, emotional restoration (ER), soundscape congruence (SC), and pro-environmental behavioral intention (PEBI) captured using standardized rating scales. The analysis framework relied on descriptive statistics, reliability testing, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), correlation analysis implemented using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The procedure involved comparing responses under three playback conditions: NS alone, AM alone, and integrated soundscape–music (ISM) exposure. Participants evaluated their emotional connection to the environment and willingness to engage in environmentally responsible actions following each condition. Results indicated that significant improvements were confirmed, which revealed a high mean score (3.65–4.07), moderate variability (SD = 0.61–0.76), Cronbach’s Alpha (0.887), and correlations (0.46–1). PEBI showed moderate to strong positive effects under harmonized music playback; mismatched music reduced perceived environmental authenticity. Overall, regulated music improves NSs, encouraging empathy-driven pro-environmental behavior and directing sustainable, delightful forest tourist experiences.
References
[1]. 1.Crețan, R., Chasciar, D., and Dragan, A., 2024. Forests and Their Related Ecosystem Services: Visitors' Perceptions in the Urban and Peri-Urban Spaces of Timișoara, Romania. Forests, 15(12), p.2177. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122177
[2]. 2.Wei, Y. and Hou, Y., 2025. From Nose to Heart: Introducing Large Language Models to Explore How Olfactory Experiences Influence Forest Visitors’ Emotional Resilience. Forests, 16(1), p.85. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16010085
[3]. 3.Fei, X., Wu, Y., Dong, J., and Kong, D., 2025. The Effects of Soundscape Interactions on the Restorative Potential of Urban Green Spaces. Sustainability, 17(6), p.2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062674
[4]. 4.Fiebig, A., Jordan, P., and Moshona, C.C., 2020. Assessments of acoustic environments by emotions–the application of emotion theory in soundscape. Frontiers in psychology, 11, p.573041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.573041
[5]. 5.Wang, P., He, Y., Yang, W., Li, N. and Chen, J., 2022. Effects of soundscapes on human physiology and psychology in Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area in China. Forests, 13(9), p.1461. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091461
[6]. 6.Li, Y. and Song, M., 2024. The influence of tourist–environment fit on environmental responsibility behavior: A moderated mediation model. Forests, 15(10), p.1726. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101726
[7]. 7.Ienna, M., Rofe, A., Gendi, M., Douglas, H.E., Kelly, M., Hayward, M.W., Callen, A., Klop-Toker, K., Scanlon, R.J., Howell, L.G., and Griffin, A.S., 2022. The relative role of knowledge and empathy in predicting pro-environmental attitudes and behavior. Sustainability, 14(8), p.4622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084622
[8]. 8.Chen, X., Cheng, Z.F., and Yang, H.J., 2024. Empowering pro-environmental behaviour in tourists through digital media: The influence of eco-guilt and empathy with nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, p.1387817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1387817
[9]. 9.Jiang, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, C., Zhang, H., and Zhang, J., 2020. Natural soundscapes in nature-based tourism: leisure participation and perceived constraints. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(4), pp.485-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1540559
[10]. 10.Kankhuni, Z. and Ngwira, C., 2022. Overland tourists’ natural soundscape perceptions: influences on experience, satisfaction, and electronic word-of-mouth. Tourism Recreation Research, 47(5-6), pp.591-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.1878653
[11]. 11.Lu, Y.H., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Xiao, X., Liu, P., Zhuang, M., and Hu, M., 2022. Flow in soundscape: The conceptualization of soundscape flow experience and its relationship with soundscape perception and behaviour intention in tourism destinations. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(13), pp.2090-2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1922363
[12]. 12.Guo, Y., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., Zhang, H., and Jiang, Z., 2022. Effects of sound source landscape in urban forest park on alleviating mental stress of visitors: Evidence from Huolu Mountain Forest Park, Guangzhou. Sustainability, 14(22), p.15125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215125
[13]. 13.Wu, L., Zhang, Q., Yan, Y., Lan, T., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., He, T. and Ye, J., 2024. A Study on Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Spatial Dependence of Sound Source Perception in Fuzhou Historical and Cultural Districts. Buildings, 14(6), p.1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061753
[14]. 14.Sun, C., Meng, Q., Yang, D., and Wu, Y., 2023. Soundwalk path affecting soundscape assessment in urban parks. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p.1096952. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091461
[15]. 15.Wang, P., He, Y., Yang, W., Li, N., and Chen, J., 2022. Effects of soundscapes on human physiology and psychology in Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area in China. Forests, 13(9), p.1461. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091461
[16]. 16.Guo, X., Jiang, S.Y., Liu, J., Chen, Z., and Hong, X.C., 2024. Understanding the Role of Visitor Behavior in Soundscape Restorative Experiences in Urban Parks. Forests, 15(10), p.1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15101751
[17]. 17.Bai, W.B., Wang, J.J., Wong, J.W.C., Han, X.H. and Guo, Y., 2024. The soundscape and tourism experience in rural destinations: an empirical investigation from Shawan Ancient Town. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), pp.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02997-4
[18]. 18.Bai, Z. and Zhang, S., 2024. Effects of different natural soundscapes on human psychophysiology in national forest park. Scientific Reports, 14(1), p.17462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67812-1
[19]. 19.Lin, J., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Hong, X.C. and Liu, J., 2025. Factors Influencing Natural and Cultural Soundscape Interactions on Perceptual Experiences in Forested–Historical Interface Areas. Buildings, 15(22), p.4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224103
[20]. 20.Hong, X.C., Liu, J. and Wang, G.Y., 2022. Soundscape in urban forests. Forests, 13(12), p.2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122056
[21]. 21.Lu, Y.H., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Xiao, X., Liu, P., Zhuang, M. and Hu, M., 2022. Flow in soundscape: The conceptualization of soundscape flow experience and its relationship with soundscape perception and behaviour intention in tourism destinations. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(13), pp.2090-2108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1922363
[22]. 22.Luo, L., Zhang, Q., Mao, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, T. and Xu, J., 2023. A study on the soundscape preferences of the elderly in the urban Forest parks of underdeveloped cities in China. Forests, 14(6), p.1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14061266
[23]. 23.Jiang, J. and Yan, B., 2022. From soundscape participation to tourist loyalty in nature-based tourism: The moderating role of soundscape emotion and the mediating role of soundscape satisfaction. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 26, p.100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2022.100730
[24]. 24.Yu, X., Ma, N., Zheng, L., Wang, L. and Wang, K., 2023. Developments and applications of artificial intelligence in music education. Technologies, 11(2), p.42. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020042
[25]. 25.Franěk, M. and Režný, L., 2025. Perception of outdoor environments while listening to music: the mutual influence of music and environmental features. Psychological Research, 89(1), p.13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02029-5
[26]. 26.Pan, R., García-Díaz, J.A., Rodríguez-García, M.Á. and Valencia-García, R., 2024. Spanish MEACorpus 2023: A multimodal speech–text corpus for emotion analysis in Spanish from natural environments. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 90, p.103856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2024.103856
[27]. 27.Liu, J.X., 2023. The influence of narrative transportation on university students' environmental intentions: A serial mediation of empathy with nature and environmental Attitudes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 431, p.139763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139763
[28]. 28.Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Huang, Q., Deng, J., Deng, X. and Li, J., 2024. Empathy with nature promotes pro‐environmental attitudes in preschool children. PsyCh Journal, 13(4), pp.598-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.735
[29]. 29.Chen, X., Tang, J. and Liu, P., 2024. How place attachment affects pro-environmental behaviors: The role of empathy with nature and nature relatedness. Current Psychology, 43(23), pp.20571-20583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05820-0
[30]. 30.Ienna, M., Rofe, A., Gendi, M., Douglas, H.E., Kelly, M., Hayward, M.W., Callen, A., Klop-Toker, K., Scanlon, R.J., Howell, L.G. and Griffin, A.S., 2022. The relative role of knowledge and empathy in predicting pro-environmental attitudes and behavior. Sustainability, 14(8), p.4622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084622
[31]. 31.Duong, C.D., 2023. Karmic beliefs and social entrepreneurial intentions: a moderated mediation model of environmental complexity and empathy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), p.100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100022
[32]. 32.Lin, M.T.B., Zhu, D., Liu, C. and Kim, P.B., 2022. A meta-analysis of antecedents of pro-environmental behavioral intention of tourists and hospitality consumers. Tourism Management, 93, p.104566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104566
[33]. 33.Konalingam, K., Thivaakaran, T., Kengatharan, N., Sivapalan, A., Hensman, G.H. and Harishangar, A., 2024. Exploring the drivers of pro-environmental behavioral intentions in an emerging nation. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(9), pp.1697-1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2023-0517
[34]. 34.Gansser, O.A. and Reich, C.S., 2023. Influence of the new ecological paradigm (NEP) and environmental concerns on pro-environmental behavioral intention based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, p.134629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134629
[35]. 35.Song, Y., Bao, H. and Shen, S., 2022. Understanding the influence of initial values of college students in shaping pro-environmental behavioral intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), p.9730. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159730
[36]. 36.Fraisse, V., Montambault, C., Wanderley, M.M., and Guastavino, C., 2025. Bringing the coastline to the city: Laboratory evaluation of urban soundscapes in the presence of ambient sound art. Music & Science, 8, p.20592043251384052. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043251384052
[37]. 37.Ghalehteimouri, K.J., Shamsoddini, A., Bayramzadeh, N. and Mousavi, M.N., 2023. Identifying the pleasant sounds in the city's public parks environment (Case study: Mellat riverside park, Urmia). SAUC-Street Art and Urban Creativity (repository), 9(1), pp.149-165. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9757-4331
[38]. 38.Wang, L., Yu, H., and Zhou, B., 2025. Formation mechanism of tourists' pro-environmental behavior in the plateau ecotourism destination. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), pp.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04384-z






